GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Document type
Years
  • 1
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    In:  Flora Malesiana Bulletin (0071-5778) vol.10 (1989) nr.1 p.2
    Publication Date: 2015-04-20
    Description: When Flora Malesiana began, officially in 1950, its aim was to produce a comprehensive survey of an estimated 25,000 plant species in a period of a few decades. On the one hand the Flora had to be concise, on the other hand it had to be “a replacing encyclopedia” for all previously published knowledge. The approach was generally called ‘semi-monographic’, indicating that a certain degree of ‘completeness’ was to be realized in the treatments. Even in 1960, ten years later, the founder, Professor van Steenis wrote in an official report that the period necessary for completion would be 30 years (from 1960 onwards) and that the total size would be equivalent to 20 volumes like volumes I, 4 and I, 5 that had appeared in the first decade. Had Professor van Steenis considered more carefully the actual progress, he would have found that the true figures were another 19 decades in order to complete over 35 volumes! The graph on the preceding page shows the growth of the Flora expressed in numbers of species treated per volume. It is surprising that the original rate has not significantly slowed! For a somewhat more elaborate contemplation on these data and background concepts, see the contribution by Geesink in the Flora Malesiana Symposium Proceedings Volume ‘The Plant Diversity of Malesia’. We are now 40 years later with not yet 20% of the Flora (Phanerogams only) completed and the contents of the first volumes outdated to various degrees. This problem was the subject of a 2-day workshop organized immediately after the Flora Malesiana Symposium held in Leiden from 21-25 August 1989. The discussion papers were given to all participants prior to the workshop.
    Repository Name: National Museum of Natural History, Netherlands
    Type: Article / Letter to the editor
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2024-01-12
    Description: There is no doubt that in this matter the ideal is the productive, competent monographer who steadily revises a group worldwide and who contributes as required to Floras. For large taxa, there must be some doubt, however, whether such a person exists.\nAs with so many matters of systematics and Flora production, there are various aspects to this topic and often no clear or unanimously acceptable solutions. Only if one writes a Flora single-handed does one have the luxury of all matters of detail, style, format etc. being to one\xe2\x80\x99s personal satisfaction \xe2\x80\x93 and the days of doing so for a large Flora are over.
    Repository Name: National Museum of Natural History, Netherlands
    Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    In:  Flora Malesiana Bulletin vol. 10 no. 1, pp. 2-4
    Publication Date: 2024-01-12
    Description: When Flora Malesiana began, officially in 1950, its aim was to produce a comprehensive survey of an estimated 25,000 plant species in a period of a few decades. On the one hand the Flora had to be concise, on the other hand it had to be \xe2\x80\x9ca replacing encyclopedia\xe2\x80\x9d for all previously published knowledge. The approach was generally called \xe2\x80\x98semi-monographic\xe2\x80\x99, indicating that a certain degree of \xe2\x80\x98completeness\xe2\x80\x99 was to be realized in the treatments. Even in 1960, ten years later, the founder, Professor van Steenis wrote in an official report that the period necessary for completion would be 30 years (from 1960 onwards) and that the total size would be equivalent to 20 volumes like volumes I, 4 and I, 5 that had appeared in the first decade. Had Professor van Steenis considered more carefully the actual progress, he would have found that the true figures were another 19 decades in order to complete over 35 volumes! The graph on the preceding page shows the growth of the Flora expressed in numbers of species treated per volume. It is surprising that the original rate has not significantly slowed! For a somewhat more elaborate contemplation on these data and background concepts, see the contribution by Geesink in the Flora Malesiana Symposium Proceedings Volume \xe2\x80\x98The Plant Diversity of Malesia\xe2\x80\x99.\nWe are now 40 years later with not yet 20% of the Flora (Phanerogams only) completed and the contents of the first volumes outdated to various degrees. This problem was the subject of a 2-day workshop organized immediately after the Flora Malesiana Symposium held in Leiden from 21-25 August 1989. The discussion papers were given to all participants prior to the workshop.
    Repository Name: National Museum of Natural History, Netherlands
    Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...