Skip to main content
Log in

Difficult laryngoscopy and cephalometric roentgenograms in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We retrospectively studied the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy in 53 subjects with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and 72 subjects with chronic otitis media undergoing tympanoplasty (control group). The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy in the UPPP group was significantly higher than in the control group (18.9%vs 4.2%,P<0.001). To analyze the anatomical findings of difficult laryngoscopy in UPPP patients, cephalometric roentgenograms were compared between patients in whom direct laryngoscopy was difficult (difficult patients,n=10) and patients in whom direct laryngoscopy was not difficult (nondifficult patients,n=43). Cephalometric atlanto-occipital distance (cAOD) was less than 4mm in 80% of the difficult patients, and there were significant differences between the difficult patients and the nondifficult patients (2.8±3.3 mmvs 6.7±3.0 mm, mean ±SD,P<0.001). There were significant differences in cephalometric effective mandibular length/cephalometric posterior depth of mandible ratio (cEML/cPDM) between the difficult patients and the nondifficult patients (4.0±0.6vs 4.5 ±0.8,P<0.01); however, the calculation of cEML/cPDM was more difficult than cAOD. We concluded that OSAS patients undergoing UPPP are at high risk for difficult laryngoscopy, and that cAOD calculated from cephalometric roentgenograms is an easy and sensitive predictive indicator for the estimation of difficult laryngoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fujita S, Conway W, Zorick F, Roth T (1981) Surgical correction of anatomic abnormalities in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Otolarygol Head Neck Surg 89:923–934

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Partinen M, Guilleminault C, Quera-Salva M-A, Jamieson A (1988) Obstructive sleep apnea and cephalometric roentgenograms —The role of anatomic upper airway abnormalities in the definition of abnormal breathing during sleep. Chest 93:1199–1205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jamieson A, Guilleminault C, Partinen M, Quera-Salva MA (1986) Obstructive sleep apneic patients have craniomandibular abnormalities. Sleep 9:469–477

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hegstrom T, Emmons LL, Hoddes E, Kennedy T, Christopher K, Collins T, Spofford B (1988) Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Preoperative radiologic evaluation. Am J Roentgenol 150:67–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davies RJO, Stradling JR (1990) The relationship between neck circumference, radiographic pharyngeal anatomy, and the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Eur Respir J 3:509–514

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ryan CF, Dickson RI, Lowe AA, Blokmanis A, Flectham JA (1990) Upper airway measurements predict response to uvulopalatopharyngoplasty in obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope 100:248–253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Okamoto M, Fujita S (1993) Role of dynamic cephalometry in upper airway evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome In: Togawa T, Katayama S, Hishikawa Y, Ohta Y, Horie T (ed) Sleep apnea and rhonchopathy. Karger, Basel, pp 100–106

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cormack RS, Lehane J (1984) Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 39:1105–1111

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vgontzas AN, Tan TL, Bixler EO, Martin LF, Shubert D, Kales A (1994) Sleep apnea and sleep disruption in obese patients. Arch Intern Med 154:1705–1711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL (1985) A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 32:429–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oates JDL, Macleod AD, Oates PD, Pearsall FJ, Howie JC, Murray GD (1991) Comparison of two methods for predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 66:305–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rocke DA, Murray WB, Rout CC, Gouws E (1992) Relative risk analysis of factors associated with difficult intubation in obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesiology 77:67–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. White A, Kander PL (1975) Anatomical factors in difficult direct laryngoscopy. Br J Anesth 47:468–474

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nichol HC, Zuck D (1983) Difficult laryngoscopy—the “anterior” larynx and the atlanto-occipital gap. Br J Anesth 55:141–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chou H-C, Wu T-L (1993) Mandibulohyoid distance in difficult laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth 71:335–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kato, S., Hoshino, M. & Goto, F. Difficult laryngoscopy and cephalometric roentgenograms in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. J Anesth 10, 260–263 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02483392

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02483392

Key words

Navigation