Abstract: The ‘Sepsis Six’ bundle was promoted as a deliverable tool outside of the critical care settings, but there is very little data available on the progress and change of sepsis care outside the critical care environment in the UK. Our aim was to compare the yearly prevalence, outcome and the Sepsis Six bundle compliance in patients at risk of mortality from sepsis in non-intensive care environments. Patients with a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of 3 or above and suspected or proven infection were enrolled into four yearly 24-h point prevalence studies, carried out in fourteen hospitals across Wales from 2016 to 2019. We followed up patients to 30 days between 2016–2019 and to 90 days between 2017 and 2019. Out of the 26,947 patients screened 1651 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were recruited. The full ‘Sepsis Six’ care bundle was completed on 223 (14.0%) occasions, with no significant difference between the years. On 190 (11.5%) occasions none of the bundle elements were completed. There was no significant correlation between bundle element compliance, NEWS or year of study. One hundred and seventy (10.7%) patients were seen by critical care outreach; the ‘Sepsis Six’ bundle was completed significantly more often in this group (54/170, 32.0%) than for patients who were not reviewed by critical care outreach (168/1385, 11.6%; p   〈  0.0001). Overall survival to 30 days was 81.7% (1349/1651), with a mean survival time of 26.5 days (95% CI 26.1–26.9) with no difference between each year of study. 90-day survival for years 2017–2019 was 74.7% (949/1271), with no difference between the years. In multivariate regression we identified older age, heart failure, recent chemotherapy, higher frailty score and do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation orders as significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality. Our data suggests that despite efforts to increase sepsis awareness within the NHS, there is poor compliance with the sepsis care bundles and no change in the high mortality over the study period. Further research is needed to determine which time-sensitive ward-based interventions can reduce mortality in patients with sepsis and how can these results be embedded to routine clinical practice. Trial registration Defining Sepsis on the Wards ISRCTN 86502304 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN86502304 prospectively registered 09/05/2016.

Abstract: Cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) is an incurable skin homing T cell malignancy. We have previously reported p38 as therapeutic targets for CTCL.1 However, the mechanism underlying p38 signaling is not completely understood. To further investigate p38 and its downstream signaling components, we examined public database of gene expression and found that p38γ is overexpressed in CTCL as compared to normal T cells. In addition, p38γ has negligible expression in normal lymphoid tissues, with the exception of high level expressed in smooth and cardiac muscle cells. We have demonstrated that p38γ over-expression increases cell proliferation and knockdown of p38γ causes Hut78 cell death. p38γ plays an important role in inflammation-associated tumorigenesis3 and inhibition of its activity has emerged as a strategy to treat a spectrum of cancers.4 The transcription factor, NFATc4, downstream of p38γ, is also significantly up-regulated in CTCL cells by microarray analysis, and it is at non-detectable level in normal T cells.1We have demonstrated that shRNA-mediated knockdown of p38γ reduced NFATc4 mRNA levels in Hut78 cells, and that inhibition of NFATc4 by siRNA reduces the proliferation of CTCL cells. We also found that the cytokine IL17A functions downstream of p38γ and NFATc4, as knockdown of either p38γ or NFATc4 significantly reduced IL17A mRNA levels in Hut78 cells. This result suggests that IL17A is a target for transcriptionally activated NFATc4. Previously we have shown that IL17A rescues Hut78 cells from apoptosis induced by combined inhibition of NFAT and NFkB (treated with curcumin and Ly2228820). This implicates IL17A as a key mediator for CTCL survival. Therefore, we propose a novel p38γ - NFATc4 - IL17A signaling pathway in malignant T cells that promotes the survival of CTCL which provides potential therapeutic target against this disease. To further define the role of p38 and identify targets that increase the antitumor efficacy of p38 inhibition, we performed a synthetic lethal RNA interference (RNAi) screen in Hut78 cells treated with 10 µM of the p38 MAPK inhibitor Ly2228820. We transduced control and Ly2228820-treated Hut78 cells with a pooled retroviral RNAi library consisting of 4290 shRNAs that targeted more than 1000 genes involved in human cancers. If a shRNA from the library is not toxic to the control cells, but causes cell death in Ly2228820-treated cells, the gene targeted by this shRNA would be identified by the screen as synthetically lethal to p38 inhibition. Among many hits identified from the screen, we selected UCHL5 for further analysis. UCHL5encodes a deubiquitin enzyme that cleaves K48-linked polyubiquitin chains and plays an important role in the regulation of protein stability. Interestingly, combination of Ly2228820 and b-AP15, a small molecule inhibitor of UCHL5, significantly reduced the protein levels of NFATc4 isoform but not other NFAT isoforms. NFATc4 protein levels are known to be regulated by ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.2 Our finding thus suggests UCHL5 as a potential new regulator that stabilizes NFATc4 protein. Further studies are needed to confirm this prediction. More importantly, combination of Ly2228820 and b-AP15 enhanced apoptosis in CTCL cell lines (HH and Hut78) and primary Sézary cells, but was not toxic in normal PBMC cells. In summary, our findings suggest that the p38γ - NFATc4 - IL17A signaling pathway plays an important role in the survival of CTCL. In addition, improving the efficacy of targeting this pathway via p38 may also benefit from combined inhibition of UCHL5, a potentially important regulator of NFATc4 that needs further characterization. Reference: 1 Bliss-Moreau M, Coarfa C, Gunaratne PH, Guitart J, Krett NL, Rosen ST (2015). Identification of p38beta as a therapeutic target for the treatment of Sezary syndrome. The Journal of investigative dermatology135:599-608. 2 Fan Y, Xie P, Zhang T, Zhang H, Gu D, She M et al (2008). Regulation of the stability and transcriptional activity of NFATc4 by ubiquitination. FEBS letters582:4008-4014. 3 Qi X, Yin N, Ma S, Lepp A, Tang J, Jing W et al (2015). p38gamma MAPK Is a Therapeutic Target for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Stimulation of Cancer Stem-Like Cell Expansion. Stem cells33:2738-2747. 4 Yin N, Qi X, Tsai S, Lu Y, Basir Z, Oshima K et al (2015). p38gamma MAPK is required for inflammation-associated colon tumorigenesis. Oncogene. Disclosures Querfeld: Actelion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract: Systemic treatment for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) involves the use of less aggressive, well-tolerated therapies. Pralatrexate is a novel antifolate with high affinity for reduced folate carrier-1. A dose de-escalation strategy identified recommended pralatrexate dosing for patients with CTCL that demonstrated high activity, good rates of disease control, and an acceptable toxicity profile for continuous long-term dosing. Eligibility included mycosis fungoides, Sézary syndrome, or primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, with disease progression after ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy. The starting dose and schedule was 30 mg/m2/wk intravenously for 3 of 4 (3/4) weeks. Subsequent starting doses were 20, 15, and 10 mg/m2/wk for 3/4 or 2 of 3 (2/3) weeks. Response was evaluated by the modified severity-weighted adjustment tool. Fifty-four patients were treated. The recommended regimen was identified as 15 mg/m2/wk for 3/4 weeks and was explored in the expansion cohort. In 29 patients treated overall with the recommended dosing regimen, the median number of prior systemic therapies was 4. Pralatrexate was administered for a median of 4 cycles; response rate was 45%. The most common grade 3 adverse event (AE) was mucositis (17%); the only grade 4 AE was leukopenia (3%). Pralatrexate 15 mg/m2/wk for 3/4 weeks shows high activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory CTCL.

Abstract: Background: Double-hit lymphomas (DHL) - diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) with concurrent rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6, and double-expressor lymphomas (DEL) - DLBCL with co-expression of MYC and BCL2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), are associated with poor outcomes after standard chemoimmunotherapy. We have previously demonstrated that patients with relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) DHL and DEL have inferior outcomes after autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) compared to patients with neither DEL nor DHL [Herrera et al, ASH 2015]. Although patients with DEL and DHL have inferior outcomes after chemotherapy-based treatment modalities, we hypothesized that allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) could potentially abrogate that negative prognostic impact. Data are extremely limited regarding the outcome of patients with DHL who undergo alloSCT, and no study has examined alloSCT outcomes in patients with DEL. We studied alloSCT outcomes in a multicenter cohort of rel/ref DLBCL patients and evaluated the prognostic impact of DEL and DHL status. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients with rel/ref DLBCL, transformed indolent lymphoma (TIL), or high-grade B-cell lymphoma unclassified (BCLU) who had available tumor tissue and underwent alloSCT at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, or City of Hope between 1/2000 and 5/2014. IHC for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 were performed. DEL was defined as MYC expression in ≥ 40% tumor cells and BCL2 expression in ≥ 50% tumor cells. FISH for MYC was performed using dual-color break-apart probes. Cases with MYC-rearrangement had FISH performed for BCL2 and BCL6 using break-apart probes. Rearrangement was defined as ≥ 10% nuclei with break-apart signals. DHL was defined as concurrent rearrangement of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6. Results: Tumor tissue was available in 103 patients, among whom we could obtain complete IHC and FISH data in 74. In these 74 patients, the median age was 54 years (range 24-69); 69% had DLBCL/BCLU whereas 31% had TIL; the median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 2-9); 58% had prior autoSCT; 73% were in complete or partial remission (CR/PR) at alloSCT; 77% had reduced intensity conditioning (RIC); 78% had a matched related or unrelated donor. 4y progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in the overall cohort were 34%, 40%, 44% and 22%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 46 months for survivors. 47% of patients had DEL and 14% had DHL. The proportion of patients with a history of primary refractory disease was higher among DHL (60%) and DEL (52%) patients compared to nonDHL/nonDEL patients (37%), although the difference was not significant (p=0.3). Overall, there were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between patients with DHL, DEL, and nonDHL/nonDEL. Neither DEL nor DHL were significantly associated with outcome (Figure). The 4y PFS in DEL v non-DEL patients was 29% v 39% (p=0.2), 4y OS 30% v 49% (p=0.11), 4y CIR 50% v 40% (p=0.3), and 4y NRM 21% v 22% (p=1.0). The 4y PFS in DHL v non-DHL patients was 40% v 33% (p=0.6), OS 50% v 37% (p=0.4), CIR 40% v 45% (p=0.9), and NRM 20% v 22% (p=0.8). In multivariable Cox models for PFS and OS, age ≥ 55 (PFS: HR 0.4, p=0.002; OS: HR 0.4, p=0.005), refractory disease (not CR/PR) at alloSCT (PFS: HR 2.4, p=0.009; OS HR 2.6, p=0.007), and TIL (PFS HR 0.4, p=0.018; OS HR 0.4, p=0.028) were associated with PFS and OS, but DEL (PFS HR 1.2, p=0.5; OS HR 1.6, p=0.12) and DHL (PFS HR 0.8, p=0.7; OS HR 0.8, p=0.7) were not. We also constructed multivariable competing risk regression models for CIR and NRM. Age, remission status, histology, and conditioning intensity were associated with relapse, while no factor was significantly associated with NRM. Neither DEL (CIR HR 1.2, p=0.7, NRM HR 0.8, p=0.7) nor DHL (CIR HR 1.1, p=0.9, NRM HR 0.8, p=0.8) were associated with either outcome in those models. Conclusions: AlloSCT produced durable remissions in heavily treated rel/ref DLBCL patients, regardless of DEL and DHL status. In our cohort, DEL and DHL status did not have a significant prognostic impact. Although patients with DEL or DHL have poorer outcomes after chemoimmunotherapy and autoSCT, our results suggest that alloSCT may overcome the chemoresistance of double-hit/double-expressor tumors. Figure Progression-Free Survival After AlloSCT in DEL, DHL, and nonDEL/nonDHL Patients Figure. Progression-Free Survival After AlloSCT in DEL, DHL, and nonDEL/nonDHL Patients Disclosures Herrera: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Song:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Chen:Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chen:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Koreth:LLS: Research Funding; amgen inc: Consultancy; takeda pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; kadmon corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; prometheus labs inc: Research Funding; millennium pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Pillai:Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding. Siddiqi:Janssen Biotech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Zain:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kwak:XEME BioPharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Antigenics: Equity Ownership; Celltrion: Consultancy; Sella Life Sciences: Consultancy. Nademanee:Celgene: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weinstock:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Soiffer:Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rodig:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Perkin Elmer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Armand:Roche: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sequenta Inc: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract: Tipifarnib (R115777, Zarnestra®) is a methylquinolone analogue that is a potent inhibitor of farnesylation. The initial phase I study in leukemia by Karp and Lancet (Blood, 2001) showed clinical responses in 10/34 evaluable patients with AML on a 21 day schedule, with 600 mg bid identified as the MTD. Preclinical work shows that farnesyltransferase remains inhibited for seven days after tipifarnib, suggesting an alternate week dosing schedule. We report the results of a tipifarnib phase I dose escalation trial in AML on a week on week off schedule. Dose levels were 400, 600, 800, 1200, 1400, and 1600 mg BID on a standard 3+3 design. Eligibility was defined as relapsed or refractory AML after one to three prior induction regimens. A total of 30 patients have been accrued. with 27 patients evaluable for toxicity. Median age is 64.5 (range 33–75). Grade 3 toxicities were seen at dose levels 1 (400 mg bid)- metabolic acidosis and hepatic failure in a patient with progressive leukemia who had previous hepatic toxicity during chemotherapy, and level 5 (1200 mg bid)- grade 3 creatinine elevation. Other grade 1 and 2 toxicities included fatigue, nausea, anorexia, elevated liver enzymes, increased bilirubin, and renal insufficiency. The maximum target treatment dose, 1600 mg PO bid was attained. There were 3 complete responses (CR) out of 9 patients treated at the 1000–1200 mg bid dose level- after cycle 1 in a 47 year old woman with relapsed AML after autologous transplant, with a 10 month continuing remission as of 8/06 (she underwent successful allogeneic transplant); after 2 cycles in a 69 year old man with relapsed AML, who relapsed after 5 months, (with response after retreatment with tipifarnib), and in a 67 year old man with relapsed AML who achieved PR after one cycle and CR after five cycles. One patient with AML evolving out of CMMoL had disappearance of the AML blasts but persistence of the CMMoL after two cycles at the 800 mg bid level, and one patient at the 1400 dose had a platelet rise to 140 from a starting platelet count below 40 despite continued presence of blasts. In AML patients, greater than two fold increase in tipifarnib dosing can be tolerated on this dosing schedule with efficacy perhaps enhanced. Based on these promising results a monotherapy phase 2 or tipifarnib combination study in AML appears warranted.

Abstract: Introduction Relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) carries a poor prognosis, with most approved therapies having response rates of & lt; 30% and limited progression-free survival (PFS). Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, is FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after ≥ 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. DUV exhibited potent activity against T-cell lymphoma cell lines in vitro, and DUV monotherapy at 25 or 75 mg BID demonstrated clinical activity in patients (pts) with R/R peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) in phase 1 studies [overall response rate (ORR), 50%] across multiple subtypes (Horwitz et al. Blood 2018; Horwitz et al. 2019 ICML). The phase 2 PRIMO trial was designed to determine an optimal regimen of DUV monotherapy in R/R PTCL and characterize the efficacy and tolerability of DUV in this disease. We report the results for the dose-optimization phase of the PRIMO trial (NCT03372057). Methods In the dose-optimization phase, pts with R/R PTCL, ECOG performance score of ≤ 2, and no history of allogeneic stem cell transplant were randomized to receive DUV 25 mg BID with an option for dose escalation (cohort 1) or DUV 75 mg BID (cohort 2) continuously until development of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (cycle = 28 days). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR, and secondary endpoints included duration of response and safety. Results A total of 33 pts (cohort 1, n = 20; cohort 2, n = 13) were treated in the dose-optimization phase (Table). Pts had a median of 1.5 years (range, 0.3-12.7 years) from initial diagnosis and a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-8). Patients were evaluable if they completed 1 cycle of DUV and had ≥ 1 efficacy assessment. Nonevaluable patients could be replaced. Response was assessed in the evaluable and overall populations. All patients in cohort 2 and 13 of 20 patients in cohort 1 were able to complete 1 cycle of therapy. Seven patients in cohort 1 discontinued therapy early due to disease progression and/or toxicity. Low CD4 counts ( & lt; 50 cells/mm3; Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4) were associated with early discontinuation of DUV. Most responses (cohort 1, 5/7; cohort 2, 6/7) were observed at the end of cycle 1. At a median follow-up of 20 weeks, the majority of responders (cohort 1, 4/7; cohort 2, 6/7) were still in response at the time of their last assessment. ORR as assessed by blinded independent central review could be determined for 31 patients and was 42% in cohort 1 and 67% in cohort 2. Table. Analysis Populations and Investigator-Assessed Response Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated a dose-related increase in exposure, with ≈ 2-fold increase in the steady-state exposure of DUV at the 75 vs 25 mg BID dosage, suggesting that adequate exposure can be more rapidly and reliably achieved with a higher dose of DUV. No differences were observed in pharmacodynamic markers (pAKT in monocytes and B cells) at 25 and 75 mg dose levels. The most common (≥ 3 patients) grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) in all patients receiving DUV were neutropenia (7), thrombocytopenia (5), and sepsis (4), with disease progression, pneumonia, aspartate aminotransferase elevation, lymphopenia, dyspnea, and rash observed in 3 patients. Serious AEs occurring in ≥ 2 patients were colitis, pyrexia, disease progression, sepsis, pneumonia, hyponatremia, dyspnea, pneumonitis, and respiratory failure. Overall, 12% of pts receiving DUV discontinued due to an AE. Conclusions These findings confirm that both 25 and 75 mg BID starting dosages of DUV are clinically active in pts with R/R PTCL, with complete responses in both cohorts. There were no unexpected toxicities. Early progression was seen more frequently in the 25 mg cohort, and higher initial exposure may be important in aggressive diseases. The expansion phase of the PRIMO trial will investigate DUV starting at 75 mg BID for 2 cycles to achieve rapid tumor response, followed by 25 mg BID to maintain long-term disease control and mitigate the potential for later onset toxicity. Disclosures Horwitz: Miragen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding. Mehta-Shah:Kiowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Verastem Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Pro:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding. Jacobsen:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Research Funding. Casulo:Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses. Brammer:Celgene: Research Funding; Seatlle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Haney:Verastem Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Youssoufian:Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Weaver:Verastem Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Inventor; Hillstream Biopharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; FemtoDx: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: Inventor. Baglio:Verastem Oncology: Employment. Narasimhan:Verastem: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-delta,gamma inhibitor, is US FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after at least 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after at least two prior systemic therapies.

Abstract: Introduction: High intensity treatments such as autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can be curative for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma (Hodgkin [HL], non-Hodgkin [NHL] ), but this needs to be balanced by the risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) associated with HCT and potentially sub-optimal disease response with less intensive treatments. Measures of pre-treatment body composition such as quantity and quality of muscle are prognostic in patients with solid tumors, but their association with post-HCT outcomes is unknown. We examined the prognostic significance of muscle depletion prior to HCT, defined by having both low muscle quantity (lumbar skeletal muscle index [SMI]) and quality (muscle attenuation [MA] ) on computed tomography (CT) imaging, in a population-based cohort of patients undergoing autologous HCT for lymphoma. Next, we examined the prognostic significance of muscle depletion after HCT in a subset of patients with normal muscle composition prior to HCT, allowing us to examine the impact of change in body composition over time. Methods: 440 consecutive patients with lymphoma, age ≥18y, who underwent a first HCT between 2009 and 2014 at a single institution were included in the study. Measures of muscle quantity (SMI) and quality (MA) were ascertained from pre- and post-HCT abdominal CT scans using image analysis software (SliceOmatic; Tomovision, Quebec, Canada). SMI was calculated as the ratio of skeletal muscle area (cm2) divided by height (m)2. Sex and body mass index (BMI)-specific cutoff values of low SMI and MA were used to identify patients with muscle depletion (J Clin Oncol 2013 31:1539). Measurements were made by trained researchers blinded to patient demographics and HCT outcome (Figure 1); 3rd lumbar vertebra was used as a landmark because of its high correlation with whole-body muscle mass (J Clin Oncol 2016 34:1339). This report is limited to 321 (73%) patients with CT scans performed ≤90 days from HCT. Cumulative incidence of NRM was calculated taking into consideration competing risk of disease-related mortality. Kaplan-Meier method was used to examine overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for relevant covariates (demographics, diagnosis, pre-HCT Karnofsky performance score [KPS] and comorbidity index [HCT-CI] ). Results: Sixty-two (19.3%) patients had muscle depletion pre-HCT. Median age at HCT was 53y (range: 18-78); 62.0% were male; 54.0% were non-Hispanic white; Diagnoses: HL (N=84 [26.2%]), NHL (N=237 [73.8%] ); KPS ≤80 (N=87 [27.1%]); HCT-CI ≥3 (N=52 [16.2%] ). Impact of pre-HCT muscle depletion: Patients with pre-HCT muscle depletion had significantly worse 5-y OS (56.4% vs. 77.8%, p 〈 0.001; Figure 2) and higher NRM (11.4% vs. 5.1%, p=0.05) when compared to those with normal body composition. OS was especially poor for patients who were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and had muscle depletion (20.0% vs. 77.1%, p 〈 0.001) pre-HCT. Median length of hospitalization was also significantly longer (27d vs. 23d; p=0.03) among patients with muscle depletion. Muscle depletion was associated with a 2.2-fold (HR=2.2 [CI: 1.0-4.5]) risk of NRM and 1.8-fold (HR=1.8 [CI: 1.1-3.1] ) risk of all-cause mortality when compared to those with normal body composition. Impact of post-HCT muscle depletion: Among 223 patients with normal body composition prior to HCT, 24 (9.3%) developed muscle depletion after HCT, detected at a median 63d (range 27-165) from HCT. In these patients, there was a 3-fold (HR=3.1 [CI: 1.5-6.4]) risk of all-cause mortality compared to those who maintained normal muscle composition throughout HCT. Conclusion: Muscle depletion is an important and independent predictor of outcomes after HCT, with potential additional downstream impacts on health-economic outcomes such as length of hospitalization and the burden of chronic morbidity in long-term survivors. Taken together, these data form the basis for real-time decision making prior to HCT (e.g. pre-habilitation, less intensive treatment approaches), or during HCT (e.g. dietary optimization, increased supportive care services, resistance training), setting the stage for innovative strategies to improve outcomes after HCT. Disclosures Chen: Affimed: Research Funding; Merck & Co., Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech Inc.: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Forman:Mustang Therapeutics: Other: Licensing Agreement, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Abstract: The prevalence of vancomycin-resistance Enterococci colonization (VRE-C) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (aHCT) is between 23-40%. Pre-HCT VRE-C is shown to be associated with high risks of VRE bloodstream infection (VRE-BSI), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and lower overall survival. Recent studies investigating the association between VRE-C and risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after aHCT has demonstrated conflicting results, possibly due to the heterogeneous transplant conditioning and GVHD prophylactic regimens. Here, we sought to examine the VRE-C prevalence and determine its impact on aHCT outcomes, in patients receiving tacrolimus and sirolimus (T/S) as aGVHD prophylaxis. To explore the association between pre-HCT VRE-C and transplant outcomes, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of a cohort of 1074 consecutive patients who underwent aHCT at City of Hope from 2014 to 2017. Patients with stool culture screening within 30 days pre-aHCT (n=862) were identified from the microbiology database and were grouped as VRE-C and non-colonized (VRE-NC). Data was not available on VRE-C in 185 patients and they were not included in analysis. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were examined by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Non-relapse mortality (NRM), VRE-BSI, and GVHD rates of the 2 groups were compared by cumulative incidence rates and Gray's test. Multivariate analyses were performed when adjusting for prognostic factors. Two-sided P value of ≤0.05 was considered significant. Of the 862 evaluated patients, 68 had VRE-C (7.9% prevalence). Median age of patients in VRE-C and VRE-NC groups were 53 and 55 years, respectively. Gender distribution, transplant indications, stem cell source, proportion of unrelated donors, GVHD prophylaxis with T/S and other clinical variables including intensity of conditioning regimen and HCT-CI were similar between the two groups (Table 1) . Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 90-100 and 70-80 were seen in 40% and 53% of patients with VRE-C compared to 47% and 48% of VRE-NC patients (p=0.12). Overall, VRE-BSI episodes were rare (n=7) with 4 patients in VRE-C (6.1%) and 3 patients in VRE-NC (0.4 %); p 〈 0.001. All 3 patients in the VRE-NC group developed bacteremia within the first 100 days (range 2-97) but VRE-BSI was not the eventual cause of death. The median onset of VRE-BSI in the VRE-C group (n=4) was only 6 days (range: 2-12) with 1 surviving patient and 3 who died of non VRE-BSI related causes. No statistical significance was detected in rates of non-VRE BSI (24.1% in VRE-C Vs. 19.2% in VRE-NC; p=0.30) and fungemia (1.5% in VRE-C vs 1.2% VRE-NC; p=0.77). At a median follow-up duration of 19.4 months (range: 2.7-48.4), similar 1-year OS was achieved in both groups (67.4% in VRE-C and 76.5% in VRE-NC; p=0.11) but 1 year PFS was significantly lower in the VRE-C cohort (55.6% Vs. 69.4%; p=0.038). Higher NRM was achieved in the VRE-C cohorts on days +100 and +365 (11.8% Vs. 7.2% and 25.1% Vs. 14.4%, respectively, p=0.041). (Figure 1) There were no differences in rates of day 100 aGVHD (grades II-IV) (Figure 2) and relapse rates at 12 months between the two groups. Conditioning regimen intensity, donor type, KPS, and primary diagnosis were significantly associated with NRM. When these variables were included in the multivariate model, VRE-C was found to be independently associated with higher NRM (HR=1.82, 95%CI: 1.12-2.93; p=0.015). In conclusion, in our cohort of patients receiving predominantly T/S-based aGVHD prophylaxis, no association was detected between VRE-C and aGVHD incidence. Higher rate of VRE-BSI in the VRE-C group is in accordance with published data, albeit lower rates of VRE-BSI was seen in our cohort. VRE-C contributed to higher NRM at days 100 and 365 post-aHCT and was an independent risk factor for poor HCT outcomes Since VRE-C is a potentially modifiable risk factor, our data supports continued efforts for specific interventional strategies (i.e. antimicrobial stewardship) to reduce drug resistant bacterial colonization, and for clinical research to reverse the impact of VRE-C, such as the use of agents, which may modulate gut microbiome. Disclosures Salhotra: Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Consultancy. Ali:Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stein:Amgen Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Forman:Mustang Therapeutics: Other: Licensing Agreement, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Dadwal:AiCuris: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; MERK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Research Funding.