Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of the Iwate difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: do surgical outcomes differ for tumors in segments VI and VII?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The Iwate Score (IS) have not been well-validated for specific procedures, especially for right posterior sectionectomy (RPS). In this study, the utility of the IS was determined for laparoscopic (L)RPS and the effect of tumor location on surgical outcomes was investigated.

Methods

Post-hoc analysis of 647 L-RPS performed in 40 international centers of which 596L-RPS cases met the inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes of patients stratified based on the Iwate score were compared to determine whether a correlation with surgical difficulty existed. A 1:1 Mahalanobis distance matching was utilized to investigate the effect of tumor location on L-RPS outcomes.

Results

The patients were stratified into 3 levels of difficulty (31 intermediate, 143 advanced, and 422 expert) based on the IS. When using a stepwise increase of the IS excluding the tumor location score, only Pringle’s maneuver was more frequently used in the higher surgical difficulty level (35.5%, 54.6%, and 65.2%, intermediate, advanced, and expert levels, respectively, Z = 3.34, p = 0.001). Other perioperative results were not associated with a statistical gradation toward higher difficulty level. 80 of 85 patients with a segment VI lesion and 511 patients with a segment VII lesion were matched 1:1. There were no significant differences in the perioperative outcomes of the two groups including open conversion, operating time, blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative stay, major morbidity, and mortality.

Conclusion

Among patients undergoing L-RPS, the IS did not significantly correlate with most outcome measures associated with intraoperative difficulty and postoperative outcomes. Similarly, tumor location had no effect on L-RPS outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goh BKP, Lee SY, Koh YX, Kam JH, Chan CY (2020) Minimally invasive major hepatectomies: a Southeast Asian single institution contemporary experience with its first 120 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg 90:553–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chua D, Syn N, Koh YX, Goh BKP (2021) Learning curves in minimally invasive hepatectomy: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Br J Surg 108:351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goh BKP, Lee SY, Teo JY, Kam JH, Jeyaraj PR, Cheow PC et al (2018) Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections. Surg Endosc 32:4658–4665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Alikhanov R et al (2018) The Southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg 268:11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y et al (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Halls MC, Berardi G, Cipriani F, Barkhatov L, Lainas P, Harris S et al (2018) Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 105:1182–1191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasegawa Y, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, Takahara T, Katagiri H, Umemura A et al (2017) A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty. Surg Endosc 31:5356–5363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2018) Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Proposal for a New Classification. Ann Surg 267:13–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wakabayashi G (2016) What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:281–289

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka S, Kawaguchi Y, Kubo S, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F et al (2019) Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Surgery 165:731–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tripke V, Huber T, Mittler J, Lang H, Heinrich S (2020) Prediction of complexity and complications of laparoscopic liver surgery: the comparison of the Halls-score to the IWATE-score in 100 consecutive laparoscopic liver resections. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 27:380–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goh BKP, Prieto M, Syn N, Koh YX, Teo JY, Lee SY et al (2021) Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies. HPB (Oxford) 23:770–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawaguchi Y, Tanaka S, Fuks D, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F et al (2020) Validation and performance of three-level procedure-based classification for laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 34:2056–2066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Belghiti J, Clavien PA, Gadzijev E et al (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Shin SH (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144:32–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rhu J, Kim SJ, Choi GS, Kim JM, Joh JW, Kwon CHD (2018) Laparoscopic versus open right posterior sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in a high-volume center: a propensity score matched analysis. World J Surg 42:2930–2937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee MK, Gao F, Strasberg SM (2015) Perceived complexity of various liver resections: results of a survey of experts with development of a complexity score and classification. J Am Coll Surg 220:64–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ibuki S, Hibi T, Tanabe M, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Wakabayashi G et al (2020) Short-term outcomes of “difficult” laparoscopic liver resection at specialized centers: report from INSTALL (International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection)-2 on 4478 patients. Ann Surg 275(5):940–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chiow AKH, Fuks D, Choi GH, Syn N, Sucandy I, Marino MV et al (2021) International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy. Br J Surg 108:1513–1520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kabir T, Tan ZZ, Syn N et al (2021) Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: meta-analysis. Br J Surg 109:21–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goh BK, Syn N, Lee SY et al (2021) Impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimally-invasive liver resections: 1:1 coarsened exact-matched controlled study. Surg Endosc 35:5231–5238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Troisi RI, Berardi G, Morise Z, Cipriani F, Ariizumi S, Sposito C et al (2021) Laparoscopic and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis: multicentre propensity score-matched study. Br J Surg 108:196–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yip VS, Poon RT, Chok KS, Chan AC, Dai WC, Tsang SH et al (2015) Comparison of survival outcomes between right posterior sectionectomy and right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver: a single-centre experience. World J Surg 39:2764–2770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ivanecz A, Plahuta I, Magdalenic T, Ilijevec B, Mencinger M, Perus I et al (2021) Evaluation of the Iwate model for predicting the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: does tumor size matter? J Gastrointest Surg 25:1451–1460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kabir T, Syn N, Koh YX, Teo JY, Chung AY, Chan CY et al (2021) Impact of tumor size on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 48(1):169–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The members of International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators are Incheon Kang (Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea); Jae Young Jang (Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea); Chung-Yip Chan (Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital); Mizelle D’Silva (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea); Henri Schotte (Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium); Celine De Meyere (Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium); Eric Lai (Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China); Felix Krenzien (Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany); Moritz Schmelzle (Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany); Prashant Kadam (Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom); Roberto Montalti (Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy); Mariano Giglio (Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy); Qu Liu (Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China); Kit-Fai Lee (Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China; Diana Salimgereeva (Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia); Ruslan Alikhanov (Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia); Lip-Seng Lee (Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore); Mikel Prieto (Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain); Chetana Lim (Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitte-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France; Phan Phuoc Nghia (HPB Surgery Department, University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam); Masayuki Kojima (Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan); Yutaro Kato (Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan); Jasper Sijberden (Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy); Paulo Herman (Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil); Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger (Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil); Mansour Saleh (Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France); Franco Pascual (Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France); Bernardo Dalla Valle (General and Hepatobiliary Surgery. Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy); Victor Lopez-Lopez (Department  of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia Spain); Margarida Casellas-Robert (Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdIBGi, Girona, Spain); Ugo Giustizieri (HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy); Davide Citterio (HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy); Kohei Mishima (Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan); Asmund Avdem Fretland (The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway); Jacob Ghotbi (The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway); Giuseppe Maria Ettorre (Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy); Marco Colasanti (Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy); Yoelimar Guzmán (General & Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain); Francesco Ardito (Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy); Simone Vani (Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy); Hao-Ping Wang Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung.

Funding

Dr T. P. Kingham was partially supported by the US National Cancer Institute MSKCC Core Grant number P30 CA008747 for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian K. P. Goh.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr Goh BK has received travel grants and honoraria from Johnson & Johnson, Olympus and Transmedic the local distributor for the Da Vinci Robot. (ii) Dr Marino MV is a consultant for CAVA Robotics, LLC. (iii) Johann Pratschke received a research grant from Intuitive Surgical Deutschland GmbH and personal fees or non-financial support from Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, AFS Medical, Astellas, CHG Meridian, Chiesi, Falk Foundation, La Fource Group, Merck, Neovii, NOGGO, pharma-consult Peterson, and Promedicis. (iv) Moritz Schmelzle received personal fees or other support outside of the submitted work from Merck, Bayer, ERBE, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, Takeda, Olympus, Medtronic, and Intuitive. (v) Asmund Fretland reports receiving speaker fees from Bayer. (vi) Fernando Rotellar reports speaker fees and support outside the submitted work from Integra, Medtronic, Olympus, Corza, Sirtex and Johnson & Johnson. Drs Sung-Hoon Choi, Kuo-Hsin Chen, Nicholas L. Syn, Federica Cipriani, Tan-To Cheung, Adrian K. H. Chiow, Gi-Hong Choi, Tiing-Foong Siow, Iswanto Sucandy, Mikel Gastaca, Charing C. Chong, Jae-Hoon Lee, Arpad Ivanecz, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Santiago Lopez-Ben, Constantino Fondevila, Fernando Rotellar, Ricardo Robles Campos, Mikhail Efanov, T. Peter Kingham, Robert P. Sutcliffe, Roberto I. Troisi, Xiaoying Wang, Mathieu D’Hondt, Chee Chine Yong, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri, Chung Ngai Tang, Andrea Ruzzenente, Daniel Cherqui, Alessandro Ferrero, Go Wakabayashi, Olivier Scatton, Davit Aghayan, Bjørn Edwin, Fabricio Ferreira Coelho, Felice Giuliante, Rong Liu, Jasper Sijberden, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Atsushi Sugioka, Tran Cong Duy Long, David Fuks. Luca Aldrighetti and Ho-Seong Han have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The members of International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators are listed in Acknowledgements.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, S., Chen, KH., Syn, N.L. et al. Utility of the Iwate difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: do surgical outcomes differ for tumors in segments VI and VII?. Surg Endosc 36, 9204–9214 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09404-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09404-6

Keywords

Navigation