GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • Parameswaran, Prasanth V.  (3)
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 1583-1583
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 1583-1583
    Kurzfassung: 1583 Background: Good mental health improves the overall quality of life. Anxiety and depression in post-treatment cancer survivors is common and can affect adversely on the individual. CanCovDirect is a novel, tele-medicine self-care intervention for cancer survivors. We practiced a randomized controlled superiority trial to compare CanCovDirect with usual standard care (SC) in this population.Methods: Individuals completing cancer treatment within the past 3 years who had symptoms with or without anxiety or depression were recruited from clinical and community settings in Northern Kerala. We allocated the participants using block randomization (CanCovDirect plus SC or to SC alone). Assessments of anxiety and depression severity (Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale [CES-D]; primary outcome) and secondary outcomes anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) health-related quality of life (Short Form Survey-12 mental and physical component summaries), were conducted at baseline, as well as 3 and 6 months (primary time point). Analyses of outcomes were adjusted for covariates using linear regression. Results: Participants recruited between June 2020 and November 2020 were randomly assigned to CanCovDirect (n = 152) or SC (n = 152). Among 350 participants randomly assigned, 304 (86.85%) completed the primary outcome at 6 months. CanCovDirect participants reported less severe anxiety and depressive symptoms on the CES-D than SC participants at 6 months, adjusted effect size (ES) 1.68 (95% CI, 1.28 to 2.05). CanCovDirect participants also had significantly greater quality of life compared with SC. Exploratory analysis suggested that types of cancer was a modifier of the primary outcome (interaction term P value =.04); the intervention was effective in women (ES, 0.62; 95% CI, −0.45 to 0.89). Conclusions: CanCovDirect is an essential method of managing mild-moderate depression and anxiety symptoms in cancer survivors.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e20518-e20518
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e20518-e20518
    Kurzfassung: e20518 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation have been demonstrated to be both predictive and prognostic for patients with metastatic lung cancer. The administration of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved survival in this group of patients. Several generations of EGFR TKIs are currently available. The EGFR mutations have been divided into common and rare. The common mutations include Exon 19 deletion and Exon 21 L858R mutations and rest are grouped as rare. The presence of visceral metastasis in the brain and liver are usually portends a poor prognosis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of lung cancer patients who attended our hospital outpatient department from 2017 to 2021. The prevalence, demographics and clinical profile of EGFR common and rare mutations were studied using descriptive statistics. Survival of EGFR mutated patients was plotted using Kaplan Meier plots. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Results: The prevalence of EGFR mutation among metastatic lung cancer was 14.10% (161/1148). The median age of the group was 60 years (23- 104 years). Smokers with EGFR mutations were 11.8% (n = 19). Male to Female ratios was 76:85 (47.2% and 52.8%). Three patients with squamous cell carcinoma exhibited EGFR mutation. Most common EGFR TKI used was Gefitnib. Osimertinib was used in 13 patients (1.4%). The percentage of common mutations were 85.75% (N = 132) and rare mutations were 14.3% (n = 22). The type of mutations could not be identified in 10 patients. The percentage of patients with exon 19 deletion were 63% (n = 97) and L858R were 24.7% (n = 38). Visceral metastasis (brain and liver) was seen in 47 patients (n = 29.2%). Brain progression was seen in 32 patients (n = 19.9%). The survival of patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion and L858R mutation was 16.36 + 8.97 months and 15.97+ 10.93 months, Survival among patients with common mutation was 16.20 + 9.57 months and among rare mutation was 13.43 + 12.19 months. Median Survival period of patients with visceral metastasis was 12 months (0 to 38 months). Conclusions: In our retrospective study, there was no significant difference between survival among common and rare EGFR mutations.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2022
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e18636-e18636
    Kurzfassung: e18636 Background: The majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers are linked to BRCA1/2 mutations. However, in patients with a suggestive personal or family history, a specific predisposing gene is identified in 〈 30% of cases. Mutation testing is recommended for individual genes in the appropriate clinical setting with a high suspicion index for a specific mutated gene. The risk of contralateral breast cancer increases with the time since the first breast cancer, reaching 20%–30% at ten years of follow-up and 40%–50% at 20 years, depending on the gene involved. Methods: The study assessed the prevalence of BRCA testing among young breast cancer women (age less than 50 years) and explored the factors hindering the performance of the BRCA mutation test. Among the 3400 breast cancers reported from 2017 to 2022, 46.17% (n = 1570) of young breast cancer women were advised for BRCA testing. We administered the questionnaire on factors influencing the BRCA mutation profiling performance to all the young breast cancer women (n = 1532). The data was collected from the electronic medical records and the department of molecular oncology. We performed regression analysis to predict the act of BRCA mutation profile testing. Results: Among them (n = 1570), only 17.70% (n = 278) performed BRCA1/2 genetic testing. In 278 patients who had undergone BRCA testing, pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1/2/HRR mutations were detected in 52 patients (18.7%). 38 (13.7%) with BRCA 1, 14(5%) with BRCA2. Somatic with HRR testing was done in 13(4.6%), Somatic testing in 37(13.3%) and germline testing was done in 228 (82%). BRCA mutation was detected in 18 (34.6%) patients with breast cancer, 32(61.5%) patients with ovarian cancer. The factors influencing not performing the BRCA testing were the higher Cost of the test (83.4%), delay in getting the result (32.4%), unawareness of the importance of the test (52.6%), and not being advised by the physician as a mandatory test to perform (47.6%) and male spouse as a decision maker (31.8%). Conclusions: BRCA mutation profile test is mandatory to know their recurrence risk and treatment decisions for opting for PARP inhibitor. But the Cost of the test is the main barrier to performing this in a low-middle-income country setting. Female gender and related decision-making conflict could be the other reasons not to perform the test.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2023
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...