Skip to main content
Log in

Proposal for a modification of the UVI risk scale

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The standardisation of UV information to the public through the UV Index (UVI) has been hugely beneficial since its endorsement by multiple international agencies more than 10 years ago. It has now gained widespread acceptance, and UVI values are available throughout the world from satellite instruments, ground-based measurements, and from forecasts based on model calculations. These have been useful for atmospheric scientists, health professionals (skin and eye specialists), and the general public. But the descriptors and health messages associated with the UVI scale are targeted towards European skin types and UV regimes, and are not directly applicable to the population living closer to the equator, especially for those in the high-altitude Altiplano region of South America. This document arose from discussions at the Latin American Society of Photobiology and Photomedicine’s Congress, which was held in Arequipa, Peru, in November 2013. A major outcome of the meeting was the Arequipa Accord, which is intended as a unifying document to ensure co-ordination of UV and health research decisions in Latin America. A plank of that agreement was the need to tailor the UVI scale to make it more relevant to the region and its population. Here we make some suggestions to improve the international applicability of the UVI scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. B. Liley and R. L. McKenzie, Where on Earth has the highest UV? in UV Radiation and its Effects: an update, RSNZ Miscellaneous Series, Dunedin, 2006, vol. 68, pp. 36–37 (https://www.niwa.co.nz/sites/default/files/import/attachments/Liley_2.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. R. Cordero, G. Seckmeyer, A. Damiani, S. Riechelmann, J. Rayas, F. Labbe and D. Laroze, World’s highest levels of surface UV: a case study, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2014, 13, 70–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Cede, E. Luccini, L. Nuñez, R. D. Piacentini and M. Blumthaler, Monitoring of erythemal irradiance in the Argentina ultraviolet network, J. Geophys. Res., 2002, 107D13, 4165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. T. Pfeifer, P. Koepke and J. Reuder, Effects of altitude and aerosol on UV radiation, J. Geophys. Res., 2006, 111.

    Google Scholar 

  5. WHO, Global solar UV Index: A practical guide, World Health Organisation (WHO), World Meteorological Organisation (WMO), United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), and International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNRP), Geneva, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. CIESEN/SEDAC, Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University; and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). 2005. Gridded Population of the World Version 3 (GPWv3): Population Grids. Palisades, NY: Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Columbia University. Available at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw (21 Dec 2013). 2013.

  7. A. F. McKinlay and B. L. Diffey, A reference action spectrum for ultra-violet induced erythema in human skin, in Human Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation: Risks and Regulations, ed. W. F. Passchier and B. F. M. Bosnajakovic, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987, pp. 83–87.

  8. D. Black, A. D. Pozo, J. M. Lagarde and Y. Gall, Seasonal variability in the biophysical properties of stratum corneum from different anatomical sites, Skin Res. Technol., 2000, 6, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. M. Elias, Stratum corneum defensive functions: an integrated view., J. Invest. Dermatol., 2005, 125, 183–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. N. G. Jablonski and G. Chaplin, The evolution of human skin colouring, J. Hum. Evol., 2000, 39, 57–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Allinson, M. Asmuss, C. Baldermann, J. Bentzen, D. Buller, N. Gerber, A. C. Green, R. Greinert, M. Kimlin, J. Kunrath, R. Matthes, C. Pölzl-Viol, E. Rehfuess, C. Rossmann, N. Schüz, C. Sinclair, E. V. Deventer, A. Webb, W. Weiss and G. Ziegelberger, Validity and use of the UV Index: Report from the UVI Working Group, Schloss Hohenkammer, Germany, 5–7 December 2011, Health Phys., 2012, 103, 301–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. H. Relethford, Hemispheric differences in human skin color, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1997, 104, 449–457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. T. B. Fitzpatrick, The validity and practicality of Sun-reactive skin types I through VI, Arch. Dermatol., 1988, 124, 869–871.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. L. McKenzie, K. J. Paulin and M. Kotkamp, Erythemal UV irradiances at Lauder, New Zealand: relationship between horizontal and normal incidence, Photochem. Photobiol., 1997, 66, 683–689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Vernez, A. Milon, L. Vuilleumier, J.-L. Bulliard, A. Koechlin, M. Boniol and J. F. Dore, A general model to predict individual exposure to solar UV irradiance by using ambient data, J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol., 2014, DOI: 10.1038/jes.2014.6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Seckmeyer, M. Schrempf, A. Wieczorek, S. Riechelmann, K. Graw, S. Seckmeyer and M. Zankl, A novel method to calculate solar UV exposure relevant for the vitamin D production in humans, Photochem. Photobiol., 2013, 89, 974–983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard L. McKenzie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zaratti, F., Piacentini, R.D., Guillén, H.A. et al. Proposal for a modification of the UVI risk scale. Photochem Photobiol Sci 13, 980–985 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4pp00006d

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c4pp00006d

Navigation