GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: Research data from the Field Research Facility (FRF) http://www.frf.usace.army.mil/
    Keywords: FRF
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/zip, 7 datasets
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: USACE / FRF has maintained wave buoys around the 17 m and/or 20 m depth contour since 1980. Over the years, we have used three different types of waverider buoys manufactured by Datawell B.V. (Haarlem, Netherlands). From 1980 until 1996, we used non-directional buoys, first the 0.7 m hull diameter design and then the 0.9 m hull diameter design. The buoys operate by recording the output of an accelerometer suspended in fluid and gimbaled (Hippy-40). For data prior to September 1986, data were recorded at 2 or 4 Hz and record lengths were either 34 or 17 minutes, respectively. Collection intervals were either three hours or six hours. From September 1986 to November 1996 data was collected hourly. Frequency spectra were computed using the Welch method with 50% overlapped ensembles [1]. From the end of 1996 onward, we have maintained 0.9 m hull diameter Directional Waverider MkII and MKIII buoys [2] that, in addition to vertical acceleration, also measure two orthogonal components of horizontal acceleration. From Feb 1997 to May 2005, time series were collected at 1.28 Hz and cross-spectral analysis was performed on shore [3, 4]. Between May 2005 and May 2013, directional Fourier coefficients computed on-board the buoy and transmitted onshore. Since May 2013, data analysis has been manged through the Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP), UCSD San Diego, CA. Data are transmitted via an Iridium satellite link at half-hour intervals. Two dimensional (2D) frequency-direction spectra are computed using an Iterative Maximum Likelihood Estimator (IMLE) method [5]. For more information see FRF data paper, FRF website and data portal, and CDIP website. [1] Welch, P (1967) [2] de Vries, JJ (2014) [3] Longuet-Higgins, M.S., Cartwright, D.E. and Smith, N.D. (1963) [4] Earle, M.D., Steele, K.E. and Wang, D.W.C. (1999) [5] Oltman-Shay, J. and Guza, R.T. (1984)
    Keywords: coastal wave; CT; Field_Research_Facility; FRF; North Carolina; ocean wave; significant wave height; Underway cruise track measurements; wave; wave buoy; wave spectra
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/x-netcdf, 4.7 MBytes
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: This data include a unique series of repetitive surveys (1979-now) of shore-perpendicular profile lines surrounding the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Field Research Facility (FRF) in Duck, NC. The surveys typically include 28 lines which extend from 600 m south of the FRF research pier to 600 m north. Special surveys may extend the coverage further. Surveys are typically monthly and after major storms but may be done as frequently as daily during special experiments (DUCK82, DUCK85, SuperDuck '86, DELILAH '90, DUCK94, SandyDuck 1997, DUCK98 and MORPHOS 2008, etc.). Profile lines are spaced ~45 m apart and extend from the primary dune line to approximately 2 km offshore (-15 m isobath NAVD88). Profile lines are numbered according to their FRF coordinate longshore distance in meters. 4 lines (1097, 1006, 1 and -91) were surveyed biweekly until ~2007. During the experiments, surveys were conducted more frequently of an area located north of the pier and known as the "minigrid" where profile line spacing was ~25 m. Over time the survey techniques evolved; accuracy and data point coverage improved. The platforms used include: (1) A Sea Sled with a graduated mast which was pulled offshore by a boat and winched back to shore by means of a cable; (2) The Coastal Research Amphibious Buggy or CRAB, a 10-m tall motorized tripod which an operator drives from the beach through the surf zone to a depth of ~-9 m at ~1000m offshore. (3) A Lighter Amphibious Resupply Cargo V (LARC-V) vessel which is a 10-m long amphibious vessel capable of continuous data collection from the beach, through the surf zone and offshore. LARC-V surveys extend to a depth of ~-15 m at ~2000 m offshore. Survey instruments included a Motorola Miniranger, Automatic Survey Level, Zeiss Elta 2s Electronic Total Station, Geotronics Geodimeter 140T auto-tracking total station and most recently a Real-Time Kinematic Global Positioning System (RTK-GPS). Speed, accuracy and error sources depend on the survey system used. These data are part of a series of surveys since October 1979 which document the evolving beach topography and bathymetry surrounding the USACE Field Research Facility (FRF) and which provide a measure of the beach's response to coastal processes, including storms. Survey data are complemented by a suite of continuous observations of local waves, winds, tides and currents. These data are unique in their temporal coverage and vertical accuracy and have been the subject of multiple technical papers. For more information and technical details, please see the PDF embedded with the data files (or see further details reference).
    Keywords: CT; Field_Research_Facility; File content; File format; File name; File size; FRF; North Carolina; Underway cruise track measurements; Uniform resource locator/link to file
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 10 data points
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: USACE / FRF has maintained wave buoys around the 17 m and/or 20 m depth contour since 1980. Over the years, we have used three different types of waverider buoys manufactured by Datawell B.V. (Haarlem, Netherlands). From 1980 until 1996, we used non-directional buoys, first the 0.7 m hull diameter design and then the 0.9 m hull diameter design. The buoys operate by recording the output of an accelerometer suspended in fluid and gimbaled (Hippy-40). For data prior to September 1986, data were recorded at 2 or 4 Hz and record lengths were either 34 or 17 minutes, respectively. Collection intervals were either three hours or six hours. From September 1986 to November 1996 data was collected hourly. Frequency spectra were computed using the Welch method with 50% overlapped ensembles [1]. From the end of 1996 onward, we have maintained 0.9 m hull diameter Directional Waverider MkII and MKIII buoys [2] that, in addition to vertical acceleration, also measure two orthogonal components of horizontal acceleration. From Feb 1997 to May 2005, time series were collected at 1.28 Hz and cross-spectral analysis was performed on shore [3, 4]. Between May 2005 and May 2013, directional Fourier coefficients computed on-board the buoy and transmitted onshore. Since May 2013, data analysis has been manged through the Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP), UCSD San Diego, CA. Data are transmitted via an Iridium satellite link at half-hour intervals. Two dimensional (2D) frequency-direction spectra are computed using an Iterative Maximum Likelihood Estimator (IMLE) method [5]. For more information see FRF data paper, FRF website and data portal, and CDIP website. [1] Welch, P (1967) [2] de Vries, JJ (2014) [3] Longuet-Higgins, M.S., Cartwright, D.E. and Smith, N.D. (1963) [4] Earle, M.D., Steele, K.E. and Wang, D.W.C. (1999) [5] Oltman-Shay, J. and Guza, R.T. (1984)
    Keywords: coastal waves; CT; directional wave data; Field_Research_Facility; FRF; North Carolina; ocean waves; Underway cruise track measurements; wave; wave buoy; wave spectra
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/x-netcdf, 2.2 GBytes
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: By 1986, FRF scientists and technicians designed and built a novel wave sensor. A fixed, precisely-surveyed array of pressure gauges working in sync forming a wave antennae with a directional resolution well beyond that of buoys; details can be found in [1]. From 1986 - 1990, the array consisted of 10 elements parallel to the shore, referred to as the "linear array". The linear array resolved directional spectra but with 180 degree ambiguity. Although most of the wave energy propagates towards the coast, there is some fraction of reflected wave energy (not resolved). Please see the FRF data paper, FRF website, and FRF data portal for more information. [1] Long, C. E. and Oltman-Shay, J. M. (1991)
    Keywords: coastal waves; CT; directional waves; Field_Research_Facility; FRF; linear array; North Carolina; ocean waves; Underway cruise track measurements; wave; wave array; wave data; wave measurement; wave spectra
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/x-netcdf, 57.2 MBytes
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: Over time, wind data has been recorded at 10+ distinct wind stations often with multiple stations active simultaneously. The highest quality records were selected to be included into a conglomerate. From 1981-1987, station locations included a tower near the main building and the roof of the main building. In 1987, measurements were additionally made at the end of the pier and, in 1994, the pier became their exclusive location. At each station, wind speed and direction were measured by either Weather Measure Skyvane anemometers or RM Young (RMY) marine anemometers. Both were mechanical anemometers whereby the action of the wind turns an impeller. In the early era, there was a gauge preference based on location (e.g., the pier location was preferred over the roof). In the modern era of multiple wind stations at the end of the pier, an algorithm chose a preferred station. Wind stations, and their preference, are listed in the Scientific Data paper. Most recently, station 1 or 2 is given preference depending on wind direction (the upwind sensor is preferred). If data from the preferred station passes QC, it is included in the conglomerate. If not, the same process is applied down the chain of preference until a record passes (stations 5 and 8 were never used). Wind speed and direction were recorded a 1 or 2 Hz with various record lengths. There are 3 main eras of sampling. Sampling schemes varied until near continuous sampling began in 1992. All previous sampling schemes were reanalyzed into 10 minute segments for calculating statistics. Record remainders are kept if they are at least 6 minutes but forced to 10 minute time steps. Data is in a netCDF file with variables (units): time (seconds), latitude (deg. N), longitude (deg. W), sensorID, sensorElevation (m), windSpeed (m/s), windGust (m/s), windDirection (deg.), qcFlagSpeed, qcFlagDirection. time is unix epoch time, sensorID is digit code representing unique ID and sensor preference, sensorElevation is relative to NAVD88, windSpeed is 10 minute average, windGust is highest 5 second average, windDirection is coming from convention - clockwise from true North, qcFlagSpeed & qcFlagDirection are indications of data quality - 1 = passed, 3 = questionable, and 4 = fail. Please see the paper for full documentation.
    Keywords: CT; Field_Research_Facility; FRF; North Carolina; Underway cruise track measurements; wind; wind direction; wind gust; wind speed
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/x-netcdf, 26.9 MBytes
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: USACE / FRF has maintained wave buoys around the 17 m and/or 20 m depth contour since 1980. Over the years, we have used three different types of waverider buoys manufactured by Datawell B.V. (Haarlem, Netherlands). From 1980 until 1996, we used non-directional buoys, first the 0.7 m hull diameter design and then the 0.9 m hull diameter design. The buoys operate by recording the output of an accelerometer suspended in fluid and gimbaled (Hippy-40). For data prior to September 1986, data were recorded at 2 or 4 Hz and record lengths were either 34 or 17 minutes, respectively. Collection intervals were either three hours or six hours. From September 1986 to November 1996 data was collected hourly. Frequency spectra were computed using the Welch method with 50% overlapped ensembles [1]. From the end of 1996 onward, we have maintained 0.9 m hull diameter Directional Waverider MkII and MKIII buoys [2] that, in addition to vertical acceleration, also measure two orthogonal components of horizontal acceleration. From Feb 1997 to May 2005, time series were collected at 1.28 Hz and cross-spectral analysis was performed on shore [3, 4]. Between May 2005 and May 2013, directional Fourier coefficients computed on-board the buoy and transmitted onshore. Since May 2013, data analysis has been manged through the Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP), UCSD San Diego, CA. Data are transmitted via an Iridium satellite link at half-hour intervals. Two dimensional (2D) frequency-direction spectra are computed using an Iterative Maximum Likelihood Estimator (IMLE) method [5]. For more information see FRF data paper, FRF website and data portal, and CDIP website. [1] Welch, P (1967) [2] de Vries, JJ (2014) [3] Longuet-Higgins, M.S., Cartwright, D.E. and Smith, N.D. (1963) [4] Earle, M.D., Steele, K.E. and Wang, D.W.C. (1999) [5] Oltman-Shay, J. and Guza, R.T. (1984)
    Keywords: coastal waves; CT; Field_Research_Facility; FRF; North Carolina; ocean waves; significant wave height; Underway cruise track measurements; wave; wave buoy; wave spectra
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/x-netcdf, 9.5 MBytes
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Publication Date: 2022-05-25
    Description: © The Author(s), 2015. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Geophysical Research Letters 42 (2015): 7992–8000, doi:10.1002/2015GL065980.
    Description: Despite the importance of sediment availability on wetland stability, vulnerability assessments seldom consider spatiotemporal variability of sediment transport. Models predict that the maximum rate of sea level rise a marsh can survive is proportional to suspended sediment concentration (SSC) and accretion. In contrast, we find that SSC and accretion are higher in an unstable marsh than in an adjacent stable marsh, suggesting that these metrics cannot describe wetland vulnerability. Therefore, we propose the flood/ebb SSC differential and organic-inorganic suspended sediment ratio as better vulnerability metrics. The unstable marsh favors sediment export (18 mg L−1 higher on ebb tides), while the stable marsh imports sediment (12 mg L−1 higher on flood tides). The organic-inorganic SSC ratio is 84% higher in the unstable marsh, and stable isotopes indicate a source consistent with marsh-derived material. These simple metrics scale with sediment fluxes, integrate spatiotemporal variability, and indicate sediment sources.
    Description: U.S. Geological Survey Coastal and Marine Geology Program; Global Change and Land Use Program
    Keywords: Sediment transport ; Tidal wetlands ; Wetland stability ; Wetland vulnerability
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Format: application/pdf
    Format: application/msword
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Publication Date: 2022-05-25
    Description: This paper is not subject to U.S. copyright. The definitive version was published in Estuaries and Coasts 35 (2012): 1285-1298, doi:10.1007/s12237-012-9515-x.
    Description: Increased nutrient loading to estuaries has led to eutrophication, degraded water quality, and ecological transformations. Quantifying nutrient loads in systems with significant groundwater input can be difficult due to the challenge of measuring groundwater fluxes. We quantified tidal and freshwater fluxes over an 8-week period at the entrance of West Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts, a eutrophic, groundwater-fed estuary. Fluxes were estimated from velocity and salinity measurements and a total exchange flow (TEF) methodology. Intermittent cross-sectional measurements of velocity and salinity were used to convert point measurements to cross-sectionally averaged values over the entire deployment (index relationships). The estimated mean freshwater flux (0.19 m3/s) for the 8-week period was mainly due to groundwater input (0.21 m3/s) with contributions from precipitation to the estuary surface (0.026 m3/s) and removal by evaporation (0.048 m3/s). Spring–neap variations in freshwater export that appeared in shorter-term averages were mostly artifacts of the index relationships. Hydrodynamic modeling with steady groundwater input demonstrated that while the TEF methodology resolves the freshwater flux signal, calibration of the index– salinity relationships during spring tide conditions only was responsible for most of the spring–neap signal. The mean freshwater flux over the entire period estimated from the combination of the index-velocity, index–salinity, and TEF calculations were consistent with the model, suggesting that this methodology is a reliable way of estimating freshwater fluxes in the estuary over timescales greater than the spring– neap cycle. Combining this type of field campaign with hydrodynamic modeling provides guidance for estimating both magnitude of groundwater input and estuarine storage of freshwater and sets the stage for robust estimation of the nutrient load in groundwater.
    Description: Funding was provided by the USGS Coastal and Marine Geology Program and by National Science Foundation Award #0420575 from the Biocomplexity/Coupled Biogeochemical Cycles Program.
    Keywords: Estuarine hydrodynamics ; Coastal groundwater discharge ; Total exchange flow ; Estuarine modeling ; Index-velocity method
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Publication Date: 2022-05-25
    Description: This paper is not subject to U.S. copyright. The definitive version was published in Coastal Engineering 136 (2018): 147-160, doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.01.003.
    Description: The performance of a linear depth inversion algorithm, cBathy, applied to coastal video imagery was assessed using observations of water depth from vessel-based hydrographic surveys and in-situ altimeters for a wide range of wave conditions (0.3 〈 significant wave height 〈 4.3 m) on a sandy Atlantic Ocean beach near Duck, North Carolina. Comparisons of video-based cBathy bathymetry with surveyed bathymetry were similar to previous studies (root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.75 m, bias = −0.26 m). However, the cross-shore locations of the surfzone sandbar in video-derived bathymetry were biased onshore 18–40 m relative to the survey when offshore wave heights exceeded 1.2 m or were greater than half of the bar crest depth, and broke over the sandbar. The onshore bias was 3–4 m when wave heights were less than 0.8 m and were not breaking over the sandbar. Comparisons of video-derived seafloor elevations with in-situ altimeter data at three locations onshore of, near, and offshore of the surfzone sandbar over ∼1 year provide the first assessment of the cBathy technique over a wide range of wave conditions. In the outer surf zone, video-derived results were consistent with long-term patterns of bathymetric change (r2 = 0.64, RMSE = 0.26 m, bias = −0.01 m), particularly when wave heights were less than 1.2 m (r2 = 0.83). However, during storms when wave heights exceeded 3 m, video-based cBathy over-estimated the depth by up to 2 m. Near the sandbar, the sign of depth errors depended on the location relative to wave breaking, with video-based depths overestimated (underestimated) offshore (onshore) of wave breaking in the surfzone. Wave speeds estimated by video-based cBathy at the initiation of wave breaking often were twice the speeds predicted by linear theory, and up to three times faster than linear theory during storms. Estimated wave speeds were half as fast as linear theory predictions at the termination of wave breaking shoreward of the sandbar. These results suggest that video-based cBathy should not be used to track the migration of the surfzone sandbar using data when waves are breaking over the bar nor to quantify morphological evolution during storms. However, these results show that during low energy conditions, cBathy estimates could be used to quantify seasonal patterns of seafloor evolution.
    Description: This research was funded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Field Data Collection Program, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Research and Technology under ERDC's research program titled “Force Projection Entry Operations, STO D.GRD.2015.34”, the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory base program from the Office of Naval Research, a Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship funded by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, and the National Science Foundation.
    Keywords: Remote sensing ; Beach morphology ; Depth inversion ; Bathymetry estimation ; Video imaging ; Surfzone
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...