Assessing the Influence of Different Comorbidities Indexes on the Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in a Developing Country

Gustavo Machado Teixeira; Henrique Bittencourt; Antonio Vaz de Macedo; Glaucia Helena Martinho; Enrico Antônio Colosimo; Suely Meireles Rezende

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137390

Abstract

Although the application of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) has enabled better prediction of transplant-related mortality (TRM) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (AHSCT), data from developing countries are scarce. This study prospectively evaluated the HCT-CI and the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation (ACE-27), in its original and in a modified version, as predictors of post-transplant complications in adults undergoing a first related or unrelated AHSCT in Brazil. Both bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) as graft sources were included. We analyzed the cumulative incidence of granulocyte and platelet recovery, sinusoidal obstructive syndrome, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, relapse and transplant-related mortality, and rates of event-free survival and overall survival. Ninety-nine patients were assessed. Median age was 38 years (18–65 years); HCT-CI ≥ 3 accounted for only 8% of cases; hematologic malignancies comprised 75.8% of the indications for AHSCT. There was no association between the HCT-CI or the original or modified ACE-27 with TRM or any other studied outcomes after AHSCT. These results show that, in the population studied, none of the comorbidity indexes seem to be associated with AHSCT outcomes. A significantly low frequency of high-risk (HCT-CI ≥ 3) in this Brazilian population might justify these results.

Citation: Teixeira GM, Bittencourt H, de Macedo AV, Martinho GH, Colosimo EA, Rezende SM (2015) Assessing the Influence of Different Comorbidities Indexes on the Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in a Developing Country. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0137390. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137390

Editor: Senthilnathan Palaniyandi, University of Kentucky, UNITED STATES

Received: June 22, 2015; Accepted: August 17, 2015; Published: September 22, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Teixeira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: Due to ethical restrictions set by the Ethics and Research Committee at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, data are available by request. Interested researchers may request access to the data (“Avaliação do impacto da presença de comorbidades nos desfechos clínicos do transplante alogênico de celulas Tronco hematopoéticas – n° 0437-06”) from coep@prpq.ufmg.br.

Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a potentially curative treatment option for different hematological malignancies and non-malignant diseases [1]. Modifications in immunosuppressive therapies, improvements in clinical supportive care, and introduction of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have led to an increased indication of transplant to patients who were otherwise not previously eligible for AHSCT with a myeloablative conditioning regimen (MA), such as the elderly [2]. Nevertheless, AHSCT continues to have a significant morbimortality rate [3].

Three main factors influence mortality and survival rates after AHSCT: the primary disease per se, donor type, and patient-related factors, such as the presence of comorbidities [2].

Comorbidity indexes have been developed to evaluate the impact of these comorbidities on different clinical situations, including cancer and HSCT [4–7] Charlson’s Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation (ACE-27) are valuable tools in predicting mortality in cancer patients [4,6] However, CCI has shown a low sensitivity for this purpose in AHSCT [7,8]. In an attempt to improve the assessment of the comorbidity risk profile in AHSCT patients, the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) was developed [7,9] The HCT-CI included a larger number of pre-transplant comorbidities compared to CCI and provided a better predictability of transplant-related mortality (TRM) and overall survival (OS) [7,9]. The HCT-CI has been validated in several developed countries as a TRM and OS predictor [9–15] However, not all studies have confirmed its predictive value for TRM [16–18].

In developing countries, data on the impact of comorbidities on AHSCT outcomes remain scarce. Three studies investigated the incidence of comorbidities and their effects on transplant-related mortality in developing countries [12,19,20]. However, these studies had retrospective design and they did not draw any definitive conclusion. Therefore, we aimed at evaluating, in a prospective study, the HCT-CI and the ACE-27 indexes as predictors of AHSCT complications in a Brazilian HSCT unit.

Materials and Methods

Study

A prospective cohort study was conducted in the HSCT Unit of Hospital das Clínicas at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The inclusion period ranged from March 1^st, 2008 to March 31^st, 2013. The study was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee, and all patients included signed an informed consent form.

Patients

Patients with hematologic malignancies and non-malignant diseases, aged ≥ 18 years, and undergoing a first related or unrelated AHSCT were considered eligible. Transplants using umbilical cord blood (UCBHSC) as graft source (n = 1 during the study period) were excluded.

Variables

Primary diseases included hematologic malignancies (acute leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, primary myelofibrosis, lymphomas, myelodysplastic syndrome, and unspecified myeloproliferative disorders) and non-malignant diseases (aplastic anemia, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, Fanconi anemia, and congenital dyskeratosis). For malignant disorders, a modification of the neoplastic disease /disease status index (DR/DS) was used [21], which allowed for stratification of the hematologic malignancies into two categories: low/intermediate and high/very high risk.

Information on patients’ comorbidities was obtained by direct interviews with the patient and/or corresponding family members, and by consulting laboratory, radiological, echocardiogram, electrocardiogram and pulmonary function tests that had constituted the pre-AHSCT work-up. Furthermore, additional data were obtained from medical records, when needed. Patients were stratified according to their scores on the HCT-CI [7] and ACE-27 [6]. The next step was to create a modified version of the original ACE-27 by excluding hematologic malignancies as a classification criterion.

AHSCT was defined as “related” when the donor comprised a family member, and “unrelated”, when the donor was a volunteer enrolled in national or international registries. Graft source included: bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells (BMHSC) and peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell (PBHSC).

Conditioning regimens were classified according to the definitions from the National Marrow Donor Program and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [22, 23] and grouped into: (i) myeloablative conditioning regimens (MA), when a total busulfan (BU) (oral formulation) dose of ≥ 9 mg/kg and/or intravenous melphalan (MEL) dose of ≥ 140 mg/m² were used; (ii) Reduced intensity regimens (RIC) included busulfan-melphalan, busulfan-fludarabine, cyclophosphamide alone, and fludarabine-cyclophosphamide combinations.

Alemtuzumab, combined with the conditioning regimen, was used in all unrelated AHSCT patients and in related AHSCT cases of polytransfused aplastic anemia (≥ 10 prior blood transfusions), as well as for patients aged ≥ 45 years with myelodysplasia, acute leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia or myelofibrosis.

Outcomes

Outcomes evaluating recovery of hematopoiesis were granulocyte recovery (GR) and platelet recovery (PR), defined as the first of three consecutive days with neutrophil counts above 500 cells/mm³ and the first of seven consecutive days with platelet counts ≥ 20,000/mm³ with no need for platelet transfusion, respectively. Diagnosis of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) was based on the clinical criteria proposed by the Seattle group [24] Diagnosis and classification of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were based on the criteria proposed by Glucksberg et al. For this analysis, only acute GVHD grade II to IV were considered [25]. For chronic GVHD, diagnosis was based on the criteria proposed by the National Institutes of Health [26].

Relapse was considered as follows: (i) in acute leukemia, presence of > 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate and/or immunophenotyping; (ii) in lymphomas, recurrence of lymphadenopathy and/or lymphoid organ infiltration, with a histopathological confirmatory diagnosis; (iii) in myelofibrosis, resurgence of hepatosplenomegaly, and bone marrow trephine biopsy showing fibrosis, and (iv) in chronic myeloid leukemia, molecular relapse through presence of increasing levels of the BCR-ABL fusion gene by quantitative real time PCR. Cytogenetic relapse was defined by the reappearance of t(9;22) in post-transplant cytogenetic assessments.

Transplant-related mortality (TRM) was defined as the cumulative incidence (CI) of death associated with AHSCT complications rather than recurrence of primary disease within a period of two years after AHSCT. Event-free survival (EFS) was the probability of being alive and without relapse within two years after transplant, whereas OS was the probability of being alive in the first two years after AHSCT.

Statistical analysis

Description of variables included frequency (n) and percentages, for categorical variables, and median, minimum and maximum values, for continuous variables. EFS and OS probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test for comparisons between groups. The data were censored at the time of death or up to the last contact date according to medical records. We used Gray’s model in the analysis of incidence of competing events, whereby death was considered as a competitive event in the analysis of platelet and granulocyte recovery, SOS development, acute and chronic GVHD, and relapse. In the analysis of the cumulative incidence of TRM, relapse was considered as a competing event. The hazard ratio (HR) was estimated with a confidence interval of 95% (CI 95%). The multivariate analysis of EFS and OS used Cox’s regression model, while the multivariate analysis of competing events for other outcomes was performed using the Fine and Gray method. The following variables were used in the univariate analysis: HCT-CI, ACE-27, modified ACE-27, primary disease, donor type, graft source, conditioning regimen, and use of alemtuzumab. In the assessment of relapse, the DR/DS index was also used. In multivariate analysis, the HCT-CI and the ACE-27 and modified ACE-27 indexes were included, as well as the variables that had presented a p value ≤ 0.3 in univariate analysis. All statistical models were analyzed using the Easy R software [27].

Results

Patients

A total of 108 adult patients underwent an AHSCT during the study’s recruitment period. Of these, 9 patients did not consent to participate. Thus, 99 patients were included in the study. Males comprised 60.6% (n = 60). The median age at transplantation was 38 years (range, 18 to 65 years), and patients aged ≥ 50 years represented 22.3% of the total. Hematologic malignancies accounted for 75.8% of all cases (n = 75). Other demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Download:

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137390.t001

Recovery of hematopoiesis

Cumulative incidence of granulocyte recovery (GR) at 30 days was 84.8%, with a median time of 19 days (range, 9 to 35 days). The cumulative incidence of platelet recovery (PR) was 80.8% at 180 days, with a median time of 20 days (range, 9 to 110 days). None of the comorbidity indexes, HCT-CI, ACE-27 and modified ACE-27, influenced GR or PR (Table 2).

Download:

Table 2. Results of multivariate analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137390.t002

Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome

The cumulative incidence of SOS at 30 days was 18.2%, with a median time of 10.5 days (range, 0 to 17 days). In the univariate analysis, only the presence of a hematologic malignancy (22.7% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.04) and use of a MA regimen (25.5% vs 9.1%, p = 0.04) were associated with an increase in the incidence of SOS. Multivariate analysis did not confirm the influence of these variables on the incidence of SOS. Similarly, the HCT-CI, ACE-27 and modified ACE-27 did not affect the incidence of SOS (Table 2).

Graft-versus-host disease

The cumulative incidence of acute grade II-IV GVHD at 100 days was 28.3%, with a median time of 23 days (range, 12 to 100 days). In the univariate analysis, only the presence of a hematologic malignancy (34.7% versus 8.3%, p = 0.01) and a higher ACE-27 index (7.6%, 5.0%, 36.8% and 39.5% for an ACE-27 index of 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively, p = 0.02) showed an association with the incidence of acute GVHD. In the multivariate analysis, the HCT-CI, ACE-27, modified ACE-27, hematologic malignancy, use of alemtuzumab, and unrelated AHSCT were not risk factors for the development of acute GVHD (Table 2).

The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at two years was 31.4% in 70 patients at risk, with a median time to onset of 179 days (range, 59 to 351 days). In the univariate analysis, ACE-27 (p = 0.004), graft source (p = 0.05), primary disease (p = 0.01) and type of conditioning regimen (p <0.001) were associated with chronic GVHD. Neither the HCT-CI or the ACE-27 showed any association with the incidence of chronic GVHD in multivariate analysis. Use of RIC was the only variable associated with a lower incidence of chronic GVHD (HR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.53; p = 0.002).

Relapse

The cumulative incidence of relapse at two years was 37.9%, with a median time of 0.4 year (range, 0.1 to 1.9 years). In the univariate analysis, only high/very high DR/DS (50.1% versus 30.4%; p = 0.02) was associated with incidence of relapse. This was confirmed in the multivariate model (HR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.06–4.48; p = 0.03). None of the three comorbidity indexes studied had any influence on the relapse rate (Table 2).

Transplant-related mortality

The cumulative incidence of TRM at two years was 37.4%, with a median of 0.6 year (range, 0 to 2 years). Causes of death were infection (n = 23), SOS (n = 6) and acute GVHD (n = 7). Through univariate analysis, only the ACE-27 index was associated with TRM, where score 0, 1, 2 and 3 presented an incidence of 29.4%, 30.0%, 15.5% and 48.8%, respectively (p = 0.04). In the multivariate analysis, none of the studied variables were predictive for TRM (Table 2).

Event-free and overall survival

EFS at two years was 43.2%, with a median time of 0.6 year (range, 0.2 to 5.5 years). In univariate analysis, type of primary disease (33.0% for hematologic malignancies versus 75.0% for non-malignant diseases, p < 0.001), graft source (37.1% for PBHSCT versus 59.3% for BMHSCT; p = 0.03), type of conditioning regimen (34.0% for MA versus 50.0% for RIC; p = 0.02) and ACE-27 (64.7%, 65.0%, 52.6% and 20.3% for score 0, 1, 2 and 3, respectively; p < 0.001) influenced EFS. In the multivariate analysis, only the presence of a hematologic malignancy was predictive for EFS (HR = 3.68; 95% CI = 1.43–9.47; p = 0.006). None of the comorbidity indexes influenced EFS in the multivariate analysis (Table 2).

The OS at two years was 41.3%, with a median of 0.9 year (range, 0.5 to 5.5 years). In the univariate analysis, primary disease (p = 0.001) and ACE-27 (p < 0.001) influenced OS, which was not confirmed in multivariate analysis (Table 2).

Discussion

This study evaluated the presence and relevance of comorbidities as predictors for complications related to AHSCT using HCT-CI, ACE-27, and modified ACE-27 indexes. We did not show any association between these comorbidity indexes and any of the post-transplant clinical outcomes studied.

Sorror et al [7], in a large retrospective single-center study of 1,055 patients, and Raimondi et al [13], in a prospective multi-center study with 1,937 patients, confirmed the predictive value of the HCT-CI on TRM and OS. Both studies included patients with malignant and non-malignant hematologic diseases who underwent related or unrelated HSCT, and neither of them included UCBHSC as graft source. Unlike these studies, we could not confirm this predictive value for TRM and OS. Nevertheless, there are important differences between our study population and those of the above mentioned studies, such as: (i) a younger population in our study (median age of 38 years compared to 44.8 years and 47 years in the studies by Sorror et al and Raimondi et al, respectively); (ii) a significantly lower proportion of patients classified as HCT-CI ≥ 3 in our study (8% compared to 28% in Sorror et al and 19% in Raimondi et al); (iii) a higher proportion of non-malignant hematologic diseases in our study (24.0% versus 3.0% in Sorror’s study and 4.9% in Raimondi’s study) and (iv) a significantly lower proportion of unrelated AHSCT in our study (11%), since, in the studies by Sorror et al, and Raimondi et al., these accounted for 42% and 50.5% of cases, respectively [7,13].

Likewise, a few other studies did not confirm the predictive value of the HCT-CI on AHSCT clinical outcomes [16,18]. Birninger et al, in a retrospective single-center study of 340 patients (adults and children) with acute myeloid leukemia, did not report any influence of the HCT-CI on TRM and OS [16]. However, when comparing the Birninger study population and that of the present study, major differences were found, especially regarding the proportion of hematologic malignancy (100% versus 75.8%), age (median 53 versus 38 years), and the percentage of patients with HCT-CI ≥3 (74% vs 8%), respectively. In another single-center prospective study of 187 patients undergoing related and unrelated AHSCT for hematologic diseases, the predictive value of the HCT-CI for TRM and OS was also not confirmed [18]. Some of the characteristics of this study were similar to ours, such as median age (39 years) and proportion of patients with hematologic malignancy (79%). However, there was a greater use of BMHSC (72.0% versus 27.3%) and a larger proportion of patients with HCT-CI ≥ 3 (55% versus 8%) in the study by Guilfoyle et al [18] when compared to our study.

With regard to other outcomes, a retrospective study of 2,985 patients who had undergone related or unrelated AHSCT showed that the HCT-CI was an independent risk factor for the development of acute GVHD, especially of its severe forms (grade III-IV) [28]. In our study, we did not find an association between the HCT-CI and the incidence of acute GVHD (II-IV), although there are differences between the population in our study when compared to that of Sorror et al [18], such as a lower proportion of patients aged ≥ 50 years (22.3% versus 38.0%), lower proportion of unrelated AHSCT (11% versus 45%), and lower proportion of patients classified as HCT-CI ≥ 3 (8% versus 37%), respectively. It is noteworthy, however, that we did not evaluate the association between the HCT-CI and the severity of acute GVHD, because of the small number of patients who developed severe forms (n = 7). Sorror’s study did not use alemtuzumab, whereas the use of this medication in a significant number of patients in our study may have contributed to the reduced incidence of severe forms of acute GVHD observed.

ACE-27, a comorbidity index developed for cancer patients, did not show to be a good predictor of transplant-related complications, since it includes hematologic malignancies among its scoring criteria. Even the modified ACE-27 index, which excludes hematologic malignancies from its criteria, did not prove to be of much benefit when used in the AHSCT setting, as it contains comorbidities that are rarely found in patients who are candidates for this therapeutic modality, such as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, congestive heart failure, and severe dementia.

The use of RIC regimens in our study was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of chronic GVHD amongst patients at risk for this complication. This difference is also likely a result of a significant number of patients who were transplanted with a non-malignant disease, an increased use of alemtuzumab, and the use of BMHSC as graft source in the RIC group. Potter et al. and Marsh et al. reported that the use of alemtuzumab in RIC regimens results in a low incidence of chronic GVHD [29,30]. As to the type of graft source, two meta-analysis studies have suggested that use of PBHSC as a cell source is a risk factor for the development of chronic GVHD, when compared to the use of bone marrow [31,32].

The DR/DS index, as expected, was associated with the incidence of relapse, where patients classified as high/very high risk showed a high incidence of this outcome, which is in accordance with the previous publication by Armand et al [21].

There are some important limitations of this study which are worth mentioning, such as its single-center nature and the small number of patients who were classified as HCT-CI ≥ 3. The lower proportion of patients stratified as HCT-CI ≥ 3 is probably a result of the use of stricter selection criteria for the indication of this procedure by the transplant team and/or the fact that, in Brazil, there is still a waiting list for AHSCT, which may account for the selection of “fitter” patients for transplant. On the other hand, our study is highly significant in that it has a prospective design and targets a particularly underrepresented population in the literature: that of the developing countries.

Conclusion

We have shown that in the population studied, we did not confirm the predictive value of the HCT-CI for the different AHSCT-related outcomes. Furthermore, the original ACE-27 and its modified index are not adequate tools for use in the AHSCT setting, mainly because they either include hematologic malignancies in their criteria or encompass comorbidities that are rarely found in transplant candidates.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GMT HB AVM GHM EAC SMR. Performed the experiments: GMT HB AVM GHM EAC SMR. Analyzed the data: GMT HB AVM GHM EAC SMR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GMT HB AVM GHM EAC SMR. Wrote the paper: GMT HB AVM GHM SMR.

References

1. Horowitiz MM. Uses and growth of hematopoietic cell transplantation. In: Blume KG, Forman SJ, Appelbaum FR (eds). Thomas' Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Stem Cell Transplantation. 4ª ed. Edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Malden, MA, USA, 2009, pp 15–21.
2. Xhaard A, Porcher R, Chien JW, Latour RP, Robin M, Ribaud P, et al. Impact of comorbidity indexes on non-relapse mortality. Leukemia, 2008; 22(11): 2062–9. pmid:18685612
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Gooley TA, Chien JW, Pergam SA, Hingorani S, Sorror ML, Boeckh M, et al. Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med, 2010; 363(22): 2091–101. pmid:21105791
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40(5): 373–83. pmid:3558716
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Charlson ME, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47(11): 1245–51. pmid:7722560
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Piccirillo JF, Spitznagel EL Jr, Vermani N, Costas I, Schnitzler M. Comparison of comorbidity indexes for patients with head and neck cancer. Med Care 2004; 42(5): 482–6. pmid:15083109
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood, 2005; 106(8): 2912–9. pmid:15994282
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storer B, Sandmaier BM, Diaconescu R, Flowers C, et al. Comparing morbidity and mortality of HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative and myeloablative conditioning: influence of pretransplant comorbidities. Blood 2004; 104(4): 961–8. pmid:15113759
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Sorror ML, Giralt S, Sandmaier BM, De Lima M, Shahjahan M, Maloney DG, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation specific comorbidity index as an outcome predictor for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: combined FHCRC and MDACC experiences. Blood 2007; 110(13): 4606–13. pmid:17873123
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Barba P, Piñana JL, Martino R, Valcárcel D, Amorós A, Sureda A, et al. Comparison of two pre transplant predictive models and a flexible HCT-CI using different cut off points to determine low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups: the flexible HCT-CI is the best predictor of NRM and OS in a population of patients undergoing allo-RIC. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 413–20. pmid:19922807
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Lim ZY, Ingram W, Brand R, Ho A, Kenyon M, Devereux S, et al. Impact of pretransplant comorbidities on alemtuzumab-based reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and AML. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45(4): 633–9. pmid:19767782
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Mo XD, Xu LP, Liu DH, Zhang XH, Chen H, Chen YH, et al. The hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) is an outcome predictor for partially matched related donor transplantation. Am J Hematol 2013; 88(6): 497–502. pmid:23536204
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Raimondi R, Tosetto A, Oneto R, Cavazzina R, Rodeghiero F, Bacigalupo A, et al. Validation of the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index: a prospective, multicenter GITMO study. Blood 2012; 120(6): 1327–33. pmid:22740454
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Smith AR, Majhail NS, MacMillan ML, DeFor TE, Jodele S, Lehmann LE, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index predicts transplantation outcomes in pediatric patients. Blood 2011; 117(9): 2728–34. pmid:21228326
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Wood W, Deal A, Whitley J, Sharf A, Serody J, Gabriel D, et al. Usefulness of the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) in predicting outcomes for adolescents and young adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant. Pediatr blood cancer 2011; 57(3); 499–505. pmid:21384538
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Birninger N, Bornhäuser M, Schaich M, Ehninger G, Schetelig J. The hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index fails to predict outcomes in high-risk AML patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation-investigation of potential limitations of the index. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17(12): 1822–32. pmid:21708108
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Bokhari SW, Watson L, Nagra S, Cook M, Byrne JL, Craddock C, et al. Role of HCT-comorbidity index, age and disease status at transplantation in predicting survival and non-relapse mortality in patients with myelodysplasia and leukemia undergoing reduced-intensity-conditioning hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47(4): 528–534. pmid:21743502
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Guilfoyle R, Demers A, Bredeson C, Richardson E, Rubinger M, Szwajcer D, et al. Performance status, but not the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI), predicts mortality at a Canadian transplant center. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43(2): 133–139. pmid:18762762
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Macedo AV, Teixeira GM, Ferreira GGP, Amaral LC, Soares PA, Vieira MDB, et al. Avaliação de comorbidades e do nível sócio-econômico em transplante de células-tronco hematopoéticas—Dados Preliminares. Rev Bras Hematol e Hemoter 2009; 31 (suppl 3) S87 (abstract 166).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Colella MP, Miranda ECM, Aranha FJP, Fernandes-Junior VCA, Medina SM, De Souza CA, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) as a tool to predict non relapse mortality after allogeneic high dose conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2011; 33 (suppl 1) S84 (abstract 174).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Armand P, Gibson CJ, Cutler C, Ho VT, Koreth J, Alyea EP, et al. A disease risk index for patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2012; 120(4): 905–13. pmid:22709687
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Giralt S, Lazarus H, Ho V, et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15(12): 1628–33. pmid:19896087
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Giralt S, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Bacigalupo A, Horowitz M, Pasquini M, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen workshop: defining the dose spectrum. Report of a workshop convened by the center for international blood and marrow transplant research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15(3): 367–69. pmid:19203728
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Mcdonald GB, Sharma P, Matthews DE, Shulman HM, Thomas ED. Venocclusive disease of the liver after bone marrow transplantation: diagnosis, incidence, and predisposing factors. Hepatology 1984; 4(1): 116–22. pmid:6363247
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA, et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation 1974; 18: 295–304. pmid:4153799
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11: 945–56. pmid:16338616
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 452–8. pmid:23208313
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Sorror ML, Martin PJ, Storb RF, Bhatia S, Maziarz RT, Pulsipher MA, et al. Pre-transplant comorbidities predict severity of acute graft-versus-host disease and subsequent mortality. Blood 2014; 124(2): 287–95 pmid:24797298
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Potter VT, Krishnamurthy P, Barber LD, Lim Z, Kenyon M, Ireland RM, et al. Long-term outcomes of alemtuzumab-based reduced-intensity conditioned hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20: 111–7. pmid:24216184
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Marsh JC, Gupta V, Lim Z, Ho AY, Ireland RM, Hayden J, et al. Alemtuzumab with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide reduces chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acquired aplastic anemia. Blood 2011; 118: 2351–57. pmid:21518925
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Chang YJ, Weng CL, Sun LX, Zhao YT. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared to peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: a meta-analysis based on time-to-event data from randomized controlled trials. Ann Hematol 2012; 91: 427–37. pmid:21789620
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Zhang H, Chen J, Que W. Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Leuk Res 2012; 36: 431–37. pmid:22050904
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Horowitiz MM. Uses and growth of hematopoietic cell transplantation. In: Blume KG, Forman SJ, Appelbaum FR (eds). Thomas' Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Stem Cell Transplantation. 4ª ed. Edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Malden, MA, USA, 2009, pp 15–21.

[ref2] 2. Xhaard A, Porcher R, Chien JW, Latour RP, Robin M, Ribaud P, et al. Impact of comorbidity indexes on non-relapse mortality. Leukemia, 2008; 22(11): 2062–9. pmid:18685612
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] PubMed/NCBI

[5] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Gooley TA, Chien JW, Pergam SA, Hingorani S, Sorror ML, Boeckh M, et al. Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med, 2010; 363(22): 2091–101. pmid:21105791
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] PubMed/NCBI

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40(5): 373–83. pmid:3558716
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Charlson ME, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47(11): 1245–51. pmid:7722560
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Piccirillo JF, Spitznagel EL Jr, Vermani N, Costas I, Schnitzler M. Comparison of comorbidity indexes for patients with head and neck cancer. Med Care 2004; 42(5): 482–6. pmid:15083109
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood, 2005; 106(8): 2912–9. pmid:15994282
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storer B, Sandmaier BM, Diaconescu R, Flowers C, et al. Comparing morbidity and mortality of HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative and myeloablative conditioning: influence of pretransplant comorbidities. Blood 2004; 104(4): 961–8. pmid:15113759
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Sorror ML, Giralt S, Sandmaier BM, De Lima M, Shahjahan M, Maloney DG, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation specific comorbidity index as an outcome predictor for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: combined FHCRC and MDACC experiences. Blood 2007; 110(13): 4606–13. pmid:17873123
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Barba P, Piñana JL, Martino R, Valcárcel D, Amorós A, Sureda A, et al. Comparison of two pre transplant predictive models and a flexible HCT-CI using different cut off points to determine low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups: the flexible HCT-CI is the best predictor of NRM and OS in a population of patients undergoing allo-RIC. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 413–20. pmid:19922807
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Lim ZY, Ingram W, Brand R, Ho A, Kenyon M, Devereux S, et al. Impact of pretransplant comorbidities on alemtuzumab-based reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and AML. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45(4): 633–9. pmid:19767782
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Mo XD, Xu LP, Liu DH, Zhang XH, Chen H, Chen YH, et al. The hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) is an outcome predictor for partially matched related donor transplantation. Am J Hematol 2013; 88(6): 497–502. pmid:23536204
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Raimondi R, Tosetto A, Oneto R, Cavazzina R, Rodeghiero F, Bacigalupo A, et al. Validation of the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index: a prospective, multicenter GITMO study. Blood 2012; 120(6): 1327–33. pmid:22740454
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Smith AR, Majhail NS, MacMillan ML, DeFor TE, Jodele S, Lehmann LE, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index predicts transplantation outcomes in pediatric patients. Blood 2011; 117(9): 2728–34. pmid:21228326
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Wood W, Deal A, Whitley J, Sharf A, Serody J, Gabriel D, et al. Usefulness of the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) in predicting outcomes for adolescents and young adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant. Pediatr blood cancer 2011; 57(3); 499–505. pmid:21384538
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Birninger N, Bornhäuser M, Schaich M, Ehninger G, Schetelig J. The hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index fails to predict outcomes in high-risk AML patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation-investigation of potential limitations of the index. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17(12): 1822–32. pmid:21708108
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Bokhari SW, Watson L, Nagra S, Cook M, Byrne JL, Craddock C, et al. Role of HCT-comorbidity index, age and disease status at transplantation in predicting survival and non-relapse mortality in patients with myelodysplasia and leukemia undergoing reduced-intensity-conditioning hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47(4): 528–534. pmid:21743502
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Guilfoyle R, Demers A, Bredeson C, Richardson E, Rubinger M, Szwajcer D, et al. Performance status, but not the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI), predicts mortality at a Canadian transplant center. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43(2): 133–139. pmid:18762762
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Macedo AV, Teixeira GM, Ferreira GGP, Amaral LC, Soares PA, Vieira MDB, et al. Avaliação de comorbidades e do nível sócio-econômico em transplante de células-tronco hematopoéticas—Dados Preliminares. Rev Bras Hematol e Hemoter 2009; 31 (suppl 3) S87 (abstract 166).
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Colella MP, Miranda ECM, Aranha FJP, Fernandes-Junior VCA, Medina SM, De Souza CA, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) as a tool to predict non relapse mortality after allogeneic high dose conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2011; 33 (suppl 1) S84 (abstract 174).
View Article
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Armand P, Gibson CJ, Cutler C, Ho VT, Koreth J, Alyea EP, et al. A disease risk index for patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2012; 120(4): 905–13. pmid:22709687
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Giralt S, Lazarus H, Ho V, et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15(12): 1628–33. pmid:19896087
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Giralt S, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Bacigalupo A, Horowitz M, Pasquini M, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen workshop: defining the dose spectrum. Report of a workshop convened by the center for international blood and marrow transplant research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15(3): 367–69. pmid:19203728
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Mcdonald GB, Sharma P, Matthews DE, Shulman HM, Thomas ED. Venocclusive disease of the liver after bone marrow transplantation: diagnosis, incidence, and predisposing factors. Hepatology 1984; 4(1): 116–22. pmid:6363247
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA, et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation 1974; 18: 295–304. pmid:4153799
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11: 945–56. pmid:16338616
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 452–8. pmid:23208313
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Sorror ML, Martin PJ, Storb RF, Bhatia S, Maziarz RT, Pulsipher MA, et al. Pre-transplant comorbidities predict severity of acute graft-versus-host disease and subsequent mortality. Blood 2014; 124(2): 287–95 pmid:24797298
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Potter VT, Krishnamurthy P, Barber LD, Lim Z, Kenyon M, Ireland RM, et al. Long-term outcomes of alemtuzumab-based reduced-intensity conditioned hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20: 111–7. pmid:24216184
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Marsh JC, Gupta V, Lim Z, Ho AY, Ireland RM, Hayden J, et al. Alemtuzumab with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide reduces chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acquired aplastic anemia. Blood 2011; 118: 2351–57. pmid:21518925
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Chang YJ, Weng CL, Sun LX, Zhao YT. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared to peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: a meta-analysis based on time-to-event data from randomized controlled trials. Ann Hematol 2012; 91: 427–37. pmid:21789620
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Zhang H, Chen J, Que W. Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Leuk Res 2012; 36: 431–37. pmid:22050904
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Study

Patients

Variables

Outcomes

Statistical analysis

Results

Patients

Recovery of hematopoiesis

Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome

Graft-versus-host disease

Relapse

Transplant-related mortality

Event-free and overall survival

Discussion

Conclusion

Author Contributions

References