Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Random-Effects, Fixed-Effects and the within-between Specification for Clustered Data in Observational Health Studies: A Simulation Study

Figure 5

Hausman test.

The solid orange lines show the share of the simulations for which the Hausman test does not reject, at the 90% confidence level, the null hypothesis that both RE and FE estimation are consistent. Conventional wisdom is that this suggests that researchers should use RE estimation as it is more efficient. The dashed orange lines show the share of the simulations for which the Hausman test suggests the estimator with smaller absolute error. The red background indicates when the RE estimator is MSE-preferred, while the blue background indicates when the FE estimator is MSE-preferred. The white regions indicate that the difference between the MSE of the two estimators is trivial. All simulation inputs are baseline.

Figure 5

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110257.g005