Literatur
Prince JL, Links JM (2015) Medical imaging signals and systems. Pearson, London
Yen K, Vock P, Tiefenthaler B, Ranner G, Scheurer E, Thali MJ, Zwygart K, Sonnenschein M, Wiltgen M, Dirnhofer R (2004) Virtopsy: forensic traumatology of the subcutaneous fatty tissue; MultiSlice Computed Tomography (MSCT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as diagnostic tools. J Forensic Sci 49(4):1–8
Yen K, Thali MJ, Aghayev E, Jackowski C, Schweitzer W, Boesch C, Vock P, Dirnhofer R, Sonnenschein M (2005) Strangulation signs: initial correlation of MRI, MSCT, and forensic neck findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 22(4):501–510
Scheurer E, Lovblad KO, Kreis R, Maier SE, Boesch C, Dirnhofer R, Yen K (2011) Forensic application of postmortem diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain in situ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a2508
Jackowski C, Warntjes MJB, Kihlberg J, Berge J, Thali MJ, Persson A (2011) Quantitative MRI in isotropic spatial resolution for forensic soft tissue documentation. Why and how? J Forensic Sci 56(1):208–215
Brüschweiler W, Braun M, Dirnhofer R, Thali MJ (2003) Analysis of patterned injuries and injury-causing instruments with forensic 3D/CAD supported photogrammetry (FPHG): an instruction manual for the documentation process. Forensic Sci Int 132(2):130–138
Subke J, Wehner HD, Wehner F, Szczepaniak S (2000) Streifenlichttopometrie (SLT). A new method for the three-dimensional photorealistic forensic documentation in colour. Forensic Sci Int 113(1–3):289–295
Thali MJ, Braun M, Dirnhofer R (2003) Optical 3D surface digitizing in forensic medicine: 3D documentation of skin and bone injuries. Forensic Sci Int 137(2–3):203–208
Thali MJ, Braun M, Wirth J, Vock P, Dirnhofer R (2003) 3D surface and body documentation in forensic medicine: 3‑D/CAD photogrammetry merged with 3D radiological scanning. J Forensic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs2003118
Thali MJ, Braun M, Brueschweiler W, Dirnhofer R (2003) ’Morphological imprint’: determination of the injury-causing weapon from the wound morphology using forensic 3D/CAD-supported photogrammetry. Forensic Sci Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(03)00021-5
Buck U, Naether S, Braun M, Bolliger S, Friederich H, Jackowski C, Aghayev E, Christe A, Vock P, Dirnhofer R, Thali MJ (2007) Application of 3D documentation and geometric reconstruction methods in traffic accident analysis: with high resolution surface scanning, radiological MSCT/MRI scanning and real data based animation. Forensic Sci Int 170(1):20–28
Buck U, Naether S, Räss B, Jackowski C, Thali MJ (2013) Accident or homicide—virtual crime scene reconstruction using 3D methods. Forensic Sci Int 225(1):75–84
Palmiere C, Binaghi S, Doenz F, Bize P, Chevallier C, Mangin P, Grabherr S (2012) Detection of hemorrhage source: the diagnostic value of post-mortem CT-angiography. Forensic Sci Int 222(1–3):33–39
Grabherr S, Grimm J, Dominguez A, Vanhaebost J, Mangin P (2014) Advances in postmortem CT-angiography
Ebert LC, Ptacek W, Breitbeck R, Fürst M, Kronreif G, Martinez RM, Thali M, Flach PM (2014) Virtobot 2.0: the future of automated surface documentation and CT-guided needle placement in forensic medicine. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10(2):179–186
Al-Alousi LM, Anderson RA, Worster DM, Land DV (2001) Multiple-probe thermography for estimating the postmortem interval: I. Continuous monitoring and data analysis of brain, liver, rectal and environmental temperatures in 117 forensic cases. J Forensic Sci 46(2):317–322
Bornik A, Urschler M, Schmalstieg D, Bischof H, Krauskopf A, Schwark T, Scheurer E, Yen K (2018) Integrated computer-aided forensic case analysis, presentation, and documentation based on multimodal 3D data. Forensic Sci Int 287:12–24
Urschler M, Bornik A, Scheurer E, Yen K, Bischof H, Schmalstieg D (2012) Forensic-case analysis: from 3D imaging to interactive visualization. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 32(4):79–87
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
A. Bornik, S. Heinze, L. Campana, T. Rost, H. Wittig, D. Labudde, P. Genet und S. Grabherr geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Additional information
Basisdokument, 3. Februar 2018
Unter Mitwirkung von
Joel Aissa, Jessica Katharina Baltes, Christoph Birngruber, Herwig Brandtner, Dirk Breitmeier, Gina Bruch, Andreas Bucher, Ursula Buck, Kirsten Buße, Fabrice Dedouit, Florian Fischer, Hartmut Fischer, Pia Genet, Tanja Germerott, Philip Glemser, Jochen Grimm, Claus Grundmann, Benno Hartung, Sara Heinbuch, Axel Heinemann, Janine Helmus, Johannes Höller, Sandra Jaschinski, Thomas Kamphausen, Manuel Kellinghaus, Sophie Kerbacher, Mattias Kettner, Sarah Kölzer, Astrid Krauskopf, Anja Leipner, Rüdiger Lessig, Constantin Lux, Bernhard Neumayer, Stefanie Plenzig, Reingard Riener-Hofer, Uwe Schmidt, Andreas Schuff, Christian Schyma, Hanna Sprenger, Ines Steinhagen, Dankwart Stiller, Christian Stumm, Michael Thali, Iliana Tzimas, Harry van Venrooij, Marcel Verhoff, Bridgette Webb, Ulrike Weinberger
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bornik, A., Heinze, S., Campana, L. et al. Theoretische Grundlagen der forensischen Bildgebung. Rechtsmedizin 29, 1–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-018-0295-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-018-0295-x