Publication Date:
2023-08-30
Description:
The fundamental issue with various altimetry satellite tidal analysis is the unusual temporal resolution, as the satellites' repeating cycles span from a few to tens of days. The accuracy of tidal estimations over the Indonesian sea using multi-source altimetry data was studied in this research. The evaluation was carried out by studying and comparing the internal and external accuracy of each altimetry satellite mission based on the tide analysis results, allowing the best satellite combination to be selected. Tidal analysis was performed utilizing response methods over the Indonesian sea on 12 major tidal harmonic constants, including diurnal (K〈sub〉1〈/sub〉, O〈sub〉1〈/sub〉, P〈sub〉1〈/sub〉, Q〈sub〉1〈/sub〉), semi-diurnal (M〈sub〉2〈/sub〉, S〈sub〉2〈/sub〉, K〈sub〉2〈/sub〉, N〈sub〉2〈/sub〉), and long period (S〈sub〉A〈/sub〉, S〈sub〉SA〈/sub〉, M〈sub〉M〈/sub〉, M〈sub〉F〈/sub〉).ERM (Exact Repeat Mission) TOPEX/Jason series altimetry satellites (i.e. TOPEX, Jason-1, Jason-2, Jason-3, and SENTINEL-6A) covering the period (1993-2022), SENTINEL-3A (2016-2021), SENTINEL-3B (2018-2022), ENVISAT (2002-2010), GFO (2000-2008), and ERS-2 (1995-2011), were used in this research. These satellites' along-track altimetry was utilized for tidal analysis and modeling. The findings of this study indicate that the incorporation of ENVISAT, SENTINEL-3A, and SENTINEL-3B satellites in the construction of tidal models contributes significantly to internal and external errors of 6-30 cm and 1-10 cm, respectively. Before developing the Indonesian tidal models, the key findings of this research can be used as a guideline and a consideration in selecting the best multi-source altimetry data.
Language:
English
Type:
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Permalink