GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Document type
Keywords
Years
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2023-04-24
    Keywords: Aluminium oxide; Barium; Calcium oxide; Chromium; Copper; DEPTH, sediment/rock; Energy dispersive polarization X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (EDP-XRF); Gallium; Iron oxide, FeO; Lead; Magnesium oxide; Manganese oxide; Nickel; Niobium; Orlovat; OUTCROP; Outcrop sample; Phosphorus pentoxide; Potassium oxide; Rubidium; Serbia; Silicon dioxide; Sodium oxide; Strontium; Thorium; Titanium dioxide; Vanadium; Yttrium; Zinc; Zirconium
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 2208 data points
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    PANGAEA
    In:  Supplement to: Obreht, Igor; Zeeden, Christian; Schulte, Philipp; Hambach, Ulrich; Eckmeier, Eileen; Timar-Gabor, Alida; Lehmkuhl, Frank (2015): Aeolian dynamics at the Orlovat loess–paleosol sequence, northern Serbia, based on detailed textural and geochemical evidence. Aeolian Research, 18, 69-81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2015.06.004
    Publication Date: 2023-01-13
    Description: Previous investigations showed that the Orlovat loess-paleosol section, northern Serbia, is characterized by irregularities in sedimentological properties, magnetic susceptibility and color of the sediment. Here, we applied granulometric analysis and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyses to study how the sedimentation at the Orlovat site was conditioned by specific geomorphological or climatic conditions. Grain-size analysis is an established method and one of the most frequently used paleoenvironmental proxies of loess deposits, and is complemented here with high resolution XRF analysis on sand-free samples to obtain a more detailed insight into paleoenvironmental conditions and weathering during the past ~160 ka. The geomorphological conditions of the surrounding area and variations in wind speed over time are of great importance for a better understanding of loess-paleosol deposits. The Orlovat section was exposed to special depositional conditions, which differ from other sections studied in the Carpathian Basin. Sand was delivered during interglacials, most probably from the Deliblato Sands by the southeast Kosava wind. This study highlights the importance of an integrated sedimentological approach for reliable paleoenvironmental reconstruction.
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/zip, 3 datasets
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2023-02-07
    Keywords: CaCO3 analysis, Scheibler, DIN 19684; Calcium carbonate; DEPTH, sediment/rock; Orlovat; OUTCROP; Outcrop sample; Serbia
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 95 data points
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2023-07-11
    Keywords: Beckman Coulter Laser diffraction particle size analyzer LS 13 320; DEPTH, sediment/rock; Grain size, mean; Median, grain size; Mode, grain size; Orlovat; OUTCROP; Outcrop sample; Serbia; Size fraction; Size fraction 0.044-0.04 µm; Size fraction 0.048-0.044 µm; Size fraction 0.053-0.048 µm; Size fraction 0.058-0.053 µm; Size fraction 0.064-0.058 µm; Size fraction 0.07-0.064 µm; Size fraction 0.077-0.07 µm; Size fraction 0.084-0.077 µm; Size fraction 0.093-0.084 µm; Size fraction 0.102-0.093 µm; Size fraction 0.112-0.102 µm; Size fraction 0.122-0.112 µm; Size fraction 0.134-0.122 µm; Size fraction 0.148-0.134 µm; Size fraction 0.162-0.148 µm; Size fraction 0.178-0.162 µm; Size fraction 0.195-0.178 µm; Size fraction 0.214-0.195 µm; Size fraction 0.235-0.214 µm; Size fraction 0.258-0.235 µm; Size fraction 0.284-0.258 µm; Size fraction 0.311-0.284 µm; Size fraction 0.342-0.311 µm; Size fraction 0.375-0.342 µm; Size fraction 0.412-0.375 µm; Size fraction 0.452-0.412 µm; Size fraction 0.496-0.452 µm; Size fraction 0.545-0.496 µm; Size fraction 0.598-0.545 µm; Size fraction 0.656-0.598 µm; Size fraction 0.721-0.656 µm; Size fraction 0.791-0.721 µm; Size fraction 0.868-0.791 µm; Size fraction 0.953-0.868 µm; Size fraction 1.047-0.953 µm; Size fraction 1.149-1.047 µm; Size fraction 1.261-1.149 µm; Size fraction 1.385-1.261 µm; Size fraction 1.520-1.385 µm; Size fraction 1.668-1.52 µm; Size fraction 1.832-1.668 µm; Size fraction 10.777-9.817 µm; Size fraction 101.096-92.092 µm; Size fraction 1041.030-948.322 µm; Size fraction 11.831-10.777 µm; Size fraction 110.979-101.096 µm; Size fraction 1142.81-1041.03 µm; Size fraction 12.988-11.831 µm; Size fraction 121.829-110.979 µm; Size fraction 1254.54-1142.81 µm; Size fraction 133.740-121.829 µm; Size fraction 1377.19-1254.54 µm; Size fraction 14.257-12.988 µm; Size fraction 146.815-133.74 µm; Size fraction 15.651-14.257 µm; Size fraction 1511.83-1377.19 µm; Size fraction 161.168-146.815 µm; Size fraction 1659.63-1511.83 µm; Size fraction 17.181-15.651 µm; Size fraction 176.925-161.168 µm; Size fraction 18.861-17.181 µm; Size fraction 1821.88-1659.63 µm; Size fraction 194.222-176.925 µm; Size fraction 2.011-1.832 µm; Size fraction 2.207-2.011 µm; Size fraction 2.423-2.207 µm; Size fraction 2.660-2.423 µm; Size fraction 2.920-2.66 µm; Size fraction 20.705-18.861 µm; Size fraction 2000.00-1821.88 µm; Size fraction 213.210-194.222 µm; Size fraction 22.729-20.705 µm; Size fraction 234.054-213.21 µm; Size fraction 24.951-22.729 µm; Size fraction 256.936-234.054 µm; Size fraction 27.391-24.951 µm; Size fraction 282.056-256.936 µm; Size fraction 3.205-2.92 µm; Size fraction 3.519-3.205 µm; Size fraction 3.863-3.519 µm; Size fraction 30.069-27.391 µm; Size fraction 309.631-282.056 µm; Size fraction 33.008-30.069 µm; Size fraction 339.902-309.631 µm; Size fraction 36.235-33.008 µm; Size fraction 373.132-339.902 µm; Size fraction 39.778-36.235 µm; Size fraction 4.240-3.863 µm; Size fraction 4.655-4.24 µm; Size fraction 409.611-373.132 µm; Size fraction 43.667-39.778 µm; Size fraction 449.657-409.611 µm; Size fraction 47.936-43.667 µm; Size fraction 493.617-449.657 µm; Size fraction 5.110-4.655 µm; Size fraction 5.610-5.1 µm; Size fraction 52.622-47.936 µm; Size fraction 541.876-493.617 µm; Size fraction 57.767-52.622 µm; Size fraction 594.852-541.876 µm; Size fraction 6.158-5.61 µm; Size fraction 6.760-6.158 µm; Size fraction 63.414-57.767 µm; Size fraction 653.008-594.852 µm; Size fraction 69.614-63.414 µm; Size fraction 7.421-6.76 µm; Size fraction 716.849-653.008 µm; Size fraction 76.420-69.614 µm; Size fraction 786.932-716.849 µm; Size fraction 8.147-7.421 µm; Size fraction 8.943-8.147 µm; Size fraction 83.891-76.42 µm; Size fraction 863.866-786.932 µm; Size fraction 9.817-8.943 µm; Size fraction 92.092-83.891 µm; Size fraction 948.322-863.866 µm
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 23109 data points
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2024-02-07
    Description: Gully formation has been associated to groundwater seepage in unconsolidated sand- to gravel-sizedsediments. Our understanding of gully evolution by groundwater seepage mostly relies on experiments and nu-merical simulations, and these rarely take into consideration contrasts in lithology and permeability. In addition,process-based observations and detailed instrumental analyses are rare. As a result, we have a poor understandingof the temporal scale of gully formation by groundwater seepage and the influence of geological heterogeneityon their formation. This is particularly the case for coastal gullies, where the role of groundwater in their for-mation and evolution has rarely been assessed. We address these knowledge gaps along the Canterbury coastof the South Island (New Zealand) by integrating field observations, luminescence dating, multi-temporal un-occupied aerial vehicle and satellite data, time domain electromagnetic data and slope stability modelling. Weshow that gully formation is a key process shaping the sandy gravel cliffs of the Canterbury coastline. It is anepisodic process associated to groundwater flow that occurs once every 227 d on average, when rainfall intensi-ties exceed 40 mm d−1. The majority of the gullies in a study area southeast (SE) of Ashburton have undergoneerosion, predominantly by elongation, during the last 11 years, with the most recent episode occurring 3 yearsago. Gullies longer than 200 m are relict features formed by higher groundwater flow and surface erosion〉2 kaago. Gullies can form at rates of up to 30 m d−1via two processes, namely the formation of alcoves and tunnelsby groundwater seepage, followed by retrogressive slope failure due to undermining and a decrease in shearstrength driven by excess pore pressure development. The location of gullies is determined by the occurrenceof hydraulically conductive zones, such as relict braided river channels and possibly tunnels, and of sand lensesexposed across sandy gravel cliffs. We also show that the gully planform shape is generally geometrically similarat consecutive stages of evolution. These outcomes will facilitate the reconstruction and prediction of a prevalenterosive process and overlooked geohazard along the Canterbury coastline.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed , info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: text
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...