Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Foraging behaviour in fishes: perspectives on variance

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

The positive relationship between size of prey and frequency of ingestion by predators has been a focal point of investigations in foraging ecology. Field studies compare the frequency distribution of prey sizes in the predator's gut with that in the environment. Laboratory and field (enclosure) studies are based upon comparison of the frequency distributions of prey sizes in controlled environments, before and after the introduction of a predator. ‘Optimal’ caloric return for foraging effort (i.e. the theory of optimal foraging) has been widely used as a guiding principle in attempts to explain what a fish consumes. There is a body of information, however, which seems to indicate that the perceptual potentialities and cognitive abilities of a predator can account for both the direction of the prey size versus ingestion frequency relationship and the variance surrounding it. Part of this variance may be evidence of ‘systematic ambiguity’, a property of cognitive skills causing predators to respond to the same stimulus in different ways and to different stimuli in the same way. More extensive examination of cognitive skills (minimally defined as learning, remembering and forgetting) in fish may permit causal interpretations (immediate and ultimate) of variance in predatory skills. In such a paradigm of foraging behaviour, environmental stimulus is not taken as the predator's object of response (percept); a cognitive representation connects mind to stimulus and this is the criterion for the act of perception. Cognition, here considered as a formal system which acts upon representations, connects mind to response and thus to adaptation. Studies of the relationships among rates of learning, long and short-term memory, rates of forgetting, prey behavior, size and population turnover rates, lateralization of brain functions, diel fluctuations in predator activity levels and sleep, experience, and ‘critical periods’ in the development of the predator's nervous system should be examined in relation to foraging behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Ahlbert, I.B. 1976. Organization of the cone cells in the retinae of salmon, Salmo salar and trout Salmo trutta in relation to their feeding habits. Acta Zool. 57: 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M.A. (ed.). 1975. Vision in fishes: a new approaches in research. Plenum Press, New York. 836 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, W. 1889. Notes on the senses and habits of some crustacea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 1: 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, C. 1976. Modification of visual function by early visual experience. Bull. Schweiz. Akad. Med. Wiss. 32: 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, C. 1977. Genetic instructions and developmental plasticity in the kitten's visual cortex. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 278: 425–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaxter, J.H.S. 1970. Sensory deprivation and sensory input in rearing experiments. Helgol. Wiss. Meeresunters. 20: 642–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaxter, J.H.S. 1975. Reared and wild fish. How do they compare? Proc. 10th Europ. Symp. Mar. Biol. 1: 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brawn, V.M. 1969. Feeding behaviour of cod. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 26: 583–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, R.J. 1975. Biorythm variations in consciousness and psychological functions. Can. Psychol. Rev. 16: 217–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browman, H.I. 1985. Feeding behaviour in fry of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. M.Sc. Thesis. McGill University, Montreal. 141 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browman, H.I. & B.M. Marcotte. 1986. Diurnal feeding and prey size selection in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) alevins. Dev. Env. Biol. Fish. 7: 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, T.H. 1983a. Why study fish brains? Some aims of comparative neurology today. pp. 361–368. In: R. E. Davis & R.G. Northcutt (ed.) Fish Neurobiology, Vol. 2, Higher Brain Areas and Functions, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, T.H. 1983b. Neurobiological roots and neuroethological sprouts. pp. 403–412. In: F. Huber & H. Markl(ed.) Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, T.H. 1984a. Comparative neuroscience holds promise for quiet revolutions. Science 225: 473–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, T.H. 1984b. The future of comparative neurology. Amer. Zool. 24: 693–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C.B.G. & W.W. Hodos. 1970. The concept of homology and the evolution of the nervous system. Brain Behav. Evol. 3: 353–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M.L. 1974. Optimization in ecology. Science 183: 1156–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1969. Sensation and perception I. Vision. Rand McNally & Co., Chicago. 76 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J.E. & T.J. Horder. 1977. The multiple factors determining retinotopic order in the growth of optic fibers into the optic tectum. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 278: 261–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. & G. Mitchison. 1983. The function of dream sleep. Nature 304: 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronley-Dillon, J. R. 1964. Units sensitive to direction of movement in goldfish optic tectum. Nature 203: 214–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. 1984. Optimal foraging theory tested. Nature 311: 603–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, T.A. & H.R. MacCrimmon. 1982. Influence of hatchery experience on growth and behavior of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) within allopatric and sympatric stream populations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 1453–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, L.M. 1983. Adaptive flexibility in the foraging behavior of fishes. Can. J. Fisher. Aquat. Sci. 40: 398–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easter, S. S., P.R. Johns & L.R. Baumann. 1977. Growth of the adult goldfish eye I: optics. Vision Res. 17: 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G.M. & L.H. Finkel. 1985. Neuronal group selection in the cerebral cortex. pp. 00–00. In: G.M. Edelman, W.M. Cowan & W.E. Gall (ed.) Dynamic Aspects of Neocortical Function, Wiley, New York (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenderson, O.C., W.H. Everhart, & K.M. Muth. 1968. Comparative agonistic and feeding behavior of hatchery-reared and wild salmon in aquaria. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 25: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortier, L. 1983. Environmental and behavioral control of largescale distribution and local abundance of ichthyoplankton in the St. Lawrence estuary. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal. 176 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, J.W. 1984. Is conventional foraging theory optimal? Amer. Nat. 124: 900–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, J.-G.J. 1981. Daily patterns of feeding behaviour, daily rations, and diets of juvenile Pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) in two marine bays of British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 38: 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, N., T. Li Kao & S.S. Easter. 1982. Fish vision and the detection of planktonic prey. Science 218: 1240–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D.H. & T.N. Wiesel. 1970. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J. Physiol., London 206: 419–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J.R. 1980. The feeding behavior and ecology of marine fish larvae. pp. 287–330. In: J.E. Bardach, J.J. Magnuson, R.C. May & J.M. Reinhart(ed.) Fish Behavior and Its Use In the Capture and Culture of Fishes, ICLARM, Manila.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingle, D. 1968. Spatial dimensions of vision in fish. pp. 51–59. In: D. Ingle(ed.) The Central Nervous System and Fish Behaviour, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 272 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. & R.M. Gaze. 1964. Types of visual response from single units in the optic nerve of the goldfish. Quart. J. Expt. Physiol. 49: 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, P.R. & S.S. Easter. 1977. Growth of the adult goldfish eye II: increase in retinal cell number. J. Comp. Neurol. 176: 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmanova, I.G., A.I. Belich & S.G. Lazarev. 1981. An electrophysiological study of wakefulness and sleep-like states in fish and amphibians. pp. 181–200. In: P.R. Laming(ed.) Brain Mechanisms of Behavior in Lower Vertebrates, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, L. & I. Rock. 1962. The moon illusion. Scient. Amer. 207: 120–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M.J. 1976. The formation of visual neuronal connections: an appraisal of the present status of the theory of neuronal plasticity. pp. 59–110. In: G. Gottlieb(ed.) Neuronal and Behavioral Specificity, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M.J. 1977. Evidence for plasticity of intertectal neuronal connections in adult Xenopus. Phil Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 278: 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. & R. Armitage. 1979. Rhythms in human performance: 1 1/2 hour oscillations in cognitive style. Science 204: 1326–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleitman, N. 1963. Sleep and wakefulness. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago. 552 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleitman, N. 1969. Basic rest-activity cycle in relation to sleep and wakefulness. pp. 33–38. In: A. Kales(ed.) Sleep Physiology and Pathology, Lippincott, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J.R. 1979. Foraging strategies and their social significance. pp. 225–270. In: P. Marler & J.G. Vandenbergh (ed.) Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, Vol. 3, Social Behavior and Communication, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, R. 1981. Marine fish larvae. Morphology, ecology, and relation to fisheries. University of Washington Press, Seattle. 131 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. 1975a. Evolution of communities near equilibrium. pp. 16–50. In: M.L. Cody & J.M. Diamond(ed.) Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. 1975b. The limits of optimization. pp. 49–60. In: Proceedings Can. Mathematical Congress, Mathematics in the Life Sciences.

  • Luecke, C. & W.J. O'Brien. 1981. Prey location volume of a planktivorous fish: a new measure of prey vulnerability. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38 1264–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A.R. 1973. The working brain. Penguin, London. 398 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, H.R. 1954. Stream studies in planted Atlantic salmon. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 11: 362–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiorana, V.C. 1981. Prey selection by sight: random or economical. Amer. Nat. 118: 450–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcotte, B.M. 1983. Imperatives of copepod diversity: perception, cognition, competition and predation. pp. 47–72. In: F. Schram(ed.) Crustacean Phylogeny, Balkema, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, W.N. & E.R. Loew. 1983. Wave produced changes in underwater light and their relations to vision. Env. Biol. Fish. 8: 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, W.L. & D.A. Ritz. 1984. Effect of prey density and hunger state on capture of krill, Nyctiphanes australis S., by Australian salmon, Arripis trutta. J. Fish. Biol. 24: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, S.R. & J.M. Cullen. 1974. Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behavior of cephalopods and fish predators. J. Zool. Lond. 172: 549–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northmore, D., F.C. Volkmann & D. Yager. 1978. Vision in fishes: colour and pattern. pp. 79–136. In: D.I. Mostofsky(ed.) The Behaviour of Fish and Other Aquatic Animals, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, W.J. 1979. The predator-prey interaction of planktivorous fish and zooplankton. Amer. Scient. 67: 572–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliphan, V.I. 1957. On the diel rhythm of feeding among Baikal grayling fry, and on diel rhythms among young fish in general. Doklady Akademii Nauk (USSR) 114: 669–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeke, H.V., S.C. Peeke & J.S. Williston. 1972. Long term memory deficits for habituation of predatory behavior in the forebrain ablated goldfish (Carassius auratus). Exp. Neurol. 36: 288–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinskii, F. Ya. 1967. Daily feeding rhythm and diets of young of the salmon (Salmo salar L.) when raised in ponds. Fish. Res. Board. Can. Translation Ser. No. 114.

  • Pyke, G.H., H.R. Pulliam & E.L. Charnov. 1977. Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Quart. Rev. Biol. 52: 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringler, N.H. 1983. Variation in foraging tactics of fishes. pp. 159–171. In: D.L.G. Noakes et al. (ed.) Predators and Prey in Fishes, Dev. in Env. Biol. Fish. 2, Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., B. Jenkins & J.R. Johnstone. 1980. Size constancy fails below half a degree. Nature 283: 473–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T.W. 1979. Generality of the size-distance relation in models of optimal foraging. Amer. Nat. 114: 902–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shustov, Yu.A., I.L. Shchurov & Yu.A. Smirnov. 1980. Adaptation times of hatchery salmon, Salmo salar, to river conditions. J. Ichthyol. 20: 156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosiak, A. J., R.G. Randall & J.A. McKenzie. 1979. Feeding by hatchery-reared and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) part in streams. J. Fis. Res. Board Can. 36: 1408–1412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, N.S. 1968. Shape discrimination in the goldfish. pp. 33–50. In: D. Ingle(ed.) The Central Nervous System and Fish Behaviour, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, W.H. 1969. Learning and instinct in animals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 558 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. 1968. Vision in fish: the origins of the visual frame of action in vertebrates. pp. 61–94. In: D. Ingle(ed.) The Central Nervous System and Fish Behaviour, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinyard, G.I. & W.J. O'Brien. 1976. Effects of light and turbidity on the reactive distance of Bluegill sunfish (Lepomis machrochirus). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33: 2845–2849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, D.M. 1971. Predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri): the effect of experience. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28: 1842–1852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, R.G. & J.H.S. Blaxter. 1980. Growth and survival of larval herring (Clupea harengus) in relation to prey density. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 1063–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1964. Measurement of co-association among fishes and comments on the evolution of schooling. Publ. Mus. Michigan State Univ. 2: 351–383.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Howard I. Browman

    Present address: Department of Systematics and Ecology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. McGill University, Institute of Oceanography, 3620 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B2, Canada

    Brian M. Marcotte & Howard I. Browman

Authors
  1. Brian M. Marcotte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Howard I. Browman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marcotte, B.M., Browman, H.I. Foraging behaviour in fishes: perspectives on variance. Environ Biol Fish 16, 25–33 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005157

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005157

Keywords

Search

Navigation