GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Document type
Years
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2016-06-10
    Description: Estimating small-scale V P / V S variations at depth can be a powerful tool to infer lithology and hydration of a rock, with possible implications for frictional behavior. In principle, from the differential arrival times of P and S phases from a set of spatially clustered earthquakes, an estimate of the local V P / V S can be extracted, because the V P / V S is the scaling factor between the P and S differential times for each pair of earthquakes. We critically review the technique proposed by Lin and Shearer (2007) , in which the mean value over all stations is subtracted from the differential arrival times of each pair of events in order to make the method independent of a priori information on origin times. The demeaned differential P and S arrival times are plotted on a plane, and the V P / V S ratio is estimated by fitting the points on this plane. We tested the method by both theoretical analysis and numerical simulations of P and S travel times in several velocity models. We found that the method returns exact values of V P / V S only in the case of a medium with homogeneous V P / V S , whereas, when a V P / V S gradient is present, the estimates are biased as an effect of systematic differences between P and S takeoff angles. We demonstrated that this bias arises from the demeaning of the arrival times over the stations. In layered models with V P / V S decreasing with depth, we found that V P / V S is overestimated or underestimated, respectively, for takeoff angles larger or smaller than 90°. Moreover, we calculated analytically the dependence of this bias on the takeoff angles. Our simulations also showed that the difference between the calculated and the expected V P / V S is reduced for simple horizontally layered velocity structures (〈0.06), whereas it is 0.27 in a more realistic velocity model mimicking a subduction zone.
    Print ISSN: 0037-1106
    Electronic ISSN: 1943-3573
    Topics: Geosciences , Physics
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...