Skip to main content
Log in

Convergent succession of phytoplankton in microcosms with different inoculum species composition

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Different initial mixtures of phyto-and zooplankton from different lakes were grown under identical chemical and physical conditions in medium size (8-and 12–1) laboratory microcosm cultures until convergence of phytoplankton species composition was attained. Five such experiments with four (four experiments) or three (one experiment) microcosm cultures were run. Three experiments were performed with weak stirring which permitted sedimentary elimination of the diatoms. Two experiments were conducted with stronger stirring to prevent sedimentation. In the three “sedimentation intensive” experiments, the final phytoplankton community was composed of the filamentous chlorophyte Mougeotia thylespora together with a smaller biomass of nanoplanktic algae. In the two “sedimentation free” experiments the final phytoplankton community consisted of pennate diatoms. Both dissolved nutrient concentrations and the chemical composition of biomass suggested strong nutrient limitation of algal growth rates in the final phase of the experiments. The zooplankton communities at the end of the experiments were composed of species that were apparently unable to ingest the large, dominant algae and that presumably fed on the nanoplanktic “undergrowth” and the bacteria. There was a distinct sequence of events in all experiments: first, the large zooplankton species (Daphnia and Copepoda) were replaced by smaller ones (Chydorus, Bosmina, rotifers); second, all cultures within one experiment developed the same nutritional status (limitation by the same nutrient); and third, the taxonomic composition of phytoplankton of the different cultures within one experiment converged. The last took 7–9 weeks, with is about 2–3 times as long as the time needed in a phytoplankton competition experiment to reach the final outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bray JR Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27: 325–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks JL, Dodson SI (1965) Predation, body size and composition of plankton. Science 150: 28–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns C (1969) The relationship between body size of filter-feeding Cladocera and the maximum size of particles ingested. Limnol Oceanogr 13: 675–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller W, Müller H (1981) The filtration apparatus of Cladocera: filter mesh-sizes and their implications on food-selectivity. Oecologia 49: 316–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz ZM (1977) Food-size selection and seasonal succession of filter fecding zooplankton in a eutrophic lake. Ekol Polska 25: 179–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz ZM (in press) Daphnia growth at different concentrations of filaments. Arch Hydrobiol

  • Goldman JC, McCarthy JJ, Peavey DG (1979) Growth rate influence on the chemical composition of phytoplankton in oceanic waters. Nature 279: 210–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris GP (1986) Phytoplankton ecology. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins P, Lampert W (1989) The effect of Daphnia body size on filtering rate inhibition in the presence of a filamentous cyanobacterium. Limnol Oceanogr 34: 1084–1089

    Google Scholar 

  • Knisely K, Geller W (1986) Selective feeding of four zooplankton species on natural lake phytoplankton. Oecologia 69: 86–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl JG, Nicklisch A (1988) Ökophysiologie der Algen. Akademie Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert W, Schober U (1978) Das regelmäßige Auftreten von Frühjahrsblüte und “Klarwasserstadium” im Bodensee als Folge klimatischer bedingungen und Wechselwirkungen zwischen Phyto-und Zooplankton. Arch Hydrobiol 82: 364–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha O, Duncan A (1985) The relationship between cell carbon and cell volume in freshwater algal species used in zooplankton studies. J Plankton Res 7: 279–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J, Gaines SD, Pacala SW (1987) Supply side ecology: The role of physical transport processes. In Gee JHR, Giller PS (eds) Organisation of communities past and present. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 491–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RE, Kalff J (1983) Competition for phosphorus among cooccurring freshwater phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 28: 448–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1983) Nutrient competition between phytoplankton species in multispecies chemostat experiments. Arch Hydrobiol 96: 399–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1985) Comparison between steady state and non-steady state competition: Experiments with natural phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 30: 335–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1986) Phytoplankton competition along a gradient of dilution rates. Oecologia 68: 503–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1988a) Phytoplankton succession in microcosm experiments under simultaneous grazing pressure and resource limitation. Limnol Oceanogr 33: 1037–1054

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1988b) Does nutrient competition among phytoplankton occur in situ? Verh Internal Verein Limnol 23: 707–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1989a) The role of competition for resources in phytoplankton succession. In Sommer U (ed) Plankton ecology: Succession in plankton communities. Springer, Berlin, pp 57–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1989b) Nutrient status and nutrient competition of phytoplankton in a shallow, hypertrophic lake. Limnol Oceanogr 34: 1162–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (in press) The application of the Droop-model of nutrient limitation to natural phytoplankton. Vert Internal Verein Limnol 24:

  • Sommer U, Gliwicz ZM, Lampert W, Duncan A (1986) The PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters. Arch Hydrobiol 106: 433–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW (1986) Herbivores direct and indirect effects on algal populations. Science 231: 605–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW (1989) The role of grazers in phytoplankton succession. In Sommer U (ed) Plankton Ecology: Succession in plankton communities, Springer, Berlin, pp 107–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland JDH, Parsons DR (1972) A practical handbook of seawater analysis. 2nd edn. Bull Fish Res Board Can 167

  • Tessenow U (1966) Untersuchungen über den Kieselsäuregehalt der Binnengewässer. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 32: 1–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Sterner RW (1984) Invasions of equilibria: test of resource competition using two species of algae. Oecologia 61: 197–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Kilham SS, Kilham P (1982) Phytoplankton community ecology: The role of limiting nutrients. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13: 349–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Kiesling R, Sterner RW, Kilham SS, Johnson FA (1986) Green, bluegreen and diatom algae: Taxonomic differences in competitive ability for phosphorus, silicon and nitrogen. Arch Hydrobiol 106: 473–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster KE, Peters RH (1978) Some size-dependent inhibitions of larger cladoceran filterers in filamentous suspensions. Limnol Oceanogr 23: 1238–1245

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sommer, U. Convergent succession of phytoplankton in microcosms with different inoculum species composition. Oecologia 87, 171–179 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00325254

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00325254

Key words

Navigation