GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: International Journal of Stroke, SAGE Publications, Vol. 10, No. 1 ( 2015-01), p. 90-94
    Abstract: Approved use of intravenous alteplase for ischemic stroke offers net benefit. Pooled randomized controlled trial analysis suggests additional patients could benefit but others be harmed with treatment initiated beyond 4·5 h after stroke onset. We proposed prognostic scoring methods to identify a strategy for patient selection. Methods We selected 500 patients treated by intravenous alteplase and 500 controls from Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive, matching modified Rankin score outcomes to those from pooled randomized controlled trial 4·5–6 h data. We ranked patients by prognostic score. We chose limits to optimize our sample for a net treatment benefit significant at P = 0·01 by Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test and by ordinal regression. For validation, we had these applied to the pooled randomized controlled trial data for 4·5–6 h, testing for net benefit by Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test, ordinal regression, and also by dichotomized outcomes: modified Rankin score 0–1, mortality and parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 bleeds. All analyses were adjusted for age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Results In the training dataset, limits of 56–95 on a prognostic score retained 714 patients in whom there was net benefit significant at P = 0·01. When applied to the 1120 patients in the pooled randomized controlled trial 4·5–6 h dataset, score limits of 56–95 retained 711 patients and gave odds ratio for improved modified Rankin score distribution of 1·13, 95% confidence interval 0·87–1·47, Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel P = 0·89. More patients achieved modified Rankin score 0–1 (odds ratio 1·44, 1·02–2·05, P = 0·04) but mortality and parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 bleeds were increased: odds ratio 1·56, 1·01–2·40, P = 0·04; odds ratio 15·6, 3·7–65·8, P = 0·0002, respectively. Conclusion Selection of patients between 4·5 and 6 h based on simple clinical measures failed to deliver a population in whom the alteplase effect would be safe and effective.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1747-4930 , 1747-4949
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2211666-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Diabetes Care, American Diabetes Association, Vol. 33, No. 12 ( 2010-12-01), p. 2531-2537
    Abstract: The use of alteplase in patients who have had a prior stroke and concomitant diabetes is not approved in Europe. To examine the influence of diabetes and prior stroke on outcomes, we compared data on thrombolysed patients with nonthrombolysed comparators. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We selected patients with ischemic stroke on whom we had data on age, pretreatment baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (b-NIHSS), and 90-day outcome measures (functional modified Rankin score [mRS]) and neurological measures [NIHSS] ) in the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive. We compared outcomes between thrombolysed patients and nonthrombolysed comparators in those with and without diabetes, those who have had a prior stroke, or both and report findings using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test and proportional odds logistic regression analyses. We report an age-adjusted and b-NIHSS–adjusted CMH P value and odds ratio (OR). RESULTS Rankin data were available for 5,817 patients: 1,585 thrombolysed patients and 4,232 nonthrombolysed comparators. A total 1,334 (24.1%) patients had diabetes, 1,898 (33.7%) patients have had a prior stroke, and 491 (8%) patients had both. Diabetes and nondiabetes had equal b-NIHSS (median 13; P = 0.3), but patients who have had a prior stroke had higher b-NIHSS than patients who have not had a prior stroke (median 13 vs. 12; P & lt; 0.0001). Functional outcomes were better for thrombolysed patients versus nonthrombolysed comparators among both nondiabetic (P & lt; 0.0001; OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.3–1.6]) and diabetic (P = 0.1; 1.3 [1.05–1.6 ] ) subjects. Similarly, outcomes were better for thrombolysed patients versus nonthrombolysed comparators among who have not had a prior stroke (P & lt; 0.0001; 1.4 [1.2–1.6 ]) and those who have (P = 0.02; 1.3 [1.04–1.6 ] ). There was no interaction of diabetes and prior stroke with treatment (P = 0.8). Neurological outcomes were consistent with the mRS. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes from thrombolysis are better among patients with diabetes and/or those who have had a prior stroke than in control subjects. Withholding thrombolytic treatment from otherwise-eligible patients may not be justified.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0149-5992 , 1935-5548
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Diabetes Association
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1490520-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: International Journal of Stroke, SAGE Publications, Vol. 8, No. SA100 ( 2013-10), p. 95-99
    Abstract: Race-ethnic differences may influence postthrombolysis outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy to treat Asian stroke patients are based mostly on extrapolated western data. Aims We undertook to examine outcomes among Asians by comparing a propensity-matched cohort of thrombolyzed patients from a tertiary center in Singapore with nonthrombolyzed Asian comparators collated from Virtual International Stroke Trials Archives (control). Methods We identified propensity scores-matched patients between thrombolyzed and control Asian patients lodged in the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archives by employing propensity scores method. We compared matched patients for their distributions of three-month functional (modified Rankin scores) and neurological outcomes (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) by employing Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test and proportional odds logistic regression analysis. We report odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for improved outcomes on day 90. Results Virtual International Stroke Trials Archives and National University Hospital, Singapore, contributed 517 and 133 patients of Asian race-ethnicity ( n = 650), respectively. After propensity matching, sample size reduced to 237 patients; 104 were from Virtual International Stroke Trials Archives. Age (59·7 vs. 61·5 years, P = 0·2) and mean baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores were similar ( 14 ) between thrombolyzed and control. The odds ratio for shift toward improved modified Rankin scores and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale distributions after tissue plasminogen activator therapy were 2·8 (95% confidence interval 1·8–4·5, P 〈 0·0001, n = 233; Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel P 〈 0·0001) and 2·8 (95% confidence interval 1·7–4·7, P = 0·0008, n = 201; Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel P = 0·0001). Conclusions Our data indicate that Asian patients derive benefit from thrombolytic therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1747-4930 , 1747-4949
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2211666-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...