Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare pain patterns and identify factors associated with residual shoulder pain after rotator cuff repairs using double-row and single-row techniques.
Methods
A cohort study was performed using patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs at our center in 2015. Patients were allocated according to the repair technique into an single-row (SR) group or a double-row (DR) group. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain were assessed at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. Functional and radiographic assessments were performed at least 24 months postoperatively. The proportion of patients with residual pain and factors associated with residual shoulder pain (VAS > 0 at the final follow-up) were analyzed in both groups.
Results
Fifty-two patients were enrolled in the SR group, and 53 were enrolled in the DR group. The DR group appeared to have higher levels of pain 1 week (P < 0.001) and 3 months (P = 0.041) postoperatively, while at other time points, the pain intensity of the two groups was comparable. Fourteen (26.4%) and 25 (48.1%) patients in the DR and the SR groups, respectively, developed residual shoulder pain, (P = 0.022; RR 1.82). The univariate analysis and multiple regression revealed that a poorer quality of tendon tissue is related to residual pain in the SR group, whereas tendon retraction is associated with residual pain in the DR group. The rate of re-tear was similar between the two groups and between patients with and without residual pain.
Conclusions
The DR repair technique results in a greater intensity of pain than that of SR repair during the first 3 months after surgery; however, patients who underwent DR repair presented a significantly lower proportion of residual shoulder pain and better tendon quality after 2 years. Poorer tendon quality and larger tendon retraction as determined intraoperatively were risk factors for residual pain. These results highlight the necessity of promoting healing on the grounds of residual pain prevention.
Level of evidence
II.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson G, Backman LJ, Christensen J et al (2017) Nerve distributions in insertional achilles tendinopathy—a comparison of bone, bursae and tendon. Histol Histopathol 3:263–270
Baums MH, Buchhorn GH, Spahn G et al (2008) Biomechanical characteristics of single-row repair in comparison to double-row repair with consideration of the suture configuration and suture material. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:1052–1060
Baums MH, Schminke B, Posmyk A et al (2015) Effect of single- and double-row rotator cuff repair at the tendon-to-bone interface: preliminary results using an in vivo sheep model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1:111–118
Bigliani LU, Morrison DS, April EW (1986) The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans 10:228
Carbonel I, Martinez AA, Calvo A et al (2012) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized clinical study. Int Orthop 9:1877–1883
Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ et al (2008) A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2:355–361
Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164
Cuff DJ, O’Brien KC, Pupello DR et al (2016) Evaluation of factors affecting acute postoperative pain levels after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 7:1231–1236
Davis ME, Stafford PL, Jergenson MJ et al (2015) Muscle fibers are injured at the time of acute and chronic rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1:226–232
Davidson PA, Rivenburgh DW (2000) Rotator cuff repair tension as a determinant of functional outcome. J Shoulder Elb Surg 6:502–506
Divani K, Chan O, Padhiar N et al (2010) Site of maximum neovascularisation correlates with the site of pain in recalcitrant mid-tendon achilles tendinopathy. Man Ther 5:463–468
Dolkart O, Liron T, Chechik O et al (2014) Statins enhance rotator cuff healing by stimulating the COX2/PGE2/EP4 pathway: an in vivo and in vitro study. Am J Sports Med 12:2869–2876
Freemont AJ, Peacock TE, Goupille P et al (1997) Nerve ingrowth into diseased intervertebral disc in chronic back pain. Lancet 350:178–181
Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C (1999) Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elb Surg 6:599–605
Ge Y, Chen S, Chen J et al (2013) The development and evaluation of a new shoulder scoring system based on the view of patients and physicians: the Fudan University shoulder score. Arthroscopy 4:613–622
Gerber C, Meyer DC, Schneeberger AG et al (2004) Effect of tendon release and delayed repair on the structure of the muscles of the rotator cuff: an experimental study in sheep. J Bone Jt Surg Am 9:1973–1982
Gimbel JA, Mehta S, Van Kleunen JP et al (2004) The tension required at repair to reappose the supraspinatus tendon to bone rapidly increases after injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:258–265
Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M et al (2009) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy 1:4–12
Hein J, Reilly JM, Chae J et al (2015) Retear rates after arthroscopic single-row, double-row, and suture bridge rotator cuff repair at a minimum of 1 year of imaging follow-up: a systemic review. Arthroscopy 11:2274–2281
Huberty DP, Schoolfiled JD, Brady PC et al (2009) Incidence and treatment of postoperative stiffness following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 8:880–890
Killian ML, Cavinatto LM, Ward SR et al (2015) Chronic degeneration leads to poor healing of repaired massive rotator cuff tears in rats. Am J Sports Med 10:2401–2410
Kim CW, Kim JH, Kim DG (2014) The factors affecting pain pattern after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Surg 6:392–400
Kim DH, Jang YH, Choi YE et al (2016) Evaluation of repair tension in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: does it really matter to the integrity of the rotator cuff? Am J Sports Med 11:2807–2812
Kim YK, Moon SH, Cho SH (2013) Treatment outcomes of single- versus double-row repair for larger than medium-sized rotator cuff tears: the effect of preoperative remnant tendon length. Am J Sports Med 10:2270–2277
Ma HL, Chiang E-R, Wu H-TH et al (2012) Clinical outcome and imaging of arthroscopic single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized trial. Arthroscopy 1:16–24
Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ (2002) American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elb Surg 6:587–594
Millett PJ, Warth RJ, Dornan GJ et al (2014) Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized clinical trials. J Shoulder Elb Surg 4:586–597
Nicholas SJ, Lee SJ, Mullaney MJ, Tyler TF, Fukunaga T, Johnson CD et al (2016) Functional outcomes after double-row versus single-row rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized trial. Orthop J Sports Med 10:2325967116667398
Nelson CO, Sileo MJ, Grossman MG et al (2008) Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison. Arthroscopy 8:941–948
Oh JH, Kim SH, Lee HK (2008) Moderate preoperative shoulder stiffness does not alter the clinical outcome of rotator cuff repair with arthroscopic release and manipulation. Arthroscopy 9:983–991
Park JY, Lhee SH, Choi JH et al (2008) Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single and double row repairs in rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 36:1310–1316
Santoni BG, McGilvray KC, Lyons AS et al (2010) Biomechanical analysis of an ovine rotator cuff repair via porous patch augmentation in a chronic rupture mode. Am J Sports Med 4:679–686
Simon CB, Coronado RA, Greenfield WH III, Valencia C, Wright TW, Moser MW, Farmer KW, George SZ (2016) Predicting pain and disability after shoulder arthroscopy: rotator cuff tear severity and concomitant arthroscopic procedures. Clin J Pain 5:404–410
Shin SJ, Kook SH, Rao N et al (2015) Clinical outcomes of modified Mason-Allen single-row repair for bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: comparison with the double-row suture-bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 8:1976–1982
Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K et al (2005) Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 11:1307–1316
Tudisco C, Bisicchia S, Savarese E et al (2013) Single-row vs. double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: clinical and 3 T MR arthrography results. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:43
Xu Y, Bonar F, Murrell GAC (2011) Neoinnervation in rotator cuff tendinopathy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 4:354–359
Yeo DYT, Walton JR, Lam P et al (2017) The Relationship between intraoperative tear dimensions and postoperative pain in 1624 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med 4:788–793
Funding
The research did not receive financial supports from fundings.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The Institutional Review Board of Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University approved this study (IRB no. 2015-157).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Li, H., Qiao, Y. et al. Double-row rotator cuff repairs lead to more intensive pain during the early postoperative period but have a lower risk of residual pain than single-row repairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 3180–3187 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05346-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05346-0