Skip to main content
Log in

Euro adoption and growth in Central Europe: Managing a political process

  • Forum
  • Eastward Enlargement of the Euro Zone
  • Published:
Intereconomics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. The new members from Central Europe are the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia.

  2. Robert Mundell: A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 51, 1961, pp. 657–665.

  3. Peter B. Kenen: The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View, in: R. A. Mundell and A. K. Swoboda (eds.): Monetary Problems of the International Economy, Chicago 1969, University of Chicago Press.

  4. Ronald McKinnon: Optimum Currency Areas, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 53, 1963, pp. 207–222.

  5. See for instance Jeffey A. Frankel and Andrew K. Rose: The Endogenity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria, in: The Economic Journal, Vol. 108, 1998, pp. 1009–1025; as well as Michael Bolle and Michael Neugart: How will the Euro shape European Economies, paper presented at the 4th Conference on Macroeconomic Analysis, University of Crete, 2000.

  6. A recent report by the Polish National Bank states that euro adoption should impose wage discipline and enhance wage flexibility: National Bank of Poland: A Report on the Costs and Benefits of Poland’s Adoption of the Euro, Drukarnia NBP, Warsaw 2004, edited by Jakub Borowski.

  7. This is due to the Balassa-Samuelson effect, which is estimated to add 1–2 points to consumer-price inflation in Central Europe: Mihály A. Kovács et al.: On the Estimated Size of the Balassa-Samuelson Effect in Five Central and Eastern European Countries, NBH Working Paper, No. 5, 2002.

  8. Cf William Easterly and Ross Levine: It’s Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models, in: World Bank Economic Review, 2004 (forthcoming).

  9. Leslie Lipschitz, Timothy Lane and Alex Mourmouras: Capital Flows to Transition Countries: Master or Servant?, IMF Working Paper, WP/02/11, 2002.

  10. Jeffey A. Frankel and Andrew K. Rose: Estimating the Effect of Currency Unions on Trade and Output, NBER Working Paper, No. 7857, 2000.

  11. See also Susan Schadler: Charting a Course Toward Successful Euro Adoption, in: Finance & Development, June 2004, pp. 29–33.

  12. Cf George Clarke, Robert Cull, Maria Soledad Martinez Peria and Susana M. Sánchez: Foreign Bank Entry: Experience, Implications for Developing Countries, and Agenda for further Research, in: Background Paper for the World Development Report 2002.

  13. Helmut Wagner: Pitfalls in the European Enlargement Process. Financial Instability and Real Divergence, in: Deutsche Bundesbank Economic Research Centre: Discussion Paper No. 6, 2002, pp. 18–24.

  14. Cf Sjef Ederveen, Henri L. F. de Groot and Richard Nahuis: Fertile Soil for Structural Funds?, in: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2002, No. 096/3.

  15. In a later article, Robert Mundell picks up this argument. Cf. Robert Mundell: Uncommon Arguments for Common Currencies”, in: H. Johnson, A. Swoboda (eds.): The Economics of Common Currencies, London 1973, pp. 114–132.

  16. See for instance Susan Schadler, op. cit. Charting a Course Toward Successful Euro Adoption, in: Finance & Development, June 2004, pp. 29–33.

  17. Cf Leslie Lipschitz, Timothy Lane and Alex Mourmouras: Real Convergence, Capital Flows, and Monetary Policy: Notes on the European Transition Countries, IMF, mimeo 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

and coordinator ofEzoneplus, an international research project on the Eastward Enlargement of the Eurozone within the European Union’s Fifth Framework Programme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolle, M., Meyer, T. Euro adoption and growth in Central Europe: Managing a political process. Intereconomics 39, 236–241 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031780

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031780

Keywords

Navigation