GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1471-0528
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Objectives 1. To compare the ultrasound biparietal diameter and crown-rump length of fetuses with and without Down's syndrome in the first half of pregnancy; 2. To investigate the effect of estimation of gestational age using either measure on the detection rate of serum screening for Down's syndrome.Design Matched case-control study. Cases were singleton Down's syndrome pregnancies with a biparietal diameter or a crown-rump length recorded. Five controls were matched to each case on: medical centre; the date of the ultrasound scan examination (within two years); gestational age measured as the number of days since the first day of the last menstrual period; and the ultrasound measure used (ie the biparietal diameter (the measure of choice), or the crown-rump length otherwise). If a woman had a serum screening test for Down's syndrome, the biparietal diameter or crown-rump length measurement had to be taken prior to the screening test so that the result of the test could not influence whether a scan was performed.Setting Ten antenatal screening centres in seven countries in Europe and North America.Subjects Two hundred and one women with singleton Down's syndrome pregnancies and 1005 women with unaffected singleton pregnancies.Results The median biparietal diameter of fetuses with Down's syndrome was identical to that among the controls (median difference 0.0mm, 95% confidence intervals (CI)–0.5 to 0.5mm). The estimates of gestational age based on biparietal diameter yielded a median gestational age less than that based on the women's last menstrual period: three days less for cases and two days less for controls; small but statistically significant differences probably reflected a minor systematic difference in the conversion of a biparietal diameter to a gestational age estimate. The median crown-rump length of fetuses with Down's syndrome was also identical to that among controls (median difference 0.0mm, 95% CI–1.5 to 2.0 mm). There was no significant difference between the median gestational age estimate based on crown-rump length and that based on the women's last menstrual period.Conclusion In antenatal screening for Down's syndrome the routine use of an ultrasound biparietal diameter or crown-rump length measurement to estimate gestational age will not adversely affect the detection rate. To avoid differences in gestational age estimates using the last menstrual period and the biparietal diameter influencing screening performance, separate medians should be derived for each serum marker using the two methods of estimating gestational age. The appropriate set of medians can then be used to calculate the multiple of the median value for each woman screened depending on the method used to estimate her gestational age.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    New York, NY [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell
    Biotechnology and Bioengineering 43 (1994), S. 122-130 
    ISSN: 0006-3592
    Keywords: interesterification ; lipase ; mass transfer ; solvent-free systems ; Chemistry ; Biochemistry and Biotechnology
    Source: Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
    Topics: Biology , Process Engineering, Biotechnology, Nutrition Technology
    Notes: The use of solvent-free systems in the oil and fats industry is commonplace. Initial studies on interesterification were carried out in solvent systems because the lipase was immobilized solely by adsorption onto particles of diatomaceous earth. In this study, the mass transfer characteristics associated with the continuous interesterification of olive oil in a solvent-free system have been examined, for lipase immobilized on the three ion-exchange materials: Duolite ES562, Duolite ES568, and Spheroil DEA. The process of immobilization is influenced by the internal structure of the material and this in turn influences the interesterification activity of the catalyst. Individually prepared catalysts for the three support materials have shown that external mass transfer limitations are unlikely even at low flowrates.In the case of Spherosil DEA, with a mean pore diameter of 1480 Å, the wide pores would be expected to reduce internal mass transfer limitations; however, it is more likely that the reduction in activity with increased catalyst loading is due to the lipase molecules being immobilized in a tightly packed monolayer. In such a situation, some active sites of the lipase molecules would become inaccessible to substrate molecules leading to an observed reduction in activity. For Duolite ES568, the observed results are very similar to those seen for Spherosil DEA, however, the pore structure of this support material indicate that some internal mass transfer limitations may also be occurring. Yet the contribution of the individual effects cannot be determined. The results observed for the support Duolite ES562 are different than those observed for the other materials and reflect the heterogeneity of Duolite ES562. The large proportion of narrow pores in the support mean that, for the catalysts examined, immobilization is most likely to have occurred in the external pores of the particles, and as such no internal mass transfer limitation is observed.It is clear that for interesterification the material chosen for enzyme immobilization will have an important role in determining the catalyst efficiency. External mass transfer limitations are very minor and observed internal mass transfer limitations may be caused by both internal mass transfer and the manner in which the immobilization process occurs. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Additional Material: 11 Ill.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...