Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate sequences that are established at lower magnetic field strengths for lumbar spine imaging at 7 Tesla (7 T) MR imaging.
Materials and methods
The lumbar spine of five healthy volunteers and a patient with spina bifida and meningocele were evaluated at 7 T. The examination included a T2-TSE (turbo spin echo), a 3D-DESS (double-echo steady-state sequence), a 3D-CISS (constructive interference in steady-state sequence), and a 3D-VIBE (volumetric interpolated breath hold examination) sequence. Imaging quality was evaluated by two raters on a three-level scale. The assessment included visualization of intraforaminal structures, the cauda equina, facet joints, and any abnormalities. Contrast ratios for intervertebral discs/vertebral bodies, vertebral bodies/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and CSF/spinal cord were calculated.
Results
The 3D-VIBE sequence provided best differentiation between intraforaminal structures. Visualization of the facet joints was reliable with VIBE, DESS, and CISS. Individual nerve roots of the cauda equina could only be delineated with the 3D-CISS sequence. CISS and DESS provided good contrast between vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs. Contrast between CSF and vertebral bodies was most pronounced for the T2-TSE sequence. Sufficient contrast between CSF and the spinal cord was only achieved with the T2-TSE sequence. VIBE and DESS sequences demonstrated best the bony malformations. Visualization of the meningocele was only possible with the 3D-CISS sequence.
Conclusion
At 7 T most structures of the lumbar spine were visualized with a combination of sequences. At present, imaging quality is not superior to 1.5 T or 3 T, precluding routine clinical use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schmidt GP, Wintersperger B, Graser A, Baur-Melnyk A, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:449–59.
Reul J, Gievers B, Weis J, Thron A. Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography. Neuroradiology. 1995;37:187–91.
Kraff O, Bitz AK, Kruszona S, Orzada S, Schaefer LC, Theysohn JM, et al. An eight-channel phased array RF coil for spine MR imaging at 7 T. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:734–40.
Wu B, Wang C, Krug R, Kelley DA, Xu D, Pang Y et al. 7T human spine imaging arrays with adjustable inductive decoupling. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010;57:397–403
Vossen M, Teeuwisse W, Reijnierse M, Collins CM, Smith NB and Webb AG. A radiofrequency coil configuration for imaging the human vertebral column at 7 T. J Magn Reson 2011;208:291–297
Gorres G, Mader I, Proske M. Subjective and objective image qualities: a comparison of sagittal T2 weighted spin-echo and Turbo-spin-echo sequences in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine by use of a subjective ranking system. Rontgenpraxis. 1998;51:258–65.
Ramli N, Cooper A, Jaspan T. High resolution CISS imaging of the spine. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:862–73.
Rosahl SK, Kassem O, Piepgras U, Hellwig D, Samii M. High-resolution constructive interference in steady-state imaging in tethered cord syndrome: technical note. Surg Neurol. 2005;63:372–4.
Muhle C, Ahn JM, Biederer J, Schafer FK, Frahm CH, Mohr A, et al. MR imaging of the neural foramina of the cervical spine. Comparison of 3D-DESS and 3D-FISP sequences. Acta Radiol. 2002;43:96–100.
Shen J, Wang HY, Chen JY, Liang BL. Morphologic analysis of normal human lumbar dorsal root ganglion by 3D MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:2098–103.
Kim KW, Chung JW, Park JB, Song SW, Ha KY, An HS. The course of the nerve root in the neural foramen and its relationship with foraminal entrapment or impingement in adult patients with lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis and radicular pain. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17:220–5.
Van de Moortele PF, Akgun C, Adriany G, Moeller S, Ritter J, Collins CM, et al. B(1) destructive interferences and spatial phase patterns at 7 T with a head transceiver array coil. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1503–18.
Van Gelderen P, de Zwart JA, Starewicz P, Hinks RS, Duyn JH. Real-time shimming to compensate for respiration-induced B0 fluctuations. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57:362–8.
Thomson V, Pialat JB, Gay F, Coulon A, Voloch A, Granier A, et al. Whole-body MRI for metastases screening: a preliminary study using 3D VIBE sequences with automatic subtraction between noncontrast and contrast enhanced images. Am J Clin Oncol. 2008;31:285–92.
Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, Pollack MA, Krinsky GA, Thomasson D, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology. 1999;212:876–84.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grams, A.E., Kraff, O., Umutlu, L. et al. MRI of the lumbar spine at 7 Tesla in healthy volunteers and a patient with congenital malformations. Skeletal Radiol 41, 509–514 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1197-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1197-0