GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 105, No. 4 ( 2005-02-15), p. 1810-1814
    Abstract: Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) is increasingly used in older patients. The impact of the shift from myeloablative transplantation to NST on relapse, transplant complications, and outcome has yet to be fully examined. We performed a retrospective analysis of 152 patients older than 50 years undergoing NST or myeloablative transplantation. Seventy-one patients received nonmyeloablative conditioning, fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d × 4) and intravenous busulfan (0.8 mg/kg/d × 4); 81 patients received myeloablative conditioning, primarily cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. NST patients were more likely to have unrelated donors (58% versus 36%; P = .009), a prior transplant (25% versus 4%; P = & lt; .0001), and active disease at transplantation (85% versus 59%; P = & lt; .001). Despite the adverse characteristics, overall survival was improved in the NST group at 1 year (51% versus 39%) and 2 years (39% versus 29%; P = .056). There was no difference in progression-free survival (2 years, 27% versus 25%; P = .24). The incidence of grade 2 to 4 graft-versus-host disease was similar (28% versus 27%). The nonrelapse mortality rate was lower for NST patients (32% versus 50%; P = .01), but the relapse rate was higher (46% versus 30%; P = .052). Our experience suggests that, in patients over age 50, NST with fludarabine and low-dose busulfan leads to an overall outcome at least as good as that following myeloablative therapy. (Blood. 2005;105:1810-1814)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Elsevier BV, Vol. 8, No. 11 ( 2002-11), p. 601-607
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1083-8791
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2002
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3056525-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2057605-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 104, No. 11 ( 2004-11-16), p. 300-300
    Abstract: Advanced age is a relative contraindication to myeloablative allogeneic transplantation due to the increased incidence of treatment related complications seen in older patients. Therefore, non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) is increasingly utilized in this population. The impact of the shift from myeloablative to NST upon relapse, transplant complications, and outcome has yet to be examined. We performed a retrospective analysis of 152 patients older than age 50 receiving either NST or myeloablative transplantation over a 5 years period. The decision to pursue non-myeloablative as opposed to myeloablative conditioning during this period was based on patient and physician preference. Seventy-one patients received non-myeloablative conditioning, fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day x 4) and intravenous busulfan (0.8 mg/kg/d x 4). Eighty-one patients received myeloablative conditioning, primarily cyclophosphamide and TBI. All patients received pharmacologic prophylaxis to prevent GVHD with the majority of patients receiving FK 506 and methotrexate in both groups (78% NST, 96% myeloablative) with the remainder receiving cyclosporine and prednisone. 93% of NST patients received mobilized PBSC, the median CD34+ cell count infused was 6.4 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 1.0 to 31.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg). 80% of myeloablative patients received marrow. The median age was 58 (range 51–70) years for patients receiving NST and 54 (range 51–66) years for patients receiving myeloablative transplantation. Major disease groups included acute leukemia and MDS (51% NST, 41% myeloblative). Ten percent of non-myeloablative transplant patients were in CR1 or had early stage disease at transplantation compared with 40% of myeloablative transplant patients. Primary indications for NST were advanced age (56%) and prior myeloablative transplant (24%). The median follow-up is 18 months (range 6 to 34 months) for patients receiving non-myeloablative transplantation and 46 months (range 3 to 73 months) for patients receiving myeloablative transplantation. NST patients were more likely to have unrelated donors (58% vs. 36%, p=0.009), prior transplant (25% vs. 4%, p= & lt;0.0001), and active disease at transplantation (85% vs. 59%, p= & lt;0.001). Despite the adverse characteristics, overall survival was improved in the NST group at 1 (51% vs. 39%) and 2 (39% vs. 29%) years (p = 0.056). There was no difference in progression free survival (2 year, 27% vs. 25%, p =0.24). Incidence of 2–4 GVHD was similar, (28% vs. 27%). Non-relapse mortality was lower for NST patients (32% vs. 50%, p=0.01), but relapse was higher (46% vs. 30%, p=0.052). A subset analysis was performed assessing overall and progression free survival in patients with advanced leukemia (beyond CR1) and advanced MDS. This demonstrated marginally improved overall survival and progression free survival for patients receiving NST. Our experience suggests that, in patients over age 50, NST with fludarabine and low dose busulfan leads to an overall outcome at least as good as myeloablative therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2004
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2020
    In:  Pediatric Blood & Cancer Vol. 67, No. 9 ( 2020-09)
    In: Pediatric Blood & Cancer, Wiley, Vol. 67, No. 9 ( 2020-09)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1545-5009 , 1545-5017
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2130978-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 106, No. 11 ( 2005-11-16), p. 835-835
    Abstract: Donor-recipient disparity at HLA-C is an important determinant of clinical outcome after myeloablative unrelated donor (URD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but its importance in URD non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) is less clear. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 111 patients who underwent unrelated donor NST for hematologic malignancies from 2000–2004. Of these, 78 were 10/10 matched at HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1, and 33 were mismatched at one or more HLA-C antigen/allele (21 single C, 3 double C, 9 single C + other HLA locus mismatch). A majority (78%) of the mismatches at HLA-C were detectable at the antigen level. Diseases included AML (24), ALL (3), MDS (17), CML (10), CLL (23), NHL (22), and HD (12). All patients received non-myeloablative conditioning with intravenous busulfan (0.8mg/kg/d x 4 days) and fludarabine (30mg/m2/d x 4 days). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included cyclosporine plus prednisone or tacrolimus plus low-dose methotrexate based regimens. Stem cell source was primarily G-CSF mobilized PBSC. Results: Median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC & gt; 500/ul) among patients who nadired was 12 days (range 8–21 days) in both groups. Median unfractionated marrow donor chimerism were ≥ 90% donor at day+30 and day +100 in both groups. There was one late graft failure in the C-mismatched cohort, and one early graft rejection in the 10/10 matched cohort. HLA-C disparity was associated with an increased risk for grade III-IV acute GVHD (33% vs. 12%, p = 0.01) in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (odds ratio 3.6, p = 0.03). This finding remained significant even when baseline differences in GVHD prophylaxis between the 2 cohorts were taken into consideration. Cumulative relapse incidence was not statistically different: 35% in the C-mismatched group, versus 55% in the 10/10 matched cohort, p = 0.09. There was a higher incidence of treatment related mortality in the C-mismatched group: 48% versus 16% (p = 0.001). Overall survival at 2 years was 27% in C-mismatched, vs. 47% in 10/10 matched patients (p = 0.009). In Cox regression model, HLA-C disparity was an independent factor for poor survival (hazard ratio 1.85, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Donor recipient disparity at HLA-C does not influence engraftment or donor chimerism after URD NST, but is associated with increased acute GVHD and inferior survival. HLA-C is an important transplantation antigen and should be considered in the selection of unrelated donors for NST.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...