GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 5040-5040
    Kurzfassung: Background : Oncohematological patients may have a lower immune response against SARS-CoV-2, both to natural infection and to vaccines. Most studies have focused on the analysis of the humoral response, which means that the information available on the cellular response against SARS-CoV-2 in these patients is limited. Current recommendations include vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSTC), regardless of whether they have been previously exposed to the virus. These recommendations are based on previous studies with other vaccines. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the immune response that is developed in these patients in order to make specific recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination. Objective : To study the humoral and cellular immune response before and after AHSTC in patients with oncohematological neoplasms who were exposed to SARS-CoV-2 before the transplantation. Materials & methods : Nine patients with previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 who underwent AHSTC (Table 1) and 8 healthy donors who recovered from mild COVID-19 were recruited from Hospital Ramón y Cajal and Primary Healthcare Center Pedro Laín Entralgo (Madrid, Spain), respectively. Specific direct cellular cytotoxicity (DCC) of PBMCs from these patients against Vero E6 cells infected with pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 was determined. The activation of caspase-3 in Vero cells was measured after 1 hour of co-culture with PBMCs, in which cytotoxic cell populations were analyzed by flow cytometry. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) was analyzed by quantifying the binding of Annexin V to rituximab-coated Raji cells as targets of PBMCs. Results : 1) 66% of AHSTC patients did not develop detectable levels of IgGs against SARS-CoV-2 (Fig. 1). In 33% of these patients with detectable IgG, the titers decreased after AHSTC, as well as their neutralizing capacity (Fig. 1B and C). 2) AHSTC patients showed increased levels of immature B cells (9.5-fold; p=0.0586) and plasmablasts (28.8-fold), in comparison with healthy donors who had mild COVID-19, while naive and resting memory B cells decreased 1.7- and 6.9-fold, respectively. 3) Specific DCC against SARS-CoV-2-infected cells increased 1.5-fold in comparison with healthy donors (Fig. 2A). Cytotoxic populations with NK phenotypes (CD3-CD56+CD16+), NKT (CD3+CD56+CD16+), and CD8+ T cells (CD3+CD8+TCRγδ+) increased 1.9- (p=0.0311), 1.9- (p=0.0592), and 1.6-fold, respectively (Fig. 2B). ADCC increased 2.1-fold in PBMCs from AHSTC patients in comparison with healthy donors (p = 0.0592). Conclusions : Our data show for the first time how the humoral and cellular immune response against the natural infection by SARS-Cov-2 may be modified in patients who were subsequently subjected to AHSTC. Although the humoral response may be reduced after AHSTC, the specific cellular response showed an increased cytotoxic activity. These results could be extrapolated to patients who were vaccinated against COVID-19 prior to AHSTC. Therefore, this information could be useful to define the recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination after AHSTC. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Garcia-Gutiérrez: Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: Blood Advances, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 6, No. 4 ( 2022-02-22), p. 1278-1295
    Kurzfassung: Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) comprises a heterogeneous group of patients and is associated with poor overall survival (OS). We analyze the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of adult patients with sAML in the Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematología (PETHEMA) registry. Overall, 6211 (72.9%) were de novo and 2310 (27.1%) had sAML, divided into myelodysplastic syndrome AML (MDS-AML, 44%), MDS/myeloproliferative AML (MDS/MPN-AML, 10%), MPN-AML (11%), therapy-related AML (t-AML, 25%), and antecedent neoplasia without prior chemotherapy/radiotherapy (neo-AML, 9%). Compared with de novo, patients with sAML were older (median age, 69 years), had more Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≥2 (35%) or high-risk cytogenetics (40%), less FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (11%), and nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutations (21%) and received less intensive chemotherapy regimens (38%) (all P & lt; .001). Median OS was higher for de novo than sAML (10.9 vs 5.6 months; P & lt; .001) and shorter in sAML after hematologic disorder (MDS, MDS/MPN, or MPN) compared with t-AML and neo-AML (5.3 vs 6.1 vs 5.7 months, respectively; P = .04). After intensive chemotherapy, median OS was better among patients with de novo and neo-AML (17.2 and 14.6 months, respectively). No OS differences were observed after hypomethylating agents according to type of AML. sAML was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS. We confirmed high prevalence and adverse features of sAML and established its independent adverse prognostic value. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02607059.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 2473-9529 , 2473-9537
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2022
    ZDB Id: 2876449-3
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 2786-2786
    Kurzfassung: BACKGROUND: Despite the excellent prognostic of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), approximately 50% of patients that are treated with TKIs will discontinue first line treatment due to lack of efficacy or intolerance. Once patients need a second line treatment, a considerable proportion of patients will need third or even fourth line therapy during further evolution. At this moment, there is a lack of data about real benefit of this group of patients. We have recently published our experience of 30 CML patients treated with bosutinib in 4th line. We present an update of the study where we have increased the number of patients, and the follow-up. The aim of this study is to present safety and efficacy data CML chronic phase patients treated with bosutinib in 4th line. METHODS: We have collected data from 59 CML patients treated with bosutinib in 4th line after resistance or intolerance to IM, NI and DA. 51 patients have been treated under the Spanish compassionate use program (36 centers) and 10 patients were treated in a single institution from United Kingdom. Median age of patients at diagnosis was 53 years. The percentage of low, intermediate and high risk Sokal groups were 47%, 37% and 16%. Median time TKIs exposure before bosutinib was 9 years. The most common indication (30/59) was intolerant to DA and NI. Patients' dispositions and main line characteristics are shown in table 1. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 14.3 months. All patients started bosutinib at 500mg/d, median dose of was 450mg/d. Overall probabilities to either achieve or maintain previous response were 96% (57/59), 62% (37/59), 40% (24/59) and 17% (10/59) for complete hematological response (CHR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and MR4.5 respectively. However, probabilities to obtain responses (in patients without response evaluated at baseline) were 27% (7/26), 26% (12/45) and 12% (7/55) for CCyR, MMR and MR4.5. As expected, probabilities to obtain CCyR were lower for patients resistant to DA and NI patients than for patients intolerant to DA and NI (8% VS 44%). Event free survival (EFS) and progression free survival (PFS) probabilities were 50% and 83% by 27 month. Treatment was discontinued in 20/58 (34%), most frequent reasons being adverse events 9/59(15%), lack of efficacy 5/59 (8.5%), disease progression 2/59 (3.4%) and death 1/59 (1.7%). Two patients discontinued due to stem cell transplantation. The adverse events that led to treatment discontinuation were pleural effusion (3), diarrhea (2), rash, renal impairment, auricular fibrillation and liver enzyme elevation one patient each. Overall, bosutinib was well tolerated. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities were 3%, 6% and 6% for anemia, thromboctytopenia and neutropenia. Most common non hematological side effects were diarrhea (39%, nauseas 13% and liver alterations 14% and pleural effusion 14%. CONCLUSIONS: Little is known about the therapeutic role of Bosutinib in 4th line. The series presented here is, to our knowledge, the largest being presented. Bosutinib seems to be an appropriate treatment option for patients resistant or intolerant to three prior TKIs. Table 1. IM+NI-I+DA-R (N=4) IM+NI-R+DA-R (N=18) IM+NI-I+DA-I (N=30) IM+NI-R+DA-I (N=7) Total (N=59) Sex, N (%) Male 2 (50) 11 (61.1) 16 (53.3) 2 (28.6) 31 (52.5) Median age of diagnosis, yr (range) 57.32 (50-64) 49.19 (23-73) 54.95 (21-89) 48.87 (26-68) 53.15 (21-89) Median age of Bosutinib initiation, yr (range) 69.13 (61-70) 62.27 (39-79) 64.85 (25-90) 64.79(35-74) 63.7 (25-9) Median follow up, months (range) 18.5(7.8-34.1) 8.4(1.22-36.1) 16.3(0.5-34.7) 23.4(3.3-28.9) 14.3(0.7-36.1) SOKAL Index at diagnosis, N (%) High 2(50.0) 4 (23.5) 1 (4.3) 1 (20) 8 (16.3) Intermediate 1 (25.0) 5 (29.4) 10(43.5) 2 (40) 18 (36.7) Low 1 (25.0) 8 (47.1) 12 (52.2) 2 (40) 23 (46.9) Median Time from first TKI to BOS, (yr, range) 10.3 (4.8-11.9) 9.3 (2.0-11.4) 8.8 (0.7-13.6) 8.2 (5.1-12.3) 8.8 (0.7-13.6) Median duration of prior therapy, months (range) Imatinib 38.8 (11.8-69.8) 32.6 (6.3-96.8) 26.2 (1.6-102.6) 23.1 (8.3-66.8) 28.8 (1.6-102.6) Dasatinib 21.5 (12.6-75) 21.8 (7.7-69) 31.4 (0.4-87.1) 23.7 (10.3-53.6) 23.44 (0.4-87.1) Nilotinib 19.1 (2.1-46.2) 16.7 (5-65.6) 8.9 (0.2-58.5) 30.9 (6.9-49.3) 14.3 (0.2-65.6) BOS: bosutinib, IM, imatinib; DA, dasatinib; NI, nilotinib, I: Intolerance, R: Resistant, Yr: year Disclosures García-Gutiérrez: Ariad: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Milojkovic:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Boque:Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Casado:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jiménez:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Giraldo:Pfizer: Consultancy. Steegmann:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2015
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 5523-5523
    Kurzfassung: Second-generation TKIs have demonstrated efficacy and an acceptable tolerability in patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); however, new data from so called “off target” side effects have been published. For example, serious concerns have been raised about cardiovascular (CV) events with ponatinib, and, in lesser degree with nilotinib (NI), impeding or difficulting the treatment in patients with previous CV risk factors. Besides, patients with previous history of pleural effusion or pulmonary hypertension should avoid dasatinib (DA) if possible. Bosutinib could be a good candidate for situations which preclude the use of other TKI’s. We have previously presented efficacy data of 29 patients treated with bosutinib in forth line. The aim of this study is to report safety data of heavily CML patients treated with bosutinib in 4th line. We have studied 30 pts previously treated with imatinib (IM), dasatinib and nilotinib and 5 pts previously treated with IM-DA or NI since 2012 under the Spanish Compassionate Use Program. Patient’s baseline characteristics and previous treatments are shown in table 1. We have classified patients in 2 groups regarding to investigator-driven cause of discontinuation: intolerant (INT) or resistant (RES). At the data cutoff on June 16, 2014, the median follow up was 11.47 months (range, 2.03-45.97 months). Median duration of BOS treatment across all cohorts was 9.23 months (range, 0.63-23.40 months). We observed no significant differences in terms of Index prognostic factors (Sokal, Hasford or Eutos), sex, median duration of TKIs treatment or comorbidities. However, patients with resistance where significantly older observed: 56 years vs. 67 years (p 〈 0.05). Toxicity spectrum pre-BOS: Main reason for treatment discontinuation for each TKI was: treatment failure in the case of IM (14/35) and intolerance for both DA 16/34 and NI 13/31. Hematological (HEM) toxicities grade 3-4 with all TKIs were more common in RES pts, being dasatinib the one that showed the highest rate of grade 3-4 HEM toxicities. Non-HEM toxicities to all TKIs were significantly more frequent in INT than in RES pts (p 〈 0.05). Most common grade 3-4 non-HEM toxicities were rash for IM (3/35), pleural effusion for DA (7/34) and vascular events for NI (3/31 Peripheral arterial disease (PAOD), 3/31 Ischemic heart disease (IHD)). Toxicity spectrum with BOS treatment: treatment interruptions were more frequent in INT than in RES pts 52% vs 25%, as well as dose reductions 78% vs 66% respectively. Grade 3-4 HEM toxicities were more common in RES than INT pts (41.6% vs 4.3% respectively). Non-HEM toxicities were also more frequent in RES pts than INT: diarrhea (50% vs 43%), rash (16% vs 8%), ALT or AST increase (25% vs 13%) abdominal pain (16% vs 4%), grade 3-4 non HEM toxicities were more frequent in RES than INT pts (41% vs 17%) (Diarrhea 16.7% vs 4.3%, AST/ALT increase: 16.7% vs 0%). None (0/12) vs 4/23 (17%) pts discontinued treatment due to toxicity in the RES vs. INT group respectively. Cross intolerance was extremely rare, of the 7 pts who had rash with IM, only 1 suffered rash with BOS. None pts had pleural effusion with BOS out of 15 who previously suffered with DA neither vascular events out of the 10 pts that previously suffered with NI. EFS by 20 months was 75% vs 50% for INT and RES patients. We have shown how in previously heavily pretreated CML patients, most of them in 4th line bosutinib has an excellent safety profile with no patients interrupting treatment due to side effects in previously intolerant patients. Importantly, rates of cross intolerance (namely CV, pleural and skin ) have also been very low. We conclude that Bosutinib is an excellent alternative also in patients who are left without a suitable treatment option. Table IM+NI-I +DA-R IMA+NI-R +DA-R IM+NI-I +DA-I IM+NI-R +DA-I IM+NI/DA TOTAL Pts, N(%) 2 (5.7) 7 (20) 15 (43) 6 (17) 5 (14) 35 (100) Age of diagnosis, med yr 61.0 46.7 54.7 53.8 58.7 54.2 Age of BOS initiation, med yr 74.7 61.5 64.6 64.8 65.5 63.8 Sokal index at diagnosis, N (High/intermidiate/low) 1/0/1 1/2/4 0/5/7 1/2/2 0/2/2 3/11/16 Time from first TKI to BOS, med yr 11.7 10.0 9.9 7.4 10.7 10.0 Duration of IM treatment, med, mo 63.3 33.1 26.6 21.4 78.2 27.2 Duration of DA treatment, med, mo 48.7 16.0 41.9 19.2 18.7 23.6 Duration of NI treatment, med ,mo 29.1 14.2 9.0 21.0 24.2 11.6 I:iIntolerance, R: resistant, med: median, yr: year, mo: months Disclosures García-Gutiérrez: Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Steegmann:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2014
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 19-19
    Kurzfassung: Introduction and objective. SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has deeply impacted in Spain. In cancer patients (pts) the lethality has been higher than in normal population, but, little is known on the impact in adults with ALL. Our objective was to analyze the frequency, clinical characteristics and outcome of adult ALL patients infected by SARS-CoV-2. Methods. Between March 1, 2020 and May 31, 2020 (the period of the peak of COVID-19 infection in Spain) two registries from the PETHEMA (Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematologia) and GETH (Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético y Terapia Celular) groups were activated to recruit adult patients with ALL and COVID-19 infection confirmed by PCR. The PETHEMA registry was based on ASH proposal (www.ashresearchcollaborative.org/covid-19-registry) and the GETH registry was specifically performed for hematological diseases and COVID-19 infection. Both registries were merged for this study. Eighty-four Spanish centers were contacted and weekly reminds were sent until May 19, 2020. The demographic and clinical characteristics of ALL and COVID-19 infection, the comorbidities, the treatment and outcome were collected. The study was closed for follow in July 10, 2020. Results. Fifty-six of 84 centers answered the survey and 28 patients with ALL and COVID-19 infection were identified in 17 of them, especially on March (n=11) and April (n=15). Median age was 46 (range 20-78) yrs. and 19 were aged over 40 yrs. Fifteen pts were male, 1 was active smoker and 9 showed one or more comorbidities (chronic liver disease [n=2] diabetes [n=1] , hypertension [n=5], cardiopathy [n=2] , prior malignancy [n=1] and hypogammaglobulinemia [n=1] ). ALL was of B-cell precursors in 18 pts (Ph+ in 6) and T in 10. Twenty-six pts were on treatment of LAL (induction [n=10], consolidation [n=3] , maintenance [n=1], HSCT [n=5] , rescue [n=6], and palliative [n=1] ). Eight patients were previously submitted to allogeneic HSCT, CAR T [n=1] or immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies (inotuzumab, n=4) and 21 were receiving immunosuppressive drugs (corticosteroids in 11, fludarabine in 4, among others). Eleven pts showed neutropenia & lt;0.5x109/L and 18 lymphocytopenia & lt;0.5x109/L. Median value of C reactive protein was 28.7 mg/L (0.9-311.7) and D-dimer 690 ng/mL (120-31,200). The main clinical characteristics of COVID-19 infection were: fever (n=18), cough (n=16), shortness of breath (n=9) and asthenia (n=11) and 5 pts were asymptomatic. The most frequency therapies were hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine (n=23), combined or not with lopinavir/ritonavir. Tocilizumab was given to 8 pts. Twelve pts required oxygen supply and 7 required ICU support (median stay 16 [1-47] days). COVID-19 was solved in 18 pts, although 5 pts showed PCR+ persistence (median 25 [16-91] days) after resolution of symptoms. The treatment of ALL was stopped/modified in 11 pts. Nine pts dead (COVID-19 [n=6] , COVID-19 and ALL progression [n=2] and COVID-19 andPseudomonassepsis [n=1] ). A trend for higher mortality was observed in patients with neutropenia & lt;0.5x109/L and in those with lymphocytopenia & lt;0.5x109/L. Conclusion. The frequency of adult patients with ALL and COVID-19 infection can be considered high, given the low incidence of adult ALL. COVID-19 infection was frequent in patients with advanced age and on ALL therapy. The frequency of severe COVID-19 infection and the mortality were high. Supported in part by 2017 SGR288 (GRC) Generalitat de Catalunya and "la Caixa" Foundation. Disclosures Ribera: Pfizer, Amgen, Ariad, Novartis:Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Pfizer, Amgen:Research Funding.Barba:Amgen, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer:Speakers Bureau;Amgen, Celgene, Gilead, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Shire:Consultancy.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...