GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2023-11-23
    Description: Offshore meteoric groundwater (OMG) has long been hypothesized to be a driver of seafloor geomorphic processes in continental margins worldwide. Testing this hypothesis has been challenging because of our limited understanding of the distribution and rate of OMG flow and seepage, and their efficacy as erosive/destabilizing agents. Here we carry out numerical simulations of groundwater flow and slope stability using conceptual models and evolving stratigraphy—for passive siliciclastic and carbonate margin cases—to assess whether OMG and its evolution during a late Quaternary glacial cycle can generate the pore pressures required to trigger mechanical instabilities on the seafloor. Conceptual model results show that mechanical instabilities using OMG flow are most likely to occur in the outer shelf to upper slope, at or shortly before the Last Glacial Maximum sea‐level lowstand. Models with evolving stratigraphy show that OMG flow is a key driver of pore pressure development and instability in the carbonate margin case. In the siliciclastic margin case, OMG flow plays a secondary role in preconditioning the slope to failure. The higher degree of spatial/stratigraphic heterogeneity of carbonate margins, lower shear strengths of their sediments, and limited generation of overpressures by sediment loading may explain the higher susceptibility of carbonate margins, in comparison to siliciclastic margins, to mechanical instability by OMG flow. OMG likely played a more significant role in carbonate margin geomorphology (e.g., Bahamas, Maldives) than currently thought.
    Description: Plain Language Summary: The flow of fresh to brackish groundwater has been proposed as an important process shaping the seafloor. However, we still have a poor understanding of how groundwater behaves in the sub‐seafloor and whether it can erode seafloor sediments. In this study, we test this hypothesis by using conceptual and realistic numerical models of two common types of seafloor margins—siliciclastic and carbonate—to assess the role of groundwater in making the seafloor susceptible to erosion. We show that the flow of groundwater offshore could have driven seafloor erosion close to the shelf break during the Last Ice Age, when sea level was lower than at present. Carbonate margins are more susceptible to this type of failure than siliciclastic margins. This may be explained by the higher variability in sediment properties across carbonate margins as well as the lower strength of their sediments. Groundwater has likely played an important role in shaping the seafloor in carbonate margins, and it may be responsible for landforms such as canyons, scars, and depressions in the Bahamas and the Maldives.
    Description: Key Points: Offshore meteoric groundwater (OMG) flow can drive mechanical instabilities in the outer shelf to upper slope. Such instabilities occur at, or shortly after, the Last Glacial Maximum sea‐level lowstand. Carbonate margins are more susceptible to mechanical instability by OMG than siliciclastic margins.
    Description: European Research Council http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000781
    Description: National Science Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
    Description: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7094202
    Description: https://www.rocscience.com/software/slide2
    Description: https://figshare.com/s/5336d42d19ef771d4ad8
    Description: https://figshare.com/s/5027cd5ca22a7e96b3d1
    Keywords: ddc:551.3 ; offshore groundwater ; mechanical instability ; continental margins ; seafloor geomorphology ; siliciclastic ; carbonate
    Language: English
    Type: doc-type:article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2024-02-07
    Description: Offshore meteoric groundwater (OMG) has long been hypothesised to be a driver of seafloor geomorphic processes in continental margins worldwide. Testing this hypothesis has been challenging because of our limited understanding of the distribution and rate of OMG flow and seepage, and their efficacy as erosive/destabilising agents. Here we carry out numerical simulations of groundwater flow and slope stability using conceptual models and evolving stratigraphy - for passive siliciclastic and carbonate margin cases – to assess whether OMG and its evolution during a late Quaternary glacial cycle can generate the pore pressures required to trigger mechanical instabilities on the seafloor. Conceptual model results show that mechanical instabilities by OMG flow are most likely to occur in the outer shelf to upper slope, at or shortly before the Last Glacial Maximum sea level lowstand. Models with evolving stratigraphy show that OMG flow is a key driver of pore pressure development and instability in the carbonate margin case. In the siliciclastic margin case, OMG flow plays a secondary role in preconditioning the slope to failure. The higher degree of spatial/stratigraphic heterogeneity of carbonate margins, lower shear strengths of their sediments, and limited generation of overpressures by sediment loading may explain the higher susceptibility of carbonate margins, in comparison to siliciclastic margins, to mechanical instability by OMG flow. OMG likely played a more significant role in carbonate margin geomorphology (e.g. Bahamas, Maldives) than currently thought. Key Points Offshore meteoric groundwater (OMG) flow can drive mechanical instabilities in the outer shelf to upper slope Such instabilities occur at, or shortly after, the Last Glacial Maximum sea level lowstand Carbonate margins are more susceptible to mechanical instability by OMG than siliciclastic margins
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed , info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: text
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2024-02-07
    Description: The facies distribution in time and space of sedimentary successions is controlled by a complex interplay between physical, chemical and biological processes, which are nowadays difficult to construe from the geological record. Numerical models constitute a valuable tool to identify and quantify such controlling factors permitting a reliable 3D extrapolation and prediction of stratigraphic and facies architectures beyond outcropping rock strata. This study assesses the roles of three controlling parameters being carbonate production rate, relative sea-level changes and terrigenous clastic sediment supply, on the evolution of an Aptian carbonate system. The SIMSAFADIM-CLASTIC, a 3D process-based sedimentary-stratigraphic forward model, was used for this evaluation. The carbonate succession modelled crops out in the western Maestrat Basin (E Iberia), and corresponded to a platform-to-basin transition comprising three depositional environment-related facies assemblages: platform top, slope and basin. Testing of geological parameters in forward modelling results in a wide range of possible 3D geological scenarios. The documented distribution of facies and sequence-stratigraphic framework combined with a virtual outcrop model were used as a reference to perform geometric (quantitative) and architectural and stacking pattern (qualitative) research by model-data comparison. The time interval modelled spans 1450 ky. The best-fit simulation run characterizes and quantifies (1) relative sea-level fluctuations recording five different genetic types of deposit (systems tracts) belonging to two depositional sequences as expected from field-data analysis, (2) a rate of terrigenous clastic sediment input ranging between 0.5 and 2.5 gr/s, and (3) a mean autochthonous carbonate production maximum rate of 0.08 m/ky. Furthermore, the quantitative and qualitative sensitivity tests carried out highlight that the fluctuation of relative sea level exerted the main control on the resulting stratigraphic and facies architectures, whereas the effect of inflowing terrigenous clastic sediment is less pronounced. Facies assemblages show different sensitivities to each parameter, being the slope carbonates more sensitive than the platform top facies to inflowing fine terrigenous sediments. On slope depositional settings, siliciclastic input also controls stratal stacking patterns and the dimensions of the carbonate bodies formed. The final 3D model allows to spot architectural features such as stacking patterns that can be misinterpreted by looking at the resulting record in the outcrop or by using other 2D approaches, and facilitates the comprehension of reservoir connectivity highlighting the occurrence of initial disconnected regressive platforms, which were later connected during a transgressive stage.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...