GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    FDA analysis: Impact of BMI on efficacy outcomes in multiple myeloma trials.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 8543-8543
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 8543-8543
    Abstract: 8543 Background: Obesity has been implicated as a risk factor for the development of certain types of cancers, including multiple myeloma. Previous studies in other tumor types suggest that overweight subjects may have better outcomes, however, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), it is unknown whether body weight affects outcomes to therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 13 RRMM clinical trials submitted to the FDA between 2012-2018. Patients were divided into four groups, underweight (BMI 〈 18.5 kg/m 2 ), normal weight (BMI 18.5- 〈 25 kg/m 2 ), overweight (BMI 25.0- 〈 30 kg/m 2 ) and obese (BMI 〉 30.0 kg/m 2 ). A multivariate analysis for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), stratified by study and adjusted for age, cytogenetic risk group (Standard, High, Unknown), immunoglobin subtype (IgG Y/N), ECOG status (0-1, 〉 1, UNK), sex (M/F) was used to estimate the HR. Results: A total of 5898 patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 65 years (range 30-91 years). A total of 87(1.5%) patients were underweight, 1853 (31%) were normal weight, 2212 (38%) were overweight, 1332 (23%) were obese, and 414 (7%) had missing BMI. The results of the multivariate analysis of PFS and OS are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Exploratory analysis of patients with RRMM found that patients who were overweight and obese had a trend towards slightly improved PFS and OS when compared to normal weight patients. Similar trends were observed in the analyses of overall response rate and BMI (not presented in the abstract). These results are consistent with previous studies in other malignancies. Limitations include the lack of adjustment for multiple testing, the small sample of patients in the underweight category, and heterogeneity in the treatment regimens and PFS assessments in the clinical trials included in the analysis. Future studies are needed to evaluate safety and impact of treatment regimens on efficacy outcome measures based on body weight. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.8543
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Metastasis free survival in older men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor inhibitors: An FDA-pooled analysis.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 12038-12038
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 12038-12038
    Abstract: 12038 Background: The FDA has approved three androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) based on improvements in metastasis-free survival (MFS). MFS is an earlier endpoint, defined as the time from randomization to either imaging-detectable distant disease or death. This pooled analysis examines MFS, time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy (TTCyto), and safety outcomes in men over 80 treated with AR inhibitors. Methods: Data was pooled from three randomized controlled studies (n=4117) of AR inhibitors for nmCRPC. The treatment effect of AR inhibitors on MFS and TTCyto across age groups was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Hazard Ratios for MFS and TTCyto were adjusted for baseline ECOG, total Gleason score, PSA doubling time, and prior bone-targeting therapy. Results: For patients age 80 years or older (n=675) who were treated with AR inhibitors, the hazard ratio was 0.38 (95% CI 0.29, 0.49) with an estimated median MFS of 40 months (95% CI 36, 41) versus 22 months (95% CI 18, 29) for those treated with placebo (n=348). For patients 〈 80 (n=2019) treated with AR inhibitors, the HR was 0.31 (95% CI 0.27, 0.36) with an estimated median MFS of 41 months (95% CI 36, NR) versus 16 months (95% CI 15, 18) for those treated with placebo (n=1075). Patients over 80 also derived similar improvements in time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy (HR 0.43 95% CI 0.23, 0.82), compared to their younger counterparts (HR 0.41 95% CI 0.33, 0.50). See Table for selected safety outcomes. Conclusions: In an exploratory subgroup analysis, older men (≥80) with nmCRPC derived similar benefit in MFS and time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy with AR inhibitors compared with younger patients. Men age 80 and above experienced higher rates of Grade 3-4 adverse events, serious adverse events, falls, and fractures. This trend towards increased toxicity was observed regardless of treatment arm. Analysis of patient reported outcomes is ongoing. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.12038
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    FDA analysis of pembrolizumab trials in multiple myeloma: Immune related adverse events (irAEs) and response.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 8008-8008
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 8008-8008
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.8008
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Time to treatment failure (TTF) as a potential clinical endpoint in real-world evidence (RWE) studies of melanoma.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 9578-9578
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 9578-9578
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.9578
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    An FDA analysis of the association between adverse events and outcome in patients with urothelial cancer receiving a programmed death protein 1 or programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/L1) antibody.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 4549-4549
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 4549-4549
    Abstract: 4549 Background: To assess the relationship between tumor response rate, overall survival, and the development of related adverse events of special interest (AESIs) or related immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) in patients with urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies. Methods: We examined seven trials that led to drug approval and which included 1747 patients with metastatic or locally advanced urothelial cancer treated with an anti-PD-1/L1 antibody. Five trials enrolled patients who had received prior platinum-based therapy and two enrolled patients who were cisplatin-ineligible. The datasets were searched for AESIs, related AESIs, imAEs, and related imAEs. The relationship to study drug was determined by the Investigator. Immune-mediated adverse events were defined as AESIs treated with topical or systemic corticosteroids. Results: In these exploratory analyses, a related AESI was reported in 64% of responding patients and in 34% of patients who did not respond to the anti-PD-1/L1 antibody while a related imAE occurred in 28% and 12% of patients who did and did not respond to study drug, respectively. In a responder analysis, an increase in overall survival was seen in patients with related AESIs compared to those with no related AESI [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.49]. Fifty-seven percent of responding patients with a related AESI reported a related AESI prior to documentation of response. Conclusions: Patients who responded to treatment with an anti-PD-1/L1 antibody were more likely to report a related AESI or related imAE. This relationship did not appear to be due to the increased duration of exposure in responding patients. Systemic corticosteroid use did not appear to affect the duration of response.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.4549
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    A safety study of trebananib (AMG 386) and abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2014
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 32, No. 4_suppl ( 2014-02-01), p. 218-218
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 4_suppl ( 2014-02-01), p. 218-218
    Abstract: 218 Background: Trebananib is an angiopoietin1/2 antagonist peptibody. Androgens stimulate expression of VEGF via activation of hypoxia inducible factor-a (HIFa). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is associated with lower HIF1a gene expression in prostate cancer tissue. Dual targeting of the androgen and angiogenic axis represents a potential synergistic anti-angiogenic therapeutic approach in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this preliminary safety study we hypothesize that trebananib in combination with abiraterone will have a favorable tolerability and efficacy profile. Methods: Patients with mCRPC were treated with abiraterone 1000mg daily and prednisone 5 mg twice daily. Trebananib was administered intravenously every week, in escalating doses from 15mg/kg to 30mg/kg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28-days. Results: A total of 9 patients were enrolled. Three of nine patients had prior chemotherapy. The median age was 63.8 (63-71yrs). No dose limiting toxicities were observed. The most common grade ≥ 2 toxicities included limb edema (3/9), hyperglycemia (1/9), gastrointestinal (2/9), fatigue (2/9), hypertension (1/9), confusion (1/9), weight gain (1/9) and insomnia (2/9). 5/9 of patients had an overall PSA decline of 〉 30%. 8/9 patients were evaluable for response. Prior chemotherapy patients were on study for 1 and 3 months. No prior chemotherapy patients were treated for 1, 6, 9, 10, 10, and 17 months. Conclusions: Trebananib in combination with abiraterone is well tolerated and displayed an acceptable safety profile in patients with mCRPC. Based on this safety data a randomized phase II study randomizing chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients to either abiraterone/prednisone plus AMG 386 at 30mg/kg or abiraterone/prednisone is currently accruing at the NCI. Clinical trial information: NCIT01553188.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.4_suppl.218
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Impact of radiotherapy on risk of adverse events in patients receiving immunotherapy: A U.S. Food and Drug Administration pooled analysis.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 3018-3018
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 3018-3018
    Abstract: 3018 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in the treatment of multiple advanced malignancies. Radiotherapy (RT) has been used in combination with ICIs to activate tumor-specific T cell responses, and RT also promotes non-specific acute and chronic inflammatory responses both locally and systemically. More than 50% of patients receive RT at some point during their course of cancer therapy, and relatively little information is available pertaining to the impact of RT, if any, on the risk of adverse events (AEs) in patients receiving ICIs. Methods: Pooled data from prospective trials of ICIs submitted to the FDA in initial or supplemental BLAs or NDAs through 12/2019 were included (N=66). Trials from applications that were withdrawn or not approved were not included. Patients were subdivided by whether or not radiotherapy was administered at any time during the course of their cancer treatment. AEs common to both ICI treatment and RT were identified to focus on the following reactions: neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, and myocarditis. Descriptive statistics were used to examine AEs associated with the use of radiation and ICIs. Results: A total of 25,836 patients were identified, of which 9087 (35%) received RT and 16,749 (65%) did not. Radiation was associated with similar rates of AEs overall with numerically higher hematologic toxicities and pneumonitis and numerically lower colitis, hepatitis and myocarditis (Table). Patients receiving RT were more likely to experience Grade 3-5 hematologic toxicities compared to those not receiving RT. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest report of AE risk associated with the use of radiation and ICIs. Our results show that the incidence of hematologic toxicity and pneumonitis in patients receiving RT may be slightly higher. Analysis to determine comparability of baseline demographic characteristics, comprehensive AE profile, and timing of RT is underway. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.3018
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Clinical efficacy of abiraterone and enzalutamide metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer patients who progressed rapidly on docetaxel with a genomic analysis.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e16536-e16536
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e16536-e16536
    Abstract: e16536 Background: Docetaxel has become a standard of care for mCSPC. Enzalutamide and abiraterone have been proven to improve survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Little is known about patients who have been treated with docetaxel for mCSPC and subsequent therapeutic responses. This retrospective analysis is to evaluate the response duration of abiraterone and enzalutamide in patients who previously received docetaxel for mCSPC but developed mCRPC within 12 months. Methods: Clinical Trial NCT02649855 enrolled patients with newly diagnosed mCSPC who were treated with standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles) sequenced with immunotherapy (PROSTVAC) from February 2016 to present. Patients who had progression (based on consecutive PSA rises or imaging) within 1 year of completing docetaxel and went on to subsequent abiraterone/enzalutamide were evaluated. (Note these are different PSA progression criteria than used in CHAARTED, Sweeney, NEJM, 2015). A PCR-based NGS panel (OncoMine Comprehensive Assay v3) will evaluate available tissue from these patients. Results: Of the 46 patients evaluated regardless of immunotherapy sequence, 15 (33%) went on subsequent therapy after progression on docetaxel for mCSPC, with 12 patients starting abiraterone/enzalutamide (7 with high volume disease and 5 with low volume disease). The median age was 62 (41-83) years. 6/12 patients (50%) initiated enzalutamide and 6/12 patients (50%) initiated abiraterone. The median duration of treatment for both was 7.43 (1.53 – 16.0) months, the median time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression was 2 (0 – 11) months; the median duration of PSA decline was 2 months in patients with both high and low volume disease. Of note, 3/12 (25%) of patients did not have PSA response, all of them had high volume disease. Conclusions: These data from a small cohort suggest that patients who have progression within 12 months of completing docetaxel for mCSPC have limited subsequent benefit from enzalutamide or abiraterone. Additional studies are required to determine optimal timing and treatment sequence for patients with mCSPC who rapidly develop mCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02649855.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e16536
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Clinical and immunologic impact of short course enzalutamide without androgen deprivation therapy for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 34, No. 2_suppl ( 2016-01-10), p. 214-214
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 2_suppl ( 2016-01-10), p. 214-214
    Abstract: 214 Background: Enzalutamide (enz) is FDA approved for advanced prostate cancer, but studies are evaluating enz in earlier stages of disease. We have conducted a clinical trial (NCT01875250) of enz ± a therapeutic vaccine in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had a PSA between 2.0-20.0 ng/ml, no metastatic disease and normal testosterone (T). Treatment for all pts included enz 160 mg daily for 84 days (D), but no T lowering therapy was permitted. This analysis evaluated all pts for the impact of enz on PSA and T regardless of randomization. Pts treated with Enz alone were evaluated for immune responses.The impact of the vaccine will be evaluated after protocol-defined requisite follow-up. Results: Median age for all pts (n = 34) was 66 years (range: 52-87), with a median on-study baseline PSA of 4.55 ng/ml (2.02-19.43). Common adverse events included fatigue and breast tenderness, but no pts discontinued enz for toxicity. The median PSA decline was 99% (range: 52% to 〉 99%) with 11/34 pts having undetectable nadirs. Median time to first PSA rise after 84 D course of enz was 29 D (13-70) and median recovery to baseline PSA in 25 evaluable pts was 190 D (84-469). T increased above normal limits in 18/34 pts (median Tmax = 802 ng/dl). Immune analysis (n = 12) indicated enz alone increased naïve T-cells and NK cells, and decreased several subsets of myeloid derived suppressor cells with a highly suppressive phenotype. Conclusions: The preliminary findings from this study suggest that short-course enz is well tolerated, leads to prolonged PSA suppression and enhanced immune responses in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. These immune studies provide the rationale for the use of enz in combination with immunotherapeutics in this and other malignancies. Clinical trial information: NCT01875250.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.214
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cabozantinib (C) plus docetaxel (D) and prednisone (P) in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2015
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 33, No. 7_suppl ( 2015-03-01), p. 235-235
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 7_suppl ( 2015-03-01), p. 235-235
    Abstract: 235 Background: Docetaxel (D) improves overall survival in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but benefits remain short-lived. Clinical data suggests patients (pts) with mCRPC treated with anti-androgen therapy like abiraterone (AA) or enzalutamide (ENZA) have decreased responses to subsequent therapy due to cross-resistance in the androgen pathway targeted by D, AA, or ENZA(van Soest et al, Eur J Cancer 49:18, 2013). Combining D with other agents, like cabozantinib (C), could target different cellular signaling pathways potentially minimizing tumor resistance. Methods: D naive pts receive 75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of a 21 day cycle, and prednisone (P) 5 mg po q12 hours with C at 3 dose levels: 20, 40, or 60 mg po daily until maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined. In phase 2, pts who have progressed on AA or ENZA, enroll on a randomized 2 arm cohort comparing D plus C to D alone. Results: 20 pts have been accrued; 4 at 20 mg C, 8 at 40 mg C, and 7 at 60 mg C. On phase 2, 1 pt is randomized to D alone. Median age is 68 (44-84 yrs). Median baseline PSA is 94.7 (0.01-754.1 ng/mL). Gleason score is 9 (7-10). Median cycles is 9.5 (1-33). 8 pts have bone only disease, 12 pts have bone and soft tissue disease. Common grade 2 and grade 3 adverse events possibly related to C: hand/foot syndrome (4/16), oral mucositis (4/16), hypophosphatemia (4/16), and fatigue (3/16). The MTD of C is 40 mg daily with D. 15 pts were previously treated with AA or ENZA. In 13 patients previously treated with AA, median PFS has not been reached, with a median potential follow up of 12.4 months. Six month PFS is 77.8% and 9 month PFS is 60.5%. Conclusions: D plus P may have limited benefits after disease progression on AA as seen in 3 retrospective analyses demonstrating a median PFS survival of 4.6 months or less (Mezynski J, et al. Ann Oncol 23;11, 2012) (Aggarwal R, et al. Clin Genitourin Cancer 12;5, 2014) (Schweizer MT, et al. Eur Urol 66;4, 2014). PFS results seen in this trial compare favorably to previously published data of treatment with D after AA in mCRPC, suggesting the addition of C to D may help overcome acquired resistance. Further randomized trials will determine if C in combination with D will enhance clinical outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT01683994.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.235
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...