Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Single-Dose and Steady-State Nadolol Plasma Concentrations

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of nadolol have been previously reported to be linear between single and steady-state dosing. Data from a study in our laboratory suggested greater than expected β-blockade with nadolol at steady state. Because the early potency studies were single-dose studies, we hypothesized there was a nonlinearity in nadolol pharmacokinetics which produced higher than expected plasma concentrations at steady state. Six normal volunteers from the previous study (steady state) volunteered to participate in the single-dose study. Plasma concentrations were determined for 24 hr following a single dose of nadolol, 80 mg. A simple, inexpensive, and accurate method for determination of nadolol in plasma or serum by HPLC with fluorometric detection is described. The AUCo–tau at steady state was greater than the AUC0–∞ following a single dose in five of the six subjects. The mean ratio of AUCss/AUCsd was 2.54. This value would be unity in the presence of linear pharmacokinetics. We conclude that the principle of superposition is not applicable for nadolol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. R. C. Heel, R. N. Brogden, G. E. Pakes, T. M. Speight, and G. S. Avery. Drugs 20:1–23 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Dreyfuss, R. A. Vukovich, J. M. Shaw, and D. A. Willard. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 17:300–307 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Dreyfuss, D. L. Griffith, S. M. Singhvi, J. M. Shaw, J. J. Ross, R. A. Vukovich, and D. A. Willard. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 19:712–720 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. H. Frishman. Med. Clin. No. Am. 72:37–81 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. A. Vukovich, J. E. Foley, B. Brown, D. A. Willard, M. Buckley, D. O'Kelly, D. Fitzgerald, W. Tormey, and A. Darragh. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 7 (Suppl. 2):167S–172S (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. A. Inhen and J. P. Sall. In SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 1985, pp. 656–664.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier (eds.). In Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982, pp. 445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. M. Metzler, G. L. Elfring and A. J. McWren. Biometrics 30:562 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier (eds.). In Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982, pp. 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krukemyer, J.J., Boudoulas, H., Binkley, P.F. et al. Comparison of Single-Dose and Steady-State Nadolol Plasma Concentrations. Pharm Res 7, 953–956 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015954108734

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015954108734

Navigation