Skip to main content
Log in

A moorable, automated plankton sampler: comments on Lewis & Heckl (1991)

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comments on a recently described moorable, automated plankton sampler are given, mainly because it was designed to capture large zooplankton. However, the need for automatic devices for sampling phyto- and zooplankton is stressed. A new design for such a device is presented. A preliminary test was made using standard continuous-flow (auto-analyser) equipment, a cultured flagellate and formalin as a fixative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Colebrook, J. M., 1960, Continuous plankton records: methods of analysis 1950–1959. Bull. mar. Ecol. 5: 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colijn, F., 1991, Changes in plankton communities: when, where and why? ICES variability symposium, paper no. 13, session 2.

  • Gieskes, W. W. C. & G. W. Kraay, 1977. Continuous plankton records: changes in the plankton of the North Sea and its eutrophic southern bight from 1948 to 1975. Neth. J. Sea Res. 11: 334–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, R. S., 1967, The continuous plankton recorder survey of the north Atlantic. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond. 19: 189–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. P., 1983. Mixed layer physics and phytoplankton populations: studies in equilibrium and non-equilibrium ecology. In F. E. Round & D. J. Chapman (eds), Progress in phycological research, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasle, G. R., 1978. Some specific preparations. In A. Sournia (ed.), Phytoplankton manual. UNESCO, Paris: 136–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimdal, B. R., 1978. Coccolithophorids. In A. Sournia (ed.), Phytoplankton manual. UNESCO, Paris: 148–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstraat, J. W., W. J. M. van Zeijl, J. C. H. Peeters & L. Peperzak, 1990. Flow cytometry and other optical methods for characterization and quantification of phytoplankton in seawater. Environment and pollution measurement sensors and systems, SPIE, vol. 1269: 116–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, D. A., 1973, Chlorophylla fluorescence in marine centric diatoms: responses of chloroplasts to light and nutrient stress. Mar. Biol. 23: 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, J. T. O., 1983. Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, B. S. C., 1978. Other flagellates. In A. Sournia (ed.), Phytoplankton manual. UNESCO, Paris: 151–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. G. & H. Heckl, 1991. A moorable, automated plankton sampler; Hydrobiologia 215: 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohman, M. D. & R. A. Snyder, 1991. Growth kinetics of the omnivorous oligotrich ciliateStrombidium sp. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36: 922–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieburth, J. McN., 1979. Sea microbes. Oxford University Press, New York: 1–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. J. R., 1978. Dinoflagellates. In A. Sournia (ed.), Phytoplankton manual. UNESCO, Paris: 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veer, J. van der, 1982. Simple and reliable methods for the fixation, mounting and staining of small and delicate marine plankton for light microscopic identification. Mar. Biol. 66: 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peperzak, L., Hofstraat, J.W. & Colijn, F. A moorable, automated plankton sampler: comments on Lewis & Heckl (1991). Hydrobiologia 245, 105–107 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764770

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764770

Key words

Navigation