Kurzfassung: Assessing measurable residual disease (MRD) has become standard with many tumors, but the clinical meaning of MRD in multiple myeloma (MM) remains uncertain, particularly when assessed by next-generation flow (NGF) cytometry. Thus, we aimed to determine the applicability and sensitivity of the flow MRD-negative criterion defined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG). PATIENTS AND METHODS In the PETHEMA/GEM2012MENOS65 trial, 458 patients with newly diagnosed MM had longitudinal assessment of MRD after six induction cycles with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD), autologous transplantation, and two consolidation courses with VRD. MRD was assessed in 1,100 bone marrow samples from 397 patients; the 61 patients without MRD data discontinued treatment during induction and were considered MRD positive for intent-to-treat analysis. The median limit of detection achieved by NGF was 2.9 × 10 −6 . Patients received maintenance (lenalidomide ± ixazomib) according to the companion PETHEMA/GEM2014MAIN trial. RESULTS Overall, 205 (45%) of 458 patients had undetectable MRD after consolidation, and only 14 of them (7%) have experienced progression thus far; seven of these 14 displayed extraosseous plasmacytomas at diagnosis and/or relapse. Using time-dependent analysis, patients with undetectable MRD had an 82% reduction in the risk of progression or death (hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.30; P 〈 .001) and an 88% reduction in the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.29; P 〈 .001). Timing of undetectable MRD (after induction v intensification) had no impact on patient survival. Attaining undetectable MRD overcame poor prognostic features at diagnosis, including high-risk cytogenetics. By contrast, patients with Revised International Staging System III status and positive MRD had dismal progression-free and overall survivals (median, 14 and 17 months, respectively). Maintenance increased the rate of undetectable MRD by 17%. CONCLUSION The IMWG flow MRD-negative response criterion is highly applicable and sensitive to evaluate treatment efficacy in MM.

Kurzfassung: From November 2014 to May 2017, 332 patients homogeneously treated with VRD induction, ASCT and VRD consolidation were randomized to receive maintenance therapy with RD (161 patients) vs IRD (171 patients). RD consisted of lenalidomide 15 mg/d from days 1-21 plus dexamethasone 20 mg/d on days 1-4 and 9-12 at 4-weeks intervals while in the IRD arm oral ixazomib at a dose of 4 mg on days 1,8, and 15 was added. MRD negative patients after 24 cycles were discontinued while those who were MRD positive remained on maintenance with RD for 36 more cycles. The MRD negativity from baseline increased from 50.9% to 71.8% with RD and from 59.6% to 72.4% with IRD at 2 years. After a median follow-up of 69 months from the initiation of maintenance, the PFS was similar in both arms, median not reached in either arm with a 6-years PFS rate of 61.3% and 55.6% for RD and IRD, respectively (HR 1.136 [95% CI 0.809 - 1.603]). No significant differences in PFS between RD and IRD were observed in any prognostic subgroup. After 2 years of maintenance, treatment was discontinued in 163 patients who were MRD negative while 63 MRD positive patients were continued on RD therapy. Maintenance discontinuation in MRD negative patients resulted in a low progression rate (17.2% at 4 years), even in patients with high-risk features. In summary, our results show the efficacy of RD maintenance and support the safety of maintenance discontinuation in MRD negative patients at 2 years. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02406144) and EudraCT (2014-00055410).

Kurzfassung: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) may show patchy bone marrow (BM) infiltration and extramedullary disease. Notwithstanding, quantification of plasma cells (PCs) continues to be performed in BM since the clinical translation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) remains undefined. PATIENTS AND METHODS CTCs were measured in peripheral blood (PB) of 374 patients with newly diagnosed MM enrolled in the GEM2012MENOS65 and GEM2014MAIN trials. Treatment included bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone induction followed by autologous transplant, consolidation, and maintenance. Next-generation flow cytometry was used to evaluate CTCs in PB at diagnosis and measurable residual disease (MRD) in BM throughout treatment. RESULTS CTCs were detected in 92% (344 of 374) of patients with newly diagnosed MM. The correlation between the percentages of CTCs and BM PCs was modest. Increasing logarithmic percentages of CTCs were associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS). A cutoff of 0.01% CTCs showed an independent prognostic value (hazard ratio: 2.02; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.1; P = .001) in multivariable PFS analysis including the International Staging System, lactate dehydrogenase levels, and cytogenetics. The combination of the four prognostic factors significantly improved risk stratification. Outcomes according to the percentage of CTCs and depth of response to treatment showed that patients with undetectable CTCs had exceptional PFS regardless of complete remission and MRD status. In all other cases with detectable CTCs, only achieving MRD negativity (and not complete remission) demonstrated a statistically significant increase in PFS. CONCLUSION Evaluation of CTCs in PB outperformed quantification of BM PCs. The detection of ≥ 0.01% CTCs could be a new risk factor in novel staging systems for patients with transplant-eligible MM.

Kurzfassung: MRD monitoring is one of the most relevant prognostic factors in elderly MM patients, irrespective of age or cytogenetic risk. Second-generation MFC immune profiling concomitant to MRD monitoring also helped to identify patients with different outcomes.

Kurzfassung: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) carrying standard- or high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) achieve similar complete response (CR) rates, but the later have inferior progression-free survival (PFS). This questions the legitimacy of CR as a treatment endpoint and represents a biological conundrum regarding the nature of tumor reservoirs that persist after therapy in high-risk MM. We used next-generation flow (NGF) cytometry to evaluate measurable residual disease (MRD) in MM patients with standard- vs high-risk CAs (n = 300 and 90, respectively) enrolled in the PETHEMA/GEM2012MENOS65 trial, and to identify mechanisms that determine MRD resistance in both patient subgroups (n = 40). The 36-month PFS rates were higher than 90% in patients with standard- or high-risk CAs achieving undetectable MRD. Persistent MRD resulted in a median PFS of ∼3 and 2 years in patients with standard- and high-risk CAs, respectively. Further use of NGF to isolate MRD, followed by whole-exome sequencing of paired diagnostic and MRD tumor cells, revealed greater clonal selection in patients with standard-risk CAs, higher genomic instability with acquisition of new mutations in high-risk MM, and no unifying genetic event driving MRD resistance. Conversely, RNA sequencing of diagnostic and MRD tumor cells uncovered the selection of MRD clones with singular transcriptional programs and reactive oxygen species–mediated MRD resistance in high-risk MM. Our study supports undetectable MRD as a treatment endpoint for patients with MM who have high-risk CAs and proposes characterizing MRD clones to understand and overcome MRD resistance. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01916252.

Kurzfassung: Background: Despite significant improvements in the treatment of MM, the outcome of patients with HR cytogenetics remains poor despite similar complete remission (CR) rates as compared to SR cases. Relapses among patients in CR are attributed to the persistence of MRD, but knowledge about the impact of MRD in patients with SR and HR cytogenetics, treated with modern therapies and monitored with next-generation techniques, is limited. Similarly, there is virtually no data about in vivo mechanisms of resistance in SR and HR MM; however, since MRD represents those very few cells that are resistant to treatment, it could be hypothesized that profiling MRD cells may shed light into the mechanisms of resistance in both SR and HR patients. Aim: To determine the clinical impact of MRD in MM patients with SR vs HR cytogenetics, and to identify transcriptional mechanisms determining MRD resistance by investigating the transcriptome of MRD cells in both patient subgroups. Methods: This study was conducted in a series of 390 patients enrolled in the PETHEMA/GEM2012 trial (6 induction cycles with VRD followed by ASCT and 2 courses of consolidation with VRD). FISH was analyzed on CD138 purified PCs at diagnosis. MRD was predefined to be prospectively assessed following induction, transplant and consolidation, using next-generation flow (NGF) according to EuroFlow. In 40 patients [28 with SR and 12 with HR cytogenetics: i.e., t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or del(17p)], diagnostic and MRD tumor cells persisting after VRD-induction were isolated by FACS according to patient-specific aberrant phenotypes. Due to the small number of sorted MRD cells (median of 25,600) we used a 3' end RNAseq method optimized for generating libraries from low-input starting material (MARSeq). Differential expression analyses were performed with DESeq2 R package. Results: At the latest time-point in which MRD was assessed, MRD-positive rates progressively increased (p =.006) from SR patients (148/300, 49%) to cases with t(4;14) (24/42, 57%) and del(17p) (29/38, 76%). Furthermore, MRD levels were significantly superior in patients with del(17p) compared to SR FISH (0.02% vs 0.006%, p =.009), while MRD levels in patients with t(4;14) (0.004%) were similar to those in SR MM. Only 10 patients had a t(14;16) and 4 were MRD-positive. Among patients achieving MRD-negativity ( 〈 2x10-6), 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were similar for those with SR FISH, t(4;14) and del(17p) (90%, 100% and 89%; p 〉 .05). Conversely, 3-year PFS rates for MRD-positive patients decreased from those having SR FISH to those with t(4;14) and del(17p) (59%, 46% and 24%, respectively), with statistically significant differences between the first and the latest subgroups (p 〈 .001). Since clearance of MRD notably lowered the risk of relapse and persistence of MRD significantly shortened the PFS in each cytogenetic group (p ≤.001), we investigated the unique features of MRD cells persisting after VRD-induction by comparing their transcriptome to that of patient-matched tumor cells at diagnosis (n=40). Accordingly, MRD cells showed 763 genes significantly deregulated (Padj 〈 .05), including a cluster of proteasome subunits and proteasome related genes (i.e. PSMB5, PSMC3IP, BTRC, HUWE1, FBXL20 and TRIM69). Gene set enrichment analysis unveiled biologic determinants of MRD resistance such as the IL6-JAK-STAT signaling pathway in SR patients and the ROS pathway in HR patients (FDR 〈 0.1). Interestingly, the number of genes deregulated in MRD cells of SR patients was 9-fold higher than HR cases suggesting that, whereas in SR MM, a few tumor cells with specific gene regulatory networks may have higher probability to persist VRD induction, the presence of HR cytogenetic alterations is associated per se, with a transcriptional program that allows a few MRD cells to persist treatment. Conclusions: This is one of the largest studies integrating patients' cytogenetics and MRD status. Our results, based on intensive treatment and MRD monitoring using NGF, unveil that achieving MRD-negativity may overcome the poor prognosis of HR cytogenetics. By contrast, persistent MRD significantly reduces PFS rates, particularly in patients with del(17p). Interestingly, MRD cells from SR and HR patients may have different transcriptional mechanisms leading to VRD resistance, and further understanding of these could provide knowledge on how to eradicate MRD in both patient subgroups. Disclosures Puig: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Garcia-Sanz:Affimed: Research Funding. Martinez-Lopez:BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Vivia: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Oriol:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rios:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy. De La Rubia:Ablynx: Consultancy, Other: Member of Advisory Board. Mateos:GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lahuerta:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bladé:Janssen: Honoraria. San-Miguel:Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

Kurzfassung: Early intervention in smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) requires optimal risk stratification to avoid under- and overtreatment. We hypothesized that replacing bone marrow (BM) plasma cells (PC) for circulating tumor cells (CTC), and adding immune biomarkers in peripheral blood (PB) for the identification of patients at risk of progression due to lost immune surveillance, could improve the International Myeloma Working Group 20/2/20 model. Experimental Design: We report the outcomes of 150 patients with SMM enrolled in the iMMunocell study, in which serial assessment of tumor and immune cells in PB was performed every 6 months for a period of 3 years since enrollment. Results: Patients with & gt;0.015% versus ≤0.015% CTCs at baseline had a median time-to-progression of 17 months versus not reached (HR, 4.9; P  & lt; 0.001). Presence of & gt;20% BM PCs had no prognostic value in a multivariate analysis that included serum free light-chain ratio & gt;20, & gt;2 g/dL M-protein, and & gt;0.015% CTCs. The 20/2/20 and 20/2/0.015 models yielded similar risk stratification (C-index of 0.76 and 0.78). The combination of the 20/2/0.015 model with an immune risk score based on the percentages of SLAN+ and SLAN− nonclassical monocytes, CD69+HLADR+ cytotoxic NK cells, and CD4+CXCR3+ stem central memory T cells, allowed patient’ stratification into low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk disease with 0%, 20%, 39%, and 73% rates of progression at 2 years. Conclusions: This study showed that CTCs outperform BM PCs for assessing tumor burden. Additional analysis in larger series are needed to define a consensus cutoff of CTCs for minimally invasive stratification of SMM.

Kurzfassung: Detecting persistent minimal residual disease (MRD) allows the identification of patients with an increased risk of relapse and death. In this study, we have evaluated MRD 3 months after transplantation in 106 myeloma patients using a commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy (LymphoTrack®), and compared the results with next-generation flow (NGF, EuroFlow). The use of different marrow pulls and the need of concentrating samples for NGS biased the applicability for MRD evaluation and favored NGF. Despite that, correlation between NGS and NGF was high ( R 2  = 0.905). The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates by NGS and NGF were longer for undetectable vs. positive patients (NGS: 88.7% vs. 56.6%; NGF: 91.4% vs. 50%; p   〈  0.001 for both comparisons), which resulted in a 3-year overall survival (OS) advantage (NGS: 96.2% vs. 77.3%; NGF: 96.6% vs. 74.9%, p   〈  0.01 for both comparisons). In the Cox regression model, NGS and NGF negativity had similar results but favoring the latter in PFS (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.09–0.45, p   〈  0.001) and OS (HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.06–0.75, p  = 0.02). All these results reinforce the role of MRD detection by different strategies in patient prognosis and highlight the use of MRD as an endpoint for multiple myeloma treatment.

Kurzfassung: Introduction: Several cooperative MM groups have shown that MRD monitoring may be relevant as biomarker to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment strategies, to support treatment decisions, and to act as surrogate for overall survival (OS) in MM. Because of its wider applicability, a significant fraction of available MRD data has been obtained using MFC that originally, was limited to 4- or 6-colors and measured a limited number of cells. It is assumed that the sensitivity of MFC can increase by usage of ≥8 markers and acquisition of greater cell numbers, but the degree of improved specificity and sensitivity remains unknown. Methods: We aimed at determining the increment in specificity and sensitivity upon transition from first-generation 4-color into a second-generation 8-color MFC assay, by applying new computational tools developed by the EuroFlow consortium in elderly MM patients, enrolled in the GEM2010MAS65 study, for which MRD monitoring was performed with an 8-color monoclonal antibody combination - CD45-PacB/CD138-OC515/CD38-FITC/CD56-PE/CD27-PerCPCy5.5/CD19-PECy7/CD117-APC/CD81-APCH7 - and acquisition of ≥2x106 leukocytes (detection limit: 10-5). Time-to-progression (TTP) and OS were measured from diagnosis. Results: First, we created a reference data file of normal (n=17) and clonal (n=71) plasma cells (PCs) derived from bone marrow samples of healthy individuals and MM patients (Figure 1A) in order to determine the individual contribution of each marker to the discrimination between normal vs. clonal PCs. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that CD19 ranked as the most significant marker followed by CD56, CD81, CD27, CD117, CD45, forward scatter (FSC), CD38, CD138 and sideward scatter (SSC). Accordingly, the 8-color combination resulted in improved discrimination between normal vs. clonal PCs as compared to the former 4-color approach based only on CD38/CD56/CD19/CD45 (Figure 1B); in fact, CD81, CD27 and CD117 had higher independent value than CD45 in the PCA. Afterwards, we focused on 50 randomly selected MRD-positive patients enrolled in the GEM2010MAS65 study, to compare the performance of an 8- vs. 4-color software-guided classification of MRD cells. PCA based on 8-colors showed that all but two patients were accurately located in the clonal PC reference and outside 1 or 2 standard deviation (SD) curves of the normal PC reference (96% accuracy; Figure 1C); by contrast, using 4-color software-guided classification up to 9 patients became located in the overlapping area between 1 and 2 SD of the normal and clonal PCs references (82% accuracy; Figure 1D). Afterward, we investigated the increment in sensitivity due to the evaluation of 2x106 leukocytes with the second-generation 8-color flow assay instead of the standard 2x105 cells with the first-generation 4-color approach, by determining how many of the 50 MRD-positive patients would turn into MRD-negative if only 2x105 leukocytes had been analyzed (detection limit: 10-4). Interestingly, by reducing the number of visible events to 2x105, our results showed that up to 15 out of the 50 cases (30%) would become wrongly classified as MRD-negative. Then, we investigated the impact in TTP and OS of having MRD levels of 10-5 within a series of 163 patients enrolled in the GEM2010MAS65 and with MRD assessment. Accordingly, 88 cases had detectable MRD levels ≥10-4, 21 patients had persistent MRD at 10-5, and the remaining 54 cases were MRD-negative. Importantly, MRD-positive patients at 10-5 had similar outcome as compared to cases with MRD levels ≥10-4 (both had median TTP of 31 months; 3-year OS rates were 80% and 74%, respectively) and significantly inferior to that of MRD-negative patients [median TTP not reached (P 〈 .001); 3-year OS rate of 93% (P =.05)]. Conclusions: We showed that the transition from a first-generation 4-color into a second-generation 8-color MFC assay that measured ten-times more cells resulted in increased specificity and sensitivity. MRD detection at the 10-5 level is clinically relevant, since it identifies a subset of patients with inferior survival than MRD-negative cases, similar to that of the overall MRD-positive patient population. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Paiva: Millenium: Consultancy; BD Bioscience: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; EngMab AG: Research Funding; Binding Site: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Puig:Janssen: Consultancy; The Binding Site: Consultancy. Gironella:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. van Dongen:BD Biosciences (cont'd): Other: Laboratory Services in the field of technical validation of EuroFlow-OneFlow antibody tubes in dried format. The Laboratory Services are provided by the Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NL; Cytognos: Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP on Infinicyt software, Patents on EuroFlow-based flowcytometric Diagnosis and Classification of hematological malignancies, Patents on MRD diagnostics, and Patents on PID diagnostics.; Cytognos (continued): Patents & Royalties: Royalty income for EuroFlow Consortium. The Infinicyt software is provided to all EuroFlow members free-of-charge.Licensing of Patent on detection of IgE+ B-cells in allergic diseases. Royalties for Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NL; DAKO: Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP and Patent on Split-Signal FISH. Royalties for Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NL; InVivoScribe: Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP and Patent on BIOMED-2-based methods for PCR-based Clonality Diagnostics.. Royalty income for EuroClonality-BIOMED-2 Consortium ; Immunostep: Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP and Patents on immunobead-based dection of fusion proteins in acute leukemias and other tumors. Royalties for Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC and for EuroFlow Consortium ; BD Biosciences: Other: Educational Services: Educational Lectures and Educational Workshops (+ related travelling costs). The lectures and workshops fully focus on the scientific achievements of the EuroFlow Consortium (No advertisement of products of BD Biosciences). , Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP and Patent on EuroFlow-based flowcytometric Diagnosis and Classification of hematological malignancies; Royalty income for EuroFlow Consortium.; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Laboratory Services in the field of MRD diagnostics, provided by the Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NL.. Mateos:Takeda: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria. San Miguel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.