GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Document type
Publisher
Years
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 19 (1987), S. 35-39 
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Previous studies have demonstrated that verapamil may overcome resistance to anthracyclines. In vitro and in vivo experiments were performed on wild-type and resistant Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Verapamil in concentrations of 25–50 μM enhances the accumulation of daunorubicin (DNR) in resistant cells to the same level as in wild-type cells. No significant effect of verapamil on influx or nuclear binding could be demonstrated, indicating that verapamil enhances DNR uptake by blocking active drug extrusion. Exposure of cells to a high concentration of Ca2+ did not influence the effect of verapamil on DNR accumulation, suggesting a different mode of verapamil action apart from the Ca2+-blocking effect. Attempts to circumvent acquired resistance to DNR in vivo with verapamil showed that the combination of the two drugs was more toxic than DNR given alone. The LD10 of DNR was determined as 3 mg/kg and the LD10 of the combination, as 2.5 mg/kg. The therapeutic effect of verapamil at a dose of 50 mg/kg and DNR of 2.5 mg/kg increased the life span of the mice by 50%. No difference was seen in the wild-type tumor in vivo. These data lead us to conclude that verapamil can reverse DNR resistance completely, but that verapamil at non-toxic dosage only reduces DNR resistance by 50% in vivo.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Recent studies by Boesch et al. have demonstrated that a nonimmunosuppressive cyclosporin analog, SDZ PSC 833 (an analog of cyclosporin D), is an active multidrug-resistance modifier that is at least 10 times more potent than cyclosporin A. In vitro accumulation and cytotoxicity experiments using daunorubicin (DNR) and vincristine (VCR) under the influence of SDZ PSC 833 and cyclosporin A were performed in wild-type (EHR2) and the corresponding highly DNR-resistant (about 80-fold) Ehrlich ascites tumor cells (EHR2/DNR+). In accumulation experiments, both SDZ PSC 833 and cyclosporin A were found to reverse the multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype, but to the same degree at equimolar concentrations. Thus, in EHR2/DNR+ cells, both cyclosporins at 5 μg/ml enhanced DNR and VCR accumulation to sensitive levels, but only a negligible effect on DNR accumulation in the drug-sensitive cells was seen. In the clonogenic assay, the cytotoxicity of the two modulators was equal. The lethal dose for 50% of the cell population (LD50) was approx. 7 μg/ml for both compounds, and no toxicity was observed at concentrations below 2 μg/ml. At nontoxic doses, both cyclosporins effectively increased the cytotoxicity of DNR and VCR in a concentration-dependent manner. The dose-response curves were nearly identical and did not demonstrate differences in modulator potency. These data permit the conclusion that cyclosporin A and SDZ PSC 833 do raise the intracellular accumulation of DNR and VCR to the same levels and that SDZPSC 833 does not potentiate cytotoxicity better than cyclosporin A in EHR2/DNR+ cells. However, since the new compound is nonimmunosuppressive and causes less organ toxicity, clinical studies of its MDR modulating effect seem highly relevant.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary The epipodophyllotoxines VP-16 and VM-26 are chemically closely related. VM-26 has been found to be considerably more potent than VP-16 in vitro in a number of investigations. Although the drugs have been known for 〉20 years, they have not been compared at clearly defined equitoxic doses on an optimal schedule in vivo and it has not been clarified as to whether a therapeutic difference exists between them. A prolonged schedule is optimal for both drugs; accordingly we determined the toxicity in mice using a 5-day schedule. The dose killing 10% of the mice (LD10) was 9.4 mg/kg daily (95% confidence limits, 7.4–11.8) for VP-16 and 3.4 (2.5–4.5) mg/kg daily for VM-26. In vitro, we found VM-26 to be 6–10 times more potent than VP-16 in a clonogenic assay on murine tumors P388 and L1210 leukemia and Ehrlich ascites. This pattern was also demonstrated in a multidrug-resistant subline of Ehrlich selected for resistance to daunorubicin (Ehrlich/DNR+), as it was 30 times less sensitive than Ehrlich cells to both VP-16 and VM-26. Using 90%, 45%, and 22% of the LD10 on the same murine tumors in vivo, we found that the effect of the two drugs was equal as evaluated by both the increase in life span and the number of cures. The drugs were also compared in nude mice inoculated with human small-cell lung cancer lines OC-TOL and CPH-SCCL-123; however, they were more toxic to the nude mice and only a limited therapeutic effect was observed. In conclusion, the complete cross-resistance between the two drugs suggests that they have an identical antineoplastic spectrum. VM-26 was more potent than VP-16 in vitro; however, this was not correlated to a therapeutic advantage for VM-26 over VP-16 in vivo
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1573-0778
    Keywords: anticancer drugs ; at-MDR ; cell culture ; DNA topoisomerase II ; drug resistance
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine , Process Engineering, Biotechnology, Nutrition Technology
    Notes: Abstract The characteristic feature of multidrug resistance (MDR) associated with drugs that interact with DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) is alterations in topo II activity or amount (at-MDR). We have characterized the at-MDR phenotype in human leukemic CEM cells selected for resistance to the topo II inhibitor, VM-26. Compared to drug-sensitive cells, the key findings are that at-MDR cells exhibit (i) decreased topo II activity; (ii) decreased drug sensitivity, activity and amount of nuclear matrix topo II; (iii) increased ATP requirement of topo II; (iv) a single base mutation in topo II resulting in a change of Arg to Gln at position 449, at the start of the motif B/nucleotide binding site; and (v) decreased topo II phosphorylation, suggesting decreased kinase or increased phosphatase activities. Recent results using single-stranded conformational polymorphism analysis reveals the presence of a mutation in the motif B/nucleotide binding site of the topo IIα gene in CEM at-MDR cells and in another leukemic cell line selected for resistance to m-AMSA. Finally, we have observed marked changes in the nuclear distribution of topo II in cells treated with anti-topo II drugs and have also found these changes to be attenuated in drug-resistant cells. We postulate that traditional inhibitors of topo II alter the equilibrium of the strand-passing reaction such that the number of enzyme-DNA covalent complexes increases. We further suggest that when the enzyme is bound to DNA it is protected from proteolysis, thus allowing more topo II molecules to be detected. We propose that MDR associated with alterations in topo II may have clinical consequences, and our current efforts involve exploiting these biochemical and molecular observations in the development of probes that may be useful to identify such drug resistant cells in the tumors of patients.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...