GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (33)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 31_suppl ( 2013-11-01), p. 118-118
    Kurzfassung: 118 Background: Cabazitaxel (C) and abiraterone (A) improve survival in mCRPC after progression on docetaxel (D). We examined whether mCRPC patients progressing on D received C and/or A, in which sequence, and how they compared with patients not receiving C or A. Methods: This retrospective study used medical records from the ACORN Data Warehouse. Eligible patients were: diagnosed with mCRPC, progressed after 1 st -line D, treated 2 nd -line with C (DC) or A (DA). Some went to 3 rd -line C or A (DCA, DAC). A random sample of comparable patients without A or C (DO) was included. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted. Cox regression analyses assessed PFS and OS by 2 nd -line group after D. Results: Screened out patients were: 60 with no progression on D; 41 absent records; 18 with another cancer. Table below shows patients by treatment sequence group. Age, PS, and PSA did not differ significantly. More patients appear to have received A after C (56.7%) than C after A (25.7%). In the 3-drug sequence groups, more patients received DCA in the 6-month period from April-October 2011 (n = 17/19) than in the 6-month period from June-December 2012 (n = 2/10), suggesting a drop-off in use of C immediately after D. Cox PFS treatment effect was not significant. Cox OS treatment effect was significant (DA vs DC, HR = 1.693 [95% CI: 1.066, 2.691], p = 0.0258). Conclusions: Patterns suggest comparable outcomes in PFS. Controlling for patient characteristics, OS may be longer in DC vs DA. Patients appear undertreated in third line with fewer receiving C after A than the opposite sequence. We hypothesize that DAC may not be as feasible as DCA. Reasons for underutilization of C are being examined. [Table: see text]
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2013
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e12576-e12576
    Kurzfassung: e12576 Background: Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, with or without Endocrine Therapy (COMET), is a phase III multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the risks/benefits of active monitoring (AM) versus surgery for women with low-risk DCIS. Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, accrual opened 06/30/17 and closed 01/13/23 with 995 women enrolled. Biospecimens (blood/tissue) and breast images were collected at specified timepoints (funded by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation) and stored in central tissue/image repositories. To date, more than 90% of requested samples/images have been submitted. Methods: In 2017, the COMET Translational Working Group (TWG) was formed to facilitate the collection, submission, storage, and subsequent analysis of biospecimens/images. The TWG, consisting of clinicians, pathologists, radiologists, researchers, and patient advocates (PAs), discuss topics such as categorization of biospecimens into discovery/validation sets; development of a pathology workflow/sample tracking process; and potential areas of future research that may improve DCIS diagnostics, prognostics, and care management. Results: The TWG consists of multiple partner institutions, and team members have complementary areas of expertise/experience. While competing views may exist, consensus has been achieved in relation to major issues such as authorship, biospecimen ownership, intellectual property and criteria relevant to patient needs, through targeted discussion at monthly meetings. Logistical barriers, including data sharing and the technicalities of biospecimen release, have also been resolved through this process. The TWG has played an integral role in resolving recruitment challenges. In 2019, guidance from the TWG related to standardizing pathology eligibility criteria resulted in evidence-based protocol amendments that subsequently increased accrual. A retrospective review of biospecimens was performed to determine adequacy for ensuing correlative molecular and spatial profiling studies. PAs are integral to the TWG, assisting with logistical issues (resource requests); identifying study topics relevant to patients; providing guidance on existing (commercial) predictive/prognostic tests; promoting effective stewardship of a finite resource (tissue samples); and ensuring that the overall focus of the TWG remains firmly on advancing clinical utility. Conclusions: The COMET TWG serves the important role of overseeing biospecimen/image collection including its use and sharing. This facilitates development of research and technology that can impact the decision for surgery vs AM in women with low-risk DCIS, and ensure the translation of research findings into everyday clinical practice. Subsequent correlative science studies identified by the TWG stand to improve future DCIS pathology diagnostics, prognostics and care management.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2023
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 2 ( 2014-01-10), p. 129-160
    Kurzfassung: A MESSAGE FROM ASCO'S PRESIDENT Since its founding in 1964, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has been committed to improving cancer outcomes through research and the delivery of quality care. Research is the bedrock of discovering better treatments—providing hope to the millions of individuals who face a cancer diagnosis each year. The studies featured in “Clinical Cancer Advances 2013: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer From the American Society of Clinical Oncology” represent the invaluable contributions of thousands of patients who participate in clinical trials and the scientists who conduct basic and clinical research. The insights described in this report, such as how cancers hide from the immune system and why cancers may become resistant to targeted drugs, enable us to envision a future in which cancer will be even more controllable and preventable. The scientific process is thoughtful, deliberate, and sometimes slow, but each advance, while helping patients, now also points toward new research questions and unexplored opportunities. Both dramatic and subtle breakthroughs occur so that progress against cancer typically builds over many years. Success requires vision, persistence, and a long-term commitment to supporting cancer research and training. Our nation's longstanding investment in federally funded cancer research has contributed significantly to a growing array of effective new treatments and a much deeper understanding of the drivers of cancer. But despite this progress, our position as a world leader in advancing medical knowledge and our ability to attract the most promising and talented investigators are now threatened by an acute problem: Federal funding for cancer research has steadily eroded over the past decade, and only 15% of the ever-shrinking budget is actually spent on clinical trials. This dismal reality threatens the pace of progress against cancer and undermines our ability to address the continuing needs of our patients. Despite this extremely challenging economic environment, we continue to make progress. Maintaining and accelerating that progress require that we keep our eyes on the future and pursue a path that builds on the stunning successes of the past. We must continue to show our policymakers the successes in cancer survival and quality of life (QOL) they have enabled, emphasizing the need to sustain our national investment in the remarkably productive US cancer research enterprise. We must also look to innovative methods for transforming how we care for—and learn from—patients with cancer. Consider, for example, that fewer than 5% of adult patients with cancer currently participate in clinical trials. What if we were able to draw lessons from the other 95%? This possibility led ASCO this year to launch CancerLinQ, a groundbreaking health information technology initiative that will provide physicians with access to vast quantities of clinical data about real-world patients and help achieve higher quality, higher value cancer care. As you read the following pages, I hope our collective progress against cancer over the past year inspires you. More importantly, I hope the pride you feel motivates you to help us accelerate the pace of scientific advancement. Clifford A. Hudis, MD, FACP President American Society of Clinical Oncology
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2014
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 8031-8031
    Kurzfassung: 8031 Background: Ide-cel, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, significantly improved median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall response rate (ORR) vs standard regimens (SRs) in patients (pts) with TCE RRMM in the KarMMa-3 study (NCT03651128; Rodríguez-Otero et al. NEJM 2023). Previous analyses in KarMMa (Munshi et al. NEJM 2021) of pts with later-line (4L+) TCE RRMM identified low baseline (BL) levels and complete clearance of soluble BCMA (sBCMA, a measure of tumor burden) and early minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity as correlates of durable response to ide-cel. The current analysis explored the association between biomarkers and efficacy or severity of inflammatory adverse events of ide-cel in KarMMa-3. Methods: sBCMA levels were measured in blood samples collected from pts in KarMMa-3 at BL and regular intervals from treatment (tx) initiation until confirmed progression. MRD status was assessed in bone marrow aspirate (clonoSeq; 10 -5 sensitivity) at 6 and 12 mo post infusion and reported in all pts, regardless of response. Biomarker analyses were based on pts who received ide-cel or ≥1 dose of SR. Post hoc analyses assessed correlations between biomarkers and efficacy endpoints or cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and investigator-identified neurotoxicity (iiNT); associations of interest were identified using a ranked sum test and nominal P value 〈 0.05. Results: Lower BL sBCMA levels were associated with higher ORR ( 〈 partial response [PR] vs ≥PR) in both tx arms (ide-cel, P= 0.0223; SR, P= 0.0395), indicating this may be agnostic of the BCMA-directed modality. Lower BL sBCMA was also associated with higher complete response (CR) rate ( 〈 CR vs ≥CR) in the ide-cel arm ( P= 0.0038). Additionally, lower BL sBCMA levels in the ide-cel arm were associated with lower grade (gr) of CRS (gr 0–1 vs 2 vs ≥3; P= 0.0022) and iiNT (gr 0–1 vs ≥2; P= 0.0113); however, overlapping ranges may limit predictive utility. Further analyses will be presented. In the ide-cel arm, landmark mPFS was longer in pts with undetectable versus detectable sBCMA at 2 mo post infusion (16.3 vs 5.2 mo; HR, 0.26) or at 6 mo (16.8 vs 9.6 mo; HR, 0.62). Furthermore, landmark mPFS was also longer in pts with MRD negativity versus pts with positive/indeterminate MRD status at 6 mo (17.2 vs 5.8 mo; HR, 0.288) or at 12 mo (13.8 vs 4.6 mo; HR, 0.121). Conclusions: BL sBCMA levels correlated with response and CRS and iiNT grade in the ide-cel arm of KarMMa-3, potentially reinforcing the importance of management of BL tumor burden for optimal response to ide-cel. Early clearance of sBCMA at 2 mo, sustained clearance of sBCMA at 6 mo, and MRD negativity at 6 or 12 mo, regardless of clinical response, may be useful biomarkers for identifying pts likely to achieve a complete and durable response to ide-cel. Clinical trial information: NCT03651128 .
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2023
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 5 ( 2019-02-10), p. 403-410
    Kurzfassung: Several studies have reported that among patients with localized prostate cancer, black men have a shorter overall survival (OS) time than white men, but few data exist for men with advanced prostate cancer. The primary goal of this analysis was to compare the OS in black and white men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were treated in phase III clinical trials with docetaxel plus prednisone (DP) or a DP-containing regimen. Methods Individual participant data from 8,820 men with mCRPC randomly assigned in nine phase III trials to DP or a DP-containing regimen were combined. Race was based on self-report. The primary end point was OS. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the prognostic importance of race (black v white) adjusted for established risk factors common across the trials (age, prostate-specific antigen, performance status, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, and sites of metastases). Results Of 8,820 men, 7,528 (85%) were white, 500 (6%) were black, 424 (5%) were Asian, and 368 (4%) were of unknown race. Black men were younger and had worse performance status, higher testosterone and prostate-specific antigen, and lower hemoglobin than white men. Despite these differences, the median OS was 21.0 months (95% CI, 19.4 to 22.5 months) versus 21.2 months (95% CI, 20.8 to 21.7 months) in black and white men, respectively. The pooled multivariable hazard ratio of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.91) demonstrates that overall, black men have a statistically significant decreased risk of death compared with white men ( P 〈 .001). Conclusion When adjusted for known prognostic factors, we observed a statistically significant increased OS in black versus white men with mCRPC who were enrolled in these clinical trials. The mechanism for these differences is not known.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 18_suppl ( 2018-06-20), p. LBA5005-LBA5005
    Kurzfassung: LBA5005 Background: Reports have suggested that African-American (AA) men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have shorter overall survival (OS) than Caucasian (C) men. Prior reports have been limited by small sample size. The primary goal of this analysis was to compare OS in AA men to Caucasian men treated with docetaxel/prednisone or a docetaxel/prednisone containing regimen. Methods: Individual patient data from 8,871 mCRPC men randomized on nine phase III trials to docetaxel/prednisone (DP) or a DP containing regimen were combined. Race used in the analysis was based on self-report. The primary endpoint is OS, defined as the time between randomization and death or date of last follow-up if patients were alive. The proportional hazards model was used to assess the prognostic importance of race (AA vs. C) adjusting for established risk factors that were common across the trials (age, PSA, performance status, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, and sites of metastases). Results: Of 8,871 patients, 7,528 (85%) were C, 500 (6%) were AA, 424 were Asian (5%) and 419 (4%) had race unspecified. The last two groups were deleted from the analysis leaving 8,452 pts. Median age was 69 years and 94% had performance status 0-1. Median hemoglobin, PSA and alkaline phosphatase were 12.9 g/dL, 86 ng/mL and 139 U/L, respectively. Pattern of metastatic spread were: 72% bone disease with or without lymph nodes, 9% lung disease, 9% liver disease and 7% lymph nodes only. Median OS were 21.0 (95% CI = 19.4-22.5) vs. 21.2 months (95% CI = 20.8-21.7) in AAs and C, respectively. In multivariable analysis adjusting for established risk factors, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for AAs vs. Caucasians was 0.81 (95% CI = 0.72-0.92, p-value = 0.001) in all patients. Similar results were observed in 4,172 of patients who were treated with DP. Conclusions: We observed a statistically significant increased OS in AA vs. C men with mCRPC who were eligible to be enrolled on these clinical trials. Further understanding the biological variation by race in men with mCRPC treated with DP is warranted.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2018
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 1076-1076
    Kurzfassung: 1076 Background: Serum levels of thymidine kinase 1 activity (TKa), a fundamental enzyme in DNA synthesis and cellular proliferation, are prognostic of benefit from endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who participated in SWOG S0226, a prospective randomized trial comparing anastrozole vs. anastrozole and fulvestrant given in 4 week cycles. The assay for TKa (DiviTum TKa) was FDA approved in July 2022 for monitoring of postmenopausal HR+ MBC pts. The assay for circulating MUC1, CA 15-3, is routinely utilized in monitoring of pts with MBC. We compared the prognostic and predictive utilities of CA 15-3 and TKa in pts from S0226. Methods: TKa was measured in 1725 sera from 432 pts while CA 15-3 was measured in 1298 sera from 326 pts at baseline (BL), cycles 2, 3, 4 and 7. Prespecified cutoff levels of ≥ 250 DuA and ≥ 30 U/mL were considered high for TKa and CA 15-3 respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression stratified by prior adjuvant tamoxifen use. To examine markers over time, a landmarked Cox regression analysis was done starting at initiation of Cycle 4. BL and recent (Cycle 3 if available, otherwise Cycle 2) markers were assessed for simultaneous prediction of subsequent PFS and OS. Results: BL TKa was elevated in 190/432 (44%) and CA 15-3 was elevated in 254/326 (78%). Agreement between assays was 53%. Pts with high versus low BL TKa had significantly worse PFS (median 11.6 vs. 17.2 months, HR = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37-2.06) and OS (median 34 vs. 58 months, HR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.73-2.70) whereas pts with high versus normal BL CA 15-3 had no significant difference in PFS (median 13.6 vs. 16.1 months, HR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.93-1.62) but worse OS (median 45 vs. 66 months, HR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.30-2.53). A multivariable Cox model with both markers shows only TKa as being prognostic for PFS (TKa HR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.28-2.03; CA 15-3 HR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.91-1.59), but both prognostic for OS (TKa HR = 2.09, 95% CI 1.61-2.71; CA 15-3 HR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.22-2.38). In the landmarked multivariable analysis, positive TKa at BL was a strong predictor of PFS (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.28-2.14), but recent TKa was not (HR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.93-1.68). In contrast, positive CA15-3 at BL was not a predictor of PFS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.46-1.17), but recent CA15-3 was (HR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.26-3.06). Conclusions: BL TKa is highly prognostic in pts with HR+ MBC initiating first-line systemic ET, with low BL TKa conferring superior prognosis. In contrast, CA 15-3 is only modestly prognostic at BL, but is prognostic after 3 cycles of treatment. These hypothesis-generating data suggest further study is needed to determine how these biomarkers should be employed in a complementary manner to monitor response to systemic therapy in HR+ MBC. Clinical trial information: NCT00075764 .
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2023
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 8
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. TPS599-TPS599
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. TPS599-TPS599
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2018
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 14 ( 2016-05-10), p. 1652-1659
    Kurzfassung: Reports have suggested that metastatic site is an important predictor of overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but these were based on a limited number of patients. We investigate the impact of site of metastases on OS of a substantial sample of men with mCRPC who received docetaxel chemotherapy in nine phase III trials. Patients and Methods Individual patient data from 8,820 men with mCRPC enrolled onto nine phase III trials were combined. Site of metastases was categorized as lymph node (LN) only, bone with or without LN (with no visceral metastases), any lung metastases (but no liver), and any liver metastases. Results Most patients had bone with or without LN metastases (72.8%), followed by visceral disease (20.8%) and LN-only disease (6.4%). Men with liver metastases had the worst median OS (13.5 months). Although men with lung metastases had better median OS (19.4 months) compared with men with liver metastases, they had significantly worse median survival duration than men with nonvisceral bone metastases (21.3 months). Men with LN-only disease had a median OS of 31.6 months. The pooled hazard ratios for death in men with lung metastases compared with men with bone with or without LN metastases and in men with any liver metastases compared with men with lung metastases were 1.14 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.25; P = .007) and 1.52 (95% CI, 1.35 to 1.73; P 〈 .0001), respectively. Conclusion Specific sites of metastases in men with mCRPC are associated with differential OS, with successive increased lethality for lung and liver metastases compared with bone and nonvisceral involvement. These data may help in treatment decisions, the design of future clinical trials, and understanding the variation in biology of different sites of metastases in men with mCRPC.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2016
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 6_suppl ( 2021-02-20), p. 270-270
    Kurzfassung: 270 Background: MET signaling is a key molecular driver in pRCC. Given that there is no optimal therapy for metastatic pRCC, we sought to compare an existing standard (sunitinib) to putative MET kinase inhibitors. Methods: Eligible patients had pathologically verified pRCC, Zubrod performance status 0-1, and measurable metastatic disease. Patients may have received up to 1 prior systemic therapy excluding VEGF-directed agents. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive either sunitinib 50 mg po qd (4 wks on/2 wks off), cabozantinib 60 mg po qd, crizotinib 250 mg po bid, or savolitinib 600 mg po qd. Patients were stratified by prior therapy and pRCC subtype (I vs II vs not otherwise specified [NOS]) based on local review. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) for each experimental arm versus sunitinib. With 41 eligible patients per arm, we estimated 85% power to detect a 75% improvement in median PFS with a 1-sided alpha of 0.10 using intent-to-treat analysis. A pre-planned futility analysis was performed after 50% of PFS events occurred. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, response rate, and overall survival. Results: Between 4/2016 and 12/2019, 152 patients were enrolled; 5 were ineligible. Median age was 66 (range:29-89) and 76% were male; 92% had no prior therapy. By local pathologic review, 18%, 54% and 28% of patients were characterized as having type I, type II and NOS histology, respectively. In contrast, the frequency of type I, type II, and NOS by central review was 30%, 45% and 25%, respectively. Accrual to the savolitinib and crizotinib arms was halted early for futility (PFS hazard ratio 〉 1.0 for both); accrual continued to completion in the sunitinib and cabozantinib arms. Median PFS was significantly higher with cabozantinib relative to sunitinib (Table). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 69%, 72%, 37% and 39% of patients receiving sunitinib, cabozantinib, crizotinib and savolitinib, respectively; one grade 5 adverse event was seen with cabozantinib. Overall survival and response data will be presented. Conclusions: In this multi-arm randomized trial, only cabozantinib resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful prolongation of PFS in pRCC patients compared to sunitinib. These data support cabozantinib as a reference standard for eligible patients with metastatic pRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02761057 . [Table: see text]
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...