Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Constructing Graphs in Biology Class: Secondary Biology Teachers’ Beliefs, Motivation, and Self-Reported Practices

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been a growing awareness that graphing is an essential part of the science curriculum. While much research has focused on student conceptions and abilities regarding graphical representations, only few studies have investigated what teachers think about them and how they use graphs in science class. The purpose of this study is to explore educational beliefs, motivation, and teaching practices of German secondary biology teachers regarding graph construction. Via questionnaire surveys, 71 teachers from different regions in Germany rated their beliefs and motivation as well as the frequency of different graph construction activities in biology class. The teachers surveyed in this study were quite motivated in their teaching of graph construction. Furthermore, they tended to believe that graph construction should be practiced explicitly in biology class and that students should learn clear strategies for constructing graphs. We found that teaching subjects and own research experience make a difference in teachers’ beliefs and motivation regarding graph construction in biology class. The self-report on classroom practices revealed that participants may provide limited opportunities for students to experience graphing as a social and iterative practice. Implications are drawn for teacher education and professional development as well as for further research in teacher education contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33(2/3), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akyol, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., & Traynor, A. (2012). Modeling the interrelationships among pre-service science teachers’ understanding and acceptance of evolution, their views on nature of science and self-efficacy beliefs regarding teaching evolution. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(8), 937–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9296-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alger, C. L. (2009). Secondary teachers' conceptual metaphors of teaching and learning: Changes over the career span. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 743–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (2000). An exploratory study of teachers' beliefs regarding the implementation of constructivism in their classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C. A., & Smith, P. (1994). Assessing students' abilities to construct and interpret line graphs: Disparities between multiple-choice and free-response instruments. Science Education, 78(6), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boote, S. K. (2014). Assessing and understanding line graph interpretations using a scoring rubric of organized cited factors. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9318-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Data and graph interpretation practices among preservice science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1063–1088. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslyn, W., & McGinnis, J. R. (2012). A comparison of exemplary biology, chemistry, earth science, and physics teachers' conceptions and enactment of inquiry. Science Education, 96(1), 48–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, L. A. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: Examining a prospective elementary teacher's belief system about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 835–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. M., Scott, S. M., & Stevens, J. D. (2018). Technology as a tool in teaching quantitative biology at the secondary and undergraduate levels: A review. Letters in Biomathematics, 5(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/23737867.2017.1413432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. M., McTigue, E. M., & Smolkin, L. B. (2011). Elementary teachers’ use of graphical representations in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 613–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9204-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (1999). Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 9(4), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00051-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam, B. (2012). Teaching, learning, and visual literacy: The dual role of visual representation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam, B., Poyas, Y., & Hashimshoni, R. (2014). Representing visually: What teachers know and what they prefer. In B. Eilam & J. K. Gilbert (Eds.), Models and modeling in science education. Science teachers’ use of visual representations (pp. 53–83). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.

  • Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, A., Dawson, V., & Hackling, M. (2013). Examining the beliefs and practices of four effective Australian primary science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 981–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9297-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2008). What do teachers believe?: Developing a framework for examining beliefs about teachers' knowledge and ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 134–176.

  • Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/749671.

  • Glazer, N. (2011). Challenges with graph interpretation: A review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.605307.

  • Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, J. J., Lumpe, A. T., Czerniak, C. M., & Egan, V. (2002). From beliefs to actions: The beliefs and actions of teachers implementing change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers' epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattikudur, S., Prather, R. W., Asquith, P., Alibali, M. W., Knuth, E. J., & Nathan, M. (2012). Constructing graphical representations: Middle schoolers' intuitions and developing knowledge about slope and y-intercept. School Science and Mathematics, 112(4), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00138.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203259930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, P. (2013). Evolution is a model: Why not teach it that way? In D. F. Treagust & C.-Y. Tsui (Eds.), Multiple representations in biological education (pp. 129–145). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, Z., Bumbacher, E. W., Chung, A. M., Kim, H., Litton, C., Walter, A. D., . . . Riedel-Kruse, I. H. (2016). Interactive and scalable biology cloud experimentation for scientific inquiry and education. Nature Biotechnology, 34(12), 1293–1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3747.

  • Irez, S. (2006). Are we prepared? An assessment of preservice science teacher educators' beliefs about nature of science. Science Education, 90(6), 1113–1143. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067–1104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205–226.

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Understanding charts and graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 185–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199711)34:9<949::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-U.

  • Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. Gilbert (Ed.), Models and modeling in science education (Visualization in science education) (Vol. 1, pp. 121–145). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

  • Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105–143. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0902_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B. (2004). Making sense of graphs: Does metacognitive instruction make a difference on students' mathematical conceptions and alternative conceptions? Learning and Instruction, 14(6), 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.09.003.

  • Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040001281.

  • Kultusministerkonferenz [KMK]. (2005). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss [Educational standards in biology for lower secondary education]. Berlin, Germany: Luchterhand.

  • Kunter, M., Tsai, Y.-M., Klusmann, U., Brunner, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2008). Students' and mathematics teachers' perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 468–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K., Cabrera, J., Vitale, J. M., Madhok, J., Tinker, R., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Measuring graph comprehension, critique, and construction in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 665–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060001001.

  • Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives of discourses of science (pp. 87–111). New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Levitt, K. E. (2002). An analysis of elementary teachers' beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318–1347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucero, M., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2012). Teachers' beliefs and self-reported use of inquiry in science education in public primary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1407–1423. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.704430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690121307.

  • Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38–63.

  • Lunsford, E., Melear, C. T., Roth, W.-M., Perkins, M., & Hickok, L. G. (2007). Proliferation of inscriptions and transformations among preservice science teachers engaged in authentic science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 538–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. L., Schunn, C. D., & Schuchardt, A. M. (2018). Improving conceptual understanding and representation skills through Excel-based modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9706-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(1), 25–48.

  • Martı́nez, M. A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. L. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 965–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElvany, N., Schroeder, S., Baumert, J., Schnotz, W., Horz, H., & Ullrich, M. (2012). Cognitively demanding learning materials with texts and instructional pictures: Teachers’ diagnostic skills, pedagogical beliefs and motivation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0078-1.

  • Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (1997). From verbal descriptions to graphic representations: Stability and change in students' alternative conceptions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(3), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002965907987.

  • Morrison, J., & McDuffie, A. R. (2009). Connecting science and mathematics: Using inquiry investigations to learn about data collection, analysis, and display. School Science and Mathematics, 109(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb17860.x.

  • Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitz, S., Ainsworth, S. E., Nerdel, C., & Prechtl, H. (2014). Do student perceptions of teaching predict the development of representational competence and biological knowledge? Learning and Instruction, 31, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.003.

  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozel, M., & Luft, J. A. (2013). Beginning secondary science teachers' conceptualization and enactment of inquiry-based instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 113(6), 308–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patahuddin, S. M., & Lowrie, T. (2019). Examining teachers’ knowledge of line graph task: A case of travel task. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(4), 781–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9893-z.

  • Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2010). Toward a social practice perspective on the work of reading inscriptions in science texts. Reading Psychology, 31(3), 228–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710903256361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York, NY: Macmillan.

  • Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1997). Graphing: Cognitive ability or practice? Science Education, 81(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199701)81:1<91::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-X.

  • Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068001035.

  • Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 977–1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199911)36:9<977::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-V.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

  • Schroeder, S., Richter, T., McElvany, N., Hachfeld, A., Baumert, J., Schnotz, W., . . . Ullrich, M. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs, instructional behaviors, and students’ engagement in learning from texts with instructional pictures. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.001.

  • Schultheis, E. H., & Kjelvik, M. K. (2015). Data nuggets: Bringing real data into the classroom to unearth students' quantitative & inquiry skills. The American Biology Teacher, 77(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2015.77.1.4.

  • Shah, P., & Hoeffner, J. (2002). Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013180410169.

  • Stodolsky, S. S., & Grossman, P. L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032002227.

  • Szyjka, S., Mumba, F., & Wise, K. C. (2011). Cognitive and attitudinal predictors related to line graphing achievement among elementary pre-service teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9207-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tairab, H. H., & Khalaf Al-Naqbi, A. K. (2004). How do secondary school science students interpret and construct scientific graphs? Journal of Biological Education, 38(3), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K.-S., & Moje, E. B. (2010). Relating multimodal representations to the literacies of science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9158-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Macmillan.

  • Treagust, D., & Tsui, C.-Y. (Eds.). (2013). Multiple representations in biological education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

  • Tsai, C.-C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers' beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771–783.

  • Tsai, C.-C. (2007). Teachers' scientific epistemological views: The coherence with instruction and students' views. Science Education, 91(2), 222–243.

  • Verjovsky, J., & Waldegg, G. (2005). Analyzing beliefs and practices of a Mexican high school biology teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 465–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Kotzebue, L., Gerstl, M., & Nerdel, C. (2015). Common mistakes in the construction of diagrams in biological contexts. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9419-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Kunter, M., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 249–271). Boston, MA: Springer US.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N.-H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936–960. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20032.

  • Wang, Z. H., Wei, S., Ding, W., Chen, X., Wang, X., & Hu, K. (2012). Students' cognitive reasoning of graphs: Characteristics and progression. International Journal of Science Education, 34(13), 2015–2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.709333.

  • Wavering, M. J. (1989). Logical reasoning necessary to make line graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(5), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.-K., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006a). Exploring middle school students' use of inscriptions in project-based science classrooms. Science Education, 90(5), 852–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.-K., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006b). Inscriptional practices in two inquiry-based classrooms: A case study of seventh graders' use of data tables and graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20092.

  • Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, J., Levy, E., Tversky, B., & Schiano, D. (2002). Graphs in print. In M. Anderson, B. Meyer, & P. Olivier (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and reasoning (pp. 187–206). London, NY: Springer.

  • Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany

    Carolin Enzingmüller

  2. University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

    Helmut Prechtl

Authors
  1. Carolin Enzingmüller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helmut Prechtl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolin Enzingmüller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Enzingmüller, C., Prechtl, H. Constructing Graphs in Biology Class: Secondary Biology Teachers’ Beliefs, Motivation, and Self-Reported Practices. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 1–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09975-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09975-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation