Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS): first analysis on survival

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Investigating oncological outcomes in patients registered in the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) in terms of biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) by the Phoenix and the newly developed J-POPS definitions, exploration of predictive factors for bRFS, and preliminary verification of pitfalls of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure definitions.

Methods

Between July 2005 and June 2007, 2316 clinically localized patients underwent permanent seed implantation. The primary endpoint was bRFS. One of the secondary endpoints was overall survival (OS).

Results

The median age was 69 and performance status was 0 in 99.1% of participants. The median biologically effective dose (BED) was about 180 Gy2. During a median follow-up of 60.0 months, 8.4 and 5.9% had PSA failure by the Phoenix and the J-POPS definitions, respectively. The 5-year bRFSs based on the Phoenix and the J-POPS definitions were 89.1 and 91.6%, respectively. The 5-year OS was 97.3%. According to multivariate analyses, only age affected bRFS based on the Phoenix definition, whereas the risk group and BED independently affected bRFS based on the J-POPS definition. A spontaneous PSA decrease was seen in 91.1% of participants after PSA failure based on the Phoenix definition alone, but in only 22.2% after PSA failure based on the J-POPS definition alone.

Conclusion

The world’s largest registration study, J-POPS, consisted of patients with longevity, and a highly quality-controlled BED resulted in excellent bRFS and OS. The high likelihood of PSA bounce by the Phoenix definition should be taken into account, especially in younger patients.

Clinical trial information

NCT00534196.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2012) Prostate cancer. Estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. Globocan 2012. Available via DIALOG. http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx. Accessed April 2016

  2. Ito K (2014) Prostate cancer in Asian men. Nat Rev Urol 11:197–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grimm P, Billiet I, Bostwick D et al (2012) Comparative analysis of prostate-specific antigen free survival outcomes for patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treatment by radical therapy. Results from the Prostate Cancer Results Study Group. BJU Int 109(Suppl 1):22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peinemann F, Grouven U, Bartel C et al (2011) Permanent interstitial low-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer: a systematic review of randomised and nonrandomised controlled clinical trials. Eur Urol 60:881–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stone NN, Stock RG (2007) Long-term urinary, sexual, and rectal morbidity in patients treated with iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy followed up for a minimum of 5 years. Urology 69:338–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Waterman FM, Dicker AP (2003) Probability of late rectal morbidity in 125I prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:342–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saito S, Ito K, Yorozu A et al (2015) Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS). Int J Clin Oncol 20:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stock RG, Stone NN, Cesaretti JA et al (2006) Rosenstein BS. Biologically effective dose values for prostate brachytherapy: effects on PSA failure and posttreatment biopsy results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64:527–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roach M III, Hanks G, Thames H Jr et al (2006) Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:965–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thames H, Kuban D, Levy L et al (2003) Comparison of alternative biochemical failure definitions based on clinical outcome in 4839 prostate cancer patients treated by external beam radiotherapy between 1986 and 1995. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:929–943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Crook J, Gillan C, Yeung I et al (2007) PSA kinetics and PSA bounce following permanent seed prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:426–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mazeron R, Bajard A, Montbarbon X et al (2012) Permanent 125I-seed prostate brachytherapy: early prostate specific antigen value as a predictor of PSA bounce occurrence. Radiat Oncol 7:46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zwahlen DR, Smith R, Andrianopoulos N et al (2011) Prostate-specific antigen bounce after permanent iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy—an Australian analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:179–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Satoh T, Ishiyama H, Matsumoto K et al (2009) Prostate-specific antigen ‘bounce’ after permanent 125I-implant brachytherapy in Japanese men: a multi-institutional pooled analysis. BJU Int 103:1064–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McGrath SD, Antonucci JV, Fitch DL et al (2010) PSA bounce after prostate brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation. Brachytherapy 9:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson A, Keyes M, Pickles T et al (2010) Evaluating the Phoenix definition of biochemical failure after (125)I prostate brachytherapy: Can PSA kinetics distinguish PSA failures from PSA bounces? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Amico AV, Manola J, Loffredo M et al (2004) 6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 292:821–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D’Amico AV1, Chen MH, Renshaw AA et al (2008) Androgen suppression and radiation vs radiation alone for prostate cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 299:289–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Critz FA, Levinson AK, Williams WH et al (1997) The PSA nadir that indicates potential cure after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Urology 49:668–672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pickles T, Kim-Sing C, Morris WJ et al (2003) Evaluation of the Houston biochemical relapse definition in men treated with prolonged neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen ablation and assessment of follow-up lead-time bias. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stone NN, Stock RG, Cesaretti JA et al (2010) Local control following permanent prostate brachytherapy: effect of high biologically effective dose on biopsy results and oncologic outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ho AY, Burri RJ, Cesaretti JA et al (2009) Radiation dose predicts for biochemical control in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:16–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stone NN, Potters L, Davis BJ et al (2009) Multicenter analysis of effect of high biologic effective dose on biochemical failure and survival outcomes in patients with Gleason score 7–10 prostate cancer treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:341–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohashi T, Yorozu A, Saito S et al (2015) Urinary and rectal toxicity profiles after permanent iodine-125 implant brachytherapy in Japanese men: nationwide J-POPS multi-institutional prospective cohort study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 93:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nakano M, Yorozu A, Saito S et al (2015) Seed migration after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy by using loose seeds: Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) multi-institutional cohort study. Radiat Oncol 10:228. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0532-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Miki K, Kiba T, Sasaki H et al (2010) Transperineal prostate brachytherapy, using I-125 seed with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation, in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: study protocol for a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Cancer 10:572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Konaka H, Egawa S, Saito S et al (2012) Tri-modality therapy with I-125 brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and short- or long-term hormone therapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer (TRIP): study protocol for a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Cancer 12:110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all of the investigators who contributed to the cohort 1 in the J-POPS (see list of the J-POPS Investigators). This research was supported by the Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation (Kobe, Japan; http://www.ibri-kobe.org/english/foundation.html). This work was supported in part by a Health Labor Sciences Research Grant from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (H29-ICT-Ippan-002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuto Ito.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Kazuto Ito received honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, AstraZeneca and Astellas. Shiro Saito received honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, AstraZeneca, and Astellas and received grant support from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, AstraZeneca, and Astellas. None of the remaining authors has conflicts of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported and none has any financial support from industrial companies that are related with this research.

Additional information

Investigators in the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) are listed in the Supplementary Appendix.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 49 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 190 KB)

Figure S1

. Study flow diagram in the J-POPS (cohort 1) (PDF 311 KB)

Figure S2

. Biochemical relapse-free rate (bRFR) based on the Phoenix and the J-POPS definitions (PDF 338 KB)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ito, K., Saito, S., Yorozu, A. et al. Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS): first analysis on survival. Int J Clin Oncol 23, 1148–1159 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1309-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1309-0

Keywords

Navigation