GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (5)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (5)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. e16520-e16520
    Abstract: e16520 Background: Many studies described deficits in quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients. We developed a new pathway with QoL diagnosis and treatment which was implemented as complex intervention with theory building, modeling, exploratory trial and RCT, integrated in a population based (2.1 mio) Tumorcenter. Methods: We conducted a two-armed, randomized clinical trial with 200 breast cancer patients.QoL was measured prospectively in 10 specific dimensions in first year after surgery. Along new QoL pathway patients in intervention group (IG) received QoL diagnosis and treatment consisting of 5 therapeutic options (eg physiotherapy, psychotherapy, social counseling). Members of control group (CG) received standard postoperative care. Primary endpoint was rate of patients with diseased QoL ( 〈 50 points on at least one scale with 0=bad, 100=good QoL). χ2-tests were performed to compare rates of diseased QoL (Klinkhammer-Schalke et al, BrJCancer, 2012). Results: At begin of study there were no significant differences in both groups considering QoL. 6 months after surgery rate of patients with diseased QoL was significantly lower for emotion in IG (19.8%) vs CG (38.4%, p=.007), and for global QoL almost reached significance in IG (17.6%) vs CG (29.8%, p=.064). For other dimensions (except family life) there was a trend showing better QoL in IG, but results were not significant. Rates of patients with diseased QoL in 10 dimensions 6 months after surgery in intervention group [%] vs control [%] : Global QoL 17.6% vs 29.8%!, Physical functioning 4.7% vs 5.7%, Role functioning 26.4% vs 29.9%, Arm symptoms 13.8% vs 23.3%, Body image 13.8% vs 22.1%, Pain 19.5% vs 24.4%, Emotion 19.8 %vs 38.4%xx, Concentration, remembering 10.5% vs 17.4%, Fatigue 37.9 %vs 46.5%, Family life, social encounters 17.4% vs 16.3% (χ2-test: p 〈 .10!, p 〈 .01xx). Conclusions: Results confirm effectiveness of QoL pathway: 6 months after surgery IG showed better QoL in 2 important dimensions. Lower rates of diseased QoL in other dimensions support the result. Cancer patients will benefit from the QoL system implemented in clinical routine (long term implementation).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e18200-e18200
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e18200-e18200
    Abstract: e18200 Background: The analysis of drug safety is a mandatory part of pharmaceutical studies. For quality of life (QoL) interventions equal standards are missing. We performed a safety analysis for a QoL intervention in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods: A clinical pathway with QoL diagnosis and therapy was developed in a complex intervention. In a 2-arm RCT N = 220 primary CRC patients have been recruited in 4 certified colorectal cancer centres. In the intervention group (IG) QoL of patients is measured at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18 months postoperative (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29). The coordinating practitioner (CP: physician, responsible for outpatient treatment) is informed about the results of QoL measurement (QoL profile) and receives recommendations for QoL therapy (expert report). Control group (CG) patients` QoL is also measured but CPs neither receive QoL profile nor expert report (routine follow-up care). Safety analysis was performed after data for the first 50% of patients were available. The following safety parameters were investigated: (1) exclusion of patients from RCT due to detrimental effects of study participation; (2) drop-outs of patients; (3) physician workload related to RCT; (4) physician benefit related to RCT. Descriptive statistics and chi square tests or Fisher`s exact tests were used to analyze frequencies. Results: Mean age of the 110 patients was 66.2 years (SD = 9.7) with 64% being male (n = 70). Tumor stages were UICC III (n = 40), II (n = 33), I (n = 24), and IV (n = 13). Only 1 out of 110 patients was excluded from the study by the physician due to patient`s psychological burden. Four more patients dropped out of the study due to either lack of motivation, comorbidity, or positive health situation. Workload regarding RCT was rated low by most physicians (33/35 CPs with IG-patients vs. 24/27 CPs with CG-patients; p = .65). In contrast, many physicians reported benefits connected with RCT participation (19/33 CPs with IG-patients vs. 8/27 CPs with CG-patients; p = .03). Conclusions: Data showed that the study is feasible and safe. Thus, the RCT will be continued to the end according to trial protocol.Clinical trial information: NCT02321813 Clinical trial information: NCT02321813.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 10050-10050
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e20517-e20517
    Abstract: e20517 Background: To improve breast cancer patients` quality of life (QoL) as second relevant outcome of care, a clinical pathway with diagnosis and therapy of diseased QoL has been developed, implemented and tested in a randomized trial (RCT) as part of a complex intervention. More than 6 years after RCT, long-term QoL of survivors was assessed and separately analyzed in 2 cohorts: QoL-intervention + guideline treatment in the first postoperative year (GC+) and guideline treatment alone (GC). Methods: Both cohorts were part of a randomized trial with 2 x 100 primary breast cancer patients, surgically treated between 2004 - 2006, with QoL measurement every 3 months during the first year (EORTC QLQ-C30, BR23). In GC+ cohort, QoL was presented to coordinating physicians in a QoL-profile, including recommendations for treatment of diseased QoL (cutoff 〈 50 points on scale 0 = bad, 100 = good) in 10 dimensions (global QoL, physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social functioning, arm symptoms, body image, pain, fatigue) and up to 5 targeted therapies to improve QoL. GC was treated according to S3 guideline. At follow-up 〉 6 years after diagnosis (range of months since surgery: GC+ 74-94; GC 74-96), rates of diseased QoL in both cohorts were analyzed and compared with QoL 12 months postoperatively. Results: Long-term QoL was assessed in 66 patients of GC+ (mean age 64.7 (±10.9)) and 67 of GC (mean age 63.7 (±10.9)) (death GC+=13, GC=18; response rate 79%). In GC+, 48% of patients reported at least 1 QoL deficit at 12 months compared with 52% at 6-year follow-up, while in GC rate of diseased QoL increased from 53% to 62%. Regarding single dimensions, in GC+ rates of diseased QoL increased from 12 months to 6 years (except global QoL), reaching significance for arm symptoms (9% vs 29%) and body image (3% vs 16%) (p 〈 .01, McNemar`s test). In GC no dimension changed significantly, but rates of diseased QoL for arm symptoms (26% vs 31%) and body image (9% vs 17%) were already rather high at 12 months. Conclusions: Breast cancer patients need tailored QoL therapy, exceeding the first postoperative year. Similar to traditional medical care, QoL needs to be considered continuously by anchoring it in follow-up care.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. e21564-e21564
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. e21564-e21564
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...