GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • Stone, Andrea K.  (3)
  • Englisch  (3)
Materialart
Verlag/Herausgeber
Sprache
  • Englisch  (3)
Erscheinungszeitraum
FID
  • 1
    In: Cereal Chemistry, Wiley, Vol. 97, No. 2 ( 2020-03), p. 429-440
    Kurzfassung: Pulses are a good source of protein; however, they contain phytochemicals that can negatively affect the protein quality. Enzymatic hydrolysis could be a means to enhance the nutritional value of pea by improving the digestibility of the protein. To this aim, a commercial air‐classified pea protein‐enriched flour (PPEF) was hydrolyzed by different proteases (trypsin, Savinase, papain, and pepsin) to different degrees of hydrolysis (DH 2%–4% and 10%–12%) and levels of phytochemicals and in vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score were examined. Findings Protease treatments reduced the contents of condensed tannins and total phenolics, as well as trypsin inhibitor and chymotrypsin inhibitor activities. Hydrolysis at 10%–12% DH (degrees of hydrolysis) improved the amino acid score of the PPEF, but it was still limiting sulfur amino acids, whereas low levels of hydrolysis (DH 2%–4%) decreased the amino acid score. The in vitro protein digestibility score increased slightly following hydrolysis, with the greatest improvement in digestibility occurring with the papain treatment (DH 10%–12%). The in vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score with trypsin hydrolysis at DH 2%–4% was the lowest at 59.17%, whereas pepsin hydrolysis (10%–12% DH) gave the highest score (72.89%). Conclusions Specific hydrolysis treatments could be used to improve the overall nutrition of PPEF, enhancing the potential utilization of modified pea protein ingredients. Significance and novelty This study utilized four enzymes with different specificities resulting in PPEF hydrolysates with different protein quality even when the DH was the same. Increasing the nutritional quality of a PPEF may give it a competitive advantage over other pea ingredients.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0009-0352 , 1943-3638
    URL: Issue
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Wiley
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2016053-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: Cereal Chemistry, Wiley, Vol. 96, No. 6 ( 2019-11), p. 1159-1169
    Kurzfassung: The functionality of legume and cereal flours is difficult to compare within the literature due to the lack of standardized methodologies and differences in processing methods. The aim of this research was to investigate the functional (pasting, water/oil holding, foaming, and emulsification) attributes and protein quality of flours derived from a wide range of cereal and legume market classes (Canada) for comparative purposes. Findings Overall, legume flours (mean 1.77 g/g) had slightly higher oil holding capacities than cereal flours (mean 1.50 g/g), whereas their water hydration capacities were similar. In general, legume flours produced more foam with better stability than cereal flours. All legume flours had similar emulsifying properties, whereas for the cereals, oat flour had much lower emulsion stability (52.5%) than the other cereals examined (77.3%–97.7%). The in vitro protein digestibility‐corrected amino acid score (IV‐PDCAAS) of oat flour (62.46%) was much higher than that of wheat (~42%), whereas hull‐less barley (54.29%) was in between these values. Of the legumes studied, soybean and desi and kabuli chickpea flours had high protein quality (IV‐PDCAAS 72%–82%); red lentil was inferior to the aforementioned flours with an IV‐PDCAAS of 43.63%. Conclusions Legume and cereal flours differed mostly in terms of their oil holding, foaming properties, emulsion activity and pasting properties. Selection of a cereal or legume flour will depend on the attributes desired. Significance and novelty Information relating to various legume and cereal flour functionality and nutritional quality will enable for better ingredient selection for various food applications.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0009-0352 , 1943-3638
    URL: Issue
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Wiley
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 2016053-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Texture Studies, Wiley, Vol. 51, No. 2 ( 2020-04), p. 300-307
    Kurzfassung: In this study, response surface methodology (RSM) was used to evaluate the effect of extrusion conditions on physical properties of chickpea:barley extrudates (60:40), and the resulting protein quality of their flours. Barrel temperature (150–170°C) and moisture content (16–20%) were chosen as independent variables to generate a central composite design. Hardness, expansion index, bulk density, and protein quality were analyzed as responses parameters. Expansion was found to be higher at lower temperatures and higher moisture for the 60:40 chickpea:barley blend; bulk density became reduced with increased moisture; and hardness was found to increase at higher temperatures and lower moistures. The protein quality of their resulting flours was found to be greater at moisture contents higher than 16%. The composition, protein quality, and functional attributes were also examined for raw and precooked flours of chickpea, barley, and their blend at the center point of the RSM design (18% moisture, 160°C). Extrusion also leads to improved water hydration capacities and reduced viscosities for precooked individual and blended flours relative to the raw. Moreover, extrusion also led to improved protein quality in the chickpea and chickpea‐barley blend, but not the individual barley flour.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0022-4901 , 1745-4603
    URL: Issue
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Wiley
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2176283-1
    SSG: 15,3
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...