Skip to main content
Log in

Microbial reduction of graphene oxide and its application in microbial fuel cells and biophotovoltaics

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite more than a decade of study, there are still significant obstacles to overcome before graphene can be successfully produced on a large scale for commercial use. Chemical oxidation of graphite to produce graphene oxide (GO), followed by a subsequent reduction process to synthesize reduced graphene oxide (rGO), is considered the most practical method for mass production. Microorganisms, which are abundant in nature and inexpensive, are one of the potential green reductants for rGO synthesis. However, there is no recent review discussing the reported microbial reduction of GO in detail. To address this, we present a comprehensive review on the reduction of GO by a range of microorganisms and compared their efficacies and reaction conditions. Also, presented were the mechanisms by which microorganisms reduce GO. We also reviewed the recent advancements in using microbially reduced GO as the anode and cathode material in the microbial fuel cell (MFC) and algal biophotovoltaics (BPV), as well as the challenges and future directions in microbial fuel cell research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meyer J C, Geim A K, Katsnelson M I, et al. The structure of suspended graphene sheets. Nature, 2007, 446(7131): 60–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science, 2004, 306(5696): 666–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar R, Sahoo S, Joanni E, et al. Recent progress in the synthesis of graphene and derived materials for next generation electrodes of high performance lithium ion batteries. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2019, 75: 100786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peña-Bahamonde J, Nguyen H N, Fanourakis S K, et al. Recent advances in graphene-based biosensor technology with applications in life sciences. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 2018, 16(1): 75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Radsar T, Khalesi H, Ghods V. Graphene properties and applications in nanoelectronic. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 2021, 53(4): 178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reina G, González-Domínguez J M, Criado A, et al. Promises, facts and challenges for graphene in biomedical applications. Chemical Society Reviews, 2017, 46(15): 4400–4416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hernandez Y, Nicolosi V, Lotya M, et al. High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nature Nanotechnology, 2008, 3(9): 563–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Parvez K, Wu Z S, Li R, et al. Exfoliation of graphite into graphene in aqueous solutions of inorganic salts. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(16): 6083–6091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim K S, Zhao Y, Jang H, et al. Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature, 2009, 457(7230): 706–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Emtsev K V, Bostwick A, Horn K, et al. Towards wafer-size graphene layers by atmospheric pressure graphitization of silicon carbide. Nature Materials, 2009, 8(3): 203–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cossutta M, McKechnie J, Pickering S J. A comparative LCA of different graphene production routes. Green Chemistry, 2017, 19(24): 5874–5884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Compton O C, Nguyen S T. Graphene oxide, highly reduced graphene oxide, and graphene: versatile building blocks for carbon-based materials. Small, 2010, 6(6): 711–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ray S C. Application and uses of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. In: Ray S C, ed. Applications of Graphene and Graphene-Oxide based Nanomaterials. Oxford: William Andrew Publishing, 2015, 39–55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hummers W S, Offeman R E. Preparation of graphitic oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1958, 80(6): 1339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stankovich S, Dikin D A, Piner R D, et al. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon, 2007, 45(7): 1558–1565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chua C K, Pumera M. Chemical reduction of graphene oxide: a synthetic chemistry viewpoint. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43(1): 291–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Agharkar M, Kochrekar S, Hidouri S, et al. Trends in green reduction of graphene oxides, issues and challenges: a review. Materials Research Bulletin, 2014, 59: 323–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Novoselov K S, Fal’ko V I, Colombo L, et al. A roadmap for graphene. Nature, 2012, 490(7419): 192–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Agarwal V, Zetterlund P B. Strategies for reduction of graphene oxide — a comprehensive review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 405: 127018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lehner B A E, Janssen V A E C, Spiesz E M, et al. Creation of conductive graphene materials by bacterial reduction using Shewanella Oneidensis. ChemistryOpen, 2019, 8(7): 888–895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Salas E C, Sun Z, Lüttge A, et al. Reduction of graphene oxide via bacterial respiration. ACS Nano, 2010, 4(8): 4852–4856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang G, Qian F, Saltikov C W, et al. Microbial reduction of graphene oxide by Shewanella. Nano Research, 2011, 4(6): 563–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shen L, Jin Z, Wang D, et al. Enhance wastewater biological treatment through the bacteria induced graphene oxide hydrogel. Chemosphere, 2018, 190: 201–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Song T S, Tan W M, Xie J. Bio-reduction of graphene oxide using sulfate-reducing bacteria and its implication on antibiocorrosion. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2018, 18(8): 5770–5776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo P, Xiao F, Liu Q, et al. One-pot microbial method to synthesize dual-doped graphene and its use as high-performance electrocatalyst. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3(1): 3499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yan J, Ye W, Jian Z, et al. Enhanced sulfate and metal removal by reduced graphene oxide self-assembled Enterococcus avium sulfate-reducing bacteria particles. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 266: 447–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kalathil S, Katuri K P, Alazmi A S, et al. Bioinspired synthesis of reduced graphene oxide-wrapped Geobacter sulfurreducens as a hybrid electrocatalyst for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Chemistry of Materials, 2019, 31(10): 3686–3693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu Y, Zhong L, Tang L, et al. Extracellular electron transfer leading to the biological mediated production of reduced graphene oxide. Chemosphere, 2020, 256: 127141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Akhavan O, Ghaderi E. Escherichia coli bacteria reduce graphene oxide to bactericidal graphene in a self-limiting manner. Carbon, 2012, 50(5): 1853–1860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao H, Zhang C, Wang Y, et al. Self-damaging aerobic reduction of graphene oxide by Escherichia coli: role of GO-mediated extracellular superoxide formation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(21): 12783–12791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gurunathan S, Han J W, Eppakayala V, et al. Microbial reduction of graphene oxide by Escherichia coli: a green chemistry approach. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2013, 102: 772–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gurunathan S, Han J W, Eppakayala V, et al. An environmentally friendly approach to the reduction of graphene oxide by Escherichia fergusoni. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2013, 13(3): 2091–2098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vargas C, Simarro R, Reina J A, et al. New approach for biological synthesis of reduced graphene oxide. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 151: 107331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chouhan R S, Pandey A, Qureshi A, et al. Nanomaterial resistant microorganism mediated reduction of graphene oxide. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2016, 146: 39–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Boutchich M, Jaffré A, Alamarguy D, et al. Characterization of graphene oxide reduced through chemical and biological processes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2013, 433: 012001

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Utkan G, Ozturk T, Duygulu O, et al. Microbial reduction of graphene oxide by Lactobacillus plantarum. International Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2019, 15(2): 127–136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fan M, Zhu C, Feng Z Q, et al. Preparation of N-doped graphene by reduction of graphene oxide with mixed microbial system and its haemocompatibility. Nanoscale, 2014, 6(9): 4882–4888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen Y, Niu Y, Tian T, et al. Microbial reduction of graphene oxide by Azotobacter chroococcum. Chemical Physics Letters, 2017, 677: 143–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Akhavan O. Bacteriorhodopsin as a superior substitute for hydrazine in chemical reduction of single-layer graphene oxide sheets. Carbon, 2015, 81: 158–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jiao Y, Qian F, Li Y, et al. Deciphering the electron transport pathway for graphene oxide reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Journal of Bacteriology, 2011, 193(14): 3662–3665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu T, Jiang L L, He M F, et al. Green synthesis of reduced graphene oxide by a GRAS strain Bacillus subtilis 168 with high biocompatibility to zebrafish embryos. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(74): 60024–60032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Khanra P, Kuila T, Kim N H, et al. Simultaneous biofunctionalization and reduction of graphene oxide by baker’s yeast. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 183: 526–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Nandgaonkar A G, Wang Q, Fu K, et al. A one-pot biosynthesis of reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/bacterial cellulose (BC) nanocomposites. Green Chemistry, 2014, 16(6): 3195–3201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Choudhary P, Das S K. Bio-reduced graphene oxide as a nanoscale antimicrobial coating for medical devices. ACS Omega, 2019, 4(1): 387–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Muthoosamy K, Bai R G, Abubakar I B, et al. Exceedingly biocompatible and thin-layered reduced graphene oxide nanosheets using an eco-friendly mushroom extract strategy. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2015, 10: 1505–1519

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Gurunathan S, Han J, Park J H, et al. An in vitro evaluation of graphene oxide reduced by Ganoderma spp. in human breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231). International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2014, 9: 1783–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ahmad S, Ahmad A, Khan S, et al. Algal extracts based biogenic synthesis of reduced graphene oxides (rGO) with enhanced heavy metals adsorption capability. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2019, 72: 117–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Han M, Xu B, Zhang M, et al. Preparation of biologically reduced graphene oxide-based aerogel and its application in dye adsorption. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 783: 147028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Xu B, Cheng S, Han M, et al. The characteristic and performance of reduced graphene oxide by marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. CF10-13. Ceramics International, 2020, 46(13): 21699–21706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang W, Mi J L, Shen Q C, et al. Shewanella oneidensis assisted biosynthesis of Pd/reductive-graphene-oxide nanocomposites for oxygen reduction reaction. ChemistrySelect, 2020, 5(11): 3179–3186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Raveendran S, Chauhan N, Nakajima Y, et al. Ecofriendly route for the synthesis of highly conductive graphene using extremophiles for green electronics and bioscience. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 2013, 30(7): 573–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Gurunathan S, Han J W, Eppakayala V, et al. Biocompatibility of microbially reduced graphene oxide in primary mouse embryonic fibroblast cells. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2013, 105: 58–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Gurunathan S, Han J W, Eppakayala V, et al. Green synthesis of graphene and its cytotoxic effects in human breast cancer cells. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2013, 8(1): 1015–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rathinam N K, Berchmans S, Sani R K, et al. Rewiring the microbe-electrode interfaces with biologically reduced graphene oxide for improved bioelectrocatalysis. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 256: 195–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gao W. Chapter 3: The chemistry of graphene oxide. In: Gao W, ed. Graphene Oxide: Reduction Recipes, Spectroscopy, and Applications. Switzerland: Springer, 2015, 61–95

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Tanizawa Y, Okamoto Y, Tsuzuki K, et al. Microorganism mediated synthesis of reduced graphene oxide films. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2012, 352: 012011

    Google Scholar 

  57. Khanna P, Kaur A, Goyal D. Algae-based metallic nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and applications. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2019, 163: 105656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu S, Wang L, Tian J, et al. Aniline as a dispersing and stabilizing agent for reduced graphene oxide and its subsequent decoration with Ag nanoparticles for enzymeless hydrogen peroxide detection. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2011, 363(2): 615–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Logan B E, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, et al. Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(17): 5181–5192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Tay Z H Y, Ng F L, Ling T C, et al. The use of marine microalgae in microbial fuel cells, photosynthetic microbial fuel cells and biophotovoltaic platforms for bioelectricity generation. 3 Biotech, 2022, 12(7): 148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Gajda I, Greenman J, Melhuish C, et al. Self-sustainable electricity production from algae grown in a microbial fuel cell system. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2015, 82: 87–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Ng F L, Phang S M, Thong C H, et al. Integration of bioelectricity generation from algal biophotovoltaic (BPV) devices with remediation of palm oil mill effluent (POME) as substrate for algal growth. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2021, 21: 101280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Sonawane J M, Yadav A, Ghosh P C, et al. Recent advances in the development and utilization of modern anode materials for high performance microbial fuel cells. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 2017, 90: 558–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Wey L T, Bombelli P, Chen X, et al. The development of biophotovoltaic systems for power generation and biological analysis. ChemElectroChem, 2019, 6(21): 5375–5386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Li S, Cheng C, Thomas A. Carbon-based microbial-fuel-cell electrodes: from conductive supports to active catalysts. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(8): 1602547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Periasamy V, Jaafar M M, Chandrasekaran K, et al. Langmuir-Blodgett graphene-based films for algal biophotovoltaic fuel cells. Nanomaterials, 2022, 12(5): 840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Habte A T, Ayele D W. Synthesis and characterization of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) started from graphene oxide (GO) using the tour method with different parameters. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 2019: 5058163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Yuan Y, Zhou S, Zhao B, et al. Microbially-reduced graphene scaffolds to facilitate extracellular electron transfer in microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 116: 453–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhu W H, Gao H X, Li P, et al. The interaction between microbes and electrodes decorated with bio-reduced graphene oxide — from an electrochemical point of view. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2021, 96(1): 172–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Goto Y, Yoshida N, Umeyama Y, et al. Enhancement of electricity production by graphene oxide in soil microbial fuel cells and plant microbial fuel cells. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2015, 3(42): 42

    Google Scholar 

  71. Paul D, Noori M T, Rajesh P P, et al. Modification of carbon felt anode with graphene oxide-zeolite composite for enhancing the performance of microbial fuel cell. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2018, 26: 77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Ng F L, Jaafar M M, Phang S M, et al. Reduced graphene oxide anodes for potential application in algae biophotovoltaic platforms. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4(1): 7562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Zhuang L, Yuan Y, Yang G, et al. In situ formation of graphene/biofilm composites for enhanced oxygen reduction in biocathode microbial fuel cells. Electrochemistry Communications, 2012, 21: 69–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Chen J, Hu Y, Huang W, et al. Enhanced electricity generation for biocathode microbial fuel cell by in situ microbial-induced reduction of graphene oxide and polarity reversion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(17): 12574–12582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Chen J, Hu Y, Tan X, et al. Enhanced performance of microbial fuel cell with in situ preparing dual graphene modified bioelectrode. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 241: 735–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Song T S, Jin Y, Bao J, et al. Graphene/biofilm composites for enhancement of hexavalent chromium reduction and electricity production in a biocathode microbial fuel cell. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 317: 73–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Yoshida N, Miyata Y, Doi K, et al. Graphene oxide-dependent growth and self-aggregation into a hydrogel complex of exoelectrogenic bacteria. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 21867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Yoshida N, Goto Y, Miyata Y. Selective growth of and electricity production by marine exoelectrogenic bacteria in self-aggregated hydrogel of microbially reduced graphene oxide. C — Journal of Carbon Research, 2016, 2(2): 15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Yoshida N, Miyata Y, Mugita A, et al. Electricity recovery from municipal sewage wastewater using a hydrogel complex composed of microbially reduced graphene oxide and sludge. Materials, 2016, 9(9): 742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Goto Y, Yoshida N. Microbially reduced graphene oxide shows efficient electricity ecovery from artificial dialysis wastewater. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 2017, 63(3): 165–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Ng F L, Phang S M, Periasamy V, et al. Algal biophotovoltaic (BPV) device for generation of bioelectricity using Synechococcus elongatus (Cyanophyta). Journal of Applied Phycology, 2018, 30(6): 2981–2988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Yong Y C, Yu Y Y, Zhang X, et al. Highly active bidirectional electron transfer by a self-assembled electroactive reduced-graphene-oxide-hybridized biofilm. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 2014, 53(17): 4480–4483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Huang L, Regan J M, Quan X. Electron transfer mechanisms, new applications, and performance of biocathode microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(1): 316–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Chen J, Hu Y, Huang W, et al. Biodegradation of oxytetracycline and electricity generation in microbial fuel cell with in situ dual graphene modified bioelectrode. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 270: 482–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Gnana kumar G, Awan Z, Suk Nahm K, et al. Nanotubular MnO2/graphene oxide composites for the application of open air-breathing cathode microbial fuel cells. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2014, 53: 528–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Yu J, Huang H, Bian F, et al. Supercritical CO2-fluid-assisted synthesis of TiO2 quantum dots/reduced graphene oxide composites for outstanding sodium storage capability. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2018, 1(12): 7213–7219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Yu J, Huang H, Gan Y, et al. A new strategy for the construction of 3D TiO2 nanowires/reduced graphene oxide for highperformance lithium/sodium batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2018, 6(47): 24256–24266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhong Y, Xia X, Deng S, et al. Popcorn inspired porous macrocellular carbon: rapid puffing fabrication from rice and its applications in lithium-sulfur batteries. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(1): 1701110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Zhu W, Huang H, Gan Y, et al. Mesoporous cobalt monoxide nanorods grown on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets with high lithium storage performance. Electrochimica Acta, 2014, 138: 376–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Kumar R, Singh R K, Vaz A R, et al. Self-assembled and one-step synthesis of interconnected 3D network of Fe3O4/reduced graphene oxide nanosheets hybrid for high-performance supercapacitor electrode. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(10): 8880–8890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Bian F, Yu J, Song W, et al. A new magnesium hydride route to synthesize morphology-controlled Si/rGO nanocomposite towards high-performance lithium storage. Electrochimica Acta, 2020, 330: 135248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia via Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) [FRGS/1/2022/STG01/UM/03/2][FP064-2022], Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under the Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE) Programme [IOES-2014F], UM Innovate Fund [PPSI-2020-HICOE-03] and the Research University Grant, Universiti Malaya [RU003-2022].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fong-Lee Ng or Siew-Moi Phang.

Additional information

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tee, JY., Ng, FL., Keng, F.SL. et al. Microbial reduction of graphene oxide and its application in microbial fuel cells and biophotovoltaics. Front. Mater. Sci. 17, 230642 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-023-0642-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-023-0642-z

Keywords

Navigation