Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access April 5, 2022

Calculation method of stability bearing capacity of transmission tower angle steel considering semi-rigid constraint

  • Feng Qiu , Junxia Qiu EMAIL logo , Heng Feng , Huajie Wang , Hongliang Qian , Xiaofei Jin , Kaiyuan Wang and Feng Fan

Abstract

The angle steel member is the most commonly used component form of the transmission tower structure. Considering its connection characteristics, we must deal with its stability analysis under semi-rigid constraint conditions for the proper study of the overall structure’s mechanical performance. Therefore, in order to establish a simple and high-precision method suitable for the ultimate bearing capacity analysis of the transmission tower, we build the refined finite element models of typical steel tower joints, analyze its moment-rotation curve and utilize simulation technique of spring elements to acquire the calculation method of its single angle stability bearing capacity, which is considering initial imperfection and residual stress. Furthermore, we analyze its bearing capacity under different constraint conditions such as rigid, semi-rigid and articulated connection. The results show that it is necessary to consider joint stiffness in the bearing capacity analyses. Finally, it’s confirmed that the calculation results of this method agree well with the experimental data, which validates its high accuracy. Therefore, the method provides technical support for high efficient component stability simulation in overall stability analyses of the transmission steel tower.

References

[1] McCarthy P, Melsness M. Severe weather elements associated with September 5, 1996 hydro tower failures near Grosse Isle. Manitoba, Canada: Manitoba Environmental Service Centre, Environment Canada; 1996. p. 21.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Qiang X, Zhang J. Experimental study on failure modes and retrofitting method of latticed transmission tower. Eng Struct. 2021;226:111365.10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111365Search in Google Scholar

[3] Dempsey D, White HB. Winds wreak havoc on lines. Transmission and Distribution World. 1996;48(6):32–7.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Albermani F, Kitipornchai S. Numerical simulation of structural behaviour of transmission towers. Thin-walled Struct. 2003;41(2):167–77.10.1016/S0263-8231(02)00085-XSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Albermani F, Mahendran M, Kitipornchai S. Upgrading of transmission towers using a diaphragm bracing system. Eng Struct. 2004;26(6):735–44.10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.01.004Search in Google Scholar

[6] Kitipornchai S, Albermani F, Kang WJ, Lam HF. Some practical aspects of modeling lattice towers. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures. 25 Jun 13-15; Shanghai, China. 2005;1:369-375.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Albermani F, Kitipornchai S, Chan RW. Failure analysis of transmission towers. Eng Fail Anal. 2009;16(6):1922–8.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kennedy JB, Madugula MK. Buckling of Steel Angle and Tee Struts. J Struct Div. 1972;98(11):2507–22.10.1061/JSDEAG.0003378Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bathon L, Mueller WH 3rd, Kempner L Jr. Ultimate Load Capacity of Single Steel Angles. J Struct Eng. 1993;119(1):279–300.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:1(279)Search in Google Scholar

[10] Liu Y, Chantel S. Experimental study of steel single unequal-leg angles under eccentric compression. J Construct Steel Res. 2011;67(6):919–28.10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.02.005Search in Google Scholar

[11] Cao K, Guo YJ, Zeng DW. Buckling behavior of large-section and 420 MPa high-strength angle steel columns. J Construct Steel Res. 2015;111:11–20.10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.03.014Search in Google Scholar

[12] Usami T, Galambos TV. On the Strength of Restrained Single Angle Columns Under Biaxial Bending. Papers and Reports of Japanese Society of Civil Engineering. 1971;191(191):31–44.10.2208/jscej1969.1971.191_31Search in Google Scholar

[13] Roy S, Fang SJ, Rossow EC. Secondary stresses on transmission tower structures. J Energy Eng. 1984;110(2):157–72.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1984)110:2(157)Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ke K, Xiong YH, Yam MC, Lam AC, Chung KF. Shear lag effect on ultimate tensile capacity of high strength steel angles. J Construct Steel Res. 2018;145:300–14.10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.02.015Search in Google Scholar

[15] Kettler M, Taras A, Unterweger H. Member capacity of bolted steel angles in compression–Influence of realistic end supports. J Construct Steel Res. 2017;130:22–35.10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.11.021Search in Google Scholar

[16] Temple MC, Sakla SS. Single-angle compression members welded by one leg to a gusset plate. I. Experimental study. Can J Civ Eng. 1997;25(3):569–84.10.1139/l97-116Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kishi N, Chen WF. Moment-rotation semi-rigid connections, Structural Engineering Report No. CE-STR-87-29. School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. 1987.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Zhao N. Study on load-bearing performances of semi-rigid joints and structure nonlinear analysis of UHV transmission tower [dissertation]. Chongqing: Chongqing University; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Zhou R, Guo XN, Luo YF, Shen ZY. The research on bearing capacity of single angle struts with one-sided connection. In: Liu XL, editor.Proceeding of the Thirteenth National Symposium on Modern Structural Engineering. Tianjin, China.2013:864-870.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-09-07
Accepted: 2022-02-11
Published Online: 2022-04-05

© 2022 Feng Qiu et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 10.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cls-2022-0017/html
Scroll to top button