GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Goldberg, Yair  (2)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, IOS Press, Vol. 82, No. 3 ( 2021-08-03), p. 1075-1084
    Abstract: Background: In patients with Alzheimer’s disease, global assessment scales, such as the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), the Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression Plus Caregiver Input (CIBI plus), and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) are commonly used. Objective: To clinically understand and interpret the associations between these scales, we examined the linkages for the total and change scores of CDR-SB, CIBI plus, and CGI. Methods: Individual participant data (N = 2,198) from five pivotal randomized placebo-controlled trials of donepezil were included. Data were collected at baseline and scheduled visits for up to 6 months. Spearman’s correlation coefficients ρ were examined between corresponding total and change scores of simultaneous CDR-SB, CIBI plus, and CGI ratings. To link between the simultaneous ratings, equipercentile linking was used. Results: We found strong evidence that the Spearman’s correlation coefficients between the CDR-SB and CGI, and CDR-SB and CIBI plus total scores were at least adequately correlated (ρ= 0.50 to 0.71, with p  〈  0.01). The correlation coefficients between the change scores of CDR-SB and CGI were deemed adequate for weeks 6 to 24 (ρ= 0.44 to 0.65); the remaining correlations were smaller in magnitude (ρ= 0.09 to 0.35). Overall, the linkages were in-line with expectations, e.g., CDR-SB range score of 3-4 (= very mild dementia) was linked to a CGI score of 3 (= mildly ill), and an increase of CDR-SB of 1 was linked to a change of 5 (= minimal worsening) in both CGI and CIBI plus. Conclusion: The study findings can be useful for clinicians wishing to compare scores of different scales across patients. They can also help researchers understand results of studies using different scales and can facilitate meta-analyses, to increase statistical power.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1387-2877 , 1875-8908
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: IOS Press
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2070772-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Evidence Based Mental Health, BMJ, Vol. 24, No. 2 ( 2021-05), p. 56-61
    Abstract: The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) are widely used rating scales to assess cognition in Alzheimer’s disease. Objective To understand the correspondence between these rating scales, we aimed to examine the linkage of MMSE with the ADAS-Cog and SIB total and change scores. Methods We used individual-level data on participants with Alzheimer’s disease (n=2925) from five pivotal clinical trials of donepezil. Data were collected at baseline and scheduled visits for up to 6 months. We used equipercentile linking to identify the correspondence between simultaneous measurements of MMSE with ADAS-Cog, and SIB total and change ratings. Findings Spearman’s correlation coefficients were of strong magnitude between the MMSE total score and the ADAS-Cog (rs from −0.82 to −0.87; p 〈 0.05) and SIB total scores (rs from 0.70 to 0.75; p 〈 0.05). Weaker correlations between the change scores were observed between the MMSE change score and the ADAS-Cog (week 1: r=−0.11, p=0.18; rs thereafter: −0.28 to −0.45; p 〈 0.05) and SIB change scores (rs from 0.31 to 0.44; p 〈 0.05). Linking suggested that the MMSE total scores were sensitive to moderate and severe cognitive impairment levels. Despite weak to moderate correlations for the change scores, moderate change levels linked well, indicating ceiling and floor effects. Conclusions The current results can be used in meta-analyses, data harmonisation and may contribute to increasing statistical power when pooling data from multiple sources. Clinical implications The current study results help clinicians to understand these cognitive rating scale scores.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1362-0347 , 1468-960X
    Language: English
    Publisher: BMJ
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3160283-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2052843-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...