- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- TaxaTaxa
- DataData
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
- Inst. CodeInst. Code
- ErratumErratum
- NanopubsNanopubs
Figure S1–S7, Tables S2–S6. Partial morphological and molecular results
Data type: morphological and molecular data
Explanation note: Figure S1. Landmark (●, red) and semi-landmark (▲, blue) locations in this study (M11107); the scale is 0.5 cm. Figure S2. Phylogenetic analyses of Cytb gene from all haplotypes by Bayesian Inference. Figure S3. Phylogenetic analyses of Cytb gene from all haplotypes by neighbor-joining. Figure S4. Results of automatic barcode gap discovery (ABGD) analyses. a: Histogram of genetic distance and frequency; b: Line diagram of genetic distance and total number. Figure S5. Cluster analysis based on external and skull morphological indices of N. confucianus, N. sacer, and N. lotipes. Figure S6. Superimposition of dorsal view (a), ventral view (b), lateral view of skull (c), and lateral view of mandible (d) of Niviventer confucianus. Figure S7. Comparison of the tail of N. confucianus (A), N. sacer (B), N. lotipes (C). Table S2. Results of automatic barcode gap discovery (ABGD) analyses. Table S3. One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Normal test of external and craniodental measurements of N. sacer, N. bukit, N. confucianus, and N. lotipes. Table S4. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of external and craniodental measurements of N. sacer, N. bukit, N. confucianus, and N. lotipes. Values in bold show significant differences among the four species. Table S5. Morphological difference between species as determined by LSD tests. Values in bold show significant differences between two taxa. Table S6. Discriminant analysis classification of external/skull morphological indices.