Skip to main content
Log in

Intraoperative ultrasonography of robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy: initial experiences from 110 consecutive cases

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of IOUS in robotic liver surgery and propose a standard protocol of IOUS for safe robot-assisted hepatectomy.

Methods

Between February 2015 and December 2016, liver resection was performed in 110 patients with robotic approach in Tongji Hospital. In these patients, IOUS was routinely performed. All data about demographic, surgical procedure, postoperative course were collected prospectively and analyzed.

Results

A four steps IOUS protocol in robotic liver surgery was proposed, including exploration, verification, guidance, and confirmation. A total of 11 additional lesions in 11 patients were detected and 7 patients accepted strategic surgical modification. No patient suffered from any single or multiple organ dysfunctions, and there were no mortalities observed.

Conclusion

IOUS is indispensable to understand lesions and vessels in robotic liver surgery. A four-step standard protocol of IOUS is essential for safe robot-assisted hepatectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tranchart H, Ceribelli C, Ferretti S, Dagher I, Patriti A (2014) Traditional versus robot-assisted full laparoscopic liver resection: a matched-pair comparative study. World J Surg 38:2904–2909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 250:772–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ishizawa T, Gumbs AA, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2012) Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg 256:959–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coelho FF (2016) Laparoscopic liver resection: experience based guidelines. World J Gastrointest Surg 8:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mostaedi R, Milosevic Z, Han HS, Khatri VP (2012) Laparoscopic liver resection: current role and limitations. World J Gastrointest Oncol 4:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han HS, Shehta A, Ahn S, Yoon YS, Cho JY, Choi Y (2015) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: case-matched study with propensity score matching. J Hepatol 63:643–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qiu J, Chen S, Chengyou D (2016) A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 30:862–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelletier JS, Gill RS, Shi X, Birch DW, Karmali S (2013) Robotic-assisted hepatic resection: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot Comput Assisted Surg 9:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS, World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic S (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, O’Rourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ, Tsung A, Soubrane O, Machado MA, Gayet B, Troisi RI, Pessaux P, Van Dam RM, Scatton O, Abu Hilal M, Belli G, Kwon CH, Edwin B, Choi GH, Aldrighetti LA, Cai X, Cleary S, Chen KH, Schon MR, Sugioka A, Tang CN, Herman P, Pekolj J, Chen XP, Dagher I, Jarnagin W, Yamamoto M, Strong R, Jagannath P, Lo CM, Clavien PA, Kokudo N, Barkun J, Strasberg SM (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2013) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg 205:697–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S (1985) Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstetric 161:346–350

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Castaing D, Emond J, Kunstlinger F, Bismuth H (1986) Utility of operative ultrasound in the surgical management of liver tumors. Ann Surg 204:600–605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vigano L, Ferrero A, Amisano M, Russolillo N, Capussotti L (2013) Comparison of laparoscopic and open intraoperative ultrasonography for staging liver tumours. Br J Surg 100:535–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider CM, Peng PD, Taylor RH, Dachs GW 2nd, Hasser CJ, DiMaio SP, Choti MA (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic ultrasonography for hepatic surgery. Surgery 151:756–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrero A, Lo Tesoriere R, Russolillo N, Vigano L, Forchino F, Capussotti L (2015) Ultrasound-guided laparoscopic liver resections. Surg Endosc 29:1002–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O, Ogata S, Sauvanet A, Delefosse D, Durand F (2005) The “50-50 criteria” on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg 242:824–828 discussion 828-829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Araki K, Conrad C, Ogiso S, Kuwano H, Gayet B (2014) Intraoperative ultrasonography of laparoscopic hepatectomy: key technique for safe liver transection. J Am Coll Surg 218:e37–e41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S, Takayasu K, Moriyama N (1987) The use of operative ultrasound as an aid to liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 11:615–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Parker GA, Lawrence W Jr, Horsley JS 3rd, Neifeld JP, Cook D, Walsh J, Brewer W, Koretz MJ (1989) Intraoperative ultrasound of the liver affects operative decision making. Ann Surg 209:569–576 discussion 576–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ishizawa T, Saiura A, Kokudo N (2016) Clinical application of indocyanine green-fluorescence imaging during hepatectomy. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:322–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leen E, Ceccotti P, Moug SJ, Glen P, MacQuarrie J, Angerson WJ, Albrecht T, Hohmann J, Oldenburg A, Ritz JP, Horgan PG (2006) Potential value of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography during partial hepatectomy for metastases: an essential investigation before resection? Ann Surg 243:236–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Donadon M, Botea F, Del Fabbro D, Palmisano A, Montorsi M, Torzilli G (2008) The surgical policy predicts the impact of contrast enhanced intraoperative ultrasound for colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Radiol 67:177–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Strasberg S, Belghiti J, Clavien P-A, Gadzijev E, Garden J, Lau W-Y, Makuuchi M, Strong R (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are sincerely grateful to Dr. Satish Nadig (Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, USA) for language assistance and valuable suggestions.

Funding

Grants from the Chinese Ministry of Public Health for Key Clinical Projects (No. 2012ZX10002016). Grants from Hubei Province for Key Clinical Projects (No. 2018ACA137).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.Z. perform the operation, analysis and interpretation of data, draft and revise the article. W.L., Z.-Y.D., B.-H.Z., W.-G.Z. acquisition and analysis of data. H.-C.L.: explanation of ultrasonic data. B.-X.Z., X.-P.C.: conception and design, perform the operation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bi-xiang Zhang or Xiao-ping Chen.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Peng Zhu, Wei Liao, Ze-yang Ding, Hong-chang Luo, Bin-hao Zhang, Wan-guang Zhang, Wei Zhang, Zhan-guo Zhang, Bi-xiang Zhang, Xiao-ping Chen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, P., Liao, W., Ding, Zy. et al. Intraoperative ultrasonography of robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy: initial experiences from 110 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 32, 4071–4077 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5854-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5854-9

Keywords

Navigation