Skip to main content
Log in

Academic profession in academic organization

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been argued that academic organizations are organized anarchies with ambiguous goal functions and uncertain technologies. Academia cannot evaluate itself because its dynamics is the “garbage-can” process. The counter-argument is that rational academic man(woman) is a substitute for organizational foolishness. The organizational behavior of academic institutions must be interpreted in terms of the logic of the academic profession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altbach, P. (ed.) (1974). University Reform. Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (ed.) (1977). Comparative Perspectives on the Academic Profession. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding Organizational Behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson, R. (1981). Rationell Administration. Stockholm: AEW Geber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, A. and Kogan, M. (1980). Structure and Process in Higher Education. London: Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. and Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. (1963). “Industry in a new age,” in New Society, reprinted in D. S. Pugh (ed.), Organizational Theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1978). “Academic power: concepts, modes and perspectives,” in J. Van de Graff et al. (eds.), Academic Power: Patterns of Authority in Seven National Systems of Higher Education. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1983). The Higher Education System. Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. (1963). “The nature of belief systems in mass publics” in D. E. Apter Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, H. and Shils, E. E. (eds. (1982). Universities, Politicians & Bureaucrats: Europe and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderud, H. G. (1973). Four Faces of Leadership in an Academic Organization. Copenhagen: Munhsgaard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, H. (1949). General Industrial Management. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, H. (1971). “General principles of management,” in D. S. Pugh (ed.), Organization Theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenny, L. A. (ed.) (1979). Funding Higher Education: A Six-Nation Analysis. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. (1957). “Cosmopolitans and locals - I,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 2.

  • Gouldner, A. (1958). “Cosmopolitans and locals: towards an analysis of latent social roles - II,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 2.

  • Halsey, A. H. and Trow, M. (1971). The British Academics. London: Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J-E. and Frederiksson, B. (1983). Higher Education & Public Administration. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J-E. and Stenlund, H. (1983a). “Bureaucratization of a system of higher education,” Comparative Education 19(3): 305–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J-E. and Stenlund, H. (1983b). “The higher education profession in Sweden: structure, flexibility and equality,” European Journal of Education 18: 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J-E., Stenlund, H. and Westlund, A., (1982). “Variety of attitudes towards the comprehensive university,” Higher Education 11: 441–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J-E., Stenlund, H. and Westlund, A. (1981). “Is there a university crisis in Sweden,” European Journal of Education 16: 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R. and Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1971) “The principle of supportive relationships” in D. S. Pugh (ed.), op. citNew York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Likert, R. (1961). New Patterns of Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. and Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity in Organizations. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1976). Patterns of Equality: the Influence of New Structures in European Higher Education upon the Equality of Educational Opportunity. Windsor: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1964). Structure and Process in Modern Societies. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. and Platt, G. M. (1975). The American University. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, J. A. and Baird Israel, B. (1972). Higher Education: From Autonomy to Systems. New York: International Council for Educational Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesonen, P. (1982). “Finland - the ‘one man - one vote’ issue,” in H. Daalder and E. Shils (eds.), op. cit.Universities, Politicians & Bureaucrats: Europe and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Pugh, D. S. (ed.) (1971). Organization Theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1966). Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruin, O. (1982). “Sweden: external control and internal participation: trends in Swedish higher education,” in H. Daalder and E. Shils (eds.), op. cit.Universities, Politicians & Bureaucrats: Europe and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1975a). “Public and private lives of higher education,” Daedalus II, winter.

  • Trow, M. (1975b). Teachers and Students. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1984). “Leadership and organization: the case of biology at Berkeley” in R. Premfors (ed.), Higher Education Organization: Conditions for Policy Implementation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. (1979). “The self-evaluating organization,” in A. Wildavsky (ed.), Speaking Truth to Power. The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston: Little, Brown, pp. 212–237.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lane, JE. Academic profession in academic organization. High Educ 14, 241–268 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136108

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136108

Keywords

Navigation