GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Keywords: Emergency management-Congresses. ; Electronic books.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 online resource (456 pages)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 9789402420463
    Series Statement: NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security Series
    DDC: 363.34
    Language: English
    Note: Intro -- Preface -- Introduction -- References -- Contents -- Part I The Role of NATO -- 1 NATO Cooperation with Georgia in the Framework of the Science for Peace and Security (SPS) Programme -- 1.1 The Science for Peace and Security (SPS) Programme -- 1.2 SPS Cooperation with Georgia -- 1.3 Securing Georgia and the Caucasus Against Geohazards -- 1.4 Conclusion -- 2 Lens on NATO-Georgia Cooperation: A Shared Engagement -- 3 An Overview of the 20-Year Collaboration Between NATO and Earth Scientists to Assess Geohazards in the Caucasus and Other Critical Regions -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Project CLG 982957 - Volcanic Hazards and Countermeasures for Georgian Section of Caspian Pipelines -- 3.2.1 Summary of the Project -- 3.2.2 Why this Project -- 3.2.3 Outcomes -- 3.3 Project G4934 - Security Against Geohazards at the Major Enguri Hydroelectric Scheme in Georgia -- 3.3.1 Summary of the Project -- 3.3.2 Why this Project -- 3.3.3 Outcomes -- 3.4 Project SFP 983142 - Geo-Environmental Security of the Toktogul Hydroelectric Power Station Region, Central Asia -- 3.4.1 Summary of the Project -- 3.4.2 Why this Project -- 3.4.3 Outcomes -- 3.5 CLG Project 978989 - A Multidisciplinary Approach to Recent Geologic Catastrophes at Subduction Zones -- 3.5.1 Summary of the Project -- 3.5.2 Why this Project -- 3.5.3 Outcomes -- 3.6 Discussion and Final Remarks -- References -- Part II Key Studies Focused on Regional and Geological Aspects -- 4 Active Kinematics of the Greater Caucasus from Seismological and GPS Data: A Review -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Main Tectonic Features of Greater Caucasus -- 4.3 Seismicity of the Greater Caucasus -- 4.3.1 Source of Data -- 4.3.2 Epicentre Distribution -- 4.3.3 Hypocentres Distribution -- 4.3.4 Focal Mechanism Solutions -- 4.3.4.1 Data Source -- 4.3.4.2 FMS Results -- 4.3.5 Stress Distribution -- 4.4 GPS Data. , 4.4.1 Data Source -- 4.4.2 Results -- 4.5 Discussion -- 4.5.1 Seismicity -- 4.5.2 Active Fault Kinematics -- 4.5.3 Stress Field and GPS Deformation Field -- 4.6 Conclusions -- References -- 5 Structural Architecture of the Western Greater Caucasus Orogen: New Data from a Crustal-Scale Structural Cross-Section -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 Tectonic Setting -- 5.3 The Crustal-Scale Structural Cross-Section -- 5.4 Discussion -- 5.5 Conclusions -- References -- 6 The Geometry of the Two Orogens Convergence and Collision Zones in Central Georgia: New Data from Seismic Reflection Profiles -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Geological Setting -- 6.3 Interpretation of Seismic Reflection Profiles -- 6.4 Discussion -- 6.5 Conclusions -- References -- 7 Regional Seismotectonic Zonation of Hydrocarbon Fields in Active Thrust Belts: A Case Study from Italy -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Triggered Versus Induced Seismicity -- 7.3 Stratigraphic and Structural Framework of the Italian Petroleum Systems -- 7.4 From Hydrocarbon Wells to Hydrocarbon Fields (HFs) and Hydrocarbon Field Assemblages (HFAs) -- 7.5 Kinematic Zonation of HFAs -- 7.6 Seismicity Versus HFAs -- 7.7 The Seismogenic Provinces -- 7.7.1 The Extensional Intermountain Province -- 7.7.2 The Deep and Shallow Compressional Province -- 7.7.3 The Strike-Slip Province -- 7.8 Seismotectonic Map of Hydrocarbon Field Assemblages (HFAs) -- 7.9 Final Remarks -- References -- Part III Key Studies for Seismic Hazard Assessment -- 8 The 2020 National Seismic Hazard Model for Georgia (Sakartvelo) -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Historical Review of the Development of Seismic Hazard Maps for Georgia -- 8.3 Developing the Seismic Hazard Model of Georgia -- 8.3.1 Earthquake Catalogue -- 8.3.1.1 Catalogue Compilation -- 8.3.1.2 Magnitude Homogenization -- 8.3.1.3 Declustering of the Earthquake Catalogue. , 8.3.1.4 Magnitude and Time Completeness -- 8.3.2 Regional Geology and Tectonics -- 8.3.3 Seismogenic Source Models -- 8.3.3.1 Area Source Model -- 8.3.3.2 Active Faults and Background Seismicity Model -- 8.3.3.3 Maximum Magnitude -- 8.4 Ground Motion Modelling -- 8.5 Logic Tree and Model Uncertainties -- 8.6 Ground Motion Hazard Assessment: Results -- 8.7 Hazard Disaggregation for the Selected Site -- 8.8 Conclusions and Future Perspectives -- 8.9 Data and Resources -- References -- 9 Non-ergodic Ground-Motion Models for Crustal Earthquakes in Georgia -- 9.1 Introduction -- 9.2 Nonergodic Seismic Hazard Analysis -- 9.2.1 Non-ergodic GMMs -- 9.3 Non-ergodic GMMs for California -- 9.4 Ground-Motion Data Set for Georgia -- 9.5 Non-ergodic GMM for Georgia -- 9.6 Conclusions -- References -- 10 Time Series Analysis of Fault Strain Accumulation Around Large Dam: The Case of Enguri Dam, Greater Caucasus -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2 Data -- 10.3 Recurrence Intervals and Magnitudes Time Series Analysis -- 10.4 Results -- 10.5 Discussion -- 10.6 Detection of an Anomalous Behavior of the Dam Using Complexity Analysis of Dam Tilts -- 10.7 Conclusions -- References -- 11 Geohazard Assessment Along the Southern Slope of the Greater Caucasus (Azerbaijan) -- 11.1 Introduction -- 11.2 The Study Area -- 11.3 Methodology -- 11.4 Conclusions -- References -- Part IV Key Studies for Volcanic Hazard Assessment -- 12 Quaternary Volcanic Activity in the Greater Caucasus: A Review of Elbrus, Kazbek and Keli Volcanoes -- 12.1 Introduction and Background -- 12.2 The Kazbek Neovolcanic Centre -- 12.2.1 Phase I (Mid-Pleistocene, 460-380 ka) -- 12.2.2 Phase II (Middle Pleistocene, 310-200 ka) -- 12.2.2.1 Early Episode of Phase II (II1-310-260 ka) -- 12.2.2.2 Late Episode of Phase II (II2-240-200 ka) -- 12.2.3 Phase III (Late Pleistocene, 130-90 ka). , 12.2.3.1 Early Episode of the Third Phase of Activity (III1-130-90 ka) -- 12.2.3.2 Late Episode of Phase III (III2-130-90 ka) -- 12.2.4 Phase IV (Late Pleistocene-Holocene, < -- 50 ka) -- 12.3 The Keli Neovolcanic Centre -- 12.3.1 Phase I (Middle Pleistocene, 245-170 ka) -- 12.3.2 Phase II (Late Pleistocene, 135-70 ka) -- 12.3.2.1 Early Episode of the Phase II (II1-135-100 ka) -- 12.3.2.2 Late Episode of the Phase II (II2-100-70 ka) -- 12.3.3 Phase III (Late Pleistocene-Holocene, < -- 30 ka) -- 12.4 Elbrus Neovolcanic Centre -- 12.4.1 Phase I (End of the Eopleistocene, 950-900 ka) -- 12.4.2 Phase II (Early Neopleistocene - 800-700 ka) -- 12.4.3 Phase III (Middle Neopleistocene, 225-170 ka) -- 12.4.4 Phase IV (Late Neopleistocene, 110-70 ka) -- 12.4.5 Phase V (Late Neopleistocene-Holocene, < -- 35 ka) -- 12.5 Final Remarks -- References -- 13 Tectonic Control Over the Abuli Samsari Volcanic Ridge, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia -- 13.1 Introduction -- 13.2 Geological Setting -- 13.3 Methods -- 13.3.1 Volcanic Centres and Tectonic Lineaments -- 13.3.2 Areal Density of Volcanic Centres -- 13.3.3 Inferring Magma Pathway Azimuth -- 13.4 Results -- 13.4.1 Volcanic Centres and Lineaments Identification -- 13.4.2 Areal Density of Volcanic Centers -- 13.4.3 Inferring the Direction of Magma Pathways -- 13.4.4 Field Data -- 13.5 Discussion -- 13.5.1 Geological-Structural Features -- 13.5.2 Seismic and Volcanic Hazard Assessment -- 13.6 Conclusions -- References -- Part V Key Studies for Hydrological, Landslide and Coastal Hazard Assessment -- 14 Landslide and Mudflow Hazard Assessment in Georgia -- 14.1 Rationale -- 14.2 Morphological Aspects of the Territory -- 14.3 The Influence of Climate and Weather -- 14.4 Classification of Landslide Types in the Territory of Georgia -- 14.5 New Hazard Maps Calculation -- 14.6 Results. , 14.7 Final Remarks and Future Developments -- References -- 15 Significance of the Spatial Resolution of DEM in Regional Slope Stability Analysis Enguri Dam, Republic of Georgia -- 15.1 Introduction and Background -- 15.2 Study Area -- 15.3 Data and Method -- 15.3.1 Model Inputs -- 15.3.2 GIS - TISSA -- 15.4 Results -- 15.5 Discussion -- 15.6 Conclusions -- References -- 16 Description of a 2-Year, High-Resolution Geodetic Monitoring of the Khoko Landslide, Enguri Reservoir, Georgia -- 16.1 Introduction -- 16.2 Materials and Methods -- 16.3 Results -- 16.3.1 First Observation Period -- 16.3.2 Second Observation Period -- 16.3.3 Third Observation Period -- 16.3.4 Entire Observation Period -- 16.4 Final Remarks -- References -- 17 Examples of Coastal Hazard Along the Georgian Black Sea Coast -- 17.1 Introduction -- 17.2 The Chorokhi Lithodynamic System (Southern Region) -- 17.3 The Central Coastline -- 17.3.1 Supsa-Natanebi -- 17.3.2 Kolkheti Coastal Zone -- 17.4 Abkhazia (Northern Region) -- 17.5 Final Remarks -- References -- Part VI Seismic Microzonation -- 18 Extensive Microzonation as a Tool for Seismic Risk Reduction: Methodological and Political Issues -- 18.1 Introduction -- 18.2 The Italian Guidelines for Seismic Microzonation (IGSM) -- 18.3 Implementation of Microzonation Studies in Italy -- 18.4 Conclusions -- References -- 19 Preliminary Results of Site Effects Assessment in Mtskheta (Georgia) -- 19.1 Introduction -- 19.2 Tectonic Setting and Seismicity -- 19.3 Geological Setting -- 19.4 Dataset of Geophysical Measurements -- 19.5 Results -- 19.6 Response Spectra and Amplification Factors with the Conventional Vs,30 Site Proxy -- 19.7 Conclusions -- References -- 20 Rheological Properties of Soils in Assessing the Seismic Hazard of the South Ukrainian Nuclear Power Plant -- 20.1 Introduction -- 20.2 Ground Response Analysis. , 20.3 Site Amplification in the South Ukrainian Nuclear Power Plant.
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Keywords: Natural disasters. ; Environmental sciences. ; Konferenzschrift Ivane J̌avaxišvilis Saxelobis T̕bilisis Saxelmcip̕o Universiteti 2019 ; Georgien ; Kaukasus ; Erdbeben ; Störung ; Kongress ; Großer Kaukasus ; Kleiner Kaukasus ; Erdbebengefahr ; Erdbebenzone ; Naturkatastrophe ; Vulkanismus ; Aserbaidschan ; Neotektonik ; Seismizität ; Seismologie ; Seismotektonik
    Description / Table of Contents: PART I - The role of NATO -- 01-NATO cooperation with Georgia in the framework of the Science for Peace (SPS) Programme -- 02-Lens on NATO-Georgia cooperation: a shared engagement -- 03-An overview of the 20-year collaboration between NATO and Earth scientists to assess geohazards in the Caucasus and other critical regions -- PART II - Key studies focused on regional and geological aspects -- 04-Active kinematics of the Greater Caucasus from seismological and GPS data: A review -- 05-Structural architecture of the western Greater Caucasus orogen: New data from a crustal-scale structural cross-section -- 06-The geometry of the two orogens convergence and collision zones in central Georgia: New data from seismic reflection profiles -- 07-Regional seismotectonic zonation of hydrocarbon fields in active thrust belts: a case study from Italy -- PART III - Key studies for seismic hazard assessment -- 08-The 2020 National Seismic Hazard Model for Georgia (Sakartvelo) -- 09-Non-Ergodic Ground-Motion Models for Crustal Earthquakes in Georgia -- 10-Time series analysis of fault strain accumulation around large dam: the case of Enguri dam, Greater Caucasus -- 11-Geohazard assessment along the southern slope of the Greater Caucasus (Azerbaijan) -- PART IV - Key studies for volcanic hazard assessment -- 12-Quaternary volcanic activity in the Greater Caucasus: a review of Elbrus, Kazbek and Keli volcanoes -- 13-Tectonic control over the Abuli Samsari Volcanic Ridge, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia -- PART V - Key studies for hydrological, landslide and coastal hazard assessment -- 14-Landslide and mudflow hazard assessment in Georgia -- 15-Significance of the Spatial Resolution of DEM in Regional Slope Stability Analysis Enguri Dam, Republic of Georgia -- 16-Description of a 2-year, high-resolution geodetic monitoring of the Khoko landslide, Enguri reservoir, Georgia -- 17-Examples of coastal hazard along the Georgian Black Sea Coast -- PART VI - Seismic micronation -- 18-Extensive Microzonation as a tool for seismic risk reduction: methodological and political issues -- 19-Preliminary results of site effects assessment in Mtskheta (Georgia) -- 20-Rheological properties of soils in assessing the seismic hazard of the South Ukrainian nuclear power plant -- 21-On the Seismic Waves Propagating in the Layered Earth Stratum -- PART VII - 7. Innovative approaches for geohazard and risk assessment -- 22-Commercial-UAV-based Structure from Motion for geological and geohazard studies -- 23-Automatic telemetric monitoring/Early Warning Systems, with multi-task sensor, applied to mass movements -- 24-Extensometer-based monitoring of active deformation at the Khoko landslide (Jivari, Georgia) -- 25-Aspects of Risk Management and Vulnerability Assessment of buildings in the Republic of Georgia.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource(XV, 458 p. 207 illus., 162 illus. in color.)
    Edition: 1st ed. 2021.
    ISBN: 9789402420463
    Series Statement: NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security
    Language: English
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2022-01-11
    Description: Immersive virtual reality can potentially open up interesting geological sites to students, academics and others who may not have had the opportunity to visit such sites previously. We study how users perceive the usefulness of an immersive virtual reality approach applied to Earth Sciences teaching and communication. During nine immersive virtual reality-based events held in 2018 and 2019 in various locations (Vienna in Austria, Milan and Catania in Italy, Santorini in Greece), a large number of visitors had the opportunity to navigate, in immersive mode, across geological landscapes reconstructed by cutting-edge, unmanned aerial system-based photogrammetry techniques. The reconstructed virtual geological environments are specifically chosen virtual geosites, from Santorini (Greece), the North Volcanic Zone (Iceland), and Mt. Etna (Italy). Following the user experiences, we collected 459 questionnaires, with a large spread in participant age and cultural background. We find that the majority of respondents would be willing to repeat the immersive virtual reality experience, and importantly, most of the students and Earth Science academics who took part in the navigation confirmed the usefulness of this approach for geo-education purposes.
    Description: This research has been provided in the framework of the following projects: (i) the MIUR project ACPR15T4_00098–Argo3D (http://argo3d.unimib.it/ (accessed on 26 November 2021)); (ii) 3DTeLC Erasmus + Project 2017-1-UK01-KA203-036719 (http://www.3dtelc.com (accessed on 26 November 2021)); (iii) EGU 2018 Public Engagement Grant (https://www.egu.eu/outreach/peg/ (accessed on 26 November 2021)). Agisoft Metashape is acknowledged for photogrammetric data processing. This article is also an outcome of Project MIUR–Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018–2022. Finally, this paper is an outcome of the Virtual Reality lab for Earth Sciences—GeoVires lab (https://geovires.unimib.it/ (accessed on 26 November 2021)). The work supports UNESCO IGCP 692 ‘Geoheritage for Resilience’.
    Description: Published
    Description: 9
    Description: 1TM. Formazione
    Description: JCR Journal
    Keywords: immersive virtual reality ; geology; ; photogrammetry; ; education; ; Iceland; ; Santorini ; Etna ; 04.04. Geology ; 05.03. Educational, History of Science, Public Issues ; 05.04. Instrumentation and techniques of general interest ; 04.08. Volcanology
    Repository Name: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
    Type: article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2023-02-01
    Description: In this body of work, we showcase a historic virtual geotrail on the eastern flank of the iconic Mt. Etna volcano (Italy), along a series of outstanding geological sites and features subsequent to an important eruption that took place in 1928. A geohistoric account of such a major eruption, is of great interest, since it is the only event since 1669 to have caused the destruction of a town (Mascali) in the Etna region. Volcanologists, educators, the lay public, tourists and volcano explorers can now access a series of “virtual geostops” belonging to this virtual geotrail, such that “visitors” can virtually fly above these sites by scanning a QR code on the printed or electronic version of the present manuscript, as well as on the poster provided as additional material for this manuscript. The virtual geostops that comprise the virtual geotrail were developed using the structure-frommotion (SfM) photogrammetry technique from images captured by using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The main result of our work is the virtual geotrail, subdivided in two parts and composed of eight geostops, each showing outstanding examples of geological features resulting from volcanic phenomena that took place also during 1979. Our approach is designed to support classical field trips, and it can undoubtedly become complementary to traditional field teaching in earth sciences, both now and in the future.
    Description: Published
    Description: 377
    Description: 1V. Storia eruttiva
    Description: 2V. Struttura e sistema di alimentazione dei vulcani
    Description: 2TM. Divulgazione Scientifica
    Description: JCR Journal
    Keywords: geotrail ; 04. Solid Earth
    Repository Name: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
    Type: article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2023-01-23
    Description: The 1928 CE volcanic activity on eastern Etna, Italy, produced wide surface deformation and high effusion rates along fissures, with excess volumes of about 50 million m3 of lavas. This, in conjunction with the low elevation of the main eruptive vents (1150 m a.s.l.), caused the destruction of the Mascali town. Our research focuses on a multidisciplinary study from field observations and Finite Element Method modelling through COMSOL Multiphysics ®, with the aim of reconstructing the geometry, kinematics and origin of the system of faults and fissures formed during the 1928 event. We collected quantitative measurements from 438 sites of azimuth values, opening direction and aperture amount of dry fissures, and attitude and vertical offsets of faults. From west to east, four volcanotectonic settings have been identified, related to dike propagation in the same direction: 1) a sequence of 8 eruptive vents, surrounded by a 385-m wide graben, 2) a 2.5-km long single eruptive fissure, 3) a half-graben as wide as 74 m and a symmetric, 39-m-wide graben without evidence of eruption, 4) alignment of lower vents along the pre-existing Ripe della Naca faults. Field data, along with historical aerial photos, became inputs to FEM numerical models. The latter allowed us to investigate the connection between diking and surface deformation during the 1928 event, subject to a range of overpressure values (1–20 MPa), host rock properties (1–30 GPa) and geometrical complexity (stratigraphic sequence, layer thickness). In addition, we studied the distribution of tensile and shear stresses above the dike tip and gained insights into dike-induced graben scenarios. Our multidisciplinary study reports that soft (e.g. tuff) layers can act as temporary stress barriers and control the surface deformation scenarios (dike-induced graben, single fracture or eruptive fissures) above a propagating dike by suppressing the distribution of shear stresses towards the surface.
    Description: Published
    Description: 229468
    Description: 2V. Struttura e sistema di alimentazione dei vulcani
    Description: JCR Journal
    Repository Name: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
    Type: article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Publication Date: 2022-10-27
    Description: Field-based classes in geological sciences are crucial components of geoscience education and research. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, such activities became problematic due to limitations such as travel restrictions and lockdown periods: this motivated the geoeducational community to tailor new ways to engage people in field activities. As a result, we adopted Immersive Virtual Reality as a tool to involve students, academics, and the lay public in field exploration, thus making geological exploration accessible also to people affected by permanent or temporary motor disabilities. In particular, we evaluated how users perceive the usefulness of this approach as applied to Earth Science learning and teaching, through nine outreach events, where a total of 459 participants were involved, with different ages and cultural backgrounds. The participants explored, in an immersive mode, four geological landscapes, defined as virtual geological environments, which have been reconstructed by cutting-edge, unmanned aerial system-based photogrammetry techniques. They include: Santorini (Greece), the North Volcanic Zone (Iceland), and Mt. Etna (Italy). After the exploration, each participant filled in an anonymous questionnaire. The results show that the majority would be willing to repeat the experience, and, most importantly, the majority of the students and Earth Science academics who took part in the navigation confirmed the usefulness of this technique for geo-education purposes. Our approach can be considered as a groundbreaking tool and an innovative democratic way to access information and experiences, as well as to promote inclusivity and accessibility in geo-education, while reducing travel costs, saving time, and decreasing the carbon footprint. This work has been carried out in the framework of the following projects: i) ACPR15T4_ 00098 “Agreement between the University of Milan Bicocca and the Cometa Consortium for the experimentation of cutting-edge interactive technologies for the improvement of science teaching and dissemination” of Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (ARGO3D - https://argo3d.unimib.it/); ii) Erasmus+ Key Action 2 2017-1-UK01-KA203- 036719 “3DTeLC – Bringing the 3D-world into the classroom: a new approach to Teaching, Learning and Communicating the science of geohazards in terrestrial and marine environments” (http://3dtelc.lmv.uca.fr/; https://www.3dtelc.com/); iii) 2018 EGU Public Engagement Grants (https://www.egu.eu/outreach/peg/).
    Description: This work has been carried out in the framework of the following projects: i) ACPR15T4_ 00098 “Agreement between the University of Milan Bicocca and the Cometa Consortium for the experimentation of cutting-edge interactive technologies for the improvement of science teaching and dissemination” of Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (ARGO3D - https://argo3d.unimib.it/); ii) Erasmus+ Key Action 2 2017-1-UK01-KA203- 036719 “3DTeLC – Bringing the 3D-world into the classroom: a new approach to Teaching, Learning and Communicating the science of geohazards in terrestrial and marine environments” (http://3dtelc.lmv.uca.fr/; https://www.3dtelc.com/); iii) 2018 EGU Public Engagement Grants (https://www.egu.eu/outreach/peg/).
    Description: Published
    Description: Vienna (Austria)
    Description: 1TM. Formazione
    Keywords: Virtual Reality ; geology ; tectonophysics ; education ; 04.07. Tectonophysics ; 05.03. Educational, History of Science, Public Issues ; 05.04. Instrumentation and techniques of general interest
    Repository Name: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
    Type: Conference paper
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...