The incidence of malignant melanoma has been increasing steadily in the United States. The increase may be due to lifestyle changes in subsequent generations or birth cohorts. The nine population-based tumor registries in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) have been in existence for a sufficient time to begin to investigate cohort trends for the US population. Cases were the 18.787 Caucasians aged 20 to 84 years, who reported to SEER registries with a diagnosis of melanoma in 1974–86. Among men born between 1890 and 1919, each subsequent five-year birth cohort experienced 45 to 57 percent increases in age-adjusted melanoma incidence of the arm and trunk, and 14 to 20 percent increases were experienced across each site (arm, leg, head, and trunk) for the 1920–44 cohorts of men. Among women born between 1890 and 1919, 24 to 29 percent increases were seen for melanoma of the trunk, arms, and legs for each subsequent five-year birth-cohort, followed by six to 29 percent increases in the 1920–44 cohorts. Recent birth cohorts, 1945–64, have shown stabilizing rates, even after an attempt to adjust for the increasing tendency for diagnoses to be made in doctors' offices. Thus, the dramatic birth-cohort effects appear to have ended beginning with those born in 1945. However, melanoma rates will continue to rise until those born after 1945 represent the majority of the population. Furthermore, for the most recent cohorts, the trunk has become the most common site (per square meter of body surface) for men and the second most common site for women. This suggests that some lifestyle change has led to more damaging exposure (e.g., sunburns) of the trunk among recent cohorts than earlier cohorts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Horn-Ross PL, Holly EA, Brown SR, Aston DA. Temporal trends in the incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma among Caucasians in the San Francisco-Oakland MSA. Cancer Causes Control 1991: 2: 299–305.
Ries LAG, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Hartman AM, Edwards BK. Cancer Statistics Review 1973–1988. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1991: NIH Pub. No, 91–2789.
Osterlind A, Engholm G, Jensen OM. Trends in cutaneous malignant melanoma in Denmark 1943–1982 by anatomic site. APMIS 1988; 96: 953–63.
Gallagher RP, Ma B, McLean DI, et al. Trends in basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma of the skin from 1973 through 1987. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 23: 413–21.
Lee JAH. The rising incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Am J Dermatopathol 1985; 7: 35–9.
Magnus K. Habits of sun exposure and risk of malignant melanoma: an analysis of incidence rates in Norway 1955–1977 by cohort, sex, age, and primary tumor site. Cancer 1981; 28: 2329–35.
Stevens RG, Moolgavkar SH, Malignant melanoma: dependence of site-specific risk on age. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119: 890–5.
Thorn M, Bergstrom R, Adami H, Ringborg U. Trends in the incidence of malignant melanoma in Sweden, by anatomic site, 1960–1984. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132: 1066–77.
Lee JAH, Carter AP. Secular trends in mortality from malignant melanoma. INCI 1970; 45: 91–7.
Lee JAH, Petersen GR, Stevens RG, Vesanen K. The influence of age, year of birth, and data on mortality for malignant melanoma in the population of England and Wales, Canada, and the white population of the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1979; 110: 734–9.
Scotto J, Pitcher H, Lee JAH. Indications of future decreasing trends in skin-melanoma among whites in the United States. Int J Cancer 1991; 49: 490–7.
Klepp O, Magnus K. Some environmental and bodily characteristics of melanoma patients. A case-control study, Int J Cancer 1979; 23: 482–6.
MacKie RM, Aitchison T. Severe sunburn and subsequent risk of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma in Scotland. Br J Cancer 1982; 46: 955–60.
Lew RA, Sober AJ, Cook N, Marvell R, Fitzpatrick TB, Sun exposure habits in patients with cutaneous melanoma: a case control study. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1983; 8: 981–6.
Holman CDJ, Armstrong BK. Cutaneous malignant melanoma and indicators of total accumulated exposure to the sun: an analysis separating histogenetic types. INCI 1984; 73: 75–82.
Elwood JM, Gallagher RP, Davison J, Hill GB. Sunburn, suntan and the risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma— The Western Canada Melanoma Study. Br J Cancer 1985; 51: 543–9.
Elwood JM, Gallagher RP, Hill GB, Pearson JCG, Cutaneous melanoma in relation to intermittent and constant sun exposure—The Western Canada Melanoma Study. Int J Cancer 1985; 35: 427–33.
Dubin N, Moseson M, Pasternack BS. Epidemiology of malignant melanoma: pigmentary traits, ultraviolet radiation, and the identification of high-risk populations. Recent Results Cancer Res 1986; 102: 56–75.
Gallagher RP, Elwood JM, Hill GB. Risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma: The Western Canada Melanoma Study. Recent Results Cancer Res 1986; 102: 38–55.
Green A, Bain C, McLennan Siskind V. Risk factors for cutaneous melanoma in Queensland. Recent Results Cancer Res 1986; 102: 76–97.
Holman CDJ, Armstrong BK, Heenan PJ. Relationship of cutaneous malignant melanoma to individual sunlight-exposure habits. JNCI 1986; 76: 403–13.
Holman CDJ, Armstrong BK, Heenan PJ, et al. The causes of malignant melanoma: results from the West Australian Lions Melanoma Research Project. Recent Results Cancer Res 1986; 102: 18–37.
Cristofolini M, Franceschi S, Tasin L, et al. Risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma in a northern Italian population. Int J Cancer 1987; 39: 150–4.
Osterlind A, Tucker MA, Stone BJ, Jensen OM. The Danish case-control study of cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. Importance of UV-light exposure. Int J Cancer 1988; 42: 319–24.
Young JLJr, Percy CL, Asire AJ. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results: incidence and mortality data, 1933–77. NCI Monogr 1981; 57: 1–1082.
World Health Organization. ICD-0. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. First edition. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1976.
Breslow NE, Day NE, Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Volume 1. The Analysis of Case-control Studies. Lyon, France: International Agency for Cancer Research, 1980; IARC Sci. Pub. No. 32.
Pike RL, Brown ML. Nutrition: an Integrated Approach; Second Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1975.
Pearl OK, Scott EL. The anatomical distribution of skin cancers. Int J Epidemiol 1986; 15: 502–6.
Elder DE. Human melanocytic ncoplasms and their etiologic relationship with sunlight. J Invest Dermatol 1989; 92: 297S-303S.
Elwood JM, Galiagher RP, Hill GB, et al. Pigmentation and skin reaction to sun as risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: Western Canada melanoma study. Br Med J 1984; 288: 99–102.
Weinstock MA, Colditz GA, Willett WC, et al. Melanoma and the sun: the effect of swimsuits and a ‘healthy’ tan on the risk of nonfamilial malignant melanoma in women. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 462–70.
Zanetti R, Franceschi S, Rosso S, Colonna S, Bidoli E. Cutaneous melanoma and sunburns in childhood in a southern European population. Eur J Cancer 1992; 28A: 6–7: 1172–6.
Osterlind A, Jensen OM. Increasing incidence of trunk melanoma of young Danish women [Letter]. Br J Cancer 1987; 55: 467.
Magnus K. The nordie profile of skin cancer incidence. A comparative epidemiological study of three main types of skin cancer. Int J Cancer 1991; 47: 12–9.
Karagas MR, Thomas DB, Roth GJ, Johnson LK, Welss NS. The effects of changes in health care delivery on the reported ingidence of cutaneous melanoma in western Washington state. Am J Epidemiol 1991: 133: 58–62.
Additional information
Authors are with Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, and the Department of Epidemiology at the School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Address correspondence to Dr Dennis, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1124 Columbia Street, MP702, Seattle, WA98104, USA. This research was supported by grant CA 34847 from the US National Cancer Institute.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dennis, L.K., White, E. & Lee, J.A.H. Recent cohort trends in malignant melanoma by anatomic site in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 4, 93–100 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053149
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053149