Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health-Related Quality of Life and Paid Work Participation after Duodenal Switch

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Morbid obesity can reduce the health-related quality of life (HRQL) and paid work participation, and the duodenal switch (DS) can induce large weight loss in patients suffering from this disease. However, data about HRQL combined with paid work participation after duodenal switch are lacking. The aim of this study was to provide longitudinal data of these issues.

Methods

Fifty-one consecutive morbidly obese patients accepted for DS gave their informed consent to participate in the study. Mean age was 37.7 years (SD, 8.0), and 54.9% were women. HRQL was assessed using the “Short-Form 36 Health Status Survey”. Eight subscores, the physical component summary (PCS), and the mental component summary (MCS) were calculated. Paid-work participation was assessed as performing or not performing paid work. Data were assessed before DS (T0), 1 year after DS (T1), and 2 years after DS (T2).

Results

All the SF-36 scores improved significantly from T0 to T1 and T2 (p < 0.001), when they were in the normal range compared to the population norm. The number of patients performing paid work increased from 28 (54.9%) at T0 to 34 (66.7%) at T2, p = 0.031. The patients who performed paid work had significantly better PCS and MCS scores than those who did not before, but not after, DS.

Conclusion

Our data indicate that the SF-36 scores of the patients were normalized after DS. A marked improvement in the paid work participation was also observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fontaine KR, Barofsky I. Obesity and health-related quality of life. Obes Rev. 2001;2:173–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Neovius K, Johansson K, Rossner S, et al. Disability pension, employment and obesity status: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2008;9:572–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. European Ministerial Conference On Counteracting Obesity. Copenhagen, 2006. (Accessed 05.12. 2008, at http://www.euro.who.int/Document/NUT/Instanbul_conf_edoc06.pdf.)

  4. Karlsson J, Taft C, Ryden A, et al. Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conventional treatment for severe obesity: the SOS intervention study. Int J Obes. 2007;31:1248–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner AJ, Fabry JM Jr, Thirlby RC. Return to work after gastric bypass in Medicaid-funded morbidly obese patients. Arch Surg. 2007;142:935–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hawkins SC, Osborne A, Finlay IG, et al. Paid work increases and state benefit claims decrease after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2007;17:434–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Velcu LM, Adolphine R, Mourelo R, et al. Weight loss, quality of life and employment status after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5-year analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:413–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15:408–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weinera S, Sauerland S, Weiner RA, et al. Quality of life after bariatric surgery—is there a difference? Chir Gastroenterol. 2005;21:34–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perez N, Baltasar A, Serra C, et al. Comparative analysis of vertical banded gastroplasty and duodenal switch at five years follow-up. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1061–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marceau P, Biron S, Hould FS, et al. Duodenal switch: long-term results. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1421–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cramer JA, Spilker B. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics an introduction. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273:59–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual & interpretation guide. 2nd ed. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Loge JH, Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, et al. Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1069–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ware JE, Kosinksi M. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a manual for users of version 1. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simon GE, Revicki DA, Grothaus L, et al. SF-36 summary scores: are physical and mental health truly distinct? Med Care. 1998;36:567–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Loge JH, Kaasa S. Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey: normative data from the general Norwegian population. Scand J Soc Med. 1998;26:250–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Statistics Norway. Work statistics. (Accessed 02.03. 2009, at http://www.ssb.no/arbeid/.)

  20. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pinheiro J, Bates D. Mixed effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barnett AG, van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:215–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adami GF, Ramberti G, Weiss A, et al. Quality of life in obese subjects following biliopancreatic diversion. Behav Med. 2005;31:53–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Choban PS, Onyejekwe J, Burge JC, et al. A health status assessment of the impact of weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for clinically severe obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:491–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carmichael AR, Sue-Ling HM, Johnston D. Quality of life after the Magenstrasse and Mill procedure for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2001;11:708–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dixon JB, Dixon ME, O'Brien PE. Quality of life after lap-band placement: influence of time, weight loss, and comorbidities. Obes Res. 2001;9:713–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ulset E, Undheim R, Malterud K. Has the obesity epidemic reached Norway? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007;127:34–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Doll HA, Petersen SE, Stewart-Brown SL. Obesity and physical and emotional well-being: associations between body mass index, chronic illness, and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 questionnaire. Obes Res. 2000;8:160–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fine JT, Colditz GA, Coakley EH, et al. A prospective study of weight change and health-related quality of life in women. JAMA. 1999;282:2136–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Zwaan M, Lancaster KL, Mitchell JE, et al. Health-related quality of life in morbidly obese patients: effect of gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2002;12:773–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Våge V, Solhaug JH, Viste A, Bergsholm P, et al. Anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life after jejunoileal bypass: a 25-year follow-up study of 20 female patients. Obes Surg. 2003;13:706–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Biron S, Hould FS, Lebel S, et al. Twenty years of biliopancreatic diversion: what is the goal of the surgery? Obes Surg. 2004;14:160–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Näslund E, Melin I, Gryback P, et al. Reduced food intake after jejunoileal bypass: a possible association with prolonged gastric emptying and altered gut hormone patterns. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:26–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ogden J, Clemeti C, Aylwin S. The impact of obesity surgery and the paradox of control: a qualitative study. Psychol Health. 2006;21:273–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Marceau P, Cabanac M, Frankham PC, et al. Accelerated satiation after duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:408–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jiang Y, Hesser JE. Associations between health-related quality of life and demographics and health risks. Results from Rhode Island's 2002 behavioral risk factor survey. Health Qual Life Outcome. 2006;4:14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from Sogn and Fjordane University College, Norway. We are grateful for the statistical assistance provided by statistician Tore Wentzel-Larsen (Centre for Clinical Research, Western Norway Regional Health Authority). The authors also acknowledge the patients who participated in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Roger Andersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roger Andersen, J., Aasprang, A., Bergsholm, P. et al. Health-Related Quality of Life and Paid Work Participation after Duodenal Switch. OBES SURG 20, 340–345 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9837-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9837-3

Keywords

Navigation