ISSN:
1471-0528
Source:
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
Objectives Evaluation of new mathematical formula (Femur 4) derived from a twin population to estimate fetal weight in twins using ultrasound. Comparison of Femur 4 is with conventional mathematical models.Design Retrospective analysis of ultrasonic measurements of 297 twin babies from 24 to 40 weeks of gestation who were born within 10 days of ultrasound examination.Setting Aberdeen Maternity Hospital.Methods With ultrasonic measurements obtained from twin babies, estimated fetal weight was calculated using the mathematical models of Campbell, Shepard and Hadlock. The calculations were repeated for the model of Femur 4. All models were compared against Femur 4.Results The coefficient of determination of the linear regression between the actual and predicted weight was highest for Femur 4 (0,852). Femur 4 had the highest proportion of babies with estimated weights within 10% of actual birth weight (71.4%). In babies who weighed between 2000 and 3000 g, Femur 4 had the least systematic and random error of −1.69 and 8.96, respectively. For babies below the 10th centile for weight, Femur 4 had comparable positive and negative predictive values of 76.0% and 92.3%, respectively. Femur 4 was equally poor at predicting growth discordancy with positive and negative predictive values of 70.0% and 86.5% only.Conclusion Femur 4 requires measurements of femur length and abdominal circumference only, hence avoiding the need to obtain difficult head measurements which is a common problem in twins. It is a good model for estimation of fetal weight in twins. However, prediction of growth discordancy remains problematic.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08431.x
Permalink
