GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
    Keywords: Medicine ; Allergy ; Dermatology ; Family medicine ; Internal medicine ; Nursing ; Medicine & Public Health ; Allergy ; Dermatology ; Family medicine ; Internal medicine ; Nursing ; Medicine ; Dermatitis, Irritant ; Aufsatzsammlung ; Kontaktdermatitis ; Kontaktdermatitis ; Kontaktdermatitis
    Description / Table of Contents: Dermatology - Short description currently not available.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: Online-Ressource (XXIV, 538 p. 126 illus., 79 in color, digital)
    ISBN: 9783540312949
    Series Statement: SpringerLink
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Note: Includes bibliographical references and index , CONTENTS; I. CLASSIFICATION AND CLINICAL FEATURES; 1 Ten Genotypes of Irritant Contact Dermatitis; 2 Irritant Contact Dermatitis Versus Allergic Contact Dermatitis; II. SPECIAL CLINICAL FORMS; 3 Barrier Function and Perturbation: Relevance for Interdigital Dermatitis; 4 Friction Melanosis; 5 Diaper Dermatitis; 6 Chemical Skin Burns; 7 Contact Urticaria Syndrome; 8 Airborne Irritant Dermatitis; 9 Irritant Dermatitis of the Scalp; 10 Irritant Contact Dermatitis of the Nails; III. EPIDEMIOLOGY; 11 Importance of Irritant Contact Dermatitis in Occupational Skin Disease , 12 Irritant Contact Dermatitis in the TropicsIV. OCCUPATIONAL IRRITANT DERMATITIS; 13 Occupational Issues of Irritant Contact Dermatitis; 14 Hairdressing; 15 Occupational Irritant Dermatitis - Metal Workers; 16 Health Care Workers; 17 The Electronics Industry; 18 Painters, Lacquerers, and Varnishers; V. RISK FACTORS FOR IRRITANT DERMATITIS; 19 Age; 20 Gender; 21 Ethnicity; 22 Atopy; VI. INSIGHTS FROM BIOENGINEERING; 23 Prediction Bioengineering; 24 Quantitative Sonography for the Evaluation of Irritant Reactions; 25 Functional Skin Testing: the SMART Procedures , 26 Bioengineering Correlates of the Sensitive Sking Syndrome: The Sensory Irritation Component27 Squamometry; VII. THE IRRITANTS: SPECIAL ISSUES; 28 Corrosive Materials; 29 Detergents; 30 Sodium Lauryl Sulfate; 31 Organic Solvents; 32 Oils, Cutting Fluids, and Lubricants; 33 Food; 34 Dithranol; 35 Copper; 36 Fatty Acid Binding Proteins; VIII. MECHANISMS OF IRRITANT DERMATITIS; 37 Histopathology of Irritant Contact Dermatitis; 38 Percutaneous Absorption and Irritant Dermatitis; 39 Cytokines and Irritant Dermatitis; 40 Oxidative Stress; 41 Langerhans Cells and Skin Irritation , 42 Hydration InjuryIX. PREVENTION OF IRRITANT DERMATITIS; 43 Primary Prevention of Irritant Contact Dermatitis; 44 Protective Gloves; 45 Anti-Irritants; 46 Barrier Creams; 47 Moisturizers; 48 Moisturizers and Irritant Contact Dermatitis (2); 49 Effects of CO2 on Barrier Recovery; X. MANAGEMENT AND THERAPY; 50. Treatment of Irritant Contact Dermatitis; 51 Topical Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Irritant Dermatitis; 52 Barrier Creams and Emollients; XI. PRODUCT TESTING; 53 In Vivo Models of Skin Irritation; 54 In Vitro Methods to Predict Skin Irritation; XII. APPENDICES , I. Questionnaire Methods for Hand Dermatitis StudiesII. Patient Information Sheets; III. Selected Sources of Information for Irritant Contact Dermatitis; Subject Index
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Copenhagen : Munksgaard International Publishers
    Skin research and technology 7 (2001), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1600-0846
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Background/aims: Topical corticoids are used to treat irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) in humans. However, their clinical efficacy remains sub judice. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of low- and medium-potency corticosteroids on irritant dermatitis.Methods: We induced an acute ICD via open application of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) on the hands of subjects. The dorsal side of hands was irritated with 10% SLS five times in one day. Once on day 1 and twice daily on days 2–5, 1% hydrocortisone, 0.1% betamethasone-17-valerate and vehicle cream (petrolatum) were applied subsequently. Visual grading, bioengineering techniques and squamometry were used to quantify skin response.Results: Corticosteroids were found ineffective in treating the surfactant-induced irritant dermatitis when compared with the vehicle and with the untreated control.Conclusion: The counterintuitive result (in a relatively realistic and robust model) should be interpreted with caution until verified with other irritants of varying physicochemical properties.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Copenhagen : Munksgaard International Publishers
    Skin research and technology 7 (2001), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1600-0846
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Background/aims: Tape stripping of human stratum corneum has been performed to measure stratum corneum mass, barrier function, drug reservoir and percutaneous penetration. However, the technique itself requires further development to facilitate interpretation.Methods: In this study we quantified stratum corneum (SC) tape stripping and water kinetic parameters utilizing three types of adhesive tapes, in an in vivo randomized clinical trial. Stratum corneum was tape stripped, and the mass of SC removed by each tape was quantified utilizing a protein assay. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured and barrier disruption and SC water kinetics calculated. Three commonly utilized acrylate adhesive tapes were utilized and a comparison made between them.Results: Each type of tape successfully stripped the stratum corneum, but the rayon tape did not induce SC barrier disruption. Neither the type of tape nor the site stripped significantly influenced the mass of SC removed. Water kinetic parameters did not differ significantly for the tapes that did induce barrier disruption. Individual variation in barrier disruption to water following tape stripping was demonstrated.Conclusion: The tapes utilized removed a similar amount of SC. The tapes have a different propensity to cause barrier disruption. Some individuals do not demonstrate increased TEWL despite an equivalent mass of SC being removed compared to those who do show a response.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...