Abstract: The revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) improved cytogenetic prognostic classification in comparison with IPSS classification in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (Greenberg P et al. Blood 2012, Schanz J et al. JCO 2011). Monosomal karyotype (MK) defined as the presence of at least two autosomal monosomies or one monosomy associated with structural abnormalities has been investigated in MDS patients with contradictory results regarding its independent prognostic significance (Patnaik M et al. Leukemia 2011, Gangat N et al. AJH 2013, Valcarcel D et al. JCO 2013). The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of MK in relation to IPSS-R and the presence of complex karyotype (CK). The study was conducted in 391 patients with primary MDS treated at three hematology departments in Serbia. The median age was 65 years, from 15 to 89 years. There was a predominance of male patients who made 60% (235) of patients. 229 (58 %) patients died. 87 patients (22 %) transformed to AML. The sixty eight % of patients were transfusion dependent. Disease modifying treatment was applied in 48 (12.3%) of patients (AML like chemotherapy in 37 patients, low dose ara-c in 11 patients, stem cell transplantation in five patients, and in one patient azacitidine). The rest of the patients received supportive treatment. Karyotypes were classified according to the International System for Cytogenetic Nomenclature Criteria. The inclusion of patients was based on criteria used in IPSS-R classification (a white blood cell count ≤12x109/l, an absolute neutrophil count ≤8x109/l, peripheral blood blasts ≤19%, and bone marrow blasts ≤30%). The distribution of patients according to FAB classification was as follows: 129 (32.99%) RA, 47 (12.02%) RARS, 143 (36.57%) RAEB, 48 (12.27%) RAEB-T, and 22 (5.6%) non proliferative CMML. The classification according to WHO 2008 classification was as follows: RCUD 29 (7.43%), RARS 39 (9.97%), RCMD 90 (23.01%), RAEB1 78 (19.95%), RAEB2 65 (16.62%), AML/RAEB-T 48 (5.27%), 5q- 11 (2.81%), MDS-u 7 (1.8%), CMML 1 15 (3.83%), CMML 2 7 (1.8%). IPSS-R distribution was: very low risk 38 (9.71%), low risk 108 (27.6%), intermediate risk 86 (21.99%), high risk 83 (21.23%), very high risk 74 (18.9%). Two patients could not be classified because of lack of all data. Median number of metaphases was 15, from 2 to 30. The abnormal karyotype was found in 166 (42.45%) patients. CK defined as the presence of at least three cytogenetic aberrancies was present in 32 patients (8.18%) with median survival of 5 months. CK shown prognostic significance regarding the overall survival (OS) (p = 0.00001) as well as time to AML transformation (p = 0.00014). MK was detected in 34 patients (8.69%). The patients with MK had significantly shorter OS in comparison with patients without MK (median survival 5 months versus 34 months, p 〈 0.00001, Figure 1) as well as a shorter time to AML transformation (p = 0.00006, Figure 2). If we included only the patients who have MDS according to 2008 WHO classification MK shown prognostic significance for OS (p = 0.00121) as well as for time to AML progression (p = 0.00010). The presence of MK defines the group of patients with shorter OS in high risk and very high risk IPSS-R prognostic groups (p=0.008, Figure 3). In multivariate analysis, MK shown to be independent predictor of poor survival together with age, haemoglobin concentration, platelet count and bone marrow blast cells (p 〈 0.001, HR 2.97, 95% CI 1.91-4,66) as well as for the risk of AML transformation with bone marrow blasts and platelet count (p 〈 0.001, HR 3.44, 95% CI 1.79-6.61). In 29 patients MK was associated with CK. However, in five patients (16% of MK + patients) with monosomy and an additional aberration who do not fulfil the criteria for CK the OS seems to be very short (median survival 3.5 months). The significance in OS between this small group of patients and other patients excluding the patients with CK was not significant (p=0.09). Yet, only in one case of MK cytogenetic aberrations were defined as high risk according to IPPS-R cytogenetic classification. In conclusion, MK has an independent prognostic significance for survival and risk of AML transformation in MDS patients particularly in high and very high risk IPSS-groups. In majority of patients with MK there is an association with complex karyotype. Yet, there are a few patients with MK who do not have CK and seems to have unfavourable prognosis. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibition with antibodies targeting programmed death protein 1 (PD1) was well tolerable and highly effective in pivotal phase II and III trials in relapsed or refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). We aimed to evaluate emerging therapeutic sequences and the safety and efficacy of anti-PD1 antibodies in the rapidly changing routine care of r/r cHL. Methods: GHSG-affiliated hemato-oncology departments and practices in Germany were invited to participate in this retrospective study. Patients ≥18 years of age receiving anti-PD1 antibodies for r/r cHL in routine care were eligible. Patient, disease and treatment characteristics were documented by the treating physicians with standardized case report forms. Locally assessed response rates were reported as complete (CR) or partial (PR) remission, stable (SD) or progressive (PD) disease and summarized as objective response rate (ORR: CR + PR). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier from the start of anti-PD1 treatment in routine care to PD (PFS) or death from any cause (PFS + OS). All analyses were done descriptively and conducted in SAS V9.4. Results: A total of 58 r/r cHL patients (pts.) with a median age of 48 years (range 19-89 years) and male predominance (57%) initiated anti-PD1 treatment between 11/2014 and 01/2021 at 15 sites. Median time from 1 st-line to anti-PD1 treatment was 5.5 years (0.8-26.0). The majority had received prior brentuximab vedotin (BV, 86%) or an autologous stem-cell transplantation (autoSCT, 62%) and 16% undergone prior alloSCT. Relevant co-morbidities including HIV, pre-existing autoimmune conditions, cardiovascular diseases and dialysis-dependent kidney failure were documented in 49% of patients. An impaired ECOG performance status of ≥1 was present in 57% of patients (ECOG 2: 12%, ECOG 3: 4%). At initiation of anti-PD1 treatment, 74% of patients presented with stage III/IV disease and 35% did not achieve a response to their latest prior therapy. The median duration of anti-PD1 treatment was 18.1 (0.5-79.3) months and 50% of patients still received an anti-PD1 antibody at data collection. One third (31.6%) of patients experienced grade III/IV treatment-related toxicities and a treatment delay of & gt;6 weeks due to toxicity occurred in 15.5% of patients. Investigator-assessed ORR was 66.7% with 20.4% of patients achieving a CR and 46.3% a PR as best response (Figure 1A). With a median follow-up of 19.1 (0-74.7) months and 26.7 (0-74.7) for PFS and OS, respectively, median PFS (mPFS) and OS were 12.3 months and 32 months, respectively (Figure 1B+C). Corresponding 2-year PFS and OS estimates were 38.3% (95%CI 24.4-52.2) and 78.5% (95%CI 67.2-89.8). Median PFS was more favorable in patients achieving either a CR (30.1 months) or PR (24.9 months) compared to SD (9.3) or PD (3.4, Figure 1D), with similar trends also observed for OS. Two thirds (67%) of the 29 patients eventually experiencing PD, continued anti-PD1 treatment beyond progression at least once, with a median duration of 9.9 (3.0-25.8) until 2 nd PD. Overall, 28% patients received concomitant add-on treatments with radiotherapy (62.5%) and chemotherapy (25%) administered simultaneously most commonly. Best response to combination treatment was PR in 84.6% and SD in 15.4% of patients, and 75% of patients receiving add-on treatments achieved their best response only thereafter. Most common consecutive treatments were allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (N=5), BV-based therapy (N=5), Gemcitabine-based regimens (N=4) radiotherapy (N=4) and N=13 patients did not receive further treatment after anti-PD1 failure. Most common cause of death was cHL (58% of deaths reported), followed by non-anti-PD1 treatment-related causes (16%), infections and cardiac diseases (11% each) and second neoplasms (5%). Conclusions: In this multicenter cohort of older and frailer r/r cHL patients receiving anti-PD1 antibodies in routine care, safety and efficacy data including ORR, mPFS and mOS was similar to data reported from pivotal phase II trials. Anti-PD1 treatment for r/r cHL thereby appears feasible and able to induce meaningful clinical benefit in a broad range of patients. Despite various concomitant and subsequent treatments administered, however, cHL or subsequent treatments are by far the leading cause of death. Failure of anti-PD1 in r/r cHL hence constitutes an unmet need. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Trautmann-Grill: GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kobbe: Celgene: Research Funding. Heinrich: Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Astra: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Schmidt: Incyte: Honoraria; Biotest: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Hüttmann: Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Lead Discovery Center GmbH: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fuchs: Lukon: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. von Tresckow: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support, Research Funding; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pentixafarm: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Other: congress and travel support. Borchmann: Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotech: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Engert: MSD: Honoraria; Hexal: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Tessa Therapeutics: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy. Bröckelmann: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding.

Abstract: Uvod. Savremenom terapijom kod 60?80% obolelih od akutne mijeloidne leukemije postigne se kompletna remisija nakon indukcije. Bez dodatne citostatske terapije, vecina bolesnika udje u relaps u periodu od sest meseci do godinu dana. Pitanje optimalne postremisione terapije je i dalje otvoreno. Cilj studije bio je da se uporedi prezivljavanje i ucestalost relapsa izmedju bolesnika koji su primili visoke doze citozin-arabinozida u konsolidaciji i bolesnika koji nisu primili visoke doze citozinarabinozida u konsolidaciji. Materijal i metode. Ispitanici starosti 18?60 godina, sa de novo akutnom mijeloidnom leukemijom (izuzev Acute promyelocytic leukemia po Francusko-americko-britanskoj klasifikaciji), koji su usli u kompletnu remisiju, podeljeni su u studijsku grupu (39 bolesnika), koja je primila visoke doze citozin-arabinozida i kontrolnu, grupu (20 bolesnika), koja je primila konsolidacionu terapiju bez visokih doza citozin-arabinozida. Rezultati. U studijskoj grupi koja je primila visoke doze citozin-arabinozida u konsolidaciji postoji statisticki znacajno duze prezivljavanje (p = 0,003) i nizi nivo relapsa (p = 0,02) u poredjenju sa kontrolnom grupom, koja nije primila visoke doze citozin-arabinozida. Prognosticki znacaj za prezivljavanje u univarijantnoj analizi u studijskoj grupi pokazuje pripadnost Acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation i Acute myelomonocytic leukemia podgrupi, kao i postizanje kompletne remisije nakon prve indukcije. Nezavisni prognosticki znacaj u multivarijantnoj analizi predstavlja samo pripadnost Acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation i Acute myelomonocytic leukemia podgrupama (p = 0,018). Zakljucak. Visoke doze citozin-arabinozida u konsolidaciji pokazuju statisticki znacajno duze prezivljavanje u odnosu na terapiju bez visokih doza citozin-arabinozida. Povoljan efekat visokih doza citozin-arabinozida ogranicen je na Acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation i Acute myelomonocytic leukemia podgrupe.

Abstract: Treatment intensification (including consolidative high‐dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation [HDT‐ASCT]) significantly improved outcome in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients. Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed PCNSL patients, treated with intensified treatment regimens. The following scores were evaluated in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS): Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG), and three‐factor (3F) prognostic score. Further, all scores were comparatively investigated for model quality and concordance. Results Altogether, 174 PCNSL patients were included. One hundred and five patients (60.3%) underwent HDT‐ASCT. Two‐year OS and 2‐year PFS for the entire population were 73.3% and 48.5%, respectively. The MSKCC ( p = .003) and 3F score ( p 〈 .001), but not the IELSG score ( p = .06), had the discriminatory power to identify different risk groups for OS. In regard to concordance, the 3F score (C‐index [0.71]) outperformed both the MSKCC (C‐index [0.64] ) and IELSG (C‐index [0.53]) score. Moreover, the superiority of the 3F score was shown for PFS, successfully stratifying patients in three risk groups, which also resulted in the highest C‐index (0.66). Conclusion The comparative analysis of established PCNSL risk scores affirm the clinical utility of the 3F score stratifying the widest prognostic spectrum among PCNSL patients treated with intensified treatment approaches.

Abstract: nema

Abstract: Garden rose, Rosa hybrida, is primarily used for decoration and has a wide range of growing area, contrary to R. damascena that has a limited area of distribution (Turkey and Bulgaria), yet it is extensively used for commercial production of valuable and expensive rose oil. Since the content of essential oil in rose petals is low (0.03–0.04%), its production is quite limited; however, during this process, a significant amount of rose hydrosol is obtained as a secondary product. The aim of this research was to determine the chemical composition of garden rose hydrosols and to evaluate their biological properties. Obtained results show that R. hybrida hydrosol containing phenylethyl alcohol, nerol, linalool, and geraniol may be used as an alternative for R. damascena hydrosol. However, the total phenolic content was quite low (4.96 µg GAE/mL), which is related to a low level of observed antioxidant activity based on different antioxidant activity assays. Furthermore, R. hybrida hydrosol did not exhibit antimicrobial activity against several gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, as well as yeast and fungi. Anti-inflammatory activity was also low, while no antihyperglycemic activity was detected. With these results in mind, no potential is evident for the therapeutic application of rose hydrosol beyond that found in complimentary medicine such as aromatherapy.