Abstract: To assess acute effects of bevacizumab (anti-VEGF therapy) on cerebral microvessels and systemic cardiovascular regulation. Design and subjects 20 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer (median age: 60.4 years, range 45.5-73.9 years) received bevacizumab intravenously (5 mg/kg) uncoupled of chemotherapy. Prior to and within the first 24 hours after bevacizumab infusion, patients were investigated for retinal endothelial function. A series of a triple 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement was conducted. Retinal endothelial function was determined as flicker light-induced vasodilation. The integrity of baroreflex arc and autonomic cardiovascular control was examined by stimulatory manoeuvres. Results Bevacizumab therapy significantly reduced the vasodilatory capacity of retinal arterioles in response to flicker light. A slight decrease in diastolic pressure and heart rate was observed after bevacizumab infusion but this was unrelated to changes in retinal function. The pressure response upon nitroglycerin was largely preserved after bevacizumab infusion. The proportion of patients with abnormal nocturnal blood pressure regulation increased under anti-angiogenic therapy. Autonomic blood pressure control was not affected by bevacizumab treatment. Conclusions Bevacizumab acutely impairs microvascular function independent of blood pressure changes. Imaging of the retinal microcirculation seems a valuable tool for monitoring pharmacodynamic effects of bevacizumab. Trial registration NCT ID: NCT00740168

Abstract: Background: In newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (RVd) is one of the most widely used combination regimens. Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (CD38-moAb) increase efficacy when added to standard-of-care regimens. Here we present the first primary endpoint of the randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III GMMG-HD7 trial, comparing RVd without (arm IA) or with the CD38-moAb isatuximab (Isa, arm IB) with regard to the rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity after induction therapy in patients with transplant-eligible NDMM. Patients and Methods: Patients with transplant-eligible NDMM at 67 sites in Germany were equally randomized to receive three 42-day cycles of RVd (lenalidomide 25 mg/d p.o., d1-14 and d22-35; bortezomib 1.3 mg/m 2 s.c. d1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, 32; dexamethasone 20 mg/d d1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12, 15, 22-23, 25-26, 29-30, 32-33) in both arms. Isa was added to arm IB only (10 mg/kg i.v., cycle 1: d 1, 8, 15, 22, 29; cycles 2-3: d 1, 15, 29). Randomization for induction was stratified according to revised International Staging System (R-ISS). Primary endpoint of the trial was MRD negativity assessed by next-generation flow (NGF, cut off 1x10 -5) after induction. Secondary endpoints included rates of complete response (CR) after induction and safety. Data cut-off for the present analysis was April 2021. Results: Between 10/2018 and 09/2020, 662 patients were included in the trial. 660 patients were eligible for intention-to-treat analysis and 658 patients started induction (RVd: 329/328 and Isa-RVd: 331/330). Median age was 58 (range 26-70) years and baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment arms. On induction, 35 (10.6%) and 18 (5.4%) patients discontinued treatment in the RVd vs. Isa-RVd arms (p=0.02). Among these, 8 (2.4%, RVd) vs. 7 (2.1%, Isa-RVd) patients discontinued induction due to adverse events (AE). 293 (89.1%) vs. 312 (94.3%) patients in the RVd vs. Isa-RVd arms continued further study treatment after induction. MRD negativity rates after induction were 35.6% vs. 50.1% (odds ratio [OR]=1.83, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] : 1.34-2.51, p & lt;0.001) for RVd vs. Isa-RVd, respectively. On multivariate analyses including treatment arm, R-ISS, performance status, renal impairment, age and sex, treatment with Isa-RVd (vs. RVd) remained the only significant predictor for increased MRD negativity after induction (OR=1.82, 95% CI: 1.33-2.49, p & lt;0.001). While the rates of CR after induction did not yet differ between the RVd vs. Isa-RVd arms (21.6% vs. 24.2%, p=0.46), the rate of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) was significantly higher in the Isa-RVd arm (60.5% vs. 77.3%, p & lt;0.001). The rates of progressive disease were 4.0% (RVd) vs. 1.5% (Isa-RVd). At least one AE (grade ≥3) on induction occurred in 61.3% (RVd) and 63.6% (Isa-RVd) of patients (p=0.57). Most common AE (grade ≥3) by system organ class (SOC) for RVd vs. Isa-RVd were: "investigations": 23.5% vs. 23.9% (p=0.93), "blood and lymphatic system disorders": 16.8% vs. 25.8% (p=0.006), "infections and infestations": 10.4% vs. 13.0% (p=0.33) and "nervous system disorders": 10.1% vs. 8.5% (p=0.50). Rates of serious AE (SAE, any grade) on induction were similar between RVd and Isa-RVd (36.3% vs. 34.8%, p=0.75). Eight (RVd) and four (Isa-RVd) patients died during induction. Conclusions: The GMMG-HD7 trial met its primary endpoint. To the best of our knowledge this is the first phase III trial to demonstrate superiority of MRD negativity rates after induction by adding a CD38-moAb to RVd. There were no increased rates of SAE or early discontinuation in patients treated with Isa-RVd compared to RVd. The trial is ongoing, including analyses post autologous transplantation, which is followed by a second randomization to compare the efficacy of the addition of Isa to lenalidomide maintenance. Disclosures Goldschmidt: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Johns Hopkins University: Other: Grant; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Foundation: Other: Grant; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding. Mai: Celgene / BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations and expenses, Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations and expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations and expenses, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations and expenses, Research Funding. Fenk: Takeda: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria. Besemer: Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria. Dürig: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schroers: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Metzler: Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Haenel: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mann: Cellgene: Consultancy. Asemissen: GSK: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene BMS: Honoraria. Heilmeier: Sanofi-Aventis Dtld. GmbH: Consultancy. Kriegsmann: Sanofi: Honoraria. Weinhold: Sanofi: Honoraria. Holderried: Amgen: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eurocept Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel support; MSD: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Other: Travel support; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Other: Travel support; Therakos: Other: Travel support; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: travel support; Medac: Other: Travel support; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Trautmann-Grill: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gezer: Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Invited Speaker; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Invited Speaker; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Invited Speaker; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Invited Speaker. Khandanpour: GSK: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria. Knauf: Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Munder: GSK: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding. Hoffmann: Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy. Raab: Roche: Consultancy; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Salwender: GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Chugai: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Pfizer: Honoraria. Weisel: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Isatuximab prior to ASCT in NDMM

Abstract: Introduction: The treatment of patients (pts) with rrMM remains challenging and response is often limited in depth and duration. In contrast to many other malignant diseases, targeted therapy in MM is hampered by the limited number of actionable targets. Activating mutations of BRAF have been found in 2-4% of newly diagnosed MM and in up to 8% of rrMM. Several case reports have reported clinical efficacy of downstream pathway inhibition in MM. This phase II trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of combined BRAF/MEK inhibition in rrMM pts with BRAF V600E mutation. Aims: The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of encorafenib in combination with binimetinib. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), defined as best response within 1 year of treatment. Main secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response. Safety analyses included all adverse events (AEs) with those of grade 1/2 only being assessed further if considered to be related to study medications by the investigator. Methods: A total of 15 pts with rrMM who have failed at least 2 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMID), were planned to be enrolled in this open-label phase II multicenter trial. Key inclusion criteria were presence of a BRAF V600E/K mutation confirmed by both mutation-specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing in more than 50% of MM cells. Exclusion criteria included plasma cell leukemia, CNS involvement, cardiac dysfunction, or a history of retinal vein occlusion. Pts received encorafenib 450mg p.o. daily and binimetinib 45mg p.o. twice daily. Responses were assessed using IMWG 2016 criteria. The primary endpoint was analyzed by testing the one-sided null hypothesis of ORR & lt;= 20% using a one-sided binomial test at a significance level of 5%. Exploratory biomarker assessments include cytogenetics, genomic analysis (WGS, RNAseq) and phospho-IHC. Results: As of July 2020, 12 pts have been enrolled and were evaluable for safety and 11 pts were evaluable for response as 1 pt had just completed cycle 1 with confirmation of response pending at the time of data lock. Subtypes of MM were IgG in 6 pts, IgA in 2 pts, and Bence Jones in 4 pts. Pts had received a median of 5 prior lines of therapy (range 2-14). All pts had failed previous treatment with both a PI and an IMID and in addition carfilzomib, pomalidomid, and/or anti-CD38 antibodies in 8/4/6 pts, respectively. The study already reached its primary endpoint. The ORR was 82% (lower limit of the 95% CI 56.4%, one-sided exact binomial test, p & lt;0.0001) with 9/11 pts achieving partial response (PR) or better, 6/11 pts had at least a very good partial response (VGPR, 55%) and 3 pts reached (near) complete response (nCR/CR, 27%). Responses occurred rapidly with 8/11 pts achieving at least a PR or better already after cycle 1. PFS remains immature and will be reported at the conference. Duration of response exceeding 1 year has been observed in individual pts. Adverse events of all grades, assessed to be at least possibly related to a study drug, occurred in 9/12 pts and included blurred vision, macula edema, cramps, arthralgia, diarrhea, skin rash, and decreased left ventricular function. Grade 3 or 4 AEs irrespective of causality occurring in more than 1 pt were reported in 8 pts with anemia, hypertension and thrombocytopenia (3/ 3/ 2 pts, respectively). SAEs were reported in 2 pts, respiratory tract infection in both pts and tooth decay in 1 pt that was not related to the study medication. No deaths occurred while on treatment or within 30 days of the end of treatment. Preliminary results of biomarker assessments reveal new RAS mutations and amplification of the BRAF locus at the time of relapse while on study treatment as potential markers of resistance. Analysis of pharmacodynamic markers by phospho-IHC reveals suppression of BRAF/MEK signaling at cycle 1 / day 28 and restoration of expression at the time of relapse. Conclusion: Targeting activating BRAF mutations in rrMM by combining the BRAF inhibitor, encorafenib, and the MEK inhibitor, binimetinib, induces rapid and deep responses in the majority of pts. No new safety signal has been observed when compared to prior reports on these compounds. The study reached its primary endpoint with fewer pts than expected. The primary efficacy and safety analysis will be presented at the conference. Disclosures Raab: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Heidelberg Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scheid:BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Besemer:GSK: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Metzler:Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Khandanpour:Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Trautmann-Grill:Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Mundipharma GmbH: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD): Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline (GSK): Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Johns Hopkins University: Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Foundation: Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:. Weisel:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Encorafenib and Binimetinib in BRAF V600E mutant multiple myeloma

Abstract: Background: The early COVID-19-pandemic was characterized by changes in decision making, decision-relevant value systems and the related perception of decisional uncertainties and conflicts resulting in decisional burden and stress. The vulnerability of clinical care professionals to these decisional dilemmas has not been characterized yet. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire study (540 patients, 322 physicians and 369 nurses in 11 institutions throughout Germany) was carried out. The inclusion criterion was active involvement in clinical treatment or decision making in oncology or psychiatry during the first year of COVID-19. The questionnaires covered five decision dimensions (conflicts and uncertainty, resources, risk perception, perception of consequences for clinical processes, and the perception of consequences for patients). Data analysis was performed using ANOVA, Pearson rank correlations, and the Chi²-test, and for inferential analysis, nominal logistic regression and tree classification were conducted. Results: Professionals reported changes in clinical management (27.5%) and a higher workload (29.2%), resulting in decisional uncertainty (19.2%) and decisional conflicts (22.7%), with significant differences between professional groups (p 〈 0.005), including anxiety, depression, loneliness and stress in professional subgroups (p 〈 0.001). Nominal regression analysis targeting “Decisional Uncertainty” provided a highly significant prediction model (LQ p 〈 0.001) containing eight variables, and the analysis for “Decisional Conflicts” included six items. The classification rates were 64.4% and 92.7%, respectively. Tree analysis confirmed three levels of determinants. Conclusions: Decisional uncertainty and conflicts during the COVID-19 pandemic were independent of the actual pandemic load. Vulnerable professional groups for the perception of a high number of decisional dilemmas were characterized by individual perception and the psychological framework. Coping and management strategies should target vulnerability, enable the handling of the individual perception of decisional dilemmas and ensure information availability and specific support for younger professionals.

Abstract: Acquired von Willebrand disease (aVWD) is frequently observed in patients with the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). aVWD can be treated by plasma-derived concentrates containing factor VIII (FVIII) and/or von Willebrand factor (VWF) and recombinant VWF concentrate as well as adjuvant therapies such as tranexamic acid and desmopressin. However, all of these therapeutic options possibly cause thromboembolism. Therefore, the optimal treatment remains uncertain. This report presents a case of a 16-year-old patient suffering from severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to coronavirus disease 2019 with the need of ECMO support. Our patient developed aVWD under ECMO therapy characterized by loss of high-molecular-weight multimers (HMWM) and severe bleeding symptoms following endoscopic papillotomy due to sclerosing cholangitis. At the same time standard laboratory parameters showed hypercoagulability with increased fibrinogen level and platelet count. The patient was successfully treated with recombinant VWF concentrate (rVWF; vonicog alfa; Veyvondi) combined with topic tranexamic acid application and cortisone therapy. rVWF concentrate vonicog alfa is characterized by ultra-large multimers and absence of FVIII. Patient could be successfully weaned from ECMO support after 72 days. Multimer analysis 1 week after ECMO decannulation showed an adequate reappearance of HMWM.

Abstract: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is the consequence of a complex, still incompletely understood immunological dysregulation. Proposed mechanisms include autoantibody-induced platelet destruction, impaired platelet production as well as abnormalities in T-cell immunity, such as T helper cells (Th1) polarization, a high proportion of Th17 cells, and a reduced number of regulatory T cells. Although the etiology of ITP is incompletely understood and considered multifactorial in most cases, genetic variants are thought to play a key role in susceptibility to ITP, especially in persistent or chronic ITP. Efforts are currently underway to uncover possible predisposing genetic factors for the development of ITP. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variations have been identified in several immune-related genes, such as cytokine genes, Fcγ receptor genes or T-cell costimulation genes, and have been associated with patients’ susceptibility to ITP. However, because of the clinical heterogeneity and low incidence of ITP it remains challenging to perform genetic analyses with sufficiently large sample size within informative patient populations, highlighting the need for collection of well-annotated biomaterials in clinical trials or registry projects. Another significant challenge is to go beyond performing association studies alone and to establish genotype-phenotype associations, thus proving causality between a genetic alteration and ITP pathogenesis. This review summarizes our current knowledge on genetic alterations identified as potential predisposing factors for the development of ITP in adults, thereby addressing signaling pathways considered critical for ITP pathogenesis.