GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 227, No. 5 ( 2022-11), p. 735.e1-735.e25
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-9378
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2003357-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 22, No. 11 ( 2021-11), p. 1507-1517
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1470-2045
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049730-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2018
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 78, No. 4_Supplement ( 2018-02-15), p. P6-12-08-P6-12-08
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 78, No. 4_Supplement ( 2018-02-15), p. P6-12-08-P6-12-08
    Abstract: Background: Young women with BRCA mutations may face fertility issues given the standard recommendation for risk-reducing oophorectomy after childbearing has been completed or before age 40. Potential transmission of the affected gene to future progeny may also be a concern. Little is known regarding the perspectives, management, and outcomes of young breast cancer survivors with BRCA mutations, who also face risks of recurrent disease and treatment effects on fertility. Methods: As part of a multi-center, prospective cohort study of newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC) at age ≤40 years enrolling between 2006-2016, we identified women with stage I-III BC who had self-reported results of genetic testing. Participants are surveyed at baseline then annually regarding their breast cancer treatment, genetic testing, fertility interest, pregnancy attempts, and pregnancies. Chi-square tests were used to compare proportions of carriers vs non-carriers who were interested in future biologic children, took steps to preserve fertility, underwent bilateral oophorectomy, attempted pregnancy, and became pregnant in the 5 years following diagnosis. Results: Carriers (n=104) and non-carriers (n=662) were similar in age and stage, but greater proportions of carriers had ER negative disease and received chemotherapy (Table 1). The proportion of carriers and non-carriers interested in future biologic children was similar prior to diagnosis (51% vs 38%; p=0.18), 1 year following diagnosis (30% vs 27%; p=0.44), and 5 years following diagnosis (14% vs 15%; p=0.26). Similar proportions of carriers (12%) and non-carriers (14%) took steps to prevent infertility prior to treatment. Greater proportions of carriers indicated that concern about having a child at higher risk of breast cancer affected their interest in future biologic children (15% vs 4%, p=0.02) and underwent bilateral oophorectomy (61% vs 9%, p & lt;0.0001), but there was no difference in rates of pregnancy attempts (15% vs 11%, p=0.62), or pregnancies (12% vs 8%, p=0.36) in the five years following diagnosis. Conclusion: Young breast cancer survivors with known BRCA mutations have similar interest in future fertility and both attempt and become pregnant at similar rates to non-carriers in the five years following diagnosis. Impact of specific BRCA mutation (1 or 2), ER status of tumor, and timing of pregnancy attempts will be explored in future analyses. Table 1: BRCA mutation carriers, n (%)Non-carriers, n (%)X2 p-valueAge  0.47 & lt;3018 (17)86 (13) 31-3529 (28)201 (30) 36-4057 (55)375 (57) Stage  0.73I40 (39)260 (39) II46 (44)307 (46) III18 (17)95 (14) Partnered  0.44Yes77 (74)509 (77) No27 (26)148 (22) Missing0 (0)5 (1) Children pre-diagnosis  0.33Yes62 (60)427 (64) No42 (40)235 (36) Phenotype   & lt;0.0001ER and/or PR+48 (46)490 (74) ER and PR-56 (54)171 (26) Missing0 (0)1 (0) Adjuvant hormones   & lt;0.0001Yes44 (42)488 (74) No60 (58)174 (26) Chemotherapy  0.003Yes96 (92)529 (80) No8 (8)132 (2) Missing0 (0)1 (0)  Citation Format: Poorvu PD, Gelber SI, Ruddy KJ, Seiger K, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM. Fertility interest, management and outcomes in young BRCA+ breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-08.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2011
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 71, No. 24_Supplement ( 2011-12-15), p. P1-08-05-P1-08-05
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 71, No. 24_Supplement ( 2011-12-15), p. P1-08-05-P1-08-05
    Abstract: Background: Previous research has suggested that young age at diagnosis is an independent risk factor for breast cancer recurrence and death in women with early stage breast cancer. However, young women are more likely to have aggressive subtypes of breast cancer. No prior studies have adequately controlled for tumor phenotype, including HER-2/neu (HER2) status, in particular. Recent evidence has suggested that the prognostic effect of young age varies by tumor subtype. Methods: We examined data from women with newly diagnosed Stage 1–3 breast cancer presenting to one of 8 NCCN centers between January 2000 and December 2007. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relationship between age and breast cancer specific survival, controlling for known prognostic factors and treatment. In addition, we conducted stratified analyses by estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 status. Results: 19,633 women with Stage 1–3 breast cancer eligible for analysis including 2,177 (11%) who were age 40 years or younger at diagnosis. Younger women were more likely to be non-white or Hispanic, more educated, employed, and to have higher stage, high grade, ER-negative, progesterone receptor (PR) negative, and HER2−positive disease, and treated with chemotherapy and trastuzumab (all variables P & lt; 0.0001 by Chi-Square test). 5-year survival among younger women was 94.1 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 92.9−95.3) and 96.3 (95% CI 95.9−96.6) for older women. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model controlling for sociodemographic, disease, and treatment characteristics, women age & lt; 40 or younger at diagnosis had increased mortality compared to older women (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% CI 1.02−1.56). In stratified analyses, age 40 or less was associated with increased mortality among women with ER-positive disease (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01−2.05), but was not among those with ER-negative disease (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.85−1.55). Younger age was associated with a statistically significant increase in mortality among women with HER2−negative disease (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.00−1.68), but this difference did not reach statistical significance among those with HER2−positive disease (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.82−2.09). Conclusions: The effect of age on short-term survival of women with early breast cancer appears to vary by breast cancer subtype, particularly ER status. Further research to elucidate differences in breast cancer biology and efficacy of therapy within tumor types by age is warranted. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-05.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2018
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 78, No. 4_Supplement ( 2018-02-15), p. P6-08-14-P6-08-14
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 78, No. 4_Supplement ( 2018-02-15), p. P6-08-14-P6-08-14
    Abstract: Background. Phthalates are ubiquitous in consumer goods (e.g., food containers, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals), from which they readily leach into the environment. Phthalates interfere with hormonal signaling and may affect reproductive, developmental, and cancer endpoints. Preclinical evidence implicates some phthalates in breast cancer progression—particularly dibutyl phthalate (DBP), which potentiates the estrogen receptor (ER). Associations between phthalates and breast cancer incidence have not been thoroughly investigated. Users of phthalate-containing medications have up to 70-fold higher urinary phthalate levels than other individuals, and represent a highly exposed population for efficient study of phthalate health effects. Methods. We used the Danish Drug Information Database to identify all phthalate-containing oral medications marketed during the study period. We recorded the product code and the type and mass of phthalate per pill. We identified a nationwide cohort of women at risk for a first cancer between 2005—2015, and who had no previous exposure to a phthalate-containing drug. Using the National Prescription Registry we characterized time-varying, medication-borne phthalate exposure. Incident cancers were ascertained by linking to the Danish Cancer Registry. We fit Cox regression models to estimate associations between cumulative phthalate exposures and breast cancer incidence. Exposures were updated annually and lagged by 1 year. We adjusted for established risk factors, comorbidity, co-medications (e.g., HRT), and drug substances exposed to. Results. We identified 481 products from 24 drug classes containing either DBP, diethyl phthalate (DEP), cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP), hypromellose phthalate (HPMCP), or polyvinyl acetate phthalate (PVAP). Drugs with phthalate-containing products also included phthalate-free products. Phthalate masses ranged from 3 µg to 1.3 g per pill. We followed 1.12 million women over 9.99 million person-years, during which 27,111 women were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. Fourteen percent of the cohort (n=161,751) was prescribed a phthalate-containing drug. We observed no breast cancer associations with exposure to CAP, DEP, HPMCP, and PVAP. However, the highest level of cumulative DBP exposure ( & gt;10,000 mg; range: 10,024 to 71,340 mg; median=15,390 mg) was associated with an 80% increase in breast cancer risk compared with no exposure (HRadj=1.8; 95% CI: 1.0, 3.1). The association was strongest for ER+ disease (HRadj=1.9; 95% CI: 1.1, 3.5) and among premenopausal women (HRadj=2.2; 95% CI: 0.91, 5.3). There was no evidence of a linear trend in the log-hazard across categories of cumulative DBP exposure. No published evidence links exposure to the drug substances represented by the DBP-containing products (bisacodyl, budesonide, mesalazine, multienzymes, diclofenac, and lithium) with breast cancer risk. Conclusions. High DBP exposure was associated with increased breast cancer incidence, particularly ER+ disease and among premenopausal women. This association merits further investigation. In the meantime, it may be prudent for women taking DBP-containing medications to substitute a phthalate-free version of the same drug, other considerations being equal. Citation Format: Ahern TP, Cronin-Fenton DP, Broe A, Pilgaard Ulrichsen S, Cole BF, Lash TL, Toft Sørensen H, Tamimi RM, Damkier P. Breast cancer risk in chronic users of phthalate-containing medications: A Danish nationwide cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-08-14.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2011
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 71, No. 24_Supplement ( 2011-12-15), p. P4-11-02-P4-11-02
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 71, No. 24_Supplement ( 2011-12-15), p. P4-11-02-P4-11-02
    Abstract: In a previous analysis of women enrolled in NHSII, we found that among women diagnosed with benign breast disease (BBD), those with predominant type 1/no type 3 lobules were at lower risk of subsequent breast cancer compared to women with other lobule types. Additionally, studies in animal models suggest that higher levels of IGF-1, a polypeptide hormone involved in the proliferation/differentiation of normal mammary epithelium, may inhibit involution of breast lobules. However, the interaction between IGF-1 levels and lobule types in determining breast cancer risk has not been previously evaluated. Therefore, we examined the association between IGF-1 levels and lobule type among women with BBD. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 484 women in NHSII with biopsy-confirmed BBD between 1993–2001 who had blood samples available for determining levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3. A pathologist, blinded to exposure status, classified lobule type on biopsy slides according to the number of acini per lobule (type 1 & lt; 12; type 2∼50; type 3∼80 acini). Lobule type was classified into (1) predominant type 1/no type 3 lobules or (2) other lobule types. Multivariate logistic models were used to assess the associations between plasma IGF-1, IGFBP-3, and IGF-1/IGFBP-3 levels with lobule type. Models were adjusted for age, IGF-1 batch and additional potential confounders in secondary analyses. Results: In univariate analyses, older age at biopsy, higher body mass index, postmenopausal status, nulliparity, and lower IGF-1 levels were associated with predominant type1/no type 3 lobules (p & lt;0.05). In multivariate logistic models adjusting for age, higher IGF-1 levels were associated with a decreased risk of predominant type 1/no type 3 lobules (OR quartile 4 vs. quartile 1 = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.15−0.81). Greater IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio was also associated with a decreased risk of predominant type1/no type 3 lobules (OR quartile 4 vs. quartile 1 = 0.24, 95%CI: 0.10−0.57). These associations persisted, though were slightly attenuated, in models adjusting for additional potential confounders. Conclusion: Higher IGF-1 levels and greater IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratios are associated with a decreased risk of predominant type 1 lobules/no type 3 lobules among women with BBD in the NHSII. Whether this association contributes to the mechanism by which IGF-1 confers an elevated breast cancer risk requires further investigation. Acknowledgements: This work was supported by T32 CA09001-35 CA124865, R01 CA050385, and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-02.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2013
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 73, No. 24_Supplement ( 2013-12-15), p. P2-18-02-P2-18-02
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 73, No. 24_Supplement ( 2013-12-15), p. P2-18-02-P2-18-02
    Abstract: Background: While younger age at diagnosis has consistently been identified as a predictor of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), little is known about how clinical, decisional, and psychosocial factors are related to the decision to undergo CPM in young women with breast cancer. Methods: As part of an ongoing, multi-center cohort study of young women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger, we identified 428 women with unilateral Stage I-III disease. Participants were asked to complete surveys by mail that included questions about decision-making and treatments. Tumor characteristics were ascertained via medical record review. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors of: 1) CPM vs. unilateral mastectomy (UM); 2) CPM vs. breast conserving surgery (BCS). Independent variables with a p-value ≤ 0.15 in bi-variate analyses were included in the final multivariable model. Results: 41% of women had CPM, 29% had UM and 31% had BCS. Median age at diagnosis was 37 (range: 17-40). Most women had stage I or II disease (87%), and estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors (69%); approximately 14% were carriers of a BRCA 1 or 2 mutation. In the multivariable analysis (Table 1), having a cancer-predisposing mutation, having at least one child, anxiety as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and patient-driven decision making were all associated with a greater likelihood of undergoing CPM, while women who reported their physician made the final decision about surgery were less likely to undergo CPM, compared to both UM and BCS. Additional factors significantly associated with undergoing CPM vs. BCS included nodal involvement, Her2 positivity, and lower BMI. Race/ethnicity, marital status, tumor size, tumor grade, depression (as measured by the HADS), fear of recurrence, and having a first-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer were not associated with undergoing CPM. Conclusion: Many young women with early stage breast cancer are choosing to undergo CPM. Our findings point to the need for improved communication with patients regarding surgical choices as well as better management of anxiety surrounding diagnosis. Interventions aimed at enhancing risk communication and encouraging shared patient-physician decision-making might be beneficial in this setting. Table 1. Factors associated with: 1) CPM vs. UM; 2) CPM vs. BCS CPM vs. UMCPM vs. BCS OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)Age at diagnosis0.92 (0.86-1.00)0.97 (0.90-1.04)Mutation positive3.83 (1.60-9.15)14.51 (5.02-41.92)Any nodal involvement0.79 (0.45-1.38)1.93 (1.05-3.55)Her2 positivity0.71 (0.40-1.26)2.24 (1.18-4.25)Having ≥ 1 child2.08 (1.04-4.14)3.25 (1.63-6.48)BMI0.98 (0.92-1.03)0.92 (0.87-0.97)Anxiety1.93 (1.05-3.56)2.31 (1.22-4.35)Decisional involvement (ref = shared)  Mainly patient's decision3.47 (1.99-6.06)3.71 (2.09-6.58)Mainly doctor's decision0.14 (0.03-0.63)0.16 (0.03-0.77) Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-18-02.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2009
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 69, No. 2_Supplement ( 2009-01-15), p. 1068-
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 69, No. 2_Supplement ( 2009-01-15), p. 1068-
    Abstract: Abstract #1068 Aim & #x2028; Identification at the molecular level of breast cancers sub-types associated with different clinical outcomes would be of great value to help individualize therapeutic strategies and, in turn, improve survival. With large sample size, long follow-up, and geographical spread of the population any results derived from analysis of the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) data set may be more generalizable to the U.S population. Thus the purpose of this study was to define the survival outcomes associated with distinct molecular phenotypes of invasive breast cancer in women identified from the NHS. & #x2028; Methods & #x2028; 2013 women enrolled in the NHS (1976-1996) with invasive non-metastatic breast cancer whose breast tumor samples were available for inclusion in tissue microarrays and subsequent immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis form the study population. Tumors were classified into one of 5 categories based on results of IHC assays for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, cytokeratin (CK) 5/6, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as follows: 1) Luminal-A (ER and/or PR +ve and HER2 -ve), 2) Luminal-B (ER and/or PR +ve and HER2 +ve), 3) HER2 subtype (HER2 +ve with both ER and PR -ve), 4) Basal-like (-ve for ER, PR and HER2 and +ve for either CK5/6 and/or EGFR), 5) unclassifiable (-ve for all markers). Overall survival (OS), breast-cancer-specific survival (BCS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meir product limit method and compared across groups using the log rank statistic. Cox-proportional hazards models were fitted to determine the association of molecular phenotype with survival outcomes after adjusting for age at diagnosis, stage, lymph nodes, tumor size, grade and body mass index at diagnosis. & #x2028; Results & #x2028; Median age at diagnosis was 57 years (34 – 75 years) with a median follow-up of 14 years. 1490 (74%) tumors were classified as luminal-A, 99 (4.9%) were classified as luminal-B, 106 (5.27%) were of HER2 subtype, 219 (10.9%) were classified as basal-like and 99 (4.9%) tumors were unclassifiable.726 (36%) patients had died of any cause, 433 (21.5%) had died of a breast cancer related event, and 459 (22.8%) experienced a recurrence. Five-year BCS for patients with luminal-A, luminal-B, HER2 , basal-like and unclassifiable tumors was 94%, 82%, 73%, 82% and 75% respectively (p & lt;0.001). In the fully adjusted multivariable model compared to patients with luminal-A tumors patients with luminal-B (HR 1.73, 95% 1.18-2.53), HER2 (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.97-1.20), basal-like (HR 1.50, 95% 1.32-1.20) and unclassifiable (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.30-2.74) tumors had lower BCS. Similar trends were observed for OS and RFS. & #x2028; Conclusions & #x2028; Compared to women who have luminal-A tumors those with luminal-B, HER2 subtype, basal-like and unclassifiable tumors had a worse prognosis. A fifth, unclassifiable sub-group was identified that has survival outcomes similar to and may represent a subtype of basal-like tumors. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 1068.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2011
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 71, No. 24_Supplement ( 2011-12-15), p. P5-01-13-P5-01-13
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 71, No. 24_Supplement ( 2011-12-15), p. P5-01-13-P5-01-13
    Abstract: Purpose: Heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) is the master transcriptional regulator of the cellular response to heat and a wide variety of other stressors. We previously reported that HSF1 promotes the survival and proliferation of malignant cells. At this time, however, the clinical and prognostic significance of HSF1 in cancer is unknown. Patients and methods: Breast cancer samples from 1,841 participants in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) were scored for levels of nuclear HSF1. Associations of HSF1 status with clinical parameters and survival outcomes were investigated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. The associations were further delineated by Kaplan-Meier analysis using publicly available mRNA expression data. Results: Nuclear HSF1 levels were elevated in ∼80% of in situ and invasive breast carcinomas. In invasive carcinomas, HSF1 expression was associated with high histologic grade, larger tumor size, and nodal involvement at diagnosis (P & lt;0.0001). Overall, in multivariate analysis, high-HSF1 levels were associated with increased breast cancer-specific mortality (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.21−2.17). This association was seen in the ER-positive population (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.25−2.47), even in early-stage lymph node negative cases (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.17−3.33). In public expression profiling data, high-HSF1 mRNA levels were also associated with an increase in ER-positive breast cancer-specific mortality. Conclusions: Increased HSF1 is associated with reduced survival in breast cancer. The findings indicate that HSF1 should be evaluated prospectively as an independent prognostic indicator in ER-positive breast cancer and that HSF1 may provide a useful therapeutic target. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-01-13.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2011
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 71, No. 24_Supplement ( 2011-12-15), p. PD04-05-PD04-05
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 71, No. 24_Supplement ( 2011-12-15), p. PD04-05-PD04-05
    Abstract: Background: While there is evidence that younger women with breast cancer are more likely to experience compromised quality of life compared to older women, few studies have prospectively explored the impact of treatment, including surgery, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy, on body image, in particular, in very young women (≤40 years old). This analysis examined treatment-associated differences in self-reported body image among a large cohort of young women diagnosed with breast cancer. Methods: 431 women enrolled in an ongoing multi-center prospective cohort study with Stage 0-Stage III breast cancer were included in this analysis. Body image was measured at baseline (1-12 months following diagnosis) using three items from the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES) survey. CARES scores range from 0–4, with higher scores indicative of greater image concerns. Mean differences in CARES scores between treatment groups (chemotherapy within the last month vs. none; hormone therapy vs. none; lumpectomy vs. mastectomy alone vs. mastectomy + reconstruction) were estimated using T-tests and one-way ANOVA. To control for concurrent treatment, stage, and time since diagnosis, multiple linear regression models were fit and least squares means estimated and compared between treatment groups. Multiple comparisons were adjusted for using the Bonferroni correction. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 37 (range: 17–40) and median time from diagnosis to study enrollment was 5 months (range: 1–12 months). In the unadjusted analysis, there were no significant differences in scores between women who had received chemotherapy within the last month and those who did not (p=0.80), while women who reported hormone treatment had higher mean CARES scores compared to women who did not (p=0.04). Among women who had undergone surgery (n=370), women who had lumpectomies had a mean CARES score of 0.95, which was significantly lower (p & lt;.0001) compared to both women who had undergone mastectomy alone (CARES: 1.89) and women who reported mastectomy + reconstruction (CARES: 1.53). After adjusting for concurrent treatment (including radiation), time since diagnosis, and stage of disease, only differences between surgical groups remained significant (p & lt;.0001), with mean scores among women who had either undergone mastectomy alone (CARES: 2.02) or together with reconstruction (CARES: 1.58) higher compared to those who had a breast conserving procedure (CARES: 0.92) Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest analysis of treatment-related body image issues in young women with breast cancer. Treatment with chemotherapy and hormonal therapy did not appear to affect short-term body image. However, women who had a breast conserving procedure had the fewest body image concerns as measured by the CARES, while women undergoing more radical surgery appear to be at increased risk for low perceived body image though this may be mitigated to a degree by reconstruction. Further analyses will explore whether differences between surgical groups persist over time as well as examine the trajectory of change over the course of follow-up. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD04-05.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...