- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- MapMap
- TaxaTaxa
- DataData
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
- Inst. CodeInst. Code
- NanopubsNanopubs
Tables S1–S4, Figures S1, S2
Data type: Docx file.
Explanation note: Table S1. The description of advertisement calls of five Kurixalus species. Table S2. The factor loading of principal analysis on call properties in Kurixalus inexpectatus sp. nov. and Kurixalus idiootocus. We listed the coefficients of correlation between call properties and their corresponding factors and listed out the Eigen values and accumulate explained variance of each Factor. Table S3. The factor scores of each individual for Kurixalus inexpectatus sp. nov. and Kurixalus idiootocus and the results of Discriminant Function Analysis (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.11, F (4.19) = 38.1, p < 0.001). This table shows the statistics and coefficient of determination of each factor and the square of Mahalanobis distance from each group centre, the post hoc probability (in brackets) to a group and the assigned group for each observation (individual). Table S4. Morphological data for Kurixalus inexpectatus sp. nov. used in this analysis. For the analyses, all measurements were adjusted for variations in body size, i.e. each value was divided by the SVL of the individual. The data presented here are not corrected for size. Data extracted from our samples and from the literature ananjevae (