GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. 10082-10082
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, BMJ, Vol. 30, No. 2 ( 2020-02), p. 187-192
    Abstract: Some experts have argued that obesity-related malignancies such as endometrial cancer are a “teachable moment” that lead to meaningful changes in health behaviors. It is unclear if endometrial cancer survivors lose weight following treatment. Our goal with this investigation was to evaluate post-treatment changes in body mass index (BMI) and attitudes towards health behaviors in endometrial cancer survivors. Methods Incident endometrial cancer cases undergoing surgery between 2009–2015 were identified in the Marketscan Commercial database and linked with BMI data and health behavior questionnaires from the Marketscan Health Risk Assessment database. Patients were excluded for insufficient BMI data. Standard statistical methods, including the two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test, χ 2 test, and McNemar’s test, were used. Results 655 patients with a median age of 54 (IQR 49-58) were identified and analyzed. Median duration of follow-up was 595 days (IQR 360–1091). Mean pre- and post-treatment BMI was 35.5 kg/m 2 (median 35.0; IQR 27.0–42.3) and 35.6 kg/m 2 (median 34.3; IQR 28.0–42.0), respectively. Median BMI change in the entire cohort was 0 kg/m 2 (IQR −1.0 to 2.0). Weight gain (n=302; 46.1%) or no change in weight (n=106; 16.2%) was seen in most patients. Among the 302 patients who gained weight, the mean pre-treatment BMI was 34.0 kg/m 2 and mean increase was 2.8 kg/m 2 (median 2.0; IQR 1.0–3.4). Among the 247 cases who lost weight, the mean pre-treatment BMI was 38.6 kg/m 2 and mean decrease was 3.2 kg/m 2 (median 2.0; IQR 1.0–4.0). No pre- to post-treatment differences were observed in health behavior questionnaires regarding intention to better manage their diet, exercise more, or lose weight. Discussion Most endometrial cancer survivors gain weight or maintain the same weight following treatment. No post-treatment changes in attitudes regarding weight-related behaviors were observed. The systematic delivery of evidence-based weight loss interventions should be a priority for survivors of endometrial cancer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1048-891X , 1525-1438
    Language: English
    Publisher: BMJ
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2009072-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 5513-5513
    Abstract: 5513 Background: Azenosertib (ZN-c3) is a novel, selective, and orally bioavailable WEE1 inhibitor demonstrating single-agent antitumor activity. Azenosertib may inhibit CT-induced DNA damage repair and provide benefit in pts with platinum R/R EOC. Cyclin E1 amplification/overexpression is present in ≥35% of metastatic ovarian cancer. High expression/amplification of Cyclin E1 is a poor prognostic marker and predictive of lack of response to platinum-based CT. Ovarian models overexpressing Cyclin E1 have exquisite sensitivity to azenosertib in vitro and in vivo; forced Cyclin E1 overexpression sensitizes cell lines with low endogenous Cyclin E1 to azenosertib. Methods: This open-label, multicenter study (NCT04516447) assessed azenosertib + paclitaxel (PAC), carboplatin (Carbo), gemcitabine (GEM), or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in pts with metastatic high-grade serous EOC after ≤2 lines of CT including platinum CT. Primary endpoint is safety and identification of RP2D of each combination. Secondary endpoints include clinical activity. Azenosertib was given continuously or intermittently QD in 21 or 28D cycles until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Results: 103 pts were enrolled; at data cut-off, 94 were efficacy evaluable. 26.6% had a partial response (PR) and median progression free survival (PFS) = 9.03 mo (95%CI: 5.52-11.01). Azenosertib + PAC demonstrated the highest ORR [9/18 (50%)], followed by Carbo [9/27 (33.3%)] ; ORR for azenosertib + PLD or + GEM was 14.3% (5/35, 2/14 respectively). 80 pts had available Cyclin E1 expression data by IHC; higher Cyclin E1 (H-score 〉 50) correlated with higher ORR and longer PFS (ORR = 31.3% vs 7.7%; PFS = 10.35 vs 3.25 mo, HR=0.3; Table). Frequent Grade ≥3 TEAEs (%) were neutropenia (44.4), thrombocytopenia (30.3), anemia (12.1), leukopenia (11.1), fatigue (10.1), diarrhea (6.1), nausea (5.1), and vomiting (5.1). Conclusions: Azenosertib + CT is well tolerated and has encouraging clinical activity, with durable responses in pts with platinum R/R EOC. Pts with Cyclin E1 overexpressing tumors, a subgroup with suboptimal benefits from CT, demonstrated significant improvements in ORR and PFS vs pts with tumors having low expression. These data support a planned trial of azenosertib + CT vs CT alone in Cyclin E1 overexpressing platinum R/R EOC. Clinical trial information: NCT04516447 . [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 5580-5580
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 5580-5580
    Abstract: 5580 Background: NCCN guidelines recommend consideration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for poor surgical candidates with bulky stage III or IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. However, new convincing evidence favoring NACT instead of primary tumor reductive surgery (PTRS) has resulted in shifting practices among gynecologic oncologists. This study compares operative and post-operative outcomes between patients receiving NACT and those undergoing PTRS. Methods: After IRB approval, patients who received NACT or PTRS were identified through the tumor registry and surgical database at a single institution from 2008-2012. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney, Chi square and Fisher’s exact test. Results: Of 163 patients, 109 (67%) received NACT and 54 (33%) underwent PTRS. The majority in both groups was Caucasian (82%) and had ovarian cancer (85%). The median age of all patients was 62 years. There was no difference in median age between groups. High-grade serous histology was most common. In the PTRS group, 72% were stage IIIC. During cytoreductive surgery, NACT cases had significantly shorter total operative and anesthesia time compared to PTRS cases (p = 0.005). NACT patients had significantly less blood loss (p=0.002) than PTRS patients. Based on available data, there was no difference in intraoperative transfusion rate (p = 0.098). However, PTRS cases had a higher rate of postoperative transfusion compared to NACT cases (p = 0.043). There was no difference in the proportion of optimal surgical cytoreduction between groups (p = 0.422). Available data demonstrated that PTRS patients had significantly more complications and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions compared to those receiving NACT (p = 0.024, p = 0.002 respectively). Conclusions: NACT offers advantages regarding operative and anesthesia time, blood loss, postoperative complications, and ICU admissions. NACT may offer a valuable alternative to PTRS. Further studies are warranted to better define the role of NACT in the upfront treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 5584-5584
    Abstract: 5584 Background: The surgical approach for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for primary peritoneal, ovarian, or fallopian tube carcinoma has largely been extrapolated from experience with primary tumor reductive surgery (PTRS). It is unknown whether procedures considered mandatory in PTRS, such as hysterectomy, contribute to comparable removal of macroscopic disease in the NACT setting. Our study compared the difference in pathologic distribution of disease at interval debulking surgery versus primary tumor reduction. Methods: After IRB approval, patients who received NACT or PTRS were identified through the tumor registry and surgical database at a single institution from 2008-2012. Involvement of organs at the time of surgery was categorized as either macroscopic, microscopic and no tumor. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Of the 163 patients identified, 111 (67%) received NACT and 54 (33%) underwent PTRS. Median age was 62 and the majority of patients had stage IIIC high-grade serous carcinoma (91%). Macroscopic ovarian involvement was more common at time of PTRS (92 % vs 63 %, p 〈 0.001). Gross uterine involvement was significantly less in the NACT group compared to PTRS, with the majority of specimens in the NACT group free of disease (Macroscopic 11 % vs 42%, no tumor 62% vs 44 %, p 〈 0.002). However, 27% of the NACT had microscopic uterine serosal disease. Macroscopic large bowel involvement was 50 % in the PTRS vs 26 % in NACT(p 〈 0.005). There was no difference in disease involvement of the small bowel or omentum. Conclusions: The pathologic disease distribution at the time of interval tumor debulking is significantly different from that encountered during primary cytoreductive surgery.. NACT appears to reduce macroscopic large bowel and uterine tumor involvement and may negate the need for hysterectomy and/or large bowel resection at the time of interval debulking to achieve no gross residual.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 5596-5596
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 5596-5596
    Abstract: 5596 Background: Advanced-stage (III/IV) uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) has a median overall survival (OS) of ~ 3 yrs. The study objective was to determine factors associated with long-term survival in advanced stage UPSC. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of pts diagnosed with stage III or IV UPSC between 1993 and 2012. Summary statistics were used to describe demographic and clinical characteristics. OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare pts surviving 〉 3 yrs with those surviving 〈 1 yr. Results: With a median follow-up of 2.2 years (range 0.06-13.2), 262 pts with advanced stage UPSC were identified. The probability of surviving 〉 3 yrs was 0.462, 〉 4 yrs was 0.310, and 〉 5 yrs was 0.228. Thirty-six (14%) pts survived 〉 3 yrs and 37 (14%) survived 〈 1 yr. There was no difference in median age of pts surviving 〉 3 yrs compared to pts surviving 〈 1 yr (60 vs 66, p=0.21). There was also no difference between groups in demographics or medical history. There were several significant differences in pathologic and treatment variables between groups (Table). Conclusions: Though rare, long-term survival in advanced stage UPSC is associated with mixed histology, combination treatment including chemotherapy, and complete response to primary therapy. Further study of the molecular basis for these differences has the potential to improve survival for all pts with this disease. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e16556-e16556
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e16556-e16556
    Abstract: e16556 Background: The choice of adjuvant therapy for early-stage USC remains controversial. The objective of this study was to estimate the recurrence rates of patients with surgically resected early-stage USC stratified by observation alone or adjuvant therapy. Methods: A retrospective review of women with surgically-staged stage IA-II USC followed at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between January 2000 and December 2011. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. We estimated the cumulative incidence of disease recurrence, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as a function of adjuvant therapy received. Adjuvant therapy groups listed in the Table. Results: 80 patients included in study. 58 patients had stage IA, 14 had stage IB, and 8 had stage II disease. Mean age was 66.4 years. Median follow-up for all patients was 4.83 years (range: 0.02 – 18.16). Cumulative incidence of recurrence for the whole group was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.10 – 0.28) which was reached at 3.96 years and remained at this rate until rising to 0.23 (95% CI: 0.12 – 0.36) at 11.12 years. Adjuvant treatment was not significantly associated with decreased risk of recurrence (Table). RFS at 5 years for the whole population was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59 – 0.80) and OS at 5 years was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63 – 0.85). Adjuvant treatment was not significantly associated with RFS or OS. In a subset of stage IA patients, 4 of 27 patients in the observation or cuff alone group recurred compared with 1 of 16 patients in the chemotherapy +/- cuff group (HR 0.48, CI: 0.05 – 4.27, p=0.511). Conclusions: In this study, there were no observed differences between observation and adjuvant treatment modalities in recurrence rates or survival outcomes for patients with early-stage USC. The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy may reduce risk for recurrence in stage IA patients, but further study is needed. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 5568-5568
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 5568-5568
    Abstract: 5568 Background: Nearly 50% of patients with high grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) harbor a germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1/BRCA2 or have tumors characterized by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). HRD is associated with response to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in HGOC. Although PARPi show great promise, there is interest in investigating how HRD status affects outcomes and can be used to objectively tailor other treatment strategies. We aimed to compare clinical and survival outcomes in HGOC stratified by HRD status. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all advanced HGOC from April 2013 to June 2019. Patients were included if germline BRCA and HRD status was known. Clinical outcomes were analyzed and stratified by (1) germline BRCA+ (2) germline BRCA - and somatic BRCA/HRD+, or (3) BRCA-/HRD-. Progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods stratified by HRD status and modeled via Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 1271 patients with advanced HGOC presented during the study period of which 187 met inclusion criteria. 106 patients had germline BRCA mutation, 26 somatic BRCA/HRD+, and 55 BRCA/HRD-. Patients who had HRD- tumor had older median age at diagnosis (63 vs. 54 and 60 years, p 〈 0.001), white race (89% vs. 74% and 68%), non-serous histology (20% vs. 6% and 0%, p=0.04), required more NACT chemotherapy cycles (4 vs. 3 and 3 cycles, p=0.03), and less complete gross resection (R0) at tumor reductive surgery (TRS) (60% vs. 83% and 77%, p=0.02). Patients who had BRCA/HRD- tumor had worse PFS (14.9 months) compared to germline BRCA+ (23.5 months) or somatic BRCA/HRD+ (20.2 months, p 〈 0.001). Patients with BRCA/HRD- disease also had worse OS (42.3 months) compared to germline BRCA+ (68.8 months) or somatic BRCA/HRD+ (69.2 months). Multivariate analysis for PFS revealed that age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04), p=0.01), stage (HR 5.7, 95% CI 1.39-23.4, p=0.02), R0 resection at TRS (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.83, p=0.01), and BRCA/HRD- status (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.48, p=0.02) were significant factors impacting PFS. Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.10, p 〈 0.001) and R0 resection at TRS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.44, p 〈 0.001) were significant factors impacting OS. Conclusions: Germline BRCA-mutant, somatic BRCA/HRD+ HGOC was associated with improved PFS and OS regardless of primary TRS or NACT. BRCA-/HRD- was a negative prognostic factor for survival in HGOC.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. TPS5619-TPS5619
    Abstract: TPS5619 Background: Despite initial response to conventional platinum-containing therapies, the majority of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients will eventually develop treatment resistance. Despite interest for immune checkpoint inhibitor alternatives, pembrolizumab monotherapy is poor with objective response rates (ORR) ranging between 4.1 - 10%. Poor response may be linked to higher expression of immunosuppressive factors (e.g. VEGF, TGF-β) in the tumor microenvironment (TME). In an immunosuppressive TME, monotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors can induce T-cell dysfunction and apoptosis, leading to innate resistance to pembrolizumab. Preclinical studies of other tumors have demonstrated that lenvatinib can improve T-cell activation and reduce the tumor-associated macrophage population and TGF-β/VEGF/FGF-signaling. In HGSOC, mechanisms of resistance to pembrolizumab and whether this resistance can be overcome by the addition of lenvatinib remain unknown. The objective of this investigation is to uncover the immunologic basis and synergistic mechanisms of action underlying clinical efficacy of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in HGSOC. Specifically, we will evaluate the dynamic changes in proliferative and dysfunctional T-cell populations in the peritoneal TME (p-TME) of HGSOC patients receiving monotherapy with pembrolizumab or lenvatinib followed by combination therapy. Methods: All patients will receive a cycle of monotherapy (pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks or lenvatinib 20 mg po daily) followed by combination therapy (both) up to 35 cycles. Enrolled patients will receive intra-peritoneal port placement for serial peritoneal fluid evaluations (cycle 0 day 1, cycle 0 day 8, cycle 1 day 8, cycle 2 day 1, cycle 3 day 1, cycle 5 day 1, then day 1 of every 3rd cycle) for multichannel flow cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing. Our primary translational objective is to estimate both the individual and combined effects of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib on T-cell dysfunction (PD1+ CD38+) and proliferation (ki67+) in the p-TME using multichannel flow cytometry on the peritoneal fluid. Secondary clinical objective is ORR. Secondary translational objectives include individual and synergistic effects of monotherapy and combination therapy on T-cell effector function, T-cell memory, and myeloid cell subpopulations. Exploratory objectives include evaluating the dynamic changes in immune and non-immune cells in the p-TME for exceptional responders and non-responders using single cell RNA sequencing. Key eligibility criteria include 1) histologic diagnosis of high grade serous ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer 2) platinum-resistant disease and 3) no prior lenvatinib therapy. The trial is open with 10 patients enrolled at the time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT05114421 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 5561-5561
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 5561-5561
    Abstract: 5561 Background: Health disparities exist in gynecologic cancers, with data revealing lower survival among certain racial/ethnic groups. Studies suggest underrepresented patients of color with gynecologic cancers may not receive guideline-concordant care to adequately manage their disease, including molecular testing. We conducted a patient preferences survey evaluating treatment choices and provider interactions influencing adherence to guideline-based care. Methods: From July 7 to August 18, 2021, a survey was sent to women with gynecologic cancers who participate in the SMART Patients advocacy group. Survey questions covered topics of preparedness to discuss care with provider, biomarker testing specific to gynecologic tumor type, patients’ considerations informing treatment choices, and confidence to work with providers to improve their clinical and survival outcomes. Information regarding cancer diagnosis, stage, race, ethnicity, treatment, and genetic testing was obtained. Survey responses between non-Hispanic White patients (W) versus non-White (NW) underrepresented patients of color were compared and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 89 women with gynecologic cancers (67% ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal; 21% endometrial; 9% vulvar or vaginal; and 2% cervical) participated in the patient survey. Amongst responders, 55% had localized disease while 36% indicated they had metastatic disease, and 9% did not know. Overall, 86.5% were W and 13.5% were NW (Asian, Black/African American, Native American or Pacific Islander, Hispanic, or mixed race). A higher proportion of NW compared to W patients said they were not at all prepared to discuss cost of treatment (18.2% vs 9.5%), treatment options (12.5% vs 4.5%), and side effects of treatment (20% vs 0%) with their provider; 31% of W patients discussed genetic testing and received resources from their provider compared with only 16.7% of NW patients, and a higher proportion of NW compared to W patients (37.5% vs 28.1%) indicated they were not confident in their ability to work with providers to improve their cancer treatment outcome. Conclusions: While a limitation of this study was low participation from diverse populations, the findings indicate that underrepresented NW patients felt less prepared to discuss treatment-related issues compared to W patients. Moreover, a large proportion of all patients with OC were not informed and/or aware about genetic testing, and approximately a third of participants were not confident in their ability to interact with provider to improve their outcomes. The results highlight opportunities to enhance health care provider education and community outreach to reduce gaps in care delivery.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...