Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 4, 2020

Reference range for C1-esterase inhibitor (C1 INH) in the third trimester of pregnancy

  • Hiroaki Tanaka ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Kayo Tanaka , Naosuke Enomoto , Sho Takakura , Shoichi Magawa , Shintaro Maki , Masafumi Nii , Kuniaki Toriyabe , Shinji Katsuragi and Tomoaki Ikeda

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to (i) establish the reference range and mean value for normal levels of C1-esterase inhibitor (C1 INH) during pregnancy, and (ii) investigate the association between C1 INH and uterine atony, as measured by blood loss at delivery.

Methods

We prospectively studied 200 healthy pregnant women who were registered. We studied C1 INH levels in 188 women at 34 and 35 gestational weeks of pregnancy. The reference range for C1 INH during the third trimester of pregnancy was calculated using the value of C1 INH that was determined at registration.

Results

The mean value of C1 INH was determined to be 70.3% (95% confidence interval, 68.7–71.9). While the C1 INH levels in four women were determined to be 40% lower than the calculated mean value, amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) did not occur in any of the women studied.

Conclusions

This study successfully demonstrated that a reference value for C1 INH activity can be established using the methods described herein. Further research is needed to determine whether C1 INH is involved in obstetric coagulopathy syndrome such as amniotic fluid embolism.


Corresponding author: Hiroaki Tanaka, MD, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mie University Faculty Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, Japan, Phone: +81 59 232 1111, Fax: +81 59 231 5202, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mie University Hospital on March 17th, 2017 (approval no. 3081).

References

1. Conde-Agudelo, A, Romero, R. Amniotic fluid embolism: an evidence-based review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:e1–e13. 445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.052.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Clark, SL, Hankins, GD, Dudley, DA, Dildy, GA, Porter, TF. Amniotic fluid embolism. Analysis of the national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1158–67. 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91474-9.10.1016/0002-9378(95)91474-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Tuffnell, DJ. United Kingdom amniotic fluid embolism register. BJOG 2005;112:1625–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00770.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Randoff, OD, Lepow, IH. Some properties of an esterase derived from preparations of the first component of complement. J Exp Med 1957;106:327–43. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.106.2.327.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Donaldson, VH, Evans, RR. A biochemical abnormality in hereditary angioneurotic edema: absence of serum inhibitor of C’1-esterase. Am J Med 1963;35:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(63)90162-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Osler, W. Landmark publication from the American Journal of the Medical Sciences: hereditary angio-neurotic oedema. 1888. Am J Med Sci 2010;339:175–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181b2803f.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Horiuchi, T, Ohi, H, Ohsawa, I, Fujita, T, Matsushita, M, Okada, N, et al. Guideline for hereditary angioedema (HAE) 2010 by the Japanese Association for Complement Research – secondary publication. Allergol Int 2012;61:559–62. https://doi.org/10.2332/allergolint.12-rai-0471.Search in Google Scholar

8. Farkas, H, Martinez-Saguer, I, Bork, K, Bowen, T, Craig, T, Frank, M, et al. International consensus on the diagnosis and management of pediatric patients with hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency. Allergy 2017;72:300–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Tamura, N, Kimura, S, Farhana, M, Uchida, T, Suzuki, K, Sugihara, K, et al. C1 esterase inhibitor activity in amniotic fluid embolism. Crit Care Med 2014;42:1392–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000000217.Search in Google Scholar

10. Tamura, N, Farhana, M, Oda, T, Itoh, H, Kanayama, N. Amniotic fluid embolism: pathophysiology from the perspective of pathology. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2017;43:627–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13284.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Riedl, MA. Hereditary angioedema with normal C1-INH (HAE type III). J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2013;1:427–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2013.06.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Davis, AE3rd. C1 inhibitor and hereditary angioneurotic edema. Annu Rev Immunol 1988;6:595–628. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.iy.06.040188.003115.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Kaplan, AP. Bradykinin and the pathogenesis of hereditary angioedema. World Allergy Organ J 2011;4:73–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/wox.0b013e318216b7b2.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-03-06
Accepted: 2020-08-21
Published Online: 2020-09-04
Published in Print: 2021-02-23

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2020-0099/html
Scroll to top button